Bill Gates’ Temporary Sterilization Microchip In Beta Female Testing By End of Year

By Heather Callaghan

Earlier this week, I wrote about a deal reached that would soon be pumping out medical microchip implants. Meet the new face of medicine that polygamously marries Big Pharma, biotech, nanotech and wireless remote technology. Maybe hooking oneself into the Internet of Things will be an additional app, although this sounds like a passive form of medicine where someone else gets to call the shots, so to speak.

The same developers who are bringing wireless remotely controlled microchip implants are actually focusing on their first flagship product: Gates Foundation-funded birth-control microchip implants. Wireless technology allows the remotely controlled chip to turn a woman’s ability to conceive off or on at will – temporary sterilization. Of course with remote technology funded by eugenics depopulation fanatics, the first questions should always be, “the ability to conceive by whose will?” This would be the complete antithesis of female empowerment or a “woman’s right to choose” – would it not?

The encryption is alleged to be so safe, that cyberhackers cannot break entry – that means you too.

The chip can be implanted into the hip, arms or beneath the back. Mum was the word during the last few years of development until it was finally publicly confirmed that the beta testing for the birth control chip would be starting towards the end of this year. Indeed, human volunteers will be sought for real-life chip testing.

TWCN Tech News reports more details on the microchip birth-control implant:

The birth control chip is the brain child of a professor, Robert Langer, from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Bill Gates and Melinda foundation has funded the research and the prototype is ready for human testing. The chips will be ready for sale by the year 2018 according to Robert Langer. The institute’s Chip Foundation and Bill Gates’ foundation have been working on the birth control chip for past three years.

The chip’s size is 20mm by 20mm by 7mm. The reservoirs of hormones would be stored on a microchip of 1.5cm. The chip’s data would always be encrypted so that others (cybercriminals or hackers) cannot access the information contained in the chip or misuse/alter or destroy it.


The release of hormones will be done by melting a part of solid hormonal stock using a small electric shock which won’t be noticed by humans.


The safety tests would begin by the end of year 2015 and Robert Langer is confident that the chips will hit market sometime in 2018.

As usual, “The main target” for the testing phase of the chips are women in third-world countries. That means African and Indian women will be human guinea pigs, subject to more of Gates’ destructive horrors, like paralyzing nearly 50,000 Indian children with his polio vaccine tests. Or deaths/paralysis in Pakistan and more paralysis in Africa. But, I’m sure they will go back and make sure those women can conceive again, right? No one is admitting who is actually in control of the wireless capabilities of the implant that is allegedly impenetrable by hackers. Who does a woman see to have her ability to conceive turned back on? That would be an important piece of information, correct?

Interestingly, this news came right on the heels of New Zealand academic higher-ups seriously suggesting the temporary sterilization of all young teen girls – at least in New Zealand.

Brave New World much?

Headlines were simply calling it “free contraception” and recommending the temporary chemical shutting off of young female fertility for society’s sake. No thought whatsoever to looking to solve the source of “the problem” if it even should be looked at so harshly, or to the health of developing teen girls. And just like Gates’ moves in India, no real thoughts go to solving issues of impoverishment which historically, lead to blooming birth rates and medical birth issues. Why better people’s lives when there is so much control in remotely and wirelessly deciding if a woman can conceive?

Pregnancy costs too much….it’s inconvenient…it’s bad for mother and child, and other dehumanizing reasons were given. Ethics, compulsory slippery slopes and STD concerns aside, critics zeroed in on health and environment concerns regarding chemicals. Isn’t it convenient that Gates’ birth-control microchip should launch to save the world from those critiques? Who needs artificial hormones when wireless voltage and gold are there to alchemically or A.I.-chemically create “an artificial organ” through biotech, according to one of its developers. This is where Woman meets Machine to reproduce. Now there is no reason to protest – temporary sterilization for all!

How is that for female empowerment? It requires permission…

This writer’s sentiments align with the anti-eugenics op-ed piece by Leading Edge, that said:

For me, one of the most troubling aspects of this proposal is the way in which it so flippantly treats normal healthy female fertility as if it were something that needs to be shut down or medicated against – like we would a disease, or some other physiological problem.

Indeed, is the human body really worth altering to the point of switching on and off like it’s an inconvenient afterthought? Why go against who you are – you are not a disease. At least you deserve to be thought of as a glorious human being, and not something to be eradicated. Worse yet, why let someone else take the wheel from a remote location?

Image by Heather Callaghan

Heather Callaghan is an independent researcher, natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at and Like at Facebook.

Recent posts by Heather Callaghan:

  • CAWS

    Women embraced the pill for convenience & freedom. Only much later were they told about the risk for stroke, cancer & much later about the atrifiially raised cortizone levels[ supressing your immune system] . After a decade of more of this they can’t conceive or have immune problems. Then there was the DepProvera implants putting you into temporary menopause or in many cases constant bleeding. Again difficulty conceiving. Intrauterine devices: they work by ejecting the fertilized egg from the uterus. Also causing copper poisoning,cramping, punctures, death. None of the above protect from AIDS/HIV or any other venereal disease [most of which came from vaccines made with animal viruses not detected in the growth media].
    Now they are thrilled to have the abortion pill & the BC pill will be over the counter. WOMEN ARE BEING USED AS GUINEA PIGS ! Protect your fertility and your DNA . Stay away from doctors & only eat organic food, & clean water. Avoid drugs & chemicals. This will affect many generations to come.

    • icthelite

      I think it would be much simpler, a whole lot safer much less expensive to just perform reversible vasectomies on males. I know the side effects are nil compared to what I’m reading here.

  • James Lee

    This rabbit whole is a lot deeper and further advanced in planning and implementation than most are aware of.

  • Leo

    And if a woman gets loose from her yard, and runs away, she can easily be found and identified.

    • Marie

      You got it, it’s a tracking device too! “The Mark of the Beast” brought to you courtesy of Microsoft!

  • Undecider

    The good thing about this technology is that the kind of people who would be using it most likely should not be having children in the first place. Let them drive themselves into extinction.

    • Nylene13

      If you mean people like you, I agree.

  • Carol Houchin

    Why is it always the Woman’s Responsibility? Let’s get MEN ‘chipped’ and reduce the number of Unwanted Pregnancies THAT way!?

    • michael lawless

      because men are smart enough not to let anyone put any chip in their body for any reason

    • DickVanstone

      Good ole Divide and Conquer. Is it ‘always’ the woman’s responsibility or do we have equal responsibility?

      You will never get a chip into me, you cowardly fascist swine. I care not for whom you send to try and administer it: They will be summarily executed, by myself.

  • michael lawless

    i think its a great idea
    put one in every liberal and in a few years they will be extinct

    • DickVanstone

      Haha. You are either a paid government troll fomenting division OR a complete and utter fool who falls for that fake left vs right paradigm. Take your pick.

      • michael lawless

        its not left vs right
        it common sense americans vs communist liberal america hating douches like you
        by the way dick is a nice name seems to fit u perfect
        happy fourth of july libturd
        i have to go put up my confederate flag and clean my guns

        • DickVanstone

          I’d bet dollars to donuts MY rebel flag on MY 1986 M1009 with my .300 AAC Blackout M4 nestled behind my seat kicks the shit outta anything you have douchebag.

          Take your fourth of July and shove it, you slave to the federal .Gov…

          Semper fidelis vox Populi. Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis.

          • michael lawless

            you mean your rainbow flag on your smart car with your supersoaker ?
            funny you must be the only liberal that supports the 2nd amendment
            now who is the government troll i ask ?

          • DickVanstone

            So you assume I’m the liberal and the America hating douche because I do NOT agree with your very liberal call to sterilize and genocide some of our fellow countrywomen? I see you are choosing to go all-in with the “complete and utter fool” answer. I only wonder if it is to conceal your statist, boot-licking true self.

  • Tom

    In the ancestral environment, if, after 18 to 24 months of regular sex no pregnancy resulted, it was in the genetic self-interest of both the man and the woman to break off the relationship and try again with a new partner. The hardwiring for this is called the “mate ejection module” and it persists to this day in the human brain. Perhaps some readers of this comment, on reflection, will recognize this happening in their own lives: a perfectly good relationship with someone you loved inexplicably began going sour at about 18 to 24 months. The mate ejection module predates birth control and modern decision-making about school, careers, and finances by millions of years. We can only control its effects by knowing about it and consciously compensating for it, and even then it can be extremely difficult to stay in a relationship that seems to be flying apart of its own will.

    I’m not saying birth control is a bad thing, or that women should just let themselves get pregnant on nature’s schedule, just that birth control in general can cause a lot of heartbreak and that humans are not mentally prepared for its emotional side effects. We still have a lot of evolving to do from the world in which our species was born, where tribal support was a birthright in a land of limitless room and resources.

  • Carol Houchin

    Why not be INTELLIGENT People who RESPECT each other , and ourselves, and Every Individual can Take care of themselves?? OH, I forgot, it’s because the Public is too Stupid to take care of themselves. I pray that as Asteroid hits DC, SOON!

  • Yvonne Forsman

    If this was available when I was young, I would have tried it. I am 60 yrs old now, have had hysterectomy, so I don’t need it. But my whole life I was constantly worried about getting pregnant. Every month. I lived my whole (married) adult life with this fear. 30 yrs. That’s a very long time for fear to be present! I have two kids from five pregnancies (abortion, miscarriage, child death). I hated being pregnant, and giving birth was one of a hell experience. I understand this contraception was invented to curb the global population increase b/c we are running out of drinking water and are now in a global cooling phase which will effect our crops and lead to global starvation. But contraceptive pills cause cancer, so if this doesn’t have negative side effects, I would have wanted it as my personal contraceptive choice when I was young. No man can understand what a woman goes thru mentally and emotionally just b/c we can get pregnant at any time. My story is true and I am not a paid troll, this is how I feel about this topic.

  • Spiritfruitmarcus

    Fornication is a sin that offends God. Getting married is honourable in the sight of God. You should not have sex unless you are married.

  • Cypher

    If Bill Gates is so obsessed with de-popluation why doesn’t he start with his own family?

Thank you for sharing.
Follow us to receive the latest updates.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

Send this to friend