Pentagon Seeks $300 Million in Weapons for 65,000 US-Backed Forces in Syria

By Jason Ditz

While US “relief funds” are frozen in Syria, the Pentagon continues to seek massive amounts of funding for its military operations in the country. This includes a request for $300 million in weapons to give to “partner forces” in Syria.

This amounts to enough arms for 65,000 fighters. This is expected to center on the Syrian Democratic Forces, which is to say, almost entirely the Kurdish YPG. The US has been arming the YPG for years now as part of its Syria operations.

This is being sought in spite of repeated US assurances to Turkey that their arming of the YPG was temporary. With ISIS virtually wiped out in Syria, the YPG no longer has offensive goals fitting into US plans for Syria, and rather is focused chiefly on fighting a Turkish invasion of northern Syria.

The $300 million in arms also comes with $250 million in “border security” funding for Syria. Both are going into the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), which Pentagon officials can easily shuffle around to spend on virtually anything.

While couched as “Counter-ISIS” funding, the funding looks more likely to be backing the YPG in fighting Turkey. While the US is unlikely to fund fighting against another NATO ally, it may also be this is just another excuse to grow the OCO.

By Jason Ditz / Republished with permission / ANTIWAR.COM / Report a typo

Image credit: TFTP

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

3 Comments on "Pentagon Seeks $300 Million in Weapons for 65,000 US-Backed Forces in Syria"

  1. Yeah lets give more US weapons to people we will eventually have to fight.

  2. Why don’t they just use the trillions of $ that was disappeared there?
    If they can’t keep track of that why give them more. Let them find all the money that they “ misplaced”. if this is a genuine need then they will have a powerful motivation to do so & keep track of future expenditure too.
    Otherwise there are plenty of other things the US can spend money on that will be better used & accounted for.

Leave a comment