Model Cell Phone And Wireless Safety Legislation Every U.S. State Should Enact

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Finally, at least one state, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, has seen the need for and merits of corrective legislation regarding cell phone and wireless safety legislation. As such, five extremely impressive bills have been introduced in 2017 which every state should copy and enact to safeguard the health, safety and wellbeing of citizens in view of the overwhelming impact of ubiquitous exposures to wireless radiation coming at consumers from all sides.

According to the website Electromagnetic Radiation Safety, these are the bills Massachusetts legislators had the good sense and fortitude to introduce:

S.107 would require manufacturers’ RF safety information to be plainly visible on cell phone product packaging or direct customers to safety notifications within the user manual including information pertaining to RF radiation exposure, compliance with RF regulatory requirements, and the minimum separation distance between the device and the person’s body.

S.108 would require the following language to appear on cell phone product packaging:

“To assure safety, the Federal Government requires that cell phones meet radio frequency (RF) exposure guidelines. If you carry or use your phone in a pocket or the phone is otherwise in contact with your body when the phone is on and connected to a wireless network, you may exceed the federal guidelines for exposure to RF radiation. Refer to the instructions in your phone or user manual for information about how to use your phone safely.”

This notification is required by the model cell phone “right to know” ordinance that was adopted in 2015 in Berkeley, California. The Berkeley ordinance allows the retailer the option to post the notice in the store or place it on cell phone packages.

  1. 1268 would create a commission to study the health impacts of electromagnetic fields (EMF). The commission will review non-industry funded science on the health impacts of all sources of EMF on reproductive systems, brain function including memory loss, diminished learning, performance impairment in children, headaches and neurodegenerative conditions, melatonin suppression and sleep disorders, fatigue, hormonal imbalances, immune dysregulation such as allergic and inflammatory responses, cardiac and blood pressure problems, genotoxic effects like miscarriage, cancers such as childhood leukemia, and childhood and adult brain tumors.The commission will study whether EMF has a disparate impact on potentially vulnerable subgroups including children, fetuses, pregnant women, the elderly and those with pre-existing illnesses or impairments. The commission will investigate whether children are more vulnerable.The commission will file a report by July 31, 2018, and recommend legislation needed to protect public health including a recommendation on whether children’s EMF (including Wi-Fi) exposure in schools should be eliminated or reduced. No commission member shall have a financial conflict of interest.

S.1864 would give residents the right to keep non-RF-emitting water, gas and electrical meters instead of “smart” utility meters without having to pay extra fees. Ratepayers will have the right to request that utility companies remove wireless meters and install electromechanical analog meters that emit no RF radiation.

H.2030 would require the state government to develop best practices and guidance for the purchase and installation of wireless internet service in public schools, colleges and universities. The guidelines would prioritize practices that protect the health and safety of students and staff.

Source

My sincerest thanks to Professor Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, for this information and all he does to advance safety regarding electromagnetics, cell phone and wireless radiation issues business, industry, and government agencies are lax to implement and enforce.

Wouldn’t it become a fantastic nationwide consumer and grassroots initiative if everyone were to ask their respective legislators to introduce similar legislation into each of the fifty United States?

RFID Scan Blockers – Available for Free (Ad)



Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

6 Comments on "Model Cell Phone And Wireless Safety Legislation Every U.S. State Should Enact"

  1. Coming in way late on this one, but thank you, Catherine. However, to the question, “Wouldn’t it become a fantastic nationwide consumer and grassroots initiative if everyone were to ask their respective legislators to introduce similar legislation into each of the fifty United States?” the answer, with the exception of S.1864, is a respectful but emphatic “No!”

    The reason is that S.107, S.108, and H.2030 fail to convey the whole truth about wireless systems, and instead attempt only to encourage the impossible, namely the safe (as opposed to “safer”) use of poisonous cell phones—failing, by the way, to include other wireless toys just as dangerous if not more, such as tablets, computers, games, and mice. Not to mention the towers/antennas, which bathe everything 24/7 in pathogenic energy, no matter how carefully you use your toys (see below for S.1268).

    There is no such thing as safe use. The Federal Government is LYING. In re 107&8, the Federal safety guidelines referred to are based only upon tissue-heating effects, whereas no safety studies were acknowledged or required by the Federal Government on long-term, non-thermal exposures. Where the danger lies, this aspect was summarily (conveniently) dismissed out of hand at the time (c. 1983 or so), despite the existence of a huge volume of peer-reviewed scientific papers, beginning in the 1950’s, showing harm from power levels thousands and millions of times lower than current “safe” levels. as you no doubt know, up to 2012, 4000 of these were summarized, collated and referenced in the “BioInitiative Report 2012.”

    H.2030 is a travesty since it implies that there are safe “practices and guidance for the purchase and installation of wireless internet service in public schools, colleges and universities.” Note the clever language that assumes continuing use: “best practices…” If the word “safe” were used in place of “best,” the statement would be totally erroneous, instead of mostly erroneous. So the implication is that we’ll imagine we’re harming everyone and the environment acceptably so we can continue to indulge wireless insanity.

    S.1268 is a problem for not demanding a moratorium, or in not issuing a very strong warning to the people, while the commission validates for itself what is already known. Meanwhile, for one thing, females, including fetuses, children and adults, will have ongoing irreparable damage done to the DNA in their ovarian follicles, as we pussy-foot around waiting for a commission http://www.mast-victims.org/resources/docs/WiFi-a-Thalidomide-in-the-making-who-cares.pdf

    Though all the bills purport to protect us precious humans, the larger truth is that all life is affected, with smaller species most susceptible, such as bees and other insects. In the last 27 years, there has been a 75% decline in insect numbers. Any connection? But few if any are asking what right we have to engender such destruction for money, convenience and fun. Nor are any individuals but one (Barrie Trower, PHD) pointing out that this technology was not developed for telecom, but as a stealth weapon for inducing illness. That is what’s standing in our midst.

    One of the most potentially significant effects, shown in some of the thousands of willfully ignored scientific papers of the last 60 years, is one that promises to end all effects – the termination of human reproduction.

    The three-part bottom line is: 1) There is no safe dose of information-carrying microwave radiation as it is configured for telecom – period; 2) if studies existing at the time of the original wireless rollout were taken honestly into account, the technology never would have gotten off the ground; and 3) the only solution that will save the ecosystem and humanity is industry shutdown.

    Finally, Professor Moskowitz is aware of these facts. He said to me in an email 8/18/15, among other things, “The goal is harm reduction.” I replied, among other things, “No, too much is at stake. We must have a moratorium, then research, then the decision whether or not to resume.” But he and his international entourage of 235 signers of the “International Scientist Appeal on Electromagnetic Fields & Wireless Technology” to the WHO and the UN prefer to appeal to officially deaf organizations for “…more protective exposure guidelines for EMF and wireless technology in the face of increasing evidence of health risks.” Whereas, I suggested that “…people have the power to reject the system. Yes, they will have to break a most difficult addiction. But this challenge will be made easier if only YOU FOLKS will tell the whole truth at these forums, as described in this email thread, rather than saying, in effect, we can live with this poison. That hypothesis isn’t even based on the existing science, but rather on a ‘hope’ that making adjustments will make the total of damage and losses acceptable.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cczGVhd63pM

  2. Coming in way late on this one, but thank you, Catherine. However, to the question, “Wouldn’t it become a fantastic nationwide consumer and grassroots initiative if everyone were to ask their respective legislators to introduce similar legislation into each of the fifty United States?” the answer, with the exception of S.1864, is a respectful but emphatic “No!”

    The reason is that S.107, S.108, and H.2030 fail to convey the whole truth about wireless systems, and instead attempt only to encourage the impossible, namely the safe (as opposed to “safer”) use of poisonous cell phones—failing, by the way, to include other wireless toys just as dangerous if not more, such as tablets, computers, games, and mice. Not to mention the towers/antennas, which bathe everything 24/7 in pathogenic energy, no matter how carefully you use your toys (see below for S.1268).

    There is no such thing as safe use. The Federal Government is LYING. In re 107&8, the Federal safety guidelines referred to are based only upon tissue-heating effects, whereas no safety studies were acknowledged or required by the Federal Government on long-term, non-thermal exposures. Where the danger lies, this aspect was summarily (conveniently) dismissed out of hand at the time (c. 1983 or so), despite the existence of a huge volume of peer-reviewed scientific papers, beginning in the 1950’s, showing harm from power levels thousands and millions of times lower than current “safe” levels. as you no doubt know, up to 2012, 4000 of these were summarized, collated and referenced in the “BioInitiative Report 2012.”

    H.2030 is a travesty since it implies that there are safe “practices and guidance for the purchase and installation of wireless internet service in public schools, colleges and universities.” Note the clever language that assumes continuing use: “best practices…” If the word “safe” were used in place of “best,” the statement would be totally erroneous, instead of mostly erroneous. So the implication is that we’ll imagine we’re harming everyone and the environment acceptably so we can continue to indulge wireless insanity.

    S.1268 is a problem for not demanding a moratorium, or in not issuing a very strong warning to the people, while the commission validates for itself what is already known. Meanwhile, for one thing, females, including fetuses, children and adults, will have ongoing irreparable damage done to the DNA in their ovarian follicles, as we pussy-foot around waiting for a commission http://www.mast-victims.org/resources/docs/WiFi-a-Thalidomide-in-the-making-who-cares.pdf

    Though all the bills purport to protect us precious humans, the larger truth is that all life is affected, with smaller species most susceptible, such as bees and other insects. In the last 27 years, there has been a 75% decline in insect numbers. Any connection? But few if any are asking what right we have to engender such destruction for money, convenience and fun. Nor are any individuals but one (Barrie Trower, PHD) pointing out that this technology was not developed for telecom, but as a stealth weapon for inducing illness. That is what’s standing in our midst.

    One of the most potentially significant effects, shown in some of the thousands of willfully ignored scientific papers of the last 60 years, is one that promises to end all effects – the termination of human reproduction.

    The three-part bottom line is: 1) There is no safe dose of information-carrying microwave radiation as it is configured for telecom – period; 2) if studies existing at the time of the original wireless rollout were taken honestly into account, the technology never would have gotten off the ground; and 3) the only solution that will save the ecosystem and humanity is industry shutdown.

    Finally, Professor Moskowitz is aware of these facts. He said to me in an email 8/18/15, among other things, “The goal is harm reduction.” I replied, among other things, “No, too much is at stake. We must have a moratorium, then research, then the decision whether or not to resume.” But he and his international entourage of 235 signers of the “International Scientist Appeal on Electromagnetic Fields & Wireless Technology” to the WHO and the UN prefer to appeal to officially deaf organizations for “…more protective exposure guidelines for EMF and wireless technology in the face of increasing evidence of health risks.” Whereas, I suggested that “…people have the power to reject the system. Yes, they will have to break a most difficult addiction. But this challenge will be made easier if only YOU FOLKS will tell the whole truth at these forums, as described in this email thread, rather than saying, in effect, we can live with this poison. That hypothesis isn’t even based on the existing science, but rather on a ‘hope’ that making adjustments will make the total of damage and losses acceptable.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cczGVhd63pM

  3. Coming in way late on this one, but thank you, Catherine. However, to the question, “Wouldn’t it become a fantastic nationwide consumer and grassroots initiative if everyone were to ask their respective legislators to introduce similar legislation into each of the fifty United States?” the answer, with the exception of S.1864, is a respectful but emphatic “No!”

    The reason is that S.107, S.108, and H.2030 fail to convey the whole truth about wireless systems, and instead attempt only to encourage the impossible, namely the safe (as opposed to “safer”) use of poisonous cell phones—failing, by the way, to include other wireless toys just as dangerous if not more, such as tablets, computers, games, and mice. Not to mention the towers/antennas, which bathe everything 24/7 in pathogenic energy, no matter how carefully you use your toys (see below for S.1268).

    There is no such thing as safe use. The Federal Government is LYING. In re 107&8, the Federal safety guidelines referred to are based only upon tissue-heating effects, whereas no safety studies were acknowledged or required by the Federal Government on long-term, non-thermal exposures. Where the danger lies, this aspect was summarily (conveniently) dismissed out of hand at the time (c. 1983 or so), despite the existence of a huge volume of peer-reviewed scientific papers, beginning in the 1950’s, showing harm from power levels thousands and millions of times lower than current “safe” levels. as you no doubt know, up to 2012, 4000 of these were summarized, collated and referenced in the “BioInitiative Report 2012.”

    H.2030 is a travesty since it implies that there are safe “practices and guidance for the purchase and installation of wireless internet service in public schools, colleges and universities.” Note the clever language that assumes continuing use: “best practices…” If the word “safe” were used in place of “best,” the statement would be totally erroneous, instead of mostly erroneous. So the implication is that we’ll imagine we’re harming everyone and the environment acceptably so we can continue to indulge wireless insanity.

    S.1268 is a problem for not demanding a moratorium, or in not issuing a very strong warning to the people, while the commission validates for itself what is already known. Meanwhile, for one thing, females, including fetuses, children and adults, will have ongoing irreparable damage done to the DNA in their ovarian follicles, as we pussy-foot around waiting for a commission http://www.mast-victims.org/resources/docs/WiFi-a-Thalidomide-in-the-making-who-cares.pdf

    Though all the bills purport to protect us precious humans, the larger truth is that all life is affected, with smaller species most susceptible, such as bees and other insects. In the last 27 years, there has been a 75% decline in insect numbers. Any connection? But few if any are asking what right we have to engender such destruction for money, convenience and fun. Nor are any individuals but one (Barrie Trower, PHD) pointing out that this technology was not developed for telecom, but as a stealth weapon for inducing illness. That is what’s standing in our midst.

    One of the most potentially significant effects, shown in some of the thousands of willfully ignored scientific papers of the last 60 years, is one that promises to end all effects – the termination of human reproduction.

    The three-part bottom line is: 1) There is no safe dose of information-carrying microwave radiation as it is configured for telecom – period; 2) if studies existing at the time of the original wireless rollout were taken honestly into account, the technology never would have gotten off the ground; and 3) the only solution that will save the ecosystem and humanity is industry shutdown.

    Finally, Professor Moskowitz is aware of these facts. He said to me in an email 8/18/15, among other things, “The goal is harm reduction.” I replied, among other things, “No, too much is at stake. We must have a moratorium, then research, then the decision whether or not to resume.” But he and his international entourage of 235 signers of the “International Scientist Appeal on Electromagnetic Fields & Wireless Technology” to the WHO and the UN prefer to appeal to officially deaf organizations for “…more protective exposure guidelines for EMF and wireless technology in the face of increasing evidence of health risks.” Whereas, I suggested that “…people have the power to reject the system. Yes, they will have to break a most difficult addiction. But this challenge will be made easier if only YOU FOLKS will tell the whole truth at these forums, as described in this email thread, rather than saying, in effect, we can live with this poison. That hypothesis isn’t even based on the existing science, but rather on a ‘hope’ that making adjustments will make the total of damage and losses acceptable.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cczGVhd63pM

  4. Coming in way late on this one, but thank you, Catherine. However, to the question, “Wouldn’t it become a fantastic nationwide consumer and grassroots initiative if everyone were to ask their respective legislators to introduce similar legislation into each of the fifty United States?” the answer, with the exception of S.1864, is a respectful but emphatic “No!”

    The reason is that S.107, S.108, and H.2030 fail to convey the whole truth about wireless systems, and instead attempt only to encourage the impossible, namely the safe (as opposed to “safer”) use of poisonous cell phones—failing, by the way, to include other wireless toys just as dangerous if not more, such as tablets, computers, games, and mice. Not to mention the towers/antennas, which bathe everything 24/7 in pathogenic energy, no matter how carefully you use your toys (see below for S.1268).

    There is no such thing as safe use. The Federal Government is LYING. In re 107&8, the Federal safety guidelines referred to are based only upon tissue-heating effects, whereas no safety studies were acknowledged or required by the Federal Government on long-term, non-thermal exposures. Where the danger lies, this aspect was summarily (conveniently) dismissed out of hand at the time (c. 1983 or so), despite the existence of a huge volume of peer-reviewed scientific papers, beginning in the 1950’s, showing harm from power levels thousands and millions of times lower than current “safe” levels. as you no doubt know, up to 2012, 4000 of these were summarized, collated and referenced in the “BioInitiative Report 2012.”

    H.2030 is a travesty since it implies that there are safe “practices and guidance for the purchase and installation of wireless internet service in public schools, colleges and universities.” Note the clever language that assumes continuing use: “best practices…” If the word “safe” were used in place of “best,” the statement would be totally erroneous, instead of mostly erroneous. So the implication is that we’ll imagine we’re harming everyone and the environment acceptably so we can continue to indulge wireless insanity.

    S.1268 is a problem for not demanding a moratorium, or in not issuing a very strong warning to the people, while the commission validates for itself what is already known. Meanwhile, for one thing, females, including fetuses, children and adults, will have ongoing irreparable damage done to the DNA in their ovarian follicles, as we pussy-foot around waiting for a commission http://www.mast-victims.org/resources/docs/WiFi-a-Thalidomide-in-the-making-who-cares.pdf

    Though all the bills purport to protect us precious humans, the larger truth is that all life is affected, with smaller species most susceptible, such as bees and other insects. In the last 27 years, there has been a 75% decline in insect numbers. Any connection? But few if any are asking what right we have to engender such destruction for money, convenience and fun. Nor are any individuals but one (Barrie Trower, PHD) pointing out that this technology was not developed for telecom, but as a stealth weapon for inducing illness. That is what’s standing in our midst.

    One of the most potentially significant effects, shown in some of the thousands of willfully ignored scientific papers of the last 60 years, is one that promises to end all effects – the termination of human reproduction.

    The three-part bottom line is: 1) There is no safe dose of information-carrying microwave radiation as it is configured for telecom – period; 2) if studies existing at the time of the original wireless rollout were taken honestly into account, the technology never would have gotten off the ground; and 3) the only solution that will save the ecosystem and humanity is industry shutdown.

    Finally, Professor Moskowitz is aware of these facts. He said to me in an email 8/18/15, among other things, “The goal is harm reduction.” I replied, among other things, “No, too much is at stake. We must have a moratorium, then research, then the decision whether or not to resume.” But he and his international entourage of 235 signers of the “International Scientist Appeal on Electromagnetic Fields & Wireless Technology” to the WHO and the UN prefer to appeal to officially deaf organizations for “…more protective exposure guidelines for EMF and wireless technology in the face of increasing evidence of health risks.” Whereas, I suggested that “…people have the power to reject the system. Yes, they will have to break a most difficult addiction. But this challenge will be made easier if only YOU FOLKS will tell the whole truth at these forums, as described in this email thread, rather than saying, in effect, we can live with this poison. That hypothesis isn’t even based on the existing science, but rather on a ‘hope’ that making adjustments will make the total of damage and losses acceptable.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cczGVhd63pM

  5. Coming in way late on this one, but thank you, Catherine. However, to the question, “Wouldn’t it become a fantastic nationwide consumer and grassroots initiative if everyone were to ask their respective legislators to introduce similar legislation into each of the fifty United States?” the answer, with the exception of S.1864, is a respectful but emphatic “No!”

    The reason is that S.107, S.108, and H.2030 fail to convey the whole truth about wireless systems, and instead attempt only to encourage the impossible, namely the safe (as opposed to “safer”) use of poisonous cell phones—failing, by the way, to include other wireless toys just as dangerous if not more, such as tablets, computers, games, and mice. Not to mention the towers/antennas, which bathe everything 24/7 in pathogenic energy, no matter how carefully you use your toys (see below for S.1268).

    There is no such thing as safe use. The Federal Government is LYING. In re 107&8, the Federal safety guidelines referred to are based only upon tissue-heating effects, whereas no safety studies were acknowledged or required by the Federal Government on long-term, non-thermal exposures. Where the danger lies, this aspect was summarily (conveniently) dismissed out of hand at the time (c. 1983 or so), despite the existence of a huge volume of peer-reviewed scientific papers, beginning in the 1950’s, showing harm from power levels thousands and millions of times lower than current “safe” levels. as you no doubt know, up to 2012, 4000 of these were summarized, collated and referenced in the “BioInitiative Report 2012.”

    H.2030 is a travesty since it implies that there are safe “practices and guidance for the purchase and installation of wireless internet service in public schools, colleges and universities.” Note the clever language that assumes continuing use: “best practices…” If the word “safe” were used in place of “best,” the statement would be totally erroneous, instead of mostly erroneous. So the implication is that we’ll imagine we’re harming everyone and the environment acceptably so we can continue to indulge wireless insanity.

    S.1268 is a problem for not demanding a moratorium, or in not issuing a very strong warning to the people, while the commission validates for itself what is already known. Meanwhile, for one thing, females, including fetuses, children and adults, will have ongoing irreparable damage done to the DNA in their ovarian follicles, as we pussy-foot around waiting for a commission http://www.mast-victims.org/resources/docs/WiFi-a-Thalidomide-in-the-making-who-cares.pdf

    Though all the bills purport to protect us precious humans, the larger truth is that all life is affected, with smaller species most susceptible, such as bees and other insects. In the last 27 years, there has been a 75% decline in insect numbers. Any connection? But few if any are asking what right we have to engender such destruction for money, convenience and fun. Nor are any individuals but one (Barrie Trower, PHD) pointing out that this technology was not developed for telecom, but as a stealth weapon for inducing illness. That is what’s standing in our midst.

    One of the most potentially significant effects, shown in some of the thousands of willfully ignored scientific papers of the last 60 years, is one that promises to end all effects – the termination of human reproduction.

    The three-part bottom line is: 1) There is no safe dose of information-carrying microwave radiation as it is configured for telecom – period; 2) if studies existing at the time of the original wireless rollout were taken honestly into account, the technology never would have gotten off the ground; and 3) the only solution that will save the ecosystem and humanity is industry shutdown.

    Finally, Professor Moskowitz is aware of these facts. He said to me in an email 8/18/15, among other things, “The goal is harm reduction.” I replied, among other things, “No, too much is at stake. We must have a moratorium, then research, then the decision whether or not to resume.” But he and his international entourage of 235 signers of the “International Scientist Appeal on Electromagnetic Fields & Wireless Technology” to the WHO and the UN prefer to appeal to officially deaf organizations for “…more protective exposure guidelines for EMF and wireless technology in the face of increasing evidence of health risks.” Whereas, I suggested that “…people have the power to reject the system. Yes, they will have to break a most difficult addiction. But this challenge will be made easier if only YOU FOLKS will tell the whole truth at these forums, as described in this email thread, rather than saying, in effect, we can live with this poison. That hypothesis isn’t even based on the existing science, but rather on a ‘hope’ that making adjustments will make the total of damage and losses acceptable.” www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=cczGVhd63pM

  6. I’ve been trying to post here for more than a week. It remains on hold, then disappears. Nice censorship.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*