Forging Reality: The New Manhattan Chemtrail Project Information War

chemtrails_climate_2By Peter A. Kirby

Because the people responsible for today’s New Manhattan Project are mass murdering and wrecking the environment, they feel a need to cover it up. They go about trying to firstly make the public believe that this is not happening and secondly, if it was, that it would be justified. Over the years, in order to maintain their façades, they have produced and maintained an incredibly huge and well oiled disinformation apparatus. The group most probably responsible for this apparatus is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

This paper examines the historical and ongoing psychological warfare campaign lodged against the American people designed to simultaneously occlude and legitimize the New Manhattan Project. This paper examines the New Manhattan Project’s information war.

If you do not know what the New Manhattan Project is, please refer to the author’s previous article “Chemtrails Exposed: A History of the New Manhattan Project.”

A history of deception

The New Manhattan Project is built upon a foundation of lies; chief among them is the theory of man-made global warming. Large-scale fear mongering about an out-of-control climate goes back to 1965 and has served as the rationalization for this global weather control project. The origins of the theory of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming are the origins of this coordinated disinformation campaign.

The first high-level document to assert the modern theory of man-made global warming was a little something called “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment.” This Orwellian 1965 report, written by the Environmental Pollution Panel of the President’s Science Advisory Committee, explains how CO2 emitted by man is causing global warming and therefore we may need to inject small particles into the atmosphere in order to cool the planet. Injecting small particles into the atmosphere to cool the planet is today’s Solar Radiation Management (SRM) geoengineering thesis. This is the thesis that calls for spraying toxic chemicals from airplanes. The document reads:

The climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be deleterious from the point of view of human beings. The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored. A change in the radiation balance in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo, or reflectivity, of the earth. Such a change in albedo could be brought about, for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large oceanic areas. The particles should be sufficiently buoyant so that they will remain close to the sea surface and they should have a high reflectivity, so that even a partial covering of the surface would be adequate to produce a marked change in the amount of reflected sunlight. Rough estimates indicate that enough particles partially to cover a square mile could be produced for for perhaps one hundred dollars. Thus a 1% change in reflectivity might be brought about for about 500 million dollars a year, particularly if the reflecting particles were spread in low latitudes, where the incoming radiation is concentrated. Considering the extraordinary economic and human importance of climate, costs of this magnitude do not seem excessive. An early development of the needed technology might have other uses, for example in inhibiting the formation of hurricanes in tropical oceanic areas.

According to Manabe and Strickler (1964) the absorption and re-radiation of infrared by high cirrus clouds (above five miles) tends to heat the atmosphere near the earth’s surface. Under some circumstances, injection of condensation or freezing nuclei will cause cirrus clouds to form at high altitudes. This potential method of bringing about climatic changes needs to be investigated as a possible tool for modifying atmospheric circulation in ways which might counteract the effects of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Note how at the end of the first paragraph, the authors state that injecting small particles into the atmosphere can not only save us from global warming, but also achieve weather modification. The truth is softly spoken.

To this day, the theory of man-made global warming is being used as the rationalization for SRM geoengineering programs. It is being used as the rationalization for spraying stuff out of airplanes. Once this simple deception was established, the information war began.

Two years later, in the pages of the 1967 National Science Foundation’s ninth annual weather modification report, we find an early example. It reads:

ESSA [Environmental Science Services Administration] is also investigating the effect of cirrus clouds on the radiation budget of the atmosphere by studying aircraft-produced contrails which often spread into cirrus layers covering considerable fractions of the sky. One technique proposed for modifying lower cloud development has been the generation of a high level cirrus deck with jet aircraft. By intercepting solar radiation at high altitude it may be possible to influence larger scale cloud development elsewhere by reducing solar input and reducing convective cloud generation in areas where they are not needed.

Note how the authors of this report misrepresent chemtrails as contrails. Before 1967, the National Science Foundation (NSF) was not saying this. This is a psychological warfare tactic. They are trying to make us believe that an apple is an orange. If a lie is repeated often enough and with enough conviction, people will believe it. This is what the authors of this passage are counting on. As we will see, this lie has been repeated ad nauseam. ESSA is the predecessor to today’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

A little later in that same NSF report, it reads that their computer atmospheric simulations, or “models” as they call them, might simulate, “…producing high-level cirrus cloud cover over an area by means of jet aircraft, inserting particulate matter into the upper atmosphere to alter the solar radiation balance and the like.”

A 1970 paper, again originating from the Environmental Science Services Administration (ESSA), provided another early example. The author, P.M. Kuhn writes:

The spreading out of jet contrails into extensive cirrus sheets is a familiar sight. In the most common case, when persistent conditions exist from twenty-five to forty thousand feet, a few long contrails increase in number and gradually merge into an almost solid white sheet.

Kuhn continues:

From a descriptive point of view contrail development and spreading commonly begins in the morning hours as heavy jet traffic commences and finally extends from horizon to horizon as the air traffic peaks.

Conveniently for Mr. Kuhn, this paper was not peer reviewed or refereed.

Even though our military’s use of weather modification to flood out the enemy’s main supply route in Vietnam has since been declassified, the Secretary of Defense swore that he knew otherwise. In other words, he lied about it. Let us reference a brief passage from the 1978 Congressional Research Service report:

During an April 1972 appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Secretary of Defense Laird was questioned by both Senator Pell and Senator Fullbright about rainmaking in Vietnam. The Secretary said: ‘We have never engaged in that type of activity over North Vietnam.’

In 1977 the Weather Modification Advisory Board expounded upon a familiar line of bull. Their authors wrote, “Introducing contrails in selective regions of the atmosphere can produce cirrus clouds, to keep heat in or out of an area.” 1977 was also the year that the term “geoengineering” was introduced in the premiere edition of the journal Climatic Change. The late 1970s was when today’s SRM geoengineering thesis began taking a firm foothold.

In 1987, the World Meteorological Organization and the British Royal Air Force cast this self-explanatory abomination out upon the Earth:

Chemtrails as contrails by the WMO and RAFChemtrails presented as contrails by the WMO and the Royal Air Force
Image source: the World Meteorological Organization & the British Royal Air Force

A 1999 report by the United Nations’ World Meteorological Organization and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change titled “Aviation and the Global Atmosphere” bolstered lies about contrails by stating that they can form cirrus clouds.

In 2000, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) along with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), NOAA, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) compromised themselves by releasing a report titled “EPA Aircraft Contrails Factsheet.” In this report, they tell lies about how contrails, “…last for hours while growing to several kilometers in width and 200 to 400 meters in height.” This report included the image below, of course, informing us that the emissions pictured consist only of harmless water vapor.

EPA_Aircraft_Contrails_Factsheet_chemtrailsChemtrails presented as contrails in the EPA factsheet
Image source: the Environmental Protection Agency

A 2001 paper appearing in the Journal of Geophysical Research says that “contrail clusters” cause radiative forcing (the SRM geoengineering thesis) and, “…mature into diffuse cloudiness.” The authors write:

Clusters of spreading, persistent contrails sometimes form in heavy air-traffic regions when the warm exhaust emissions from subsonic jet aircraft mix with cold and relatively moist ambient air in the upper troposphere. Time series of satellite imagery have shown that these clusters can develop into large regions of cirrus-like cloudiness [Minnis et al., 1998a], which may affect climate by modifying the atmospheric radiative budget. As contrails are ice clouds, they have radiative effects that are similar to thin cirrus clouds [Fu and Liou, 1993] and may have significant regional climatic impacts [Liou et al., 1990].

The British government has released a couple of official statements telling us that chemtrails do not exist. This is from the same government that in 2009 proposed SRM geoengineering and in 2010 produced a joint report with the U.S. House of Representatives advocating geoengineering regulation.

NASA has a web page dedicated to brainwashing children. At the top of the page it reads, “Contrail Watching for Kids.” Alongside a picture of a chemtrail-laden sky, the text reads:

Contrails are long clouds made by high-flying aircraft. Because kids are so good at watching clouds, they can easily be taught to identify contrails.

That is enough to make one a little nauseous, isn’t it? They’re coming for our kids. For those with strong stomachs, here is the link.

Our friends at NASA were providing disinformation once again when they presented the image below with a caption that described the many chemtrails as, “…contrails, cirrus clouds created by airplanes.” They must think that we are too ignorant and stupid to realize that these lines in the sky are not following routine flight paths.

Contrail Clutter over Georgia“Contrail Clutter over Georgia”
Image source: NASA

Chemtrails in media

Since the 1946 media explosion celebrating the pioneering weather modification efforts of three General Electric scientists, airplanes spraying stuff have made regular mainstream media appearances. Today, the persistent lines in the sky left behind by airplanes are woven into the mainstream media’s fabric. What is presented here is but a small sampling.

The 1959 Disney short educational film Eyes in Outer Space: A Science-factual Presentation was made in cooperation with the Department of Defense. The famous conventional weather modifier Irving P. Krick served as a technical consultant. This movie depicts men in Lawrence Livermore National Labs a global weather center controlling the weather with drone aircraft. As a plane flies across the screen emitting a trail, the narrator says, “Robot planes seed the clouds from above.” These “robot planes” are then depicted saving us all from a nasty hurricane by spraying stuff into it. Here is an edited version:

The 2008 feature film Toxic Skies starring Anne Heche is a fictional drama involving chemtrails.

In the 2012 Denzel Washington movie Flight, chemtrails were presented.

Flight movie chemtrailFlight the movie
Image source: Paramount Pictures

The Topps Company, famous for its baseball cards, produced a 2013 series of cards called Curious Cases. One of the cards in the set was about chemtrails. Here is the front of the card:

Chemtrails trading card“Chemtrails” from the Topps series “Curious Cases”
Image source: The Topps Company, Inc.

The back of the chemtrails card reads:


A Sept. 24, 2013 Guardian article about geoengineering featured a photo of one of the observable effects of today’s chemtrail spraying operations; a sun dog. They may as well have presented a photograph of chemtrails criss-crossing the sky.

why_geoengineering_suits_Russia's_carbon_agendaA Guardian geoengineering article
Image source: The Guardian

The February 22, 2016 episode of The X-Files titled “My Struggle II” featured a storyline involving an outbreak of a mass pandemic caused by chemtrails combined with microwave electromagnetic energy.

Chemtrails are consistently appearing in all types of advertisements. has a good article about it here.

Chemtrails have been drawn into video games. Here are a couple of examples; one from a Lego video game and another from Grand Theft Auto:

Lego game chemtrailsLego video game chemtrails
Image source: The Lego Group

GTA chemtrailsGrand Theft Auto chemtrails
Image source: Rockstar Games

Our armed services are also getting in on the act. Here is a webpage from the Office of Naval Research depicting chemtrails:

ONR chemtrailsOffice of Naval Research chemtrails
Image source: the Office of Naval Research

It figures. Because Navy research has been instrumental in the development of technologies used in today’s New Manhattan Project and is probably to this day involved.

Controlling the narrative

In the first section, we saw many lies coming, in a one way conversation, from the establishment. The advent of the Internet has created a new dynamic, though. Now the average citizen gets to talk back. For when this talkback disagrees with the establishment position, new ways of squelching dissent have been developed.

President Obama’s former administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Cass R. Sunstein co-wrote a 2008 paper titled “Conspiracy Theories.” Referring to theories about the 9/11 attacks, global warming, the Apollo moon missions, and many others, Sunstein and his co-author wrote that conspiracy theories can be very dangerous and must be dealt with. In stead of outright censorship, the co-authors opted for cognitive infiltration; a.k.a. psychological warfare. The authors write:

Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.

Let us not forget that our federal government’s official position is that chemtrails do not exist and that the New Manhattan Project is a conspiracy theory.

Cass Sunstein
Image source: unknown

A series of 2014 articles by Glenn Greenwald and others revealed documents, procured by Edward Snowden, showing how the British Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) has been running Internet psychological warfare operations against American citizens. The outward manifestation of these operations are the myriad of disinformation artists which almost always (sometimes immediately) pop up when anyone dares question the persistent trails in the sky or anything else the establishment doesn’t want you to know about.

“Sock puppets” (also known as “shills” and “trolls”) are the dastardly and diabolical creatures that almost invariably crawl out of the Internet’s woodwork when one asserts that chemtrails are real. They have many different modes of operation and infest comments sections, forums, and disinformation websites. Many or most are probably computers; i.e. artificial intelligence.

Although trolls employ many tactics, the most prevalent involve attempts to discredit sources and information. Incessant attacks upon an individual’s or organization’s character and credibility are used when the quality of the information coming from either cannot be impugned. The thinking goes that if one can discredit the source, than any other information produced by that source is also invalid; even if the other information produced by that source is unassailable. Trolls also build “straw men” in attempts to discredit information. A straw man is built by picking out a small aspect of a larger body of information and attempting to discredit that particular little bit. The thinking goes that if one small part of a larger body of information can be discredited, than all of the larger body is also discredited.

Many trolls are not Human at all. Way back in the early 1970s, people were communicating with computers. Not only that, but computer scientists at Stanford and UCLA were conducting wholly computerized correspondence between two computers over the ARPANET (the precursor to today’s Internet). Today, this technology is commonplace. To have “bots” automatically responding is probably simple and cost-effective; therefore desirable and prevalent. The robotic manner in which computerized sock puppets respond often reveals their hand.

In February of this year (2016), Infowars published an article titled “Backing Infowars May Soon Be Considered ‘Material Support’ of Terrorism.” In this article, Kurt Nimmo outlines the U.S. government’s latest moves to crack down on those who dare to criticize our federal gods. Here is a link.

This is quite chilling when considering that your author has been compared to the “domestic terrorists” hereby singled-out. In a March 14, 2015 article, the Christian Science Monitor (of all outlets) published a piece titled “EPA Debunks ‘Chemtrails,’ Further Fueling Conspiracy Theories.” Here is a link.

In this article, even though I have no criminal record, your author is compared to a married couple named Jerad and Amanda Miller who shot and killed three people including two police officers at a Las Vegas Wal-Mart before being killed themselves. This is a classic attempt to discredit the source and possibly set him up. That’s not very Christian of them now, is it?


It is probably the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) running the New Manhattan Project’s cover. They have been there since the beginning. The CIA’s involvement in the world’s media is well documented. They have been domestically targeting American citizens. They have a history of climate change research and related fear mongering. Not only all that, but the CIA has owned, operated, and provided cover for large, clandestine aircraft operations involving weather modification.

In a previous article titled “Death from Above: The New Manhattan Project Chemtrail Fleet,” the author documented some of the CIA’s proprietary airlines; chief among them Air America.

As recounted in the article, Chris Robbins’ book Air America documents a CIA proprietary airline, Civil Air Transport, conducting weather modification operations. Air America also describes how the CIA provided cover for their proprietary airlines by producing untraceable aircraft. These skills would come in handy when providing cover for the hundreds of aircraft necessarily involved in today’s New Manhattan Project.

At least one of the co-authors of the aforementioned 1965 White House document establishing both the theory of man-made global warming and today’s Solar Radiation Management (SRM) geoengineering theses had connections to the CIA. That co-author was none other than our good friend Gordon J.F. “How to Wreck the Environment” MacDonald. His National Academy of Sciences obituary reads:

Gordon chaired the MEDEA Committee (initially the Environmental Task Force) of the Central Intelligence Agency, a brainchild of Senator (later Vice-President) Gore for the application of ‘overhead assets,’ that is, information collected by intelligence satellites, to the solution of environmental problems. Here the intelligence and academic communities, two disparate communities meeting initially under conditions of mutual mistrust, developed over the years a feeling of trust and respect. Gordon was at his best, combining his unique environmental background with patience and perseverance. In 1994 the CIA presented Gordon with the Seal Medallion, the highest civilian honor of the agency.

As if we could forget, Al Gore has been the most prominent proponent of the theory of man-made global warming and how we need to sacrifice our quality of life because of it.

This information suggests that MacDonald was instrumental in the development of the New Manhattan Project’s satellite remote sensing needs. For more about the NMP’s satellite remote sensing operations, please see the author’s previous article “C4: Command, Control, Communications, and Computers of the New Manhattan Chemtrail Project.”

For more about the infamous Gordon J.F., please see the author’s previous article “MITRE: Architects of the New Manhattan Chemtrail Project?”

The CIA’s MEDEA (Measurements of Earth Data for Environmental Analysis) Committee, of which Mr. MacDonald was a member, existed from 1992-2001. According to a Jan. 4, 2010 New York Times article, the MEDEA Committee was resurrected as a CIA backed, National Academy of Sciences run environmental remote sensing program. Five years later, the Washington Times and Mother Jones reported that this program had, once again, been shut down.

The CIA has been commanding the mainstream media for a long time. Operation Mockingbird is a CIA program that began in the late 1940s as a way to influence foreign populations. It has since been turned upon the domestic American population. The operation was initially overseen by Allen Dulles and we have no reason to believe that it does not continue to this day.

Former Village Voice reporter Deborah Davis quoted a CIA analyst when she reported that, in the early 1950s, the CIA, through Operation Mockingbird “owned” 400-600 journalists at The New York Times, Newsweek, CBS, and other organizations. Of course, the foreign operations thundered along as well.

The CIA exerts extraordinary influence over the press. In his meticulously researched book Virtual Government: CIA Mind Control Operations in America, Alex Constantine writes:

The cost of disinforming the world cost American taxpayers an estimated $265 million a year by 1978, a budget larger than the combined expenditures of Reuters, UPI and the AP news syndicates. In 1977, the New York Times ran a front-page story detailing a worldwide propaganda effort, with direct CIA ownership of some 50 newspapers in the U.S. and elsewhere.

In this next passage from Virtual Government, we see similar disinformation tactics as those outlined in the previous section. Mr. Constantine writes:

One CIA dispatch, dated April 1, 1967, declassified nine years later under FOIA [Freedom of Information Act], advised planted ‘assets’ in the media on ‘Countering Criticism of the Warren Report.’ Features and book reviews ‘are particularly appropriate for this purpose,’ the CIA dispatch observed. Strategies to ‘answer and refute’ critics of the government’s investigation of the JFK murder included accusations that they were ‘financially interested,’ ‘hasty and inaccurate in their research,’ ‘infatuated with their own theories,’ and ‘wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in.’ The CIA’s mouthpieces in the press were directed to emphasize: ‘No significant new evidence has emerged,’ ‘there is no agreement among the critics,’ or the ever-popular, ‘Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal.’

As they attempt to throw us off the scent of today’s New Manhattan Project, chemtrail shills follow these same directives.

Pulitzer Prize winner Carl Bernstein wrote a 1977 article titled “The CIA and the Media” supporting Constantine’s findings. Here is a link to Bernstein’s complete article.

David Rockefeller was apparently talking about the CIA’s media operations when, at a 1991 Bilderberg meeting, he said:

We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years……It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.

Evidence exists that the CIA’s activities in this area continue to this day. Respected German journalist Udo Ulfkotte PhD was interviewed in 2014 saying that he got tired of publishing articles under his name, written by CIA agents. He wrote a book about it titled Gekaufte Journalisten (Bought Journalists). An English version of his book with the title of Journalists for Hire: How the CIA Buys the News is scheduled for June 1, 2016. One can pre-order a copy here.

Not only have they been running the media, but the CIA has been promoting paranoia about the Earth’s temperature for a long time. The 1974, CIA produced report titled “A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems” fear mongers incessantly about climate fluctuations and weather. They report on recent examples of extreme weather and the resultant death and destruction as evidence for a long-term shift in Earth’s climate which they call “the climate change.” Maybe they should have made a horror movie by that title.

The authors of “A Study of Climatological Research” go on to state that the combination of “the climate change” and Earth’s growing Human population is a recipe for disaster. They write that the crop failures due to “the climate change” are destabilizing governments all over the world. They write that destabilization of governments can cause war. The authors write:

Timely forecasting of climate and its impact on any nation is vital to the planning and execution of U.S. policy on social, economic, and political issues. The new climatic era brings a promise of famine and starvation to many areas of the world. The resultant unrest caused by the mass movement of peoples across borders as well as the attendant intelligence questions cannot be met with existing analytical tools. In addition, the Agency will be faced with tracing and anticipating climate modification undertaken by a country to relieve its own situation at the detriment of the United States. The implication of such a modification must be carefully assessed.

You guessed it. They need more funding.

This report appears to be the fount of the wildly reaching assumptions pervasive among global warming alarmists today claiming: famine, disease, mass-migrations, war and Humanity’s extinction all due to global warming.

A small problem for today’s global warming cult members, though, is the fact that this early example of climate change delusion concerned itself with global cooling, not global warming. If one tries hard enough, anything can be made to appear as a problem.

In 2008, the CIA contributed to a standard global warming scare-fest titled “National Intelligence Assessment on the National Security Implications of Global Climate Change to 2030.” At least this time the authors of the report didn’t foresee state failure. We have something to be thankful for.

In 2015, CNS News and Mother Jones reported that CIA director John Brennan was regurgitating nonsense about all the impending doom sure to come from Earth’s temperature fluctuations and how he is so concerned. He really cares so much. He probably got to the top of the CIA by being such a caring individual.

Lastly, the CIA, funded a study resulting in the 2015 National Academy of Sciences report titled “Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth.” This study was also supported by some of the usual suspects: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Department of Energy.

In “Climate Intervention” the authors cite the discredited Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) data to assert that global waring is occurring. Then they write that the topic of SRM geoengineering needs more research and, without admitting that anything like it is currently taking place, they present SRM geoengineering as a potential solution. If one has read scores of these types of documents, one recognizes this standard line of bull immediately.

Notable people & organizations speaking out

We are not alone. Not everyone works for the CIA. Millions of people worldwide are fully chemtrail aware and speaking out. Many other, more influential individuals have voiced concern and taken action as well. Along with some government and other organizations, at least scores of famous and notable people have been speaking out against chemtrails and geoengineering. The examples listed here are undoubtedly a partial list.

Ted Gunderson (1928-2011), the former head of the Los Angeles, Dallas and Memphis FBI claims to have witnessed huge, unmarked chemtrail spraying planes on the ground at the Lincoln, Nebraska Air National Guard facilities. He also said that chemtrail spraying planes operate out of Fort Sill, Oklahoma.

U.S. congressman Dennis Kucinich used the word “chemtrails” in proposed national legislation. The word appeared in the “Space Preservation Act of 2001.” The National legislation did not pass, but on September 10, 2002 the City Council of Berkeley, California, in support of Congressman Kucinich’s Space Preservation Act, enacted Resolution #61744 declaring the space 60 kilometers and above Berkeley as a space-based weapons-free zone. On September 14th, Congressman Kucinich was officially presented the resolution by Council member Dona Spring, who initiated the resolution before 700 people in Wheeler Auditorium. The audience gave Kucinich and Spring a standing ovation.

Natural and Non-Toxic Products. Up to 50% Off – Every Day (Ad)

In 2007, Dutch parliamentarian Erik Meijer raised the issue with the European Parliament. The European Parliament of course responded that contrails persist and that chemtrails do not exist.

There has been formal discussion of chemtrails in the New Zealand Parliament.

Former Canadian Prime Minister (1986-1991) Bill Vander Zalm has repeatedly spoken out against chemtrails.

Multi-term Arizona state senator Karen Johnson has been an outspoken critic.

A former member of the United States Air Force has testified to the fact that strange materials were being brought on base presumably for the replenishment of chemtrail spraying airplanes. Kristen Meghan’s job at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma was to monitor all materials coming in and going out. She says that anomalous containers coming on base contained the main chemtrail ingredients: aluminum, barium and strontium.

In 2012, former Georgia congresswoman Cynthia McKinney spoke out. Here is a video:

On July 3, 2013, Arizona state senator Sylvia Allen posted a note on her Facebook page indicating that she thinks for herself. She is a very dangerous woman. Here is a link.

In October of 2013, a Canadian MP by the name of Alex Atamanenko presented to the Canadian parliament a petition signed by over 1,000 people outlining concerns about chemtrails.

On June 25, 2014 the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality held a public hearing about geoengineering and chemtrails. The meeting was sponsored by state Senator Kelli Ward.

At an August 5, 2014 meeting of the Shasta County, CA board of supervisors, chemtrails were on the agenda. 300 people attended. Dozens testified. The supervisors voted to open an investigation into chemtrails and geoengineering and to send their findings to appropriate government agencies.

Former Marin County Board of Supervisors, District 1 Representative Susan Adams has voiced interest in chemtrail legislation, stating,

I will continue to monitor your efforts and if there is federal legislation or regulation being considered which the county can send a letter of support for, please let me know.

Eleventh Senatorial District California state Senator Mark Leno recognizes chemtrails. He responded to my letter about chemtrails by stating,

Thank you for writing to share the information on chemtrails. I appreciate your taking the time to voice your concerns regarding this important issue. As we begin to learn more about chemtrails and begin to have more in depth conversations about their use, I will keep the information you have forwarded in mind.

A Dec., 2014 video published by Dane Wigington titled “Geoengineering Dangers Discussed by Officials, Agency Scientists and Other Experts” provides a wealth of information.

In this video, among other speakers, we hear from a former American Airlines commercial airline pilot by the name of Jeff Nelson who testifies to the fact that jet airplane exhaust does not persist. He says that contrails dissipate quickly. That means that these lines in the sky, often stretching from horizon to horizon, are not normal contrails. Also in the video, a Shasta County, CA supervisor by the name of Bill Schappell recognizes geoengineering as an ongoing, secret operation.

On May 19, 2015 the City of Richmond, CA adopted a resolution in support of the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty to symbolically ban “space-based weapons.” The Space Preservation Act is the previously noted 2001 Kucinich sponsored federal legislation which used the word “chemtrail.”

In December of 2015, a member of the Saudi royal family, Princess Basmah Bint Saud went public with her concerns.

A North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) commander by the name of Fabio Mini and a member of the Italian parliament by the name of Sandro Brandini have gone public. Russia Today and Geoengineering Watch come through with the video:

The Cypriot government is taking action. Due to many complaints, Agriculture Minister Kouyialis has ordered an official investigation.

The Rhode Island house of representatives is currently considering a bill titled “The Climate Geoengineering Act of 2016.” If passed, this bill will outlaw SRM geoengineering over the state of Rhode Island and provide penalties for violations. Along with links to the bill itself, Geoengineering Watch has all the latest information here:


Quite a few famous musicians have spoken out. Beck released a 2008 song titled “Chemtrails.” The lyrics read like this:

So many people
Where do they go?
You and me watching a sky full of chemtrails
Watching the jet planes go by

In 2009, musician Prince spoke out about chemtrails on the Tavis Smiley Show.

In 2010, Billy Corgan of the Smashing Pumpkins took time out from one of his live performances to point out the “toxic death smoke” in the sky. Here is the video:

In a 2011 song titled “What I Hate,” country music legend Merle Haggard sings, “What I hate is looking up and seeing chemtrails in a clear blue sky today.” The song is available on YouTube:

The rock and roll band Cake is apparently chemtrail aware. Lyrics from multiple songs indicate awareness. Their 2001 song “Comfort Eagle” goes like this:

And the fluffy white lines
That the airplane leaves behind
Are drifting right in front
Of the waning of the moon

Their 2004 ditty “Wheels” informs us:

In a wooden boat in the shipping lanes
With the freighters towering over me
I can hear the jets flying overhead
Making lines across the darkening sky

Lastly, Cake’s 2011 release “Easy to Crash” states:

Clouds hung hugely and oppressively
Over our busy little cars
Clouds hung hugely and oppressively
We didn’t notice
We didn’t care
We didn’t notice


A shill online once challenged your author to find any doctors or PhDs who have spoken out against chemtrails and geoengineering. At the time, I really wasn’t aware of any. Since that fateful day, I have been compiling a list. To whomever that pathetic creature was: thank you for making us stronger. With plenty more on the way, here is the list:

Lenny Thyme PhD, Dr. Russell L. Blaylock, Ann Fillmore PhD, Leuren Moret PhD, Dr. Bill Deagle, Dr. Joseph Puleo, Dr. Rosalie Bertell, Dr. Stephen D. McKay, Dr. Patrick Flanagan, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, Dr. Eric Karlstrom, Dr. Leonard A. Cole, Dr. Betty Martini, Dr. Thomas E. Bearden, Dr. Edward Group, Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri, Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, Dr. Rima E. Laibow, Dr. Lorraine Hurley, J. Marvin Herndon PhD, Dr. Steven Amato, Dr. Ted Broer, Dr. Stephen Davis, Dr. Barrie Trower, Dr. Hamid Rabiee, Cynthia McKinney PhD & Dr. R. Michael Castle

Let history remember the people who had enough common sense to recognize the obvious and enough guts to tell the truth. When the New Manhattan Project is dead and gone, let the people who spoke out against it prosper.


If you’ve ever wondered from whence the theory of man-made global warming came, then wonder no more. The theory of man-made global warming was invented and has been perpetuated as a cover story for the New Manhattan Project.

Let that sink in real good. You heard it here first, folks. All the lies told by all the medias and all the governments of the world pertaining to global warming are cover for the greatest scientific endeavor in Human history. The first planetary level scientific endeavor is so huge that it needs a cover story this big. Many socio-economic agendas like the United Nations’ Agenda 21 and cap-and-trade have been piggybacked upon it, but the original impetus for the lie is the New Manhattan Project.

In 1965, when traitorous and illegitimate elements of our federal government released the document titled “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment,” simultaneously establishing both the theory of man-made global warming and the SRM geoengineering theses, that was the beginning of the lie. This lie about global warming served and serves as the justification for spraying megatons of toxic garbage over Humanity and the Earth’s biota. This lie was needed as justification for the visible aspects of the planned New Manhattan Project.

Let us not forget that the above noted document came out of the executive branch of the federal government and that the CIA is designed to serve the executive branch. In the New Manhattan Project, this article you are reading has shown the CIA’s pervasive involvement. The CIA probably concocted the theory of man-made global warming.

Consider the implications of this. Consider how almost all of the environmental movements and organizations in the Western world have been folded into this grand deception. Consider the countless millions of people who have marched in the street, in a satanic orgy, demanding the Earth’s (and their own) destruction. Consider all the money that has been donated to perpetuate this treachery. Consider all the fools who have forsaken and attacked their fellow man because he did not want to be destroyed. The establishment has had all these people thinking that they are doing a good turn, all the while these people have been supporting everybody’s and everything’s utter destruction. In the church of global warming, there is an altar beneath the pulpit.

If you still espouse the theory of man-made global warming, and are not completely nihilistic and selfish, please relinquish your dogma. We’re all being murdered and most of us really don’t want to be killed. Heck, most of us don’t even want a reduction in our quality of life. It’s not necessary. This is what happens when we let a vampire into our house. Death is what happens when enough people believe the big global warming lie.

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, writer, and activist. Check out his ebook Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project. Follow him on Twitter @PeterAKirby.


“Restoring the Quality of Our Environment” a report by the Environmental Pollution Panel of the President’s Science Advisory Committee, published by the U.S. Government Printing Office, 1965

National Science Foundation ninth annual weather modification report, 1967

“Contrail Effects on the Atmospheric Thermal Radiation Budget” a paper by P.M. Kuhn, produced by the Environmental Science Services Administration Research Laboratories, Atmospheric Physics and Chemistry Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado as it appeared in the Second National Conference on Weather Modification proceedings by the American Meteorological Society, 1970

“Weather Modification as a Weapon” an article by Gordon J.F. MacDonald, published by Technology Review, October/November, 1975

“Weather Modification: Programs, Problems, Policy, and Potential” a report by the Congressional Research Service, republished by the University Press of the Pacific, 1978

“A U.S. Policy to Enhance the Atmospheric Environment” a paper by the Weather Modification Advisory Board as it appeared in a weather modification hearing before the Subcommittee on the Environment and the Atmosphere of the Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, October 26, 1977

“On Geoengineering and the CO2 Problem” paper by Cesare Marchetti, published in Climatic Change, v1 n1, 1977

“Aviation and the Global Atmosphere” a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1999

“EPA Aircraft Contrails Factsheet” a report by the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Federal Aviation Administration, 2000

“Estimates of Cloud Radiative Forcing in Contrail Clusters Using GOES Imagery” a paper by David P. Duda, Patrick Minnis, and Louis Nguyen, published by the Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 106, no. D5, p4927-4937, March 16, 2001

“Contrails: Frequently Asked Questions” by the British Department for Transport

“The Government’s View on Geo-engineering Research” by the British government

“Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty” report by the U.K. Royal Society, 2009

“The Regulation of Geoengineering” report by the British House of Commons / U.S. House of Representatives Science and Technology Committee 2010

“Conspiracy Theories” a paper by Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule, produced by the Harvard University Law School and the University of Chicago Law School, 2008

“Snowden Docs Reveal British Spies Snooped on YouTube and Facebook” an article by Glenn Greenwald, published by NBC News, Jan., 27, 2014

“Snowden Docs Show UK Spies Attacked Anonymous, Hackers” an article by Mark Schone, Richard Esposito, Matthew Cole, and Glenn Greenwald, published by NBC News, Feb. 4, 2014

“Snowden Docs Show British Spies Used Sex and ‘Dirty Tricks'” an article by Mark Schone, Richard Esposito, Matthew Cole, and Glenn Greenwald, published by NBC News, Feb. 7, 2014

“How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations” an article by Glenn Greenwald, published by The Intercept, Feb. 24, 2014

Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet a book by Katie Hafner and Matthew Lyon, published by Simon & Schuster, 2006

“Backing Infowars May Soon Be Considered ‘Material Support’ of Terrorism” an article by Kurt Nimmo, published by Infowars, Feb. 21, 2016

Legacy of Ashes a book by Tim Weiner, published by Anchor Books, 2007

“How to Wreck the Environment” a paper by Gordon J.F. MacDonald as it appeared in the book Unless Peace Comes edited by Nigel Calder, published by The Viking Press, 1970

“Gordon James Fraser MacDonald 1930-2002” a memoir by Walter Munk, Naomi Oreskes, and Richard Muller, published by the National Academies Press, Biographical Memoirs, volume 84, 2004

“C.I.A. Is Sharing Data with Climate Scientists” an article by William J. Broad, published by the New York Times, Jan. 4, 2010

“CIA Ends Climate Research Program After Obama Calls Climate Change a Security Risk” an article by Douglas Ernst, published by the Washington Times, May 22, 2015

“The CIA Is Shuttering a Secretive Climate Research Program” an article by Tim McDonnell, published by Mother Jones, May 21, 2015

Virtual Government: CIA Mind Control Operations in America a book by Alex Constantine, published by Feral House, 1997

Katherine the Great: Katherine Graham and Her Washington Post Empire a book by Deborah Davis, published by the Institute for Media Analysis, 1991

“The CIA and the Media” an article by Carl Bernstein, published by Rolling Stone magazine, Oct., 1977

Gekaufte Journalisten a book by Udo Ulfkotte, 2015

“A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems” a report by the Central Intelligence Agency, 1974

“National Intelligence Assessment on the National Security Implications of Global Climate Change to 2030” a report by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, statement for the record of Dr. Thomas Fingar, Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analysis and Chairman of the National Intelligence Council, 2008

“CIA Director Cites ‘Impact of Climate Change’ as Deeper Cause of Global Instability” an article by CNS News staff, published by CNS News, Nov. 16, 2015

“CIA Director Delivers Some Blunt Talk About….Climate Change” an article by Kevin Drum, published by Mother Jones, Nov. 17, 2015

“Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth” a report by the National Academy of Sciences, 2015


  • Peter A. Kirby

    All thoughts of glory are gone. Thousands dead. Hundreds of them their own. All for an idea: a free Greece; an Athenian experiment called “democracy.”

    Have you ever felt like Themistocles loosing the arrow that plunges into the heart of King Darius?

    Please log in to up-vote comments left by actual people while down-voting those left by the dastardly and diabolical shills. Thank you.

  • Interesting that the historic photo from ’45 gives the impression that exactly the same technology they were using then is still in use to deploy the trails today. I bet the only difference is that today’s planes are automated.

  • Peter A. Kirby

    I don’t want to attack Dane. He’s doing great work. I’m puzzled as to his views on global warming. He’s on my email list and has been republishing some of my articles, so he will probably read this. The fact that BOTH the theory of man-made global warming AND the SRM geoengineering theses were introduced to the world IN THE SAME DOCUMENT might be enough to change his mind.

    • colinjames71

      Right on, please don’t mistake my comment as anything but puzzlement concerning his AGW belief, he does great work and is an important voice in spreading the chemtrail danger message. As is yours. He definitely does more good than harm, by a mile. Thanks.

    • Harold Saive

      I can’t agree that Dane is doing great work when he uses disinformation as propaganda. In the latest example Dane read from a hoax article posted on the Internet Chronicle, that alleged Edward Snowden had claimed Geoengineering was intended as a “benevolent” operation to fight global warming. I’m not the only one who sees Dane as using the chemtrails issue to promote the UN/IPCC version of climate change

  • Andrew Morin

    I want to begin my short post by saying that I agree with the author on two things: 1) there is likely ‘something’ going on regarding the issue of a secret project that involves long contrails/chemtrails > spraying from aircraft; 2) that the CIA (et al so-called ‘security agencies’/military) uses the mainstream media to regularly post propaganda and especially disinformation in order to manipulate public opinion and people’s consciousness, and this has applied to the issue here discussed; and 3) and finally, that the potential secret project has anything to do with fighting global warming, which I agree with the author, that > that it does not and that this is disinformation. However, I want to disagree with one of the main thrust of the author’s argument – and that is that global warming isn’t real; global warming is real – its happening – the Arctic ice is
    disappearing, both the sea floor of the Arctic and the Arctic
    permafrost is heating up and may soon release huge amounts of methane,
    speeding the whole process up tremendously, hugely raising sea levels, the earth will experience terrible droughts, heating, huge storms, and a whole host of increasing deleterious
    affects on the planet, including the melting of glaciers that feed rivers all over the world. So what I want to suggest to the author is that, just because some of the disinformation ‘artists’ have strongly tried to create the idea that the issue of a secret contrails/chemtrails project has anything to do with a fight against global warming, or so-called gio-engineering – is disinformation (I agree with the author) – does not mean that global warming itself isn’t real. That the main source of this disinformation is the famous (or should we say infamous) slickly done video “What In the World Are They Spraying,”, which has been for years has been a go-to source for so many for so long – is it self bogus, NOT the fact that global warming is false. One does not need to argue that global warming isn’t real, and I believe you do yourself a dis-service by arguing against global warming, to suggest that there may be something potentially nefarious going on with aircraft spraying. I notice that the author, other than arguing that the global warming/so-called geo-enginerring cover is false, doesn’t say what might actually be the reason for such a secret project.

  • gozounlimited

    So far SRM in Cali has produced warming, drought and death….. I haven’t experienced the cooling effect as of yet.

    • Peter A. Kirby

      Yes, what they say it does is the exact opposite of what it actually does. “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment” right? Welcome to 1984.

      • Harold Saive

        The environment is in decline due to corporate pollution, not CO2. The emphasis on climate change is a deception to imply that all the problems with the environment will be fixed if we can control CO2. Meanwhile, fracking, Fukushima wars and oil spills will destroy the environment before the sea level rises another inch. This huge blind spot is a dangerous form of political correctness that will bring nothing but inaction on environmental issues and promote more illegal wars to satisfy consumer demand for all the things that are really killing us.

        • Animal Agriculture? #cowspiracy

      • Harold Saive

        I’m happy to see you used my public domain “Climate Change Console” as your featured image. One of my best if I say so, myself.

        • Peter A. Kirby

          It’s good to hear from you, Harold. That illustration is awesome! The editor at Activist Post chose it, though.

      • Brett

        The endless spraying that has been going on in my area ( Newcastle NSW, Australia) is the worst I have witnessed. We are still getting very hot and extremely humid weather in autumn and I fear they are causing a pressure system to build. Same thing happened last year around this time and the resultant storm nearly destroyed the city. The spraying activity has been far worse this year, however, and this time around I feel certain the storms will be worse too. Last year they warned that the really bad storms are going to get a lot worse. How do they know this when they cant even predict the weather day to day? Cheers

    • Harold Saive

      Aerosols are forcing drought but they also inhibit transpirational cooling when conditions become unnaturally dry. Loss of transpiration adds another dimension of heat intensification beyond the mechanism of simple net warming via nocturnal cloud-cover.

  • Harold Saive

    Dane recently read from a hoax article posted on the Internet Chronicle, that alleged Edward Snowden had claimed Geoengineering was intended as a “benevolent” operation to fight global warming. I’m not the only one who sees Dane as using the chemtrails issue to promote the UN/IPCC version of climate change

    • Joe

      Well the fact that I never believed those white lines could be chemtrails until I came across Dane’s website is testimony to the fact that he is doing something right.. Maybe he like Edward Snowden is a faux truther? Anyway, I still don’t buy into the whole climate change thing, but we do have to stop polluting and using fossil fuels for the simple reason that it is disrespectful to the earth and to each other.

  • gweneth

    NASA – never a straight answer – is probably nothing more than an expansive and expensive movie set.
    Somewhere between haarp, gwen, cern and chemtrails I would say that the military has made their wet dream come true. The weather will never be the same and whatever the crap is up there is not good for animals, fishies , plants or humans.
    So whomever is behind this continuous monotonous disgusting act of spray painting the skies should be strung up.
    EPA won’t get off of their worthless latte sipping scone eating lard buts…of course look at the way they completely destroyed the Colorado Animas river. Another waste of taxpayers money that Trump will get rid of.
    The gubbers in DeCeipt do not and have not ever done anything positive for me and I have sent them at least $300,000 for their odious debt and perpetual death, sorrow and mutilating machine.
    just stop filling out the idiotic tax forms – if no one paid in the house of red will fall.

    • Brett

      I agree!

  • mooney7

    Nice article. But there is an error regarding Bill Vanderzalm. He was not the Prime Minister of Canada. He was the Premiere of a Province of Canada called British Columbia

    • Peter A. Kirby

      Ok, thank you. The correction has been made. See, this is a group effort. 🙂

  • Afshin Nejat

    Good job.

  • Orscer Ang

    We are the Home of Natural Plants like Cannabis Oil , Medical Marijuana Strains , Edibles , Seeds , wax and hash . They are all top quality Grade A with High THC and also we have them in stock . Place your order directly from our website and have it ship the same day . Visit http://www.saintmaryhouse . com or contact us at 512 640 9206

  • Orscer Ang

    We are the Home of Natural Plants like Cannabis Oil , Medical Marijuana Strains , Edibles , Seeds , wax and hash . They are all top quality Grade A with High THC and also we have them in stock . Place your order directly from our website and have it ship the same day . Visit http://www.saintmaryhouse . com or contact us at 512 640 9206

Thank you for sharing.
Follow us to receive the latest updates.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

Send this to friend