Washington’s “Topic du Jour”: Anonymous Claim Against Judge Brett Kavanaugh

Op-Ed by Catherine J. Frompovich

Are the current accusations “coming out of the woodwork” regarding sexual harassment that occurred umpteen years ago akin to shouting “Fire” in a crowded venue when, in reality, there is NO fire?

Furthermore, if some of such accusations were, in fact, “true,” normally they could not be prosecuted because the statute of limitations timelines involved.  So what’s up?

First and foremost, I do not criticize – but certainly admire – women who have the moral integrity to come forward and make their claims with full disclosure, especially their REAL LEGAL names, the calendar date(s) of the ‘happenstance(s)’ involved, and provide a notarized, written statement, plus be agreeable to taking a lie detector test.  Those types of sexual harassment reports should be considered legitimate and also be required by agencies and law enforcement.

Why?  Anything else, I think, ought to be considered in the light of many possible reasons, including “gotcha,” “get even,” or possibly to become “last chance strategies” used to destroy political opponents, such as may be the case in the Judge Brett Kavanaugh hearings.

That would include members of Congress who ‘sat’ upon incriminating information for months, but not take it in to the public forum!  They, too, ought to be questioned as to their actions and reasons for taking them.   Yes; No?

Furthermore, it is my opinion if investigative reporters were to dig into most politicians past, current members of Congress past, or most teens growing up past actions, when hormones take over rational thinking, there would be untold numbers of #MeToo reports that would crash websites, and literally take down most communication routes between those reporting such harassments and the agencies taking reports.

Aren’t there realistic and legal differences between asking for, alluding to, or sexual indiscretion ‘persuasions’ from actual implementation, performance and penetration—especially during teenage years?  Hey, states now are willing to let teens who performed real crimes get out of jail and have their criminal records expunged so they can find work and become taxpayers again! [1,2,3,4,5]

What’s with the Judge Kavanaugh accusations?

As someone who values transparency, I think when a person refuses to identify him- or herself and stands behind the “Anonymous” pseudonym, their accusations ought to be suspect and given the least amount of credibility everywhere, especially in the press, which is considered the “public town square.”

Download Your First Issue Free!
Do You Want to Learn How to Become Financially Independent, Make a Living Without a Traditional Job & Finally Live Free?

Download Your Free Copy of Counter Markets
Issue: Trends & Strategies for Maximum Freedom

The National Law Journal published “#MeToo Whistleblower Lawyer Makes Waves in Washington – It’s been a busy time for Debra Katz, the D.C. attorney identified as representing the letter-writer roiling Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation this week,” which I think describes the situation I’m trying to point out, and ought to become a classical textbook case in sexual harassment ethics and law.

What do you think?

Fox News now reports this: “Who is Christine Blasey Ford, the professor who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct?”

References:

[1] https://www.shouselaw.com/expunge-criminal-records.html
[2] https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/news/2017/04/07/430095/six-states-leading-charge-second-chance-policies/
[3] https://www.heraldmailmedia.com/news/local/new-law-allows-more-md-criminal-records-to-be-wiped/article_6d2cd31e-6c93-11e6-a01a-2345b0bfac78.html
[4] https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/sealing-juvenile-court-records-32228.html
[5] https://www.recordgone.com/expungement-pennsylvania/summary-offense-expungement/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI-PTRzcDC3QIVBQaGCh1cNQ2aEAMYASAAEgLmYvD_BwE

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available.

Image credit


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

23 Comments on "Washington’s “Topic du Jour”: Anonymous Claim Against Judge Brett Kavanaugh"

  1. Well she has identified herself and while this is way past time to charge him and timing of revelation is obviously to stall the vote; consider the more important facts. The republicans; who complained bitterly when they wanted more time to read documents and vet democratic candidates[which they received], have tried to hide pertinent info about this judge from the Bush administration[and torture]; threatened Senator Booker with expulsion for exposing Judge Kavannah’s emails and not given the opposition any time to read thousands of pages of documents to let there be a fair review because they want to rush the process. This man is a bigot [treatment of Hawaiian & Alaskan natives]
    mysogynist [will overturn Roe v Wade] and his fellow judges have written that he constantly interprets the law to suit his preferred outcomes. Appears he may also have a gambling problems. Most importantly his published writings show that he does not believe a sitting president can or should be prosecuted if he commits a crime!!!

    • Dear CAWS,
      Please provide links to support your statements about Mr. Kavanaugh.

      The people want to know.

      • well how about prosecuting a failed presidential candidate for HER crimes?
        You libtards are so anxious that Kavenaugh just might overturn Roe v Wade ( a crime of a law if ever there was one) & your right to kill babies in child sacrifice (which is exactly what abortion is) that you will go to any lengths to kill his prospects of bringing some balance back to the the very Liberal heavy Supreme Court after the mysterious death of Judge Scalia.

      • Why should CAWS do all the work towards educating you, when 1) clearly, you all have access to the internet, 2) can type & query, and 3) will likely dismiss any news you don’t like as “fake news?” Why bother?

        • Thank you . All Pedro has to do is watch the hearings which have been televised for days; even though they take place during the day when most will be at work. Tape it or play back on internet.

  2. Never Democrat again | September 17, 2018 at 10:13 pm | Reply

    This is straight out of the Democrats dirty tricks book 101!
    they did the same thing to Trump remember?
    Agenda, Agenda, Agenda written all over it.
    so disgusting, so vile!
    Is this all they can come up with?
    Im so disgusted with the degradation of the Democratic Party. The blatant lies, corruption, deceit, underhandedness, the false accusations & the collusion. Have they reached the bottom of the barrel yet?
    only time will tell.
    But after all this ill never vote Democrat again.

    • Hypocrisy much? What of Mitch McConnell’s refusal to vote on Merrick Garland, in 2016? (Who, btw, didn’t sexually assault a woman in the 1980s. Unlike “some” people.)

      I might respect Slowflakes like you more (or at all) if time and time again you folks didn’t just dish it out, so to speak, but could “take it,” too. Instead, the majority of you just puff, whine, and cry victim the moment the news doesn’t suit you, or when anyone from your little gang of Rethuglicans gets called out on bad behavior — have some dignity, for once!

  3. Rather slow in the uptick, eh? Christine Blasey Ford’s name was out there a while before this article was regurgitated – I mean, “published” here on September 17th. But, that’s what you get when you source Faux news…

  4. I was raped! by uhh by some one some where during some summer some years ago. Another slap in the face to ligit rape victims.
    Must be Kavanaugh…NOT!
    More b.s from the demoncRats.
    Nancy, Maxine, Feinstein you should all resign. Your each trying to out loon the other.

    • Thank you for treating us all to a heaping helping of crazy, comrade sallyM. In the meantime/on the bright side to all this, it’s “fun” (disgusting) and helpful for people everywhere to find out who the rape apologists are among us.

  5. AdministratorMMM | September 18, 2018 at 9:44 am | Reply

    Additional info from Catherine for consideration:

    One of the attorneys with whom I network read my Op-Ed regarding the Judge Brett Kavanaugh “last minute sexual accusations,” and forwarded me a breaking story that, if true, proves reality can be more interesting than fiction.

    The article appears on Your News Wire.com and is titled “Breaking: Kavanaugh Accuser’s Brother’s Firm Linked To Fusion GPS.”

    Holy moly! What kind of monkey-wrench does that throw into the mix by apparent Leftist interference?

    The first and second paragraphs of the above breaking story read as follows:

    “Christine Blasey-Ford, the 51-year-old woman who has come out of the woodwork at the last minute, accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her as a teenager, has a brother who worked for a law firm that later retained Fusion GPS, the primary “fixer” for the Clintons and the DNC.

    “Ralph Blasey, brother of Christine Blasey-Ford, worked for 15 years as a Litigation Partner for Baker Hostetler, a law firm that ended up retaining Fusion GPS (https://archive.fo/bGxQf#selection-847.111-847.213), the infamous D.C. company that produced the unverified Steele dossier on President Donald Trump and Russia, sparking the whole Russian collusion investigation.

    [….]

    And Fusion GPS, the company that produced the infamous Steele dossier on President Donald Trump and Russia, was also retained by Baker Hostetler amid the Prevezon litigation.”

    Source: https://yournewswire.com/kavqanaugh-accuser-brother-fusion-gps/

    As they say in many a mystery novel, “The plot thickens.”

    Judge Brett Kavanaugh and his “last minute, out of the woodwork” accuser, Christine Blasey-Ford, have their day to appear before a congressional inquiry committee Monday, September 24, 2018. Will that become a repeat of the infamous Anita Hill / Thomas Clarence accusation [1] fiasco of 1991?

    Reference:

    [1] http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/122/hill/hillframe.htm

    • Ah, I see my mistake now. I thought this article was going to be one of activistpost’s non-biased, non-politically motivated postings. Instead, this can be thrown in the “crazy lunes still hung up on Hillary/angry that the rest of sane America didn’t just fall in line with President Bonespurs” bin; really, it’s my bad (and a disappointment on my part) for reading, commenting on, or expecting intelligent discourse and analysis from a post originating in Trump camp — we should all know better by now.

  6. Sure appears to be a liar – as a previous victim (from High School, and yes I remember who, when, where and all those I told) we all know that victims never forget — but she sure has a hard time remembering anything. Then working with crazy Feinstein who calculatingly kept this vital information for months..?) what a joke on the USA and especially for women and victims. She is putting respect and credibility for women worldwide back in the closet. The fact that she’s in the mental health field speaks volumes.

    • All I hear from you are implications, insinuations, and conflagrations — “victims never forget but she had a hard time remembering,” “the fact that she’s in the mental health field speaks volumes,” etc. You sound stressed, like you have already been her judge and jury and you’ve decided what’s up? You also sound unprepared for the possible reality that this man – though a respected man – may have sexually assaulted a woman and then (gasp!) lied about it.

      So, naturally I am curious: what’s your skin in this game? Why so petulant? What’s at risk for you, personally, that you would rather cruelly malign the possible victim of a sexual assault?

      • I sound stressed??? What are you on? Haha amazing..
        I’m prepared for all possibilities & sharing my very educated opinion is in no way petulant. If you ever wondered what petulant is, look at your comments on this posts once faced with the ridiculousness of the charges after this much time with few memories — oh and she’s a Trump hater and her brother worked for a company connected to the Clinton’s – oops… crawling to your safe space yet? My skin in this obvious game as you put it as it is a political GAME — is the skin of a previous victim and one who’s worked with many other victims of sexual and domestic abuse. This is disrespectful to all those who’ve truly suffered.

        • Interesting, thanks for sharing. Based on your comments before – “we all know that victims never forget,” “what a joke on the USA and for women and victims,” plus “the fact that she’s in the mental health field speaks volumes” I would never have guessed towards your purported “previous victim[hood]” or that you allegedly work/worked with other victims/survivors of sexual assault. (Myself, as the survivor of a rape I didn’t report at the time it happened – too scared, too traumatized – I suppose I’m now grateful YOU weren’t eventually my councilor, as it sounds like you might have shamed or harassed me for going into a prolonged period or shock and then, eventually seeking therapy to get through some parts of it — I mean, if my experience maligned with your personal politics, Paige!) (Good God/God bless! If that’s your attitude while relatively anonymous, online, I can only imagine that the people around you irl are motivated to conform!)

          SO, if you’re still reading/I haven’t lost ya yet, here: your comments have left me with two pressing questions, “Paige”: 1) In what capacity do you claim to work with victims of sexual assault? (Position/title, job description, etc.), and 2) Which organization or, if you’re exceptionally brave, facility are you at?

          I want to know, specifically so other victims like you and me can be aware to stay far, far away from you, lest they be led astray by your “council.” You sound damaging to others, and far more misogynistic than I would ever expect a helper, let alone a survivor, regarding sexual assault. Very disappointing, Paige. ~CP

          • You are an obviously attempting to bully, which I do not accept, and you are spending so much time rewriting what’s been said, over and over. Why can’t you accept that she could very well be lying and have an agenda? One that may be connected to the fact she works closely with the abortion industry and may fear less public funding for such, which would affect her grants and funding if Kavanaugh is approved – whom she didn’t feel the need to try and block all these years he’s been practicing and advising presidents. I’m done with you, where’s your outrage for all the victims of the left?

          • Chelsea Poole | September 21, 2018 at 9:28 am |

            No, I just don’t accept your authority. Why can’t you accept that an overwhelming majority of women who experience sexual assault don’t come forward, if at all, until years later. You use straw man arguments, and Fundamentalist Christian confabulations in place of having real opinions/something to say. To me, and others like me, this automatically disqualifies you as a serious person; as such, I simply ask you do humankind a favor and keep your contamination to others like yourself who’ve submitted to that nonsense, but far FAR away from public policy. (Separation of church and state: It’s fine that you believe in your invisible whatever, but it doesn’t belong in laws for the rest of us.)

          • no, that’s not what I’ve done at all. still bullying I see. Opposing views seem to be poisonous to you and now you try to disqualify me as a serious person? seriously C, you have no idea of my religion or politics yet you try to use them against me. what an abusive way to discus issues. icky..

  7. Looks like this Ford should be charged with intentional sexual assault and extortion of a public official.

  8. I’l just say it, Christine Ford is a liar.
    This is all last minute crap from the communists.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*