ISIS Attacked Brussels? The US Created ISIS? Therefore?

who-created-isisBy Jon Rappoport

I want to acknowledge two researchers and reporters, whose work cuts deeply into the ISIS mirage: Tony Cartalucci and Brandon Turbeville. In a half-sane world, Cartalucci would be the international editor of the New York Times, if the Times were a real news outlet.

If we accept the premise that ISIS attacked Brussels, then the next question is: what is ISIS?

Who is behind it? Who supplies it? Who funds it? Who sustains it?

Brandon Turbeville, writing at Activist Post (“Congress Votes To Fight ISIS By Funding ISIS To Fight Assad”, 9/19/2014), states:

Obama’s plan [is] to ‘detect and degrade’ ISIS…the reality is that the plan is nothing more than a plan to…destroy the Syrian government to benefit of ISIS and other fundamentalist groups that the United States has created, funded, trained, and directed since the very beginning of the Syrian crisis.

Cartalucci, in an article titled, “In Syria, There Are No Moderates” (9/2013), writes:

…there were never, nor are there any ‘moderates’ operating in Syria. The West has intentionally armed and funded Al Qaeda and other sectarian extremists since as early as 2007 in preparation for an engineered sectarian bloodbath serving US-Saudi-Israeli interests. This latest bid to portray the terrorists operating along and within Syria’s borders as ‘divided’ along extremists/moderate lines is a ploy to justify the continued flow of Western cash and arms into Syria to perpetuate the conflict, as well as create conditions along Syria’s borders with which Western partners, Israel, Jordan, and Turkey, can justify direct military intervention [in Syria].

Turbeville writes:

Indeed, even the New York Times has been forced to admit that there are, as Cartalucci expertly argues in his article, no moderates in the ranks of the Syrian death squads. As Ben Hubbard [NY Times] wrote in April, 2013 (“Islamist Rebels Create Dilemma on Syria Policy”), ‘In Syria’s largest city, Aleppo, rebels aligned with Al Qaeda control the power plant, run the bakeries and head a court that applies Islamic law. Elsewhere, they have seized government oil fields, put employees back to work and now profit from the crude they produce…Across Syria, rebel-held areas are dotted with Islamic courts staffed by lawyers and clerics, and by fighting brigades led by extremists. Even the Supreme Military Council, the umbrella rebel organization whose formation the West had hoped would sideline radical groups, is stocked with commanders who want to infuse Islamic law into a future Syrian government…Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of.’  (emphasis added)

In other words, the “moderate Syrian rebels” are a fiction no one could fail to notice. The US funding has always gone to ISIS.

I could cite much more from Cartalucci and Turbeville, who effectively argue that ISIS is a created tool of the US government and its allies. I strongly recommend you read and study their work.

As far as the Brussels attacks are concerned, if we assume that ISIS was responsible, the whole scenario is turned upside down after analyzing the basis of ISIS.

The Obama administration (jointly with the Bush administration) should be announcing: “Well, we keep ISIS alive. Unfortunately, things happen. One of those things is Brussels.”

And then you could go on to query the sincerity of the word “unfortunately.”

Articles by Tony Cartalucci:

Brussels Attack: The True Implications of ISIS Links (3/22/2016)

ISIS: US-Saudi Plague Reaches Indonesia? (1/16/2016)

America’s Fake War on ISIS Grinds On (3/22/2016)

Turkey: The Islamic State’s Second Home (1/18/2016)

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Image Credit

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

  • dale ruff

    One of the alleged suicide bomber brothers was convicted of a robbery with an assault weapon in which he wounded a cop. The stipulated sentence for a prohibited weapon is 5 years, on top of the robbery charge. He was sentence to 9 years in late 2010 but by 2015 he was out and picked up in Turkey at the Syrian border and deported back to Belgium as a suspected terrorist.

    So he got out before he served his sentence (shooting a cop with an assault rifle would put you away for decades in most places) despite the stipulated 5 yrs just for the weapons “possession” not to mention armed assault and robbery. Why was he released? Why was the Turkish warning ignored?

    And his brother, for carjacking with an assault weapon (stipulated 5 yrs, on top of carjacking) got out on probation.

    So, we ask: why were these brothers given such light sentences and why was the Turkish warming ignored. The answer might be in the same league with questions such as: why did the Dept of State help Oswald return from the USSR after he denounced his citizenship? Why were Russian warnings about the Boston Marathon Bombing brothers ignored? Why were the 3 eyewitness to 3 tall white men shooting in San Bernardino dismissed? Why have all the foiled terrorist plots in the US involved FBI set ups?

    Just asking: why? Why did the govt lie about 9/11 and why has there been no follow up investigations, tho the accusations of lying come from the heads of the original 9/11 Commission?

    • colinjames71

      Rhetorical questions for the informed among us, for the rest those questions are to frightening to contemplate.

  • Mitko Tasev

    The blame is always on terrorists but in reality the job is done by special forces. We have seen this so many times; 9/11, Charlie Hebdo, Paris Attacks ….

  • colinjames71

    I’ve been reading Cartalucci four years, and I don’t think he’s ever been wrong about anything of consequence. Brandon too, both among my top ten favorite independent journalists.

  • Joan Camara

    Talk about Isis, Brussels, or our government being involved, but leave Israel out of it. And you wonder why the bible says that “all countries will come against her” in the endtime. Everyone wants a piece of the only land sacred to God, and mentioned over 1,000 times in our bible, and supposedly our only ally, to pull apart, piece by piece, and of course, blame for every little thing that happens in this world. Go find someone else to pick on, the muslims and their evil religion is a good place to start!

  • Geronimo Pratt

    Have you noticed that ISIS kill other Muslims and don’t attack Israel? Do you why? Because of this: ISIS means in reality Israeli Intelligence Secret Service [ISIS]. That’s why.

  • drbhelthi

    If indeed ISIL mercenaries conducted the terrorism in Brussels, they did it on orders of their supernumeraries, in the USA the CIA and in Israel the MOSSAD. Mercenaries always act on orders from their commanding officers as do all military organizations.
    Former US Psyops officer, Scott Bennett, provides insider information:!my-story/cf5l

Thank you for sharing.
Follow us to receive the latest updates.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

Send this to friend