Proposed Wind Farm Could “increase in potential for marine accidents, which may result in injury, loss of life, and property damage”

By B.N. Frank

Opposition to wind turbines and farms is likely to continue and increase in the U.S. and worldwide as various significant issues have been identified with them including biological and environmental health risks (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5).  Additional safety risks are also being considered in regard to a proposed wind farm off the Jersey Shore.

From Wind-Watch:

Proposed N.J. wind farm could have major impact on area fisheries, draft report says

Credit:  By Jonathan D. Salant | NJ Advance Media for | Jun. 19, 2022 | ~~

A proposed wind farm off the Jersey Shore could significantly affect local fisheries and boat traffic but generally have little impact on tourism and marine life while helping to move away from oil and gas, according to the draft environmental impact statement released Friday by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

The impact statement is the next step toward winning federal approval for Ocean Wind, a wind farm to be built by the Danish energy company Ørsted and PSEG.

The draft statement addressed concerns by officials in some New Jersey beach towns that the turbines would spoil the ocean views and discourage tourists from returning.

It said the impact of the wind farm would be moderate on tourism due to noise from construction and the new structures, but that the wind turbines could attract tourists eager to see them.

The impact on cultural artifacts could be significant as “the introduction of intrusive visual elements” could “alter character-defining ocean views of historic properties onshore” and work on the ocean floor could disturb shipwrecks or submerged archaeological sites, the statement said.

And the significant impacts on fisheries could be attributed to ongoing regulations, climate change and the disruptions to operations by the construction and installation of the turbines, the report said. Some fishing vessels would decide to avoid the area altogether.

In addition, the new structures would force changes in navigation routes and could increase congestion and the chances of accidents along the borders of the wind farm.

“The increase in potential for marine accidents, which may result in injury, loss of life, and property damage, could produce disruptions for ocean users,” the draft statement said.

BOEM said the Ocean Wind project would involve as many as 98 wind turbines about 15 mils southeast of Atlantic City, generating from 1,215 to 1,440 megawatts of electricity. That could power up to 504,000 homes per year. The wind farm is scheduled to become operational in 2024.

The wind farm also is expected to generate $1.2 billion in economic benefits and create about 15,000 jobs. It would be the nation’s largest such project.

Off-Grid Survival Toolkit (Ad)

It is part of an effort by President Joe Biden and Gov. Phil Murphy to develop offshore wind and wean the U.S. away from the fossil fuels whose emissions contribute to climate change.

Six companies bid $4.4 billion to develop wind farms acres off the coasts of New Jersey and New York in an area called the New York Bight, more brought in more money than any other energy leases ever, including those for oil and gas.

Murphy has set a target of producing 50% of the state’s electricity from clean sources by 2030, and 100% by 2050. Murphy said he would bring 7,500 megawatts of offshore wind power capacity online by 2035.

And the Biden administration set its own goal of developing 30 gigawatts of offshore wind energy by 2030.

BOEM will take public comments on Ocean Wind from Friday to Aug. 8 before issuing a final environmental impact statement. As part of the process, there will be three virtual public hearings: 1 p.m. on July 14, 5 p.m. on July 20, and 5 p.m. on July 26. To register for the hearings or to submit comments go to beginning Friday.

Source:  By Jonathan D. Salant | NJ Advance Media for | Jun. 19, 2022 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

It was also recently reported that wind power infrastructure in Japan is interfering with self-defense radars for detecting missiles.

Activist Post reports regularly about wind power and unsafe technology.  For more information, visit our archives.

Image: Pixabay

Become a Patron!
Or support us at SubscribeStar
Donate cryptocurrency HERE

Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on SoMee, Telegram, HIVE, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter, Gab, What Really Happened and GETTR.

Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

Be the first to comment on "Proposed Wind Farm Could “increase in potential for marine accidents, which may result in injury, loss of life, and property damage”"

Leave a comment