Council Objects to Wind Farm: “Imagine 35 years of constant noise and flicker on your body, household and community.”

By B.N. Frank

Opposition to wind turbines and farms is likely to increase worldwide until significant biological, economic, environmental, and safety issues  – including fires (see 1, 2), noise, and toxic emissions– are eliminated or greatly reduced (see also 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23).  Last month a lawsuit led to two turbines being demolished in Massachusetts.  More recently Page County, Iowa residents filed a lawsuit to stop a proposed wind project and activists stopped additional wind farm development in Scotland.  In fact, public opposition in Scotland seems to be making a big impact.

From Wind-Watch:

‘People more important’ – Highland vetoes plan for giant wind turbines

Highland Council has objected to a Sutherland wind farm application that attracted 168 complaints from the public.

Members lined up to raise their concerns – with not a single councillor supporting the project.

Renewables firm Energiekontor is applying to the Scottish Government to put up 11 turbines in Strath Oykel.

Highland was invited to comment on the proposal and planning officials recommended raising no objection.

However, councillors received a deluge of objections from the community and told north planning committee: “We must listen.”

They unanimously agreed with Michael Baird and Margaret Paterson to object to the Strath Oykel wind farm plan.

Ms Paterson told the committee people had a sense of “here we go again” as yet another wind farm was proposed. She said the beautiful area was fast becoming an industrial site.

“People are more important than the companies who want to make money,” said Ms Paterson. “These are people’s beloved homes.”

She added that 168 people had objected to the plans and highlighted their “deep distress”.

While Mr Baird welcomed the positive contribution of renewables in addressing climate change, he said the application was contrary to section 67 of the Highland-wide local development plan. It would have a detrimental impact on the area, and “the perceived encirclement of communities in Strath Oykel”.

Sutherland councillor Richard Gale said: “These turbines are 200 metres (656ft) in height. Blackpool Tower is 158m tall and here we have 11 of them, in some cases less than 1,500m (1,640 yards) from residential properties. We cannot do that.”

Mr Gale raised the negative impact on people’s health: “Imagine 35 years of constant noise and flicker on your body, household and community. That is huge.”

Former north planning chairwoman Maxine Smith said in her 15 years with the committee, she had never seen so many objections to a single application.

She said local objections matter most and she was moved by the strength of feeling expressed.

Earlier, members had considered other planning applications from Energiekontor.

The developer had asked permission to revise the traffic management plan and access track to another wind farm, Strathrory in Alness.

Ardross community council had objected but the planning committee agreed the plans were acceptable.

However, members did voice concern that large scale wind farm developments were causing havoc on fragile communities and crumbling rural roads.

Strathrory had been thrown out by council, only to be overturned by the Scottish Government on appeal.

Ms Smith pleaded with the Scottish Government not to repeat that history with Strath Oykel.

“We have to listen to what the community wants,” she said.

Source:  20 Oct 2022 | The Press and Journal (Inverness, Highlands, and Islands) | NICOLA SINCLAIR, LOCAL DEMOCRACY REPORTER

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Activist Post reports regularly about wind power and unsafe technology.  For more information, visit our archives.

Become a Patron!
Or support us at SubscribeStar
Donate cryptocurrency HERE

Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on SoMee, Telegram, HIVE, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter, Gab, What Really Happened and GETTR.

Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

Be the first to comment on "Council Objects to Wind Farm: “Imagine 35 years of constant noise and flicker on your body, household and community.”"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.