Wednesday, May 22, 2013

How Bill Clinton Forced Agenda 21 on America

Cassandra Anderson
Activist Post

A number of critics claim that Agenda 21 is not a treaty, so it is non-binding and that it is merely a paranoid conspiracy theory.

Agenda 21 is not a voluntary program. The smoking gun is Bill Clinton's Executive Order # 12852 in 1993, creating the President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD). Clinton's executive order bypassed Congress and forced taxes and restrictive policies on the American people.

Agenda 21 is the action plan to implement "sustainable development", a term coined by the United Nations that they define as "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

Sustainable development may sound nice, but in practice it aims for totalitarian control and depopulation as Clinton's President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) documents prove. Global warming is the excuse that is used.

Members of Clinton's PCSD advisory included representatives from these groups:

Executive agencies: EPA, USDA, Department of the Interior, Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Commerce, Department of Transportation, HUD, Department of Education and the Small Business Administration.

Big business: Ken Lay of Enron, BP Oil, Dow Chemical, General Motors, and more.

Extreme environmental groups: The Sierra Club, The Environmental Defense Fund, The Nature Conservancy and Natural Resources Defense Council.

The mission of Clinton's PCSD was for members to advise him on forging environmental and other policies, creating strategies for implementation and propagandizing the public about sustainable development.

Clinton's PCSD was preoccupied with locking down regulations, with complete disregard for the validity of global warming (see #4 in the Charter):
The Council should not debate the science of global warming, but should instead focus on the implementation of national and local greenhouse gas reduction policies...
This is alarming because in 2009 alone, an estimated $51 billion in taxpayer money was spent on 'green stimulus' subsidies in the US, which was used primarily for ethanol and alternative energy schemes (like Solyndra). Over $3 billion in stimulus money was spent to force Smart Meters on Americans for centralized control over individuals' energy usage. Agenda 21's implementation through taxation and policy is coercive; it is the very opposite of voluntary participation.

Clinton's PCSD lists "population stabilization" as a primary goal.

The PCSD's report on 'Population and Consumption' calls for slowing population growth and curbing US consumption.

There are 2 ways to "slow" and "stabilize" population: reduce the birth rate or reduce immigration.

While the PCSD used soft words like "reproductive health" to refer to contraception and abortion, Clinton's record speaks for itself as his policies supported abortion on demand, federally funded abortion, late-term abortion and nullifying state limitations on abortion.

In 1993, Clinton introduced the "Health Security Act" (HR 3600) that is very similar to Obamacare and would have mandated that abortion be a covered expense, which Planned Parenthood described as a "watershed event just as significant, just as vital as Roe v Wade."

While Clinton and his Council pretended to support limiting immigration and cracking down on illegal immigration, his record is contrary to those goals...

Clinton opposed English as the official language and strengthened bilingual education. He claimed to be strict on illegal immigration, but he actually granted amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, encouraging more to enter the US illegally.

Clinton's Council recommended combating US consumption rates by reducing use of natural resources, reduction in economic development and land use restriction. However, they failed to mention any real constructive measures that could improve the environment, like using hemp to replace plastic and as a fuel source, or returning to traditional farming and crop rotation to reduce the need for fertilizer.

While the PCSD has disbanded, it got the ball rolling toward the implementation of Agenda 21 through soft law in the US that continues today.

For more about globalization and Agenda 21, including a comprehensive glossary of terms, please visit Cassandra Anderson' website Morph City where this article first appeared


This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


Anonymous said...

The President's Council for Sustainable Development benefitting from I believe 7 years and millions in grant money (your $) wrote the book on how to implement A21 on the ground, in your community. Called Growing Smart Model Statutes for Planning and the Management of Change (I used to like that word). This is the Planner's Bible, promoted through the American Planning Association (APA), taught in universities. On the desk or shelf of all the planners in America (and probably beyond, as Smart Growth is global). These oppressive guide lines could go a long way toward nuetering property rights and small business in and of itself. Withoutall the over reach comming from Washington or your state's capital. True to The Agenda' insideous nature, no one voted on it, few know it.
Left and right is distraction, charade and devides us. UN Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development is what's really goin' on.
Resist it's implementation in your community by engaging everyone who will listen. Show up en masse. Insist that your 'public servants' purge this societal cancer from your town like your life depends on it. Because it does. Taking directive from a globalist NGO is treason. With their ICLEI membership the dynamic central to representative government has been subverted. As an ICLEI Charter, they no longer work for you. They take directive from, are accountable to this globalist NGO. The same basic crime cabal behind ALL that is wrong. You pay them to carry out the UN's tyranny.

A complete Plan for complete control; UN Agenda 21. -James Bennett

Anonymous said...

"Called Growing Smart Model Statutes for Planning and the Management of Change (I used to like that word)"

I know how you feel, I used to be a supporter of "revolution" until I started reading Bolshevik ideological material from the early 1900's stating that their ultimate goal was "global revolution" to establish a global communist state(under their Soviet model, not "true communism").

Combine that with the involvement of the Freemasons, a group that openly espouses supporting "revolutionary causes".

That has made me weary of all the communists supporting the current global revolutionary movement, especially those that ignore the whole Agenda 21 issue - or openly support it and it's various "green" initiatives.

The way things are now is bad and definitely needs to change, but those who desire true change should be weary of supporting revolutionary movements when they don't know who's pulling the strings.

In the case of the "Arab Spring" it is easy to see who is behind it(George Soros for one), but here in the west the sheer number of different groups with different views that are all part of this current "activist movement"(Tea Party, We Are Change, "Anonymous", etc.) makes knowing who is actually leading it very difficult.

I'm all for certain types of socialism, but 100% opposed to a global Bolshevik/Soviet "communist" NWO state - and I'm becoming more and more worried every day that we are going to end up that way.

Of course the negative views of Soviet communism means they try hard to distance this Agenda 21 socialism from Bolshevism, but with people like Gorbachev in groups like the Club of Rome which are the main pushers of the "Green Agenda" and openly state it is simply a tool for "global transformation" they can never completely detach themselves from that reality.

Any "change" that claims to require bloody, violent revolution is suspect in my view.

Even the "evil Nazi's" attained massive change(against the Freemasons and Bolsheviks) without a bloody revolution - a revolution of the mind is more powerful than a revolution of guns and bullets and bombs.

10 million people freed from mental prisons are far more capable than 5 million people armed to the teeth and 5 million dead bodies at bringing about real change.

I support evolution, not revolution - change I can actually believe in rather than change the NWO believes in.


Post a Comment