By B.N. Frank
American opposition to 5G continues to increase due to concerns about reduced property value (see 1, 2, 3, 4), public safety (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), health (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), cybersecurity (see 1, 2), privacy (see 1, 2), and environmental risks (see 1, 2, 3, 4). Some have described 5G deployment as a form of “environmental racism”.
Last year in New Hampshire, opposition led to the creation of a state commission to study the environmental and health effects of 5G technology. The majority of the commission voted to support 15 recommendations to the governor and other legislators. The commission recently submitted its final report.
Kent Chamberlin, PHD Presents on 5G Health and Environmental Effects
Kent Chamberlin, PHD Presents on 5G Health and Environmental Effects and the findings of the New Hampshire Commission on 5G
Kent Chamberlin, PHD, Professor & Chair Emeritus, Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of New Hampshire
New Hampshire 5G Commission List of Minutes and Documents
- FCC and FDA did not respond to requests to testify to Commission
- FDA did not fully respond to commission questions
- National Cancer Institute Letter
On November 1, 2020, the New Hampshire Commission to Study the Environmental and Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology has released its final report to New Hampshire Governor Christopher T. Sununu, Speaker of the House Stephen J. Shurtleff, President of the Senate Donna Soucy summarizing its findings that safety assurances for 5G have “come into question because of the thousands of peer-reviewed studies documenting deleterious health effects associated with cellphone radiation exposure.”
The majority of the New Hampshire Commission voted to support 15 recommendations to the New Hampshire Governor. Recommendations include: support an independent study of 5G health effects; reduce public exposure to cell phones, wireless devices and replace Wi-Fi with wired- non wireless networks- in schools and libraries; ensure cell network infrastructure antenna setbacks from schools and homes; measure levels of cell network radiation; establish wireless radiation limits to protect trees and insects; establish more sophisticated measurement protocols to include high data rates; require software changes to reduce radiation exposure into the body; establish wireless radiation-free zones; and call on the US Federal Communications Commission to do an environmental assessment on the impact of 5G and wireless infrastructure expansion.
The report referred to the FCC as a “captured agency with undue industry influence,” citing the Harvard Press Book “Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates,” which compares the wireless industry to the tobacco industry.
The 5G Report recommends US federal agencies coordinate “to protect people, wildlife, and the environment from harmful levels of radiation” and states “until there is Federal action, New Hampshire should take the initiative to protect its environment.”
The New Hampshire Commission includes several legislators who are also medical doctors and engineers, a scientist with expertise in electromagnetic radiation, a New Hampshire Town Councilperson and representatives from the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office, Department of Health & Human Services and the Department of Business and Economic Affairs. Also represented on the Commission were members of the industry, including a CTIA Wireless Industry representative who was one of the three members signing onto the minority report. In contrast to the majority report which documents why hundreds of scientists are raising the alarm about 5G because of substantial scientific evidence finding harmful health and environmental impacts, the minority report purports that “the scientific consensus” is that wireless is safe.
In 2019, telecom executives gave U.S. congressional testimony that they had NO independent studies proving that 5G is safe.
Later in 2019, then presidential candidate Joe Biden was confronted with this fact while he was campaigning and said, “There is a lot of debate in the scientific community of whether or not 5G does what you are saying. It should be studied thoroughly…” @CBSNews pic.twitter.com/dE2xVivS86
WATCH: A woman in Iowa tells @JoeBiden the 5G in the area is making people sick and their "minds are breaking down."
— Bo Erickson CBS (@BoKnowsNews) December 29, 2019
Since becoming president, there has been NO indication that Biden has ordered any studies to thoroughly study 5G. Instead, he has taken action to support additional unsafe technology.
In May, scientists submitted a letter to President Biden asking him to protect the public from 5G and other unsafe technology. One report has revealed the existence of 417K U.S. cell tower sites as of 2020 and the projection of 35.7 million “Radio Units” (5G/4G Small Cells, DAS, DRS) to be deployed by 2026. Freaked out yet?
Opposition to 5G is worldwide. Cities and entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums. The majority of scientists oppose deployment. Since 2017, doctors and scientists have been asking for moratoriums on Earth and in space (see 1, 2). Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses after 5G was installed (see 1, 2, 3, 4).
Americans opposed to 5G may click here to sign a letter asking the Biden administration to stop deployment immediately.
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information, visit our archives and the following websites:
- Americans for Responsible Technology
- Wireless Information Network
- Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
- Environmental Health Trust
- Physicians for Safe Technology
- 5G Information
- 5G Space Appeal
- Stop 5G International
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.