Is NOAA Altering Weather Data Ahead of the Big UN Climate Change Meeting?

thermometerBy Melissa Dykes

It has been suggested, with evidence, that NOAA has been a little less than forthcoming with temperature data this year ahead of all these big UN meetings addressing Agenda 21 and climate change. I’m sorry, did I say “a little less than forthcoming”? If this is true, I meant to say a bunch of big fat liars.

It has been announced that more than 190 countries are set to meet in Paris in December to see about a “new global agreement on climate change aimed at reducing global greenhouse gas emissions and thus avoiding the threat of dangerous climate change” since the current “commitments” on emissions run out in five years.

In its report on this, The Guardian answers the question “Why has nobody thought of getting a global agreement on this before now?” by saying they’ve been trying to get something going in this area for 20 years now at least but only in the last two decades has “science” consistently pointed in one direction which is that greenhouse gas emissions from industry and fossil fuels are causes global temps to rise.

The science, huh? The “settled” science? The data that has “consistently pointed in one direction”?

Ignore a decades-long cooling period. Ignore Climategate — an organized climate change conspiracy and collusion in exaggerating warming data out of the Climate Research Unit at University of East Anglia — or that NOAA tried to erase the “pause” in warming in 1998 by saying it was just “improperly adjusted data”, for a moment.

Also ignore any anomalies that could be caused by clandestine solar radiation management aka geoengineering (spraying of particulates to reduce incoming sunlight) as has been advocated in UN IPCC reports.

Check this out. This is data posted on the Real Science blog from NOAA.

The first graph is what NOAA released in 2014:

image 1The second picture, supposedly of the same data, is what NOAA released in 2015:

image 2Notice anything… different?

NOAAAugust2014-2015It magically got hotter all of a sudden.

The same time period should have the same data reported… So how did it suddenly get hotter over the last half a century?

Looks like more “improperly adjusted data”. As Steven Goddard at Real Science noted, “Their graph looks nothing like satellite measurements of global temperature.”

image 4Goddard concluded, “NOAA has completely erased the 30-year cooling trend, and now simply fabricate imaginary data for the southern hemisphere.”

What 30-year cooling period you may ask? The one reported on here in 1978 in The New York Times.

Never buy another battery again (Ad)

Surely it couldn’t have anything to do with UN climate change talks coming up in Paris and the deadline on Friday of what Laurent Fabius has eerily deemed the end of “500 days to climate chaos,” could it? A day which just happens to kick off the UN’s Sustainable Development Summit which the one world overpopulation myth Pope is headlining in New York City where they’re going to announce Agenda 2030 (the new Agenda 21 on steroids)?

On top of everything else, it’s not like UN and Oxfam were caught bribing journalists to write climate change scareporn or anything.

By the way, do all these rising temps explain why we had rare snows in July this year?

Meanwhile, scientists are banding together to demand Obama prosecute global warming skeptics.

Considering 31,487 American scientists have signed a petition to reject the Kyoto global warming agreement and similar agreements because limiting greenhouse gases to the extent these agreements propose would actually harm the environment, not help it — that’s a lot of people to prosecute.

Meanwhile, the actual data keeps showing no sign of global warming

Then again, if Al Gore didn’t say it, it must not be true.

Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

6 Comments on "Is NOAA Altering Weather Data Ahead of the Big UN Climate Change Meeting?"

  1. It is a federal agency, of course they are lying.

  2. Check out the Facebook group ‘The Deagel Forum’. Start at the oldest entry and work back.

  3. No one can speak of any climate change weather unless Geo-engineering activities, going on for over our heads, into our children’s lungs and bodies for over 40 years now, is part of the conversation. Period.

    To obfuscate, confuse, divide as to get us all to ignore the Big Elephant in the room, the rapid melting of Arctic Ice releasing megatons of planet killing deadly amounts of methane gas into the atmosphere where Geo-engineering is being used, making it worse, causing the mega drought in the Western States in a desperate attempt to “re-Arctify” with artificially engineered nucleated snow. THIS is the real game changer that will determine if we all go extinct within a decade or two due to mass increase in greenhouse gas production.
    Every other conversation is just nonsensical as to “climate change”. Whether it is “warming” or “cooling”, blah, blah, blah.

    The Greatest Geoengineering Experiment Ever Attempted, And Why We Must Stop it NOW!

  4. The world’s leading funders of anti-global warming propaganda, the Koch brothers, funded the Berkeley Earth Project, headed by climate skeptic, Dr. Muller. He found that the NOAA and other official data is skewed or fraudulent but totally reliable. He also explains, in his NYTimes op ed, how none of the criticism of the data holds up and how satellite data, which did not match ground temperatures, WAS distorted by the slowly deteriorating orbits of the satellites. When corrected,the data all matches.

    This project was funded to show the fakery in the data but proved the opposite. As for the Climategate scandle, all investigations have found the claims made to have no basis.

    Activist post demeans itself when it cherrypicks claims which have been refuted and ignores solid scientific evidence.

    Since1977. Exxon had evidence of global warming caused by (mostly) fossil fuel burning. The agenda of the fossil fuel industry is to fool the public to thwart action to reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Is Activist post a paid shill or is it just part of ignorant class of people who ignore the empirical science?

    • Complete and utter nonsense. We all know that climate change is a scam used to complete the one-world government, and the redistribution of wealth. Al Gore and the club of Rome decided to use it as a way to bring the world together to fight a common enemy, as the club of Rome’s main goal is a one-world government.

      • 99.9% of actual climate scientists agree that global warming is an indisputable empirical fact, and over 97% agree the only logical explanation is human activity. The other 3% are sure.

        Clearly, you have a closed mind and did not check out the Koch funded Berkeley Earth Project. Where did you get your PH.d in climate science where can I access your peer-reviewed research.

        This has nothing to do with the Club of Rome but is empirical science.

        You can ignore the facts, but they are still facts.

Leave a comment