By B.N. Frank
According to Arthur Firstenburg from the Cell Tower Task Force, The NRDC is requesting statements be sent to them about biological and environmental harm caused by 5G and other wireless infrastructure. However, you can only do so if you have been a paid member of the NRDC prior to the FCC decision.
These statements are necessary to sue the FCC in court and invalidate the FCC’s recent action.
Statements should be emailed by July 2, 2018 to firstname.lastname@example.org with “Reference Case No. 18-1135” in the subject line.
There has been outcry about the installation of small cell towers all over the world. This has been reported by many media sources including U.S. broadcast news stations. The Telecom Industry is being referred to as “Big Wireless” and compared to “Big Tobacco.”
The FCC’s ruling defines “small wireless facilities” as any facilities that are up to 50 feet tall, OR do not extend more than ten percent higher than other adjacent structures, whichever is greater — OR the antennas do not extend more than ten percent higher than the structure they are mounted on.
It is important to understand that virtually NO wireless facilities (not just 5G) that will be built from now on will be subject to environmental or historic preservation review because of this legislation.
There are decades of research that have confirmed all sources of wireless WiFi radiation are harmful. FCC employees are completely ignoring “The Precautionary Principle” when forcing this new technology on communities. Legislation regarding new technology is 20+ years old and has always favored the Telecom Industry.
For more information, visit the following websites:
- Center For Safer Wireless
- Center For Electrosmog Prevention
- Citizens for Safe Technology
- Clear Light Ventures
- Dr. Sam Milham
- Environmental Health Trust
- Generation Zapped
- In Power Movement
- National Association for Children and Safe Technology
- Parents for Safe Technology
- Scientists for Wired Tech
- We Are The Evidence