Activist Post
How would you react if I were to tell you that you or your child were forced to participate in experimental vaccine trials?
A paper published by the American Medical Association’s Virtual Mentor wants to do just that.
It seems that the amount of current participants in current experimental vaccine trials is a bit too low, so why not create a federal law forcing each person to need to “opt-out” of experimental vaccine trials in an attempt to better society?
AMA Proposes Law ‘Forcing’ Individuals to Participate in Experimental Vaccine Trials
The proposed law is lunacy, to say the least, stating that individuals must make a “mandated choice” to participate in such experimental trials. People shouldn’t be automatically enrolled in experimental trials or need to state in advance their decision to “opt-out”.
Along with the law will come a customer list for big pharma, where each participant’s information will be shared with the pharmaceutical companies in order to gather trial and field test data.
Of course this isn’t so different from how things operate now, where individuals are enrolled into big pharma’s database even if you exempt your child from vaccination. But if big pharma can’t produce enough positive data from those who actually want to volunteer for introducing a new product to the FDA for approval, they may just try to force people to participate or use a segment of the population that is ignorant to the laws surrounding the trials.
What happens if these experimental vaccines cause harm?
There are laws already set in place that essentially give vaccine manufacturers immunity to legal repercussions. That is to say that if your child is harmed from a vaccine, the vaccine manufacturers are not financially or morally responsible. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 protects vaccine manufacturers from any liability.
Another example of similar medical and political tyranny is when a document was signed by Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, where both vaccine makers and federal officials were granted complete legal immunity from any repercussions — regardless of whether or not the case is valid. Signed in July of 2009 by Sebelius, the document drew upon the provisions of a law signed in 2006 created for public emergencies. Granting swine flu vaccine makers legal protection, and establishing a compensation fund, the legislation allows for vaccine makers to virtually disregard consumer safety.
 |
| Advertisement |
What would even happen if there were complications in future trials?
Going by past history with other experimental vaccines, severe complications would probably just be hidden. The controversial trials of experimental AIDS vaccines that led to the loss of innocent lives have already been ignored by mainstream scientists and reporters. Even the scientists responsible for the deaths covered up the situation, failing to report the fatalities of their trials in order to prevent the public from finding out.
Giving big pharma a guaranteed customer list of individuals, while simultaneously giving them immunity from lawsuits is quite the deal. Through activism and spreading the word, hopefully such a deal will not be made.
Explore More:
- AIDS Vaccine Coming Soon | Experimental Vaccine Led to Censored Deaths
- Vaccine Makers Immune to Legal Repercussions
- Vaccine Information Week Starts Today, October 1st
- Genetically Modified HIV Vaccine Approved – Human Tests to Begin Shortly
- Scientists Announce a ‘Super Antibody’ Universal Flu Vaccine
- Institute of Medicine Admits Vaccine Dangers After Review
 |
| Advertisement |
BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW
8 comments:
Maybe we should make the injectors, inject themselves! Maybe the politicians kids and grandchildren should be the first ones to be injected!
perhaps these lame excuses for people will offer up their own children or their own bodies for these experiments, hm? can't have mine, sorry. i'm disengaging.
Please review the following articles:
http://tinyurl.com/88w88rp
http://tinyurl.com/7exftxv
Then let the CDC go first, the doctors and nurses second.
Everyone else opts out.
I want the new law to state that those who produced and are testing the new drug must be the first to submit to Experimental Vaccine Trials.
"mandated choice" har, har, har...
So is it mandated, or do I have a choice? Can't be both.
Every time the topic of mandated vaccinations com up, you find that the doctors and nurses refuse to take the vaccines they try to push on the rest of us, and I don't blame them.
I was forced to read "Nudge" by Cass Sundstein for a college course (indoctrination). He's the current darling of those who just think the world would be a much better place if we would only do what they say.
Opting out is on of the central tenants of this philosophy. That is to say, make is more difficult for people to not do what authorities want them to do. Along with that idea, they want to limit your choices so that instead of choosing one of infinity, you are choosing one of a very few that they also support.
Wow, that sounds kinda like the American Election System doesn't it?
Anyway, when I pressed the professor about what if one does not want to choose one of the "approved options" he was forced to admit that is when authorities would use force, "For their own good"
THE DRUG CABAL AND THE GOVERNMENT IS OUT TO KILL YOU!!! UN AGENDA 21 IN ACTION!!!!!
This all sounds like Inside Job of Wall street crossed with Germ warfare.
Post a Comment