Tuesday, June 12, 2012

No Justice - Supreme Court Rejects ALL Guantanamo Detainee Torture Suits

Dees Illustration
Joe Wright
Activist Post

Jose Padilla, a United States citizen, was incarcerated for four years without trial for an alleged 2002 "dirty bomb" plot and has been trying to sue U.S. officials for his mistreatment while detained in a military brig in South Carolina.

Despite Padilla receiving direct support by the ACLU, he has been unsuccessful at attempting to hold accountable those who have been responsible for his horrendous treatment.  Padilla's case has come to represent the overall demand by Guantanamo detainees that their cases be objectively considered. 

Yesterday, June 11, all cases filed by detainees were rejected by the United States Supreme Court, leaving little doubt as to the path this country is heading toward with its conclusion that American citizen or not, your rights end where the U.S. government says they end, regardless of Constitutional principles or legal review.

Jose Padilla has been dealt legal blow after legal blow; first having Atlanta's 11 Circuit Court of Appeals rule against U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke in September 2011, who noted that Padilla had been confined under harsh conditions and had not injured anyone, among other considerations. The majority issued their opinion in vague language that alluded to "an impermissible comparison to sentences imposed in other terrorism cases, and was based in part on inappropriate factors," as well as his suspected Al Qaeda training. (Source)


In January of this year, Padilla was then denied by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Virgina as having any right to even file suit for his claims of illegal detention and torture. 

At the heart of the case against Padilla and all Guantanamo detainees is a single label issued by the U.S. government: enemy combatant. Even though the term was supposed to have been dropped in 2009, it is still acknowledged by the courts. With this single designation, the normal rules of international law and the guarantees afforded to U.S. citizens under the Constitution become null and void. The 4th Circuit specifically stated their conundrum, as the framework of enemy combatant status essentially circumvents the American legal system.  In response, they passed the buck to Congress, which they stated had not defined any appropriate remedy in their responsibility for military conduct.

A legal black hole had been revealed, which ACLU lawyer for Jose Padilla, Ben Wizner, highlighted:
By dismissing this lawsuit, the appeals court handed the government a blank check to commit any abuse in the name of national security, even the brutal torture of a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil. This impunity is not only anathema to a democracy governed by laws, but contrary to history’s lesson that in times of fear our values are a strength, not a hindrance. (Source)
Padilla had been trying to sue Donald Rumsfeld, torture memo author John Yoo, as well as other officials that laid the foundation and/or gave the orders for his confinement and mistreatment. However, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals stepped up in early May of this year to reverse the ruling of a federal judge who concluded that Padilla could in fact file suit against John Yoo.

However, it is the latest ruling by the Supreme Court that seems to have put the final nail in the coffin for anyone attempting to obtain justice for improper treatment at the hands of the out-of-control warmongers and torturers who have infested Washington. The Supreme Court firmly rejected a cert petition to overturn the 4th Circuit's decision, as well as having rejected 7 other appeals made by Guantanamo detainees.

The highest levels of the American legal system have now decided to become subservient to whatever policy of detention the U.S. government can invent. This does not bode well for any U.S. citizen who under the NDAA officially has no right to be treated with dignity in peace time or war; whether accused, falsely arrested, tortured, or found legitimately guilty.

The full ramifications of this new system of injustice can only be imagined; but based on the past treatment of detainees, and the absolute lack of recourse to the rule of law, it is difficult to be optimistic. The bloodthirsty, well-documented, doctrine of U.S. torture where the secrets of the State are more important than the rights of the individual have been exacerbated during our present time of terror and paranoia when re-education and internment camps have become acceptable.

Perhaps with this latest Supreme Court ruling, we can finally admit to ourselves that the United States has become a tyrannical regime.

Main source for this article:
ABA Journal

You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE

Read other articles by Joe Wright here.



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

...seriously, is anyone surprised?

Adam Evenson said...

I'm witcha, Joe. I was a hostage to SCOTUS way back in the early Seventies when I finally was able to become a legal force in my own right and overcome a wrongful sentence which netted me life without parole in San Quentin beginning in 1963. It took me about 15 years to do the work, pro se the whole way. I learned a lot about SCOTUS during that time. SCOTUS has nothing to do with justice. It is a group of privileged old lawyers, each of which won the lottery that every old lawyer covets, appointment to SCOTUS. It's like winning a million dollars a day for life.

Be not deceived even for a moment, the purpose of SCOTUS is not to dispense justice, as that bunch has nothing to do with justice, but solely to maintain the status quo at all costs, whatever that status quo may be, which is what the whole government is about.

They have all finally been put under enough pressure to show their hands, all of them, and they are definitely showing them, aren't they? Is there a George Washington or Thomas Jefferson among the hundreds of thousands of them? Hardly.

And so, marvel not that SCOTUS has trashed the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights in legalizing and promoting the arrest of any citizen without cause and the torture of the accused and that such as the 4th Amendment no longer exists. SCOTUS has been trashing the constitution since its inception and will no doubt continue doing so until the wheels fall off, which point, thankfully, appears to be on the horizon finally, now that the whole world is getting into the fray. There appears to be a world rebellion against tyranny coming to the fore that will no doubt push SCOTUS and all the others into the trash bin of history ere all is said and done. I hope I'm still here to see it. And I may well be.

Anonymous said...

Dale sputters: The Supreme Court and the Federal Government must be terrorists, for they hate our freedom.

Anonymous said...

Republicans always supported torture, and Democrats always pretend they don't, even though they do.
The supreme court is just reflecting the hatred and denial that infect our political process.
The USA is a sick diseased nation on its last legs, desperate and dangerous.

Post a Comment