Utilities Commission Requests Additional Wind Farm Sound Testing; “sound wasn’t studied when the humidity was higher”

By B.N. Frank

Opposition to and complaints about wind turbines and farms is likely to increase in the U.S. and worldwide until significant biological, economic, environmental, and safety issues – including fires (see 1, 2) and toxic emissions – are eliminated or greatly reduced (see also 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21).  Recently South Dakota residents asked for another sound-testing study due to “ridiculously loud” noise coming from turbines near their homes.

From Watertown Public Opinion:

PUC asks for second sound study for wind farm in Codington, Grant, Deuel counties

Elisa Sand

Aberdeen American News

The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission has asked for an additional sound testing for a wind farm development in Codington, Deuel and Grant counties.

Xcel Energy was open to completing a follow-up study for its Crowned Ridge II development following a hearing with the commission on Aug. 30. During that hearing, landowner Greg Wall requested a second sound study. Both Wall and his sister live near turbines in the development.

More: $1 billion zero-emissions hydrocarbon plant planned for Lake Preston will produce jet fuel

One turbine is 1,840 feet from his sister’s place and 2,600 feet from his home. A second wind turbine is 2,750 feet from Wall’s home, according to testimony at the meeting.

In his comments to the commission, Wall said the initial sound study was completed in June or July, which is when the turbines are at their quietest. The turbine sound wasn’t studied when the humidity was higher, which is when Wall said they are noisier.

“When it’s foggy out, it’s ridiculously loud,” he said, describing both an alternator squeal and the “woof, woof” sound from the blades.

Darren Kearney, one of the PUC staff analysts, said there were concerns raised about the sound study happening in the summer as opposed to the fall or winter. But, he said, no further analysis was requested by concerned individuals until Wall contacted the PUC office, which is why the request was back before the commission.

Ryan Hawk, who spoke on behalf of RSG, the company that completed the sound study, said he disagrees that a study in a different season would make a difference, although he did note that local and regional weather make a difference. In explaining that further, he said, substantial wind from the south, for instance, would mean higher wind energy production and more sound from the turbines.

More: Low bid to repair 60-plus miles of Codington County roads comes in at $8.1 million

Asked about another study, Wall said, this summer would have been an optimal time as there were several high-humidity days. Those are the days where the turbines are the noisiest, he said, also questioning the results of a study from a company hired by Xcel.

Kearney said the company completing the study is an expert in the field and its data is credible.

Pat Flowers, manager of environmental services at Xcel Energy, agreed to a follow-up study, but asked if it would make sense to have someone evaluate the data that was collected for the first study.

Kearney said that could be an option, but it wouldn’t address Wall’s concern about the seasonal nature of the sound and how it changes.

PUC Commission Chairman Chris Nelson said any data collected in a follow-up study would be subject to review by a second company.

“We just need to know if this project is in compliance or not,” he said.

Nelson directed Xcel to work with Wall and other concerned parties on the details of the second study.

Wall also noted concerns about an increase in pickup traffic on his township road and said he’d prefer company employees use the county road instead as the added traffic creates more dust. Commissions said now that the project is complete, there aren’t any restrictions on which road the company uses.

More: Alan Guebert: Big Ethanol sees electric cars as a market maker, not a market taker

The PUC also heard concerns about the sound study completed for Crowned Ridge I. But since the docket on that issue is closed, those raising the concerns were told a complaint docket must be filed.

In regard to offshore wind development, despite widely reported risks and opposition, earlier this summer, the Biden Administration and administrations in 11 states formed a federal-state offshore wind partnership (requiring billions in funding), an initiative that even has environmentalists concerned.

Activist Post reports regularly about wind power and unsafe technology.  For more information, visit our archives.

Image: Pixabay

Become a Patron!
Or support us at SubscribeStar
Donate cryptocurrency HERE

Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on SoMee, Telegram, HIVE, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter, Gab, What Really Happened and GETTR.

Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

Be the first to comment on "Utilities Commission Requests Additional Wind Farm Sound Testing; “sound wasn’t studied when the humidity was higher”"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.