Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Police Take Newborn After Mother Refuses Hep B Vaccination; Lawsuit and Trial Follows

Dees Illustration
Kenny Valenzuela, Contributor
Activist Post

The state has granted powers to individuals though the use of titles, uniforms and badges; in this instance both ‘social worker’ and ‘police officer’ are the titles used to seize custody of Jodi Ferris’s newborn child after she questioned the hospitals ‘safety plan’. Once in the custody of the state the baby was injected with a Hepatitis B vaccination and the mother was evicted from the hospital and forced to stay in the parking lot, only permitted to return every three hours to breast feed her newborn daughter.

The next morning the court system determined this was a violation of Constitutional laws and the baby was immediately returned to the custody of her parents with no mention of the possible damage done to her immune system after receiving this toxic concoction.

With the help of the Home Schooling Legal Defense Association {HSLDA} the Ferris’s have filed a civil rights lawsuit on grounds that their 4th and 14th amendments had been violated. This lawsuit has been making its way through the court systems and earlier this month a judge ruled in favor of the Ferris’s claims and the case will now proceed to trial.

Jodi had planned on avoiding this situation altogether by having her baby born at home with the help of a midwife. Unfortunately a contingency plan for this particular vignette was not written down. When she went into labor out in the community her only advice was to take an ambulance to the nearest hospital.




We can learn from this by having vaccine exemption forms and a packet containing alllegal information and documentation necessary, just in case you end up in a similar situation that involves employing the help of the medical death industry, which in this instance takes no responsibility for exposing the Ferris’s daughter to harmful toxic filled injections known as vaccinations.

We need to focus on legislation that would include an ‘opt-in’ program for individuals that feel vaccines are beneficial; that way the rest of us don’t have to jump through hoops just to avoid participating in their flawed scientific experimentation called childhood immunizations.

Research Links:

EVDN Original Post

MinotDailyNews Pennsylvania Social Worker face HSLDA lawsuit

HSLDA The Decision

Momaroo Newborn Seized mom questioned vaccinations

Natural News Baby Seized Momma Thrown Out

Activist Post: Parents Refuse to Vaccinate Newborn Seized

PakalertPress Parent Refuse to Vaccinated Police Seize Newborn

HSLDA Newborn Seized in Hospital by Police

Vaccine Exemption Forms


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

9 comments:

Angel said...

Holy cow. This is going to be a case to watch!!! If a judge sees that forcing a vaccine on a newborn without mother's consent is heinous then there is hope for us yet.

Mark McCandlish said...

Back in the sixties, when I was a kid, these vaccines were given one at a time. Yeah, they had some thimerosal, but they were not as dangerous then as they are now, with multiple adjuvant agents included to "rev up"the immune system. For some kids, it's too much. It fries their little brains in a histamine reaction. I know of cases where a perfectly normal child received such a vaccination and was severely disabled by the aftereffects. Ganging vaccinations together is dangerous and should be stopped.

Anonymous said...

This is horrible!

Anonymous said...

Mark Mc, you are absolutely right. My husband has been a microbiologist for many, many years and worked for PA state. He has told me that infants should NEVER be given vaccines. The premise is that vaccines expose the child to a given disease and their immune systems then get stronger and the child is immune. This is completely wrong though because an infant's immune system hasn't developed at all yet. It's like giving an infant the German measles and thinking that it will help him. As well, the medical community knows full well about this, it's been known since forever almost. Taking people's children seems to be the new way to deal with people. Fine them, imprison them,(which I don't agree with but if the govt wants to penallize there are other options) but don't take their child, that's the worst thing a parent could ever experience. That child will never be the same, especially since he was taken from his mother for hours and subjected to alot of fright, I'm sure.

Anonymous said...

How will Donald Rumsfeld make his millions if he can't even inject us with poisons? What, you think aspartame and tamiflu are going to carry him forever? Can't someone please think of Donald Rumsfeld? All you selfish people think about is your useless-eater offspring. I mean c'mon. If the baby didn't want the vaccine he/she could fight off the nurses! Next thing you know you people are going to try and tell me that ADD and autism rises might be attributed to vaccinations. Ya, like I'm pretty sure the best scientists in the world who can memorize the periodic table and do calculus in their heads know what they are talking about. It's not like they are on the BigPharma payroll or anything. And every patriotic American knows that Congress would never allow such evil to befall the American poor and middle classes all to make a quick buck for their BigPharma friends who help finance their campaigns. It's not like that happens c'mon people! (I attribute my intense sarcasm to being vaccinated as a child.)

TLPG said...

The state acted correctly. The Hep B Vaccine is safe and does not contain anything that threatens a baby without a fully developed immune system. The assertion over live virus's in vaccines is a myth because vaccines are a chemical mixture that changes the composition of the ingredients. Basic chemistry, and nothing to do with microbiology which is a different part of the field.

The only way the parent could win this is if the baby was actually damaged by the vaccine and the parent would have to prove it. She doesn't have a case otherwise. Big Pharma make NO profit over vaccines alone. They can't, because the government is paying for it at cost to make them free to as many people as it can so everyone gets immunised. Pharma's profits come from other products like pills and so forth.

Robert4Health said...

In 2007 In the State of Maryland's threats against parents who refuse to have their children vaccinated, hundreds of children were herded into Price George County courthouse being guarded by armed personnel with attack dogs. Inside, the children were forcibly vaccinated, many against their will, under orders from the State Attorney General, various State Judges and the local School Board Director, all of whom illegally conspired to threaten parents with imprisonment if they did not submit their children to vaccinations...
“If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as the souls who live under tyranny.” – Thomas Jefferson (1778)

Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D. said...

Addressing the hepatitis B issue, Dr. Jane Orient, director of The Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, writes,

“Doctors reported only about 10,000 hepatitis B cases in the U.S. in 1997 with only 306 occurring in children under 14. The only babies at risk are those born to hepatitis B-infected mothers. In 1996, only 54 cases of the disease were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the 0 to 1 age group. There were 3.9 million births that year, so the observed incidence of hepatitis B in the 0 to 1 age group was just 0.001% [actually 0.0014%]. In the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 alone in the 0 to 1 age group [raw incidence of 0.028%], with 47 deaths reported [raw incidence of 0.0012%].

“For most children, the risk of a serious vaccine reaction may be 100 times greater than the risk of hepatitis B. Overall, the incidence of hepatitis B in the U.S. is currently about 4 per 100,000. The risk for most young children is far less; hepatitis B is heavily concentrated in groups at high risk due to occupation, sexual promiscuity, or drug abuse.”

Anonymous said...

The poster above, TPLG, who states the Hep B vaccine is safe, is flat frickin wrong.

THE HEP B VACCINE CAUSES LIVER DISEASE:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/hepb-vaccine-causes-liver-disease-science-shows-how?utm_source=www.GreenMedInfo.com&utm_campaign=d3cafc3762-Greenmedinfo&utm_medium=email

I wish people would quit sticking their noses where they don't belong...somebody's gonna get hurt...

Post a Comment