Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Genetically Modified Nature: GM Salmon Under Attack By Concerned Experts

Mike Barrett
Activist Post

The approval of genetically modified salmon has been a controversial issue for quite some time now, and the heat surrounding the altered fish isn’t dying down.

Recently three United States consumer groups petitioned the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to enforce a more strict and rigorous review process for the genetically modified fish than is currently in place.

The FDA needs to realize that many people simply do not want to knowingly consume this toxic creation. 

Consumer Groups Call for Genetically Modified Salmon to be Classified as ‘Food Additive’

A new genetically modified animal hybrid known as genetically modified salmon ignited great concern in September of 2010 due to its threat to human health and the environment. While consumer groups and activists have (and still are) attempting to at the very least require labeling of the frankenfish, government agencies such as the United States Department of Agriculture have been pushing for its approval.

The FDA currently classifies the genetically altered salmon to be a new animal drug for the approval process, but the new petition put forth by some consumer groups calls for the fish to be classified as a food additive instead – causing it to go through a much more rigorous process of FDA review and approval.


Consumer groups Food & Water Watch, Consumers Union, and the Center for Food Safety state in their petition that the genetic engineering process drastically alters the composition as well as nutritional value, causing the fish to be a food additive. This change would in turn make it more difficult to approve the salmon as safe, and therefore further protect public health. Given the numerous studies showing that genetically modified organisms threaten your health, this is the least the FDA could possibly do.

The Food & Water Watch received internal documents and emails from the U.S. Department of Interior’s Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) which exposed shocking concerns with AquaBounty’s genetically modified salmon not so long ago. Some of the information within the documents revealed that the FDA did not consult with both FWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to determine whether or not the genetically modified fish would impact wild, endangered Atlantic salmon. By not consulting with these groups, the FDA dodged requirements under the Endangered Species Act which was signed into law in the '70s in order to protect animal species from extinction.

According to Reuters,
Food & Water Watch Executive Director Wenonah Hauter said the company’s own study showed that genetically engineered salmon may contain increased levels of a hormone linked to breast, colon, prostate and lung cancer.
Although the approval of AquaBounty’s salmon was once blocked by the U.S. House of Representatives, it seems the push for approval is still hitting hard. If this salmon is approved, it will be the first genetically engineered animal to appear on your dinner plate (and you may not even know it). 

Explore More:
  1. Genetically Modified Salmon Approval Pushed by USDA with Nearly $500,000 Funding
  2. Congress Bans FDA from Approving Genetically Modified ‘Franken’ Salmon
  3. Troubling Emails Reveal Federal Scientists Fear FDA Approval of Genetically Modified Salmon
  4. New Genetically Modified Creation Threatens Health, Environment
  5. Genetically Modified Potatoes: Scientists Unleash New Monster
  6. As Predicted, FDA Will Not Require Labeling of GM Salmon
This article first appeared at Natural Society, an excellent resource for health news and vaccine information. 

Read other articles by Mike Barrett here.

Non GMO Heirloom Seed Bank

BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

3 comments:

c.w.scamman said...

The FDA needs to realize that many people simply do not want to knowingly consume this toxic creation.

Oh, but they DO realize this fact. That is why they insist that all GMOs are essentially the same as the original product and refuse to label them for what they are. The lesson was learned from Europe and the corporate controlled FDA will have none of that here!

Anonymous said...

I think the purpose of GM salmon in Britain - and all the evidence points towards it - was to put out of business many small boat owners and firms who provided the real salmon and other fish, then capture the market as a conglomerate and have the monopoly to introduce whatever prices and practises they wanted.
Another problem in farmed fish which was less prevalent in wild stocks was the rapid spread of parasites and diseases.

Anonymous said...

it's all about the $$$$$$$$ they don't care what happens to us pee on's we are guinea pigs in their sordid experiments.

Post a Comment