Governor Wants Kids to Rat Out Their Parents for Covid Violations (And Other Dystopian Weekly News)

By Simon Black, Sovereign Man

Are you ready for this week’s absurdity? Here’s our Friday roll-up of the most ridiculous stories from around the world that are threats to your liberty, risks to your prosperity… and on occasion, inspiring poetic justice.

90-year-old nursing home resident chooses assisted suicide over another lockdown

A Canadian woman, Nancy Russel, was as healthy as a 90 year old could be.

But she chose to die rather than go through another lockdown at her nursing home, and the isolation which comes with it.

Canada does not require a terminal illness in order to qualify for medically assisted suicide. But still, the first time Nancy applied she was denied.

But the second time she asked to die, “more concrete medical health issues” had developed, and she was approved.

Nancy was allowed to die surrounded by family, singing a song she chose, instead of alone and depressed.

What is wrong with this world that a government would rather assist someone to die rather than allow people to live their lives?

Click here to read the full story.

Governor Instructs Schools to Interrogate Children About Thanksgiving Gatherings

Just before Thanksgiving, the Governor of Vermont hopped on Twitter– which is apparently the only platform now for making important announcements.

He started by shaming and guilt tripping anyone who dared to celebrate Thanksgiving with family.

He continued:

Unfortunately, we know some will still get together and schools have asked for help.
@VTEducation will direct schools to ask students or parents if they were part of multi-family gatherings and if the answer is yes, they’ll need to go remote for 14 days or 7 days and a test.

So the Vermont Department of Education instructed schools to interrogate children about what they did over Thanksgiving weekend, so that they can inform on their families.

Click here to read the Twitter stream.

Hypocrisy Roundup: The Latest Politicians Who Broke Their Own Rules

You’ve probably already heard about Governor Newsom of California breaking his own rules to attend a maskless birthday dinner party.

Or Nancy Pelosi demanding a salon open up to do her hair, when it was supposed to be closed according to San Francisco’s lockdown rules.

But it’s not just these top politicians guilty of COVID hypocrisy.

It seems like everyone from Governors to County Dog Catchers feel like they are above the laws they create and enforce on the peasants.

Last month, the Mayor of Austin appeared on screen, from Mexico, and told Austin residents: “We need to stay home if you can. This is not the time to relax.”

The Wednesday before Thanksgiving, the Mayor of Denver Tweeted to “avoid travel if you can.” 30 minutes later, he boarded a flight to Houston, and then drove to Mississippi to spend Thanksgiving with his family.

Last week the Los Angeles County Supervisor voted to ban outdoor dining. And just a few hours later, she was seen dining out at an LA restaurant.

Peasants! The rules are for thee, not for me.

Cambridge professors fight back against new free speech rules

Cambridge University professors are taking a stand against proposed new rules which could see them punished for free speech critical of certain ideas.

The governing body of the University proposed forcing professors to be respectful of all opinions and identities. But Professors say the wording of the new rules is so vague, that it could neuter their ability to state an opinion.

One Cambridge Professor claims that the “Stalinist left among the student union who like to “cancel” people” are responsible for trying to restrict any controversial speech.

In turn, professors proposed amendments to the rules, among them, making it harder to ban or disinvite campus speakers because of student protests.

Interesting to see the professors take a stand against mob rule on campus. They have likely painted targets on themselves for the woke mob.

Click here to read the full story.

Biden already signals reckless abandon on spending and debt

The incoming presidential administration wants Neera Tanden to lead the US Office of Budget and Management.

This former Hillary Clinton Aide wrote an article at the beginning of the pandemic titled: “Deficit and Debt Shouldn’t Factor Into Coronavirus Recession Response.”

She argued, “Deficits and debt pose no comparable risk [to COVID-19]. Policymakers should set aside their concerns about red ink and deliver the response the crisis demands.”

Sure, let’s continue to pretend that massive debts and the devaluing of the dollar will have no impact, ever.

This is just another clear signal that debt and money printing will only accelerate, stealing from future generations.

Click here to read the full story.

Sourced from The Daily Bell

Become a Patron!

Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.

Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

1 Comment on "Governor Wants Kids to Rat Out Their Parents for Covid Violations (And Other Dystopian Weekly News)"

  1. “the Governor of Vermont…” broke his required Oath to the US Constitution, to the Vermont Constitution.

    Breaking the Oath is a crime.
    5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office the three branches of our government, the military, all law enforcement, the heads of the States, all federal employees are required to take before assuming office.

    5 U.S.C. 3333 requires the three branches of our government, the military, all law enforcement, the heads of the States, all federal employees sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office.

    18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath of office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

    5 U.S.C. 7311 explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense for anyone employed in the United States Government to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.

    The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. Executive Order 10450 provision specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”

    It is important to realize that our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. That according to Executive Order 10450 and 5 U.S. 7311 any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331 which alters the form of government other then by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.

    Brookfield Construction Company V. Stewart 284 F Sup. 94: “An officer who acts in violation of the constitution ceases to represent the government.”

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*