Since the inception of Activist Post, we have been chronicling the transition from traditional military systems toward a future war matrix of fully autonomous weapons. Many tech luminaries, universities and robotic weapons experts have called for a moratorium on the development of “killer robots,” or even the outright banning of such systems. A debate has been framed within the United Nations but, as of yet, it’s just talking points awaiting full discussion.
Meanwhile, the military industrial complex continues developing, testing and fielding various levels of autonomous systems as though they assume that widespread proliferation is an inevitability.
Based on technology developed in Israel, Duke Robotics recently issued an investment press release that indicates how the industry is proceeding with new weapons that will redefine the role of the soldier on the battlefield and how autonomous drones will be integrated.
The press release discusses some of the features of this system, and interestingly alludes to a new “problem” that the military is experiencing as it executes its drone warfare program – namely, the concept of “danger-close” distances now occurring as U.S. allies on the ground are in close proximity to those who have been identified as terrorists, and also close to civilian populations.
As the LA Times reported, this is an evolution in warfare where drone missions continue to expand:
American drone pilots now routinely launch missiles at what the Pentagon calls “danger-close” distances to U.S.-backed rebel ground forces fighting Islamic State in densely populated cities.
Hundreds of U.S special operations forces are deployed in Syria, and in some cases they direct airstrikes. But the danger-close missions also require approval from Syrian militia commanders because the missile blasts may put their ground troops at risk.
“Ideally you don’t want to accept that level of risk unless you have to,” said Col. Julian C. Cheater, commander at Creech Air Force Base, where most U.S. Predator and Reaper drone pilots are based. “But in an urban fight — like you’re now seeing in Raqqah — options might not be available to you.”
Over the last 20 years, unmanned aircraft were primarily used to collect intelligence or to launch Hellfire missiles at specific terrorist targets after extensive surveillance — enemy strongholds or targeted killings of suspects in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and elsewhere.
But drones are no longer confined to shadowy counter-terrorism missions. Their role has expanded to include more traditional military operations, including an increase in airstrikes during combat and close support for advancing ground troops.
Duke Robotics’ system is called “TIKAD – The Future Soldier” and seems to be tailored for this new reality:
“As a former Special Mission Unit commander, I have been in the battlefield for many years,” said Raziel Atuar, Duke Robotics CEO. “Over the last few years, we have seen how the needs of our troops in our battlefield has changed.”
The classic army versus army confrontation on the battlefield has become increasingly rare, while guerrilla warfare is now commonplace. The use of UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) to fire small arms from the air has not yet been a viable option. Until now.
“When terrorists operate, they operate from within the civilian population – preventing the military from shooting a missile into their targeted area,” said Atuar. “The risk of collateral damage to innocent civilians is often too high. The primary solution you are left with is sending in ground troops – but this shifts the risk to your troops, which often leads to injuries and casualties. But, we thought, ‘what if…what if there was a better way’. So we created the solution — the TIKAD.”
(Source)
TIKAD’s attributes include:
- Remotely operated, user friendly, easily carried into the field
- High-powered drone capable of carrying various weapon payloads
- Proprietary stabilization technology that enables TIKAD to absorb the recoil, pinpoint targeting and shooting accuracy that can protect troops in a variety of dangerous situations
- Reduces the number of deployed ground troops, thereby reducing the number of casualties.
Also added in the video appears to be a facial recognition capability.
As you’ll see, the drone market continues to be too profitable to slow down any time soon. Duke Robotics estimates it to be a $10 billion pie that these developers are trying to get a piece of.
Can this really “transform the way conflicts are being solved,” as Duke states? Or is it more likely that it will transform how new conflicts will be created.
H/T – Technocracy News
Nicholas West writes for ActivistPost.com. He also writes for Counter Markets agorist newsletter. Follow us at Twitter and Steemit.
This article may be freely republished in part or in full with author attribution and source link.
When I was a kid there was a commercial that featured two guys in suits havin at it while their crews stood by to keep the fight honest. The gist was this is how wars should be fought. I say set em down with a Rock Em Sock Em Robots set and first one too knock the block off wins. But no, Skynet and Terminators is what you get.
War is now for cowards – or rather – has always been.
The move to AI systems and robotics is motivated by greed. Foot soldiers are expensive and not profitable. I suspect the bankers don’t want to depend on a large loyal standing army.
the ad / video reminds me of robocop and the “invest now” video shown there.
the only way to keep warfare “HONEST” (total oxymoron, isn’t it?) is to have a human brain making decisions – “the buck has to stop somewhere.
AI and autonomous systems are without recourse, once the hounds are released, that’s it until completion of mission or total system destruction, no in-between
ex-murderer (or is he? he no longer has the reigns, so maybe he is, ex, that is) obama proved that “no collateral damage” was just a byline
How do you reduce the world population to 500M (from 7B) as seamlessly as possible? By replacing people with robots. They are trying to obsolete humanity so the elite can easily exterminate the vast majority of us because they will no longer need us. Of course, these soldier robots will be great killing machines, exactly as planned.
I believe this is the future of wars. Is this what Revelation is talking about?
Cheap, expendable, effective. THIS IS IT! Countermeasures anyone. That’s not talked about much.
Are these killer robots being developed not to take on other killer robot armies but to liquidate the millions of people left displaced and dirt poor by worker robots? Once the elite have their New World Order there should be no need for armies, except to fight the odd rogue billionaire. Masses of dispossessed people will become revolutionary and I suspect the elite would rather be rid of them before they can organize.