Friday, February 8, 2013

In a Major Privacy Victory, Seattle Mayor Orders Police to Dismantle Its Drone Program After Protests

image source
Trevor Timm
EFF

In an amazing victory for privacy advocates and drone activists, yesterday, Seattle’s mayor ordered the city's police agency to cease trying use surveillance drones and dismantle its drone program. The police will return the two drones they previously purchased with a Department of Homeland Security grant to the manufacturer.

EFF has been warning of the privacy dangers surveillance drones pose to US citizens for more than a year now. In May of last year, we urged concerned citizens to take their complaints to their local governments, given Congress has been slow to act on any privacy legislation. The events of Seattle proves this strategy can work and should serve as a blueprint for local activism across the country.

Back in early 2012, the Seattle city council was told that the Seattle police agency had obtained an authorization to fly drones from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). But they did not find out from the police; they found out from a reporter who called after the council after he saw Seattle’s name on the list obtained by EFF as part of our lawsuit against the FAA.

City council was understandably not happy, and the police agency was forced to appear before the council and apologize. It then vowed to work with the ACLU of Washington and the FAA to develop guidelines to make sure drones wouldn’t violate Seattle citizens’ privacy. But as long as the guidelines weren’t passed in a binding city ordinance, there’d be no way to enforce them.


After a townhall meeting held by police, in which citizens showed up in droves and angrily denounced the city’s plans, some reporters insinuated that city counsel members’ jobs could be on the line if they did not pass strict drone legislation protecting its citizens privacy.

Documents obtained by MuckRock and EFF in October as part of our 2012 drone census showed that the Seattle police were trying to buy two more drones despite the controversy. But that ended yesterday as the Mayor put a stop to the program completely.

Critics of the privacy protests said the participants were exaggerating the capabilities of the Seattle drones, given they would only fly for less than an hour at a time and are much smaller than the Predator drones the military flies overseas and Department of Homeland Security flies at home.

But while Seattle’s potential drones may not have been able to stay in the air for long, similar drones have already been developed and advertised by drone manufacturers with the capability to stay in the air for hours or days at a time.

In fact, Lockheed Martin has been bragging about a drone that weights 13.2 pounds (well within the FAA’s weight limits) that can be recharged by a laser on the ground and stay in the air indefinitely.

Since the Seattle protests have heated up, similar complaints have been heard at local city counsels and state legislatures across the country. At least thirteen states are now considering legislation to restrict drone use to protect privacy, and there are also members of Congress on both sides of the aisle pushing the same thing.

Here in the Bay Area, we’ve experienced a similar situation. The Alameda County Sheriff's Office tried to sneak through drone funding without a public hearing and told the county board of supervisors it only wanted to use the drone for emergency purposes.

Yet in internal documents obtained by EFF and MuckRock as part of our 2012 drone census, the Sheriff’s Office said it wanted to use the drone for “suspicious persons” and “large crowd control disturbances.”

When EFF and ACLU held a press conference pointing out this discrepancy, the county backtracked and is now attempting to write privacy guidelines that could potentially be turned into binding law. We will keep you updated on further developments.

But regardless, it’s important that privacy advocates take the lesson from Seattle and apply it all over the country. This is an important privacy victory, and like we said back in May, local governments will listen to our concerns, so let’s make our voice heard.

Please visit the Electronic Frontier Foundation for the latest in surveillance news and activism


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

city officials seem to be willing to work with the idea of drones operating there, as long as citizen privacy isn't violated. Is this the missing chapter from Lewis Carroll's "Through The Looking Glass"? (or in American English - WTF?)

Anonymous said...

AMERICA hasn't seen anything yet,these criminals think their OATH of office is just like being caught smoking pot,cause no one that has the balls to enforce these peoples treason,and besides its now fashionable to be a traitor and laugh in everyones face about it,you wanted the women to vote,you wanted them to throw the lord out of america ,so there would no longer be any rules,DO YOUR OWN THING,anything goes,well enjoy whats coming ,the lord says he's sending the cruelist armies in the world to punish america for there cruelity on other nations,I've seen it,yea he shows me whats coming,and this country is OVER,no future for america,ITS not even going to be in history books,cause there ain't going to be anyone to write them,but hey you been warned over and over,stop killing his little ones,and america said screw you,we'll do as we want,yea not much longer you won't..........americas kids are going into captivity and the rest are dead,3% survive this war and thats it,3% both coasts go down with out a fight,you gave your guns to the women,WHO says americans aren't stupid.......................

Anonymous said...

I am anonymous 3. Bet the po-po won't stop......

Post a Comment