Thousands Demand Reclassification of Wireless Radiation at Int’l Agency for Research on Cancer Headquarters

By B.N. Frank

Research has already determined that exposure to wireless radiation – Bluetooth, cell phone radiation, WiFi, and 5G – is biologically harmful AND at least increases cancer risk (see 1, 2). Many doctors and scientists also insist there is enough scientific evidence to re-classify it as a carcinogen. Protesters in France feel the same way.

From Environmental Health Trust:

Stop5G European Alliance: Thousands demonstrate in front of the International Agency for Research on Cancer Headquarters in Lyon, France calling for the”urgent reclassification” of wireless radiation as a carcinogen.

Report from Oasisana

“Great success for the international event promoted in Lyon (France) with the European Stop 5G Alliance : thousands of citizens from different countries gathered this morning in front of  the headquarters of IARC, the International Agency for Research on Cancer belonging to the WHO World Health Organization. It is the agency responsible for the reclassification of the carcinogenesis of electrosmog, radio frequency non-ionizing waves. From all, the same request: “no conflicts of interest in scientific research, the reclassification of cancer from electrosmog is urgently needed”.

The European Stop 5G Alliance, born last year in Switzerland, had already participated in a workshop at the European Parliament in Brussels.

The information and videos on this page is from Oasisana

Wireless is a human Carcinogen

Miller Anthony B., Sears Margaret E., Morgan L. Lloyd, Davis Devra L., Hardell Lennart, Oremus Mark, Soskolne Colin L. (2019). Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices, Frontiers in Public Health, 7, Pages 223, ISSN 2296-2565, doi10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223

Priyanka Bandara, David O Carpenter, (2018). Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact, The Lancet Planetary Health, Volume 2, Issue 12, Pages e512-e514, ISSN 2542-5196, doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30221-3.

Anthony B. Miller, L. Lloyd Morgan, Iris Udasin, Devra Lee Davis, (2018). Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102), Environmental Research, Volume 167, Pages 673-683, ISSN 0013-9351, doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.043.

Lennart Hardell, Michael Carlberg, (2015). Mobile phone and cordless phone use and the risk for glioma–Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997–2003 and 2007–2009,

Pathophysiology, Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 1-13, ISSN 0928-4680, doi:10.1016/j.pathophys.2014.10.001.

Carlberg, M., & Hardell, L. (2014). Decreased Survival of Glioma Patients with Astrocytoma Grade IV (Glioblastoma Multiforme) Associated with Long-Term Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(10), 10790–10805. doi:10.3390/ijerph111010790


Sources of wireless radiation include A LOT more than cell phones, laptops, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and antennas. Popular wearables (ear buds, activity trackers, etc.), medical devices, and other “Smart” technology like utility “Smart” Meters emit radiation too.

Exposure is cumulative and some will undoubtedly tolerate it better than others. The same thing can be said about other toxins as well – chloroform, engine exhaust, lead, tobacco products, etc.

Activist Post reports regularly about unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites:

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

Be the first to comment on "Thousands Demand Reclassification of Wireless Radiation at Int’l Agency for Research on Cancer Headquarters"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.