Chemtrails Exposed: A History of the New Manhattan Project

chemtrail skyBy Peter A. Kirby

“Discoveries and inventions are not terminals; they are fresh starting points from which we can climb to new knowledge.” – Dr. Willis R. Whitney, founder of General Electric Laboratories

After so many years of watching airplanes produce the lines in the sky, largely without knowing of what this Project consists or why, we have recently gained an understanding. Evidence suggests that today’s chemtrail spraying operations consist of airplanes saturating our atmosphere with nano-sized particles influenced by electromagnetic energy for the purpose of weather modification.

U.S. patent #4,686,605 “Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere” shows how stratospheric and tropospheric aerosols can be manipulated using electromagnetic energy in order to modify the weather. The ground-based antennas (known as ionospheric heaters) needed to produce the appropriate electromagnetic energy exist. For a detailed discussion, please see the author’s previous article “Smoking Gun: The HAARP and Chemtrails Connection.”

The 1996 U.S. military document “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” outlines a program using aerosols sprayed from airplanes which are then manipulated with electromagnetic energy in order to modify the weather. This document will be discussed shortly.

The common thread here is weather modification; or as the Library of Congress calls it, “weather control.” Lots of other evidence supporting this assertion exists as well, but these two documents are the most salient.

Motives are plenty. Most notably, significant direct benefits can be gained by playing financial markets which rise and fall with the weather such as the weather derivatives and catastrophe reinsurance markets; not to mention agricultural and energy commodities. Enron pioneered the markets. With foreknowledge of the weather, so many scams could be concocted that it boggles the mind. Weather routinely changes the course of Human history. It determines what we do every day. It determines the outcomes of wars and influences elections. Control of the weather is God-like power. Money and power junkies want it.

Controlling Earth’s weather would necessarily require a gigantic scientific effort. Oddly enough, when one looks for a National effort in weather modification, one finds a lot. Specifically, if one looks, one can find a history of weather control programs involving electromagnetic energy and atmospheric particles; all in a coherent chronological order.

This paper is the result of thousands of dollars and countless hours spent researching many thousands of pages of source, organizational and Government documents related to weather modification and the atmospheric sciences. This article serves as the foundation for a series of shortly forthcoming articles detailing the history and current state of this Project. May this work help end the spraying. For the fact that these environmental modifications have been done without our informed consent, may this work contribute to the largest class-action lawsuit in history.

This paper examines the origins and development of this; the first planetary level scientific endeavor. Now is our opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the New Manhattan Project.

The Origins of Weather Modification

People have been attempting to modify the weather for ever. Most commonly, man has gone about making it rain; especially in times of drought. The earliest recorded efforts were those of mystics. Local shaman would be called upon to ingest a certain concoction in order to communicate with the weather gods and ask for help. In some cases, the sacrifice of certain animals in certain fashions may have been the thing to do. Sometimes a good old rain dance may have done the trick.

Some early Western efforts to stop destructive weather are outlined in professor James Fleming’s book Fixing the Sky. On page 78 he writes, “In ancient Greece, the official ‘hail wardens’ of Cleonae were appointed at public expense to watch for hail and then signal the farmers to offer blood sacrifices to protect their fields: a lamb, a chicken, or even a poor man drawing blood from his finger was deemed sufficient.”

A little later professor Fleming writes, “In Austria, it was traditional to ring ‘thunder bells’ or blow on huge ‘weather horns’ while herdsmen set up a terrific howl and women rattled chains and beat milk pails to scare away the destructive spirit of the storm.”

Much of the early Western attempts at weather modification involved the detonation of explosive charges in the lower atmosphere. It was hypothesized that atmospheric explosions cause precipitation.

Early American Involvement

Although there has been much international participation, this article focuses on America’s participation in the New Manhattan Project. Throughout the development of the New Manhattan Project, America was the world’s technological leader; especially in the area of military technology. America led the way and developed most of this Project. America continues to lead the Project today. Therefore the early history of weather modification in America is relevant.

James Pollard Espy (1785-1860) also known as “The Storm King” was the first meteorologist in U.S. government service. Although he never received Federal funding for it, he suggested that forest fires can produce rainfall and that experiments in this area should be carried out. His magnum opus was a book called The Philosophy of Storms. This book contains a long section entitled “Artificial Rains.”

The first Federally funded weather modification field effort took place in Texas in 1891, with funds appropriated by the Congress in the amount of nine thousand dollars through the Department of Agriculture. The experiment involved weather modifier Robert St. George Dyrenforth (1844-1910) attacking the atmosphere with balloons, kites, dynamite, mortars, smoke bombs and fireworks. The results were inconclusive, but you can bet that the atmosphere was absolutely terrified!

From these early efforts until the beginning of the scientific era in 1946, the realm of weather modification was inhabited largely by a motley collection of pseudo-scientists and con artists similar to Dyrenforth. These people, who referred to themselves as “rainmakers,” traveled around the Country (mostly the West), going where local governments were willing to pay for their services. If a certain region was experiencing a severe drought, people were often desperate for solutions. These rainmakers’ activities often involved the mixing and open air release of dangerous chemicals. Some of these efforts were Federally funded. Since the days of Robert Dyrenforth, the Federal money has not stopped flowing.

Nikola Tesla

In the late 1800s, inventor Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) popularized the use of electromagnetic energy. In his 1905 United States patent number 787,412 “Art of Transmitting Electrical Energy Through the Natural Mediums” Tesla describes how electromagnetic energy may be sent and received through the atmosphere. The Supreme Court found that U.S. patent #645,576 “System of Transmission of Electrical Energy” proves he invented radio; not Marconi. He pioneered radar. He invented wireless signal and power transmission. Yes, power can be transmitted wirelessly; we’ll have more about that later.

Tesla’s musings and scientific discoveries pioneered what are today’s ionospheric heaters which use electromagnetic energy to cause atmospheric perturbations from great distances and play a defining role in the New Manhattan Project. Specifically, he pioneered the use of a certain type of electromagnetic energy called extremely-low frequency (ELF). This is a specific type of energy known to be used in the New Manhattan Project; the other being very-low frequency (VLF) electromagnetic energy.

In her book Tesla: Man Out of Time, Margaret Cheney writes that he did a good deal of theorizing about weather control. She also writes that he theorized that the entire earth might be illuminated by shooting electromagnetic energy 35,000 feet up into the atmosphere. 35,000 feet is about the altitude of today’s offending airplanes.

The Beginning of the Scientific Era

The scientific era of weather modification began famously in 1946 with a trio of scientists from General Electric Laboratories: Irving Langmuir, Vincent Schaefer and Bernard Vonnegut. Leading the group was the world famous Nobel Peace Prize winning scientist Irving Langmuir (1881-1957). This trio popularized the fact that, under certain circumstances, dumping substances from airplanes into clouds causes precipitation. Early experiments used dry ice while later experiments pioneered the use of silver iodide. Also invented were silver iodide generation equipment and many other weather related scientific instruments. Much of this trio’s work here was done in cooperation with the Office of Naval Research and the Air Force. Although others had previously dumped stuff out of airplanes in attempts to modify the weather, the G.E. scientists practiced a sound scientific method previously unseen in the field.

Schaefer, Langmuir & Vonnegut
image source: General Electric Laboratories

Following the famous scientific weather modification efforts of the G.E. Labs trio, the public’s imagination was sparked and a government regulated weather modification industry flourished. To this day, the government-regulated weather modification industry (or “conventional” weather modification industry as we will call it) expels dry ice, lead iodide or silver iodide (usually silver iodide) from airplanes.

However, the conventional weather modification industry is distinct from the New Manhattan Project and therefore is not the focus of this article. The New Manhattan Project employs electromagnetic energy to manipulate dispersed particles while conventional weather modifiers do not. Also, conventional weather modification efforts are conducted on a regional basis while the New Manhattan Project is global.

Not long after the scientific breakthroughs of the G.E. Labs trio, fueled by high level political rhetoric and popular interest, the United States federal government began pouring hundreds of millions of dollars annually into basic atmospheric research. Since then, the United States government is admitted to have spent many tens of billions of dollars on weather modification and the atmospheric sciences. Much of that was expended in 1950s, ’60s and ’70s dollars. If one is to control the weather, one must know how the atmosphere works. Or as geoengineer Dr. Clement J. Todd wrote in 1970, “Our ability to manage precipitation depends upon four factors: (1) understanding the physical processes of the atmosphere, (2) real-time knowledge of the weather we wish to manipulate, (3) devising the optimum treatment material and technique, and (4) delivery of that treatment to the cloud where and when we wish.”

The majority of the vast expanses of literature pertaining to weather modification and the atmospheric sciences is geared towards conventional weather modification. However, both the New Manhattan Project and conventional weather modification are supported by basic atmospheric research. So, buried in this body of literature, one may find glimpses of the New Manhattan Project. The rest of this paper recounts these glimpses.

Bernard Vonnegut

One member of the G.E. Labs trio, Bernard Vonnegut (1914-1997) went on to pioneer weather modification research involving the use of artificial electric charges and atmospheric aerosols. His work in this area was performed under Government contracts outsourced to a research and development firm called Arthur D. Little Inc.

Bernard Vonnegut
image source: Life Magazine

The earliest recorded instances of electricity being intentionally used to modify particles in the atmosphere can be found in the 1884 experiments of Sir Oliver Lodge (1851-1940). The 1918 U.S. patent #1,279,823 “Process and Apparatus for Causing Precipitation by Coalescence of Aqueous Particles Contained in the Atmosphere” by J.G. Balsillie built upon Lodge’s work. Using this knowledge as a basis, Mr. Vonnegut resumed Lodge’s work; this time with massive funding and modernized scientific equipment.

Beginning in 1953, Bernard Vonnegut, Arthur D. Little et al., conducted experiments involving stainless steel wires miles long strung from the tops of telephone poles, connected to a power supply and discharging corona. The coronal discharge’s effect upon ambient aerosols and the clouds above was monitored and analyzed. Through 1961, these experiments were carried out in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Texas, Illinois and New Mexico. These types of experiments are referred to as “space charge” experiments. The U.S. Signal Corps and the U. S. Coast Guard provided support. Others performed similar experiments.

Space charge experiment
image source: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The 1958 “Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Weather Control” contained an article by Bernard Vonnegut, Vincent Schaefer, J. S. Barrows and Paul MacCready titled “The Future.” In it they outline an atmosphere saturated with “chemicals” and “altering” atmospheric electrical variables. It reads:

When the nature of thunderstorm electrification is understood it may prove possible to control this process by the introduction of chemicals into the atmosphere or by altering electrical variables. Such variables might be atmospheric conductivity, field, and space charge, or perhaps the corona giving properties of the earth’s surface.

When we become sufficiently sophisticated concerning the dynamics of the atmosphere it is possible that weather may be controlled by the large scale release of chemical or more probably thermonuclear heat energy.

In 1961, Bernard Vonnegut, Arnold W. Doyle and D. Read Moffett wrote a paper for Arthur D. Little titled “Research in Electrical Phenomena Associated with Aerosols.” This was a report about their experiments of the previous 3 months involving the effects of electromagnetic energy upon a grounded sphere in a small chamber surrounded by gas. Please consider the implications of that. We will revisit this paper much later.

If you are wondering… yes, Bernard Vonnegut was related to the novelist Kurt Vonnegut. They were brothers.

***

In 1958 the chief White House advisor on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the U.S. defense department was studying “ways to manipulate the charges of the earth and sky and so affect the weather” by using an electronic beam to ionize or de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area.

***

The Department of Commerce Weather Bureau reported in 1960 that they were conducting a weather modification study in which, “Chemicals are introduced into the cloud which noticeably changes the surface tension of the droplets. Electrification effects are being observed by artificially electrifying the droplets and subjecting them to impressed electric fields.”

***

For better or for worse, this super secret program had a prophet. His name was United States Navy Admiral William Francis Raborn (1905-1990).

William Francis Raborn
image source: United States Navy

In the January 1963 edition of the U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, Admiral Raborn outlined a program using electromagnetic energy to modify the weather. His article was entitled “New Horizons of Naval Research and Development.” In this paper, underneath the heading of ‘Environmental Warfare’ he wrote:

The possibilities for the military employment of the “weather weapon” may be as diverse as they are numerous. An ability to control the weather could introduce greater changes in warfare than those which occurred in 1945 with the explosion of the first nuclear weapons.

A severe storm or hurricane striking a naval force may well inflict greater damage than could an enemy. The capability to change the direction of destructive storms and guide them toward enemy concentrations may exist in the future arsenal of the naval tactical commander.

Ground, sea, air and amphibious operations might be supported by the dissipation of fog or clouds, or by the production of rain or drought. Conversely, the creation of solid, low overcasts might be used to conceal troop concentrations, movements, and task force deployments. Large-scale weather control techniques might be used to cause extensive flooding in strategic areas or even to bring a new “ice age” upon the enemy. By influencing the ionosphere and atmosphere simultaneously, magnetic, acoustic, and pressure effects might be generated in such a way that ocean-wide sweeping of mines would occur.

Creating or dissipating atmospheric temperature/humidity ducts might modify the refractive index of the atmosphere enough to influence radar or radio transmission. Artificially-induced ionospheric storms might produce a blackout of communications.

Certain electromagnetic waves are unable to pass through an area of precipitation. A cloud seeding generator could be employed under appropriate meteorological conditions to produce precipitation that would interfere with the operation of radio-guided or remotely-controlled devices or vehicles. We already have taken our first steps toward developing an environmental warfare capability. We are using satellite weather data from Tiros II for current, tactical operations and more accurate, long-range weather predictions. Some experiments in fog dissipation have shown promise, and some exploratory research has been conducted on ways to change the heading of major storms.

For these reasons – and because our advances in science make it reasonable – we are now engaged in planning a ten-year, comprehensive study of the atmosphere, a study which we will designate ATMOS. This plan will be co-ordinated with our TENOC oceanographic studies.

About the ATMOS program, the author has failed to find any other significant information. The author has looked over a 1961 report pertaining to the Navy TENOC (Ten Year Program in Oceanography) program. Although it did not contain any specific information pertinent to the New Manhattan Project, it did make mention of another, classified TENOC report.

It is notable that the title of Raborn’s article includes the word “horizon” because the type of electromagnetic energy to which he refers is akin to “over the horizon radar.” This type of radar is called “over the horizon” because it is bounced off the ionosphere and therefore is effective far beyond the range of the forty miles or so (depending on terrain) afforded by previous radar systems. Forty miles is approximately the distance one can see over flat land or sea before the curvature of the Earth obscures points beyond. Over the horizon radar, on the other hand, is effective to thousands of miles. Today’s ionospheric heaters evolved as over the horizon radar.

Also of note is the fact that the United States Navy, of which Mr. Raborn was an admiral, is today one of the managers of the HAARP facility in Alaska. The HAARP facility contains the world’s most powerful ionospheric heater which is documented to be able to modify the weather.

***

In the 1967 National Science Foundation’s ninth annual weather modification report, it reads, “ESSA [Environmental Science Services Administration] is also investigating the effect of cirrus clouds on the radiation budget of the atmosphere by studying aircraft-produced contrails which often spread into cirrus layers covering considerable fractions of the sky. One technique proposed for modifying lower cloud development has been the generation of a high level cirrus deck with jet aircraft. By intercepting solar radiation at high altitude it may be possible to influence larger scale cloud development elsewhere by reducing solar input and reducing convective cloud generation in areas where they are not needed.” This is essentially today’s geoengineering thesis.

A little later in that same report, it reads that their computer atmospheric simulations, or ‘models’ as they call them, might simulate, “…producing high-level cirrus cloud cover over an area by means of jet aircraft, inserting particulate matter into the upper atmosphere to alter the solar radiation balance and the like.”

***

In 1966, the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences Select Panel on Weather Modification produced a document titled “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification.” On page 17 of this report, it reads, “It is anticipated that there will be a few large-scale facilities funded for the testing of modification schemes. Typical schemes might be the suspension of a spray nozzle over a valley between two mountain peaks to produce cloud-sized droplets into which electrical charges can be introduced in either polarity, contaminants can be introduced, and the drop size spectrum can be adjusted to any reasonable distribution.” The Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences subsequently agreed to proceed with the development of a National Weather Modification Program along the lines of this report.

The now defunct Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) was created by the Federal Council for Science and Technology in 1959 in order to oversee and coordinate a wide range of basic atmospheric research originating from many previously disparate government offices. Their focus was weather modification. Members of the ICAS included the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Interior, Transportation and State as well as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. These are the government agencies which have been involved in weather modification all along.

The ICAS produced a series of semi-annual reports between 1960 and 1978. In these reports, ICAS member organizations’ weather related scientific activities and expenditures were recounted. The ICAS reports’ areas of study included: Earth’s natural geomagnetic energy, different ways clouds form and different ways they precipitate, lightning, hurricanes and other extreme weather, inadvertent weather modification, intentional weather modification and extra-planetary atmospheres. The ICAS is duly noted here because so much of the history of the New Manhattan Project is accounted for in the pages of their reports.

In the 1969 ICAS report, under the heading of “Cloud Electricity Modification,” it is written that the National Science Foundation is developing, “Means for injecting significant quantities of charge artificially into clouds…”

Again in this 1969 report, on page 37 it describes the Army’s intentions in the area of weather modification. It reads, “Studies will continue on upper atmospheric structure and dynamics, lasers and other electromagnetic propagation, and acoustic propagation. New approaches to atmospheric modification will be studied.”

On page 42 of the 1971 ICAS special report “A National Program for Accelerating Progress in Weather Modification,” the authors write of fog being cleared by airplanes releasing chemicals and ‘electrical methods’ of fog dissipation.

On page 79 of the 1973 ICAS report, it is written, “There is a great deal to be learned before we can with confidence say what effect can be produced by the injection of chemically active trace gasses and particulates into the lower stratosphere. New emphasis has been given to both dynamical and physical meteorological research relevant to this question.”

***

United States patent #5,003,186 “Stratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warming” was filed by the Hughes Aircraft Corporation in 1991. The patent describes a method for dispersing particulates into the upper atmosphere in order to save us from global warming. The author David B. Chang suggests that aluminum oxide be used for this purpose. Lab tests from around the world have shown aluminum to be the number one chemtrail ingredient.

“One proposed solution to the problem of global warming,” it reads, “involves the seeding of the atmosphere with metallic particles. One technique proposed to seed the metallic particles was to add the tiny particles to the fuel of jet airliners, so that the particles would be emitted from the jet engine exhaust while the airliner was at its cruising altitude.”

The first mention of aluminum occurs in this passage, “The method comprises the step of seeding the greenhouse gas layer with a quantity of tiny particles of materials characterized by wavelength-dependent emissivity or reflectivity, in that said materials have high emissivities in the visible and far infrared wavelength region. Such materials can include the class of materials known as Welsbach materials. The oxides of metal, e.g., aluminum oxide, are also suitable for the purpose.”

The second mention of aluminum occurs a little later. It reads, “Another class of materials having the desired property includes the oxides of metals. For example, aluminum oxide (Al2O3) is one metal oxide suitable for the purpose and which is relatively inexpensive.”

The Hughes Aircraft Corporation was acquired by and is now integrated into Raytheon.

***

A 1994 document produced by Stanford Research International called “Multiple Instrument Studies of Chemical Releases and Heating at Arecibo” details three barium releases of 48 kilograms each over Puerto Rico. The barium clouds produced by these rocket-borne explosions were subsequently hit with man-made electromagnetic energy from an ionospheric heater and thus turned into a plasma. Barium has been found to be the number two chemtrail ingredient.

***

In 1996 the Air Force produced a previously mentioned document called “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.” The document was produced by the Department of Defense and written as ordered by the chief of staff of the Air Force, Ronald R. Fogleman. “Owning the Weather” was but one in a series of 39 documents speaking to a great overhaul of Air Force operations to be achieved by the year 2025. The larger set of documents is called “Air Force 2025.” “Owning the Weather” describes a system of weather modification combining atmospheric aerosols with electromagnetic energy.

On page 2 the document reads, “Prior to the attack, which is coordinated with forecasted weather conditions, the UAVs begin cloud generation and seeding operations. UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] disperse a cirrus shield to deny enemy visual and infrared (IR) surveillance. Simultaneously, microwave heaters create localized scintillation to disrupt active sensing via synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems such as the commercially available Canadian search and rescue satellite-aided tracking (SARSAT) that will be widely available in 2025. Other cloud seeding operations cause a developing thunderstorm to intensify over the target, severely limiting the enemy’s capability to defend. The WFSE monitors the entire operation in real-time and notes the successful completion of another very important but routine weather-modification mission.”

The document mostly speaks to military combat applications, but there are some very interesting quotes. Here’s one, “In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications.” Let’s hear more about those “domestic applications”

On page 34 the document reads, “The ability to modify the weather may be desirable both for economic and defense reasons.”

Also in 1996, as part of the same series containing “Owning the Weather,” the Air Force produced a document entitled “An Operational Analysis for Air Force 2025” which briefly outlines something they call a “weather analysis and modification system.” This system is described as employing both particulate seeding and microwave energy for the purpose of weather modification.

Under the heading of “Weather Analysis and Modification System,” the document reads, “A global network of sensors provides ‘weather warriors’ with the means to monitor and accurately predict weather activities and their effects on military operations. A diverse set of weather modification tools allows manipulation of small-to-medium scale weather phenomena to enhance friendly force capabilities and degrade those of the adversary.”

***

In the mid-nineties, Lawrence Livermore Laboratories scientists Edward Teller, Lowell Wood and Roderick Hyde wrote a series of papers calling for the spraying of megatons of aluminum to save us from global warming. The mid-nineties was when reports of chemtrail spraying in American skies began pouring in. If you will recall, aluminum has been found to be the number one chemtrail ingredient.

In their 1997 paper “Global Warming and Ice Ages,” the Livermore Labs trio wrote, “It has been suggested that alumina injected into the stratosphere by the exhaust of solid-rocket motors might scatter non-negligible amounts of sunlight. We expect that introduction of scattering-optimized alumina particles into the stratosphere may well be overall competitive with use of sulfur oxides; alumina particles offer a distinctly different environmental impact profile.”

They continue to espouse the virtues of stratospheric alumina in the footnotes writing, “Alumina, like sulfate, is ubiquitous in the terrestrial biosphere, and its stratospheric injection seemingly poses no significant environment issues.”

In conclusion

So there you have an evolutionary history of a project employing sprayed particles and the electrification of clouds for the purpose of weather modification. Is this a coincidence? Are all these examples simply isolated, one-off events not a part of a larger overall plan? What are the odds of these data points evolving in a chronological order such as they have without being part of a coordinated effort? One may be looking at something like a quadrillion to one; and that is conservative.

For five days only, from Thursday, February 19 through Monday, February 23, my ebook Chemtrails Exposed will be available for free from Amazon.

Stay tuned. God willing, this article is only the first of many coming in this year; 2015. The heavy lifting (studying the history of weather modification) is complete. The next papers will come much easier because they involve smaller topics and half or more of the work on each is already done. Although the topic will remain secret until publication, you can expect the next article in a couple of months, possibly sooner. Until then, keep firing in the information war. Thank you.

Notes:

Adventure into the Unknown: the first 50 years of the General Electric Research Laboratory by Laurence A. Hawkins, published by William Morrow & Company, 1950

U.S. patent #4,686,605 “Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere,” 1987

“Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” by Col. Tamzy J. House, Lt. Col. James B. Near, Jr., LTC William B. Shields (USA), Maj. Ronald J. Celentano, Maj. David M. Husband, Maj. Ann E. Mercer and Maj. James E. Pugh, published by the United States Air Force, 1996

The Smartest Guys in the Room by Bethany McLean and Peter Elkind, published by the Penguin Group, 2004

The Weather Changers by D.S. Halacy, Jr., published by Harper and Row, 1968

Fixing the Sky by James Roger Fleming, published by Columbia University Press, 2010

U.S. patent #787,412 “Art of Transmitting Electrical Energy Through the Natural Mediums,” 1905

U.S. patent #645,576 “System of Transmission of Electrical Energy,” 1900

Tesla: Man Out of Time by Margaret Cheney, published by Simon & Schuster, 1981

Early History of Cloud Seeding by Barrington S. Havens, published by the Langmuir Laboratory at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center at the State University of New York at Albany and the Research and Development Center of the General Electric Company, 1978

Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences reports 1960-1978, published by the Federal Council for Science and Technology

“Department of the Interior Program in Precipitation Management for 1970” by Dr. Clement J. Todd as it appeared in the “Proceedings of the Twelfth Interagency Conference on Weather Modification” 1970

U.S. patent #1,279,823 “Process and Apparatus for Causing Precipitation by Coalescence of Aqueous Particles Contained in the Atmosphere”

“Technique for Introducing Low-Density Space Charge into the Atmosphere” by B. Vonnegut, K. Maynard, W.G. Sykes and C.B. Moore, published by Arthur D. Little and the Journal of Geophysical Research, volume 66, number 3, March, 1961

“The Future” by Bernard Vonnegut, Vincent Schaefer, J. S. Barrows and Paul MacCready, published in the Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Weather Control, p201, 1958

Research in Electrical Phenomena Associated with Aerosols by Bernard Vonnegut, Arnold W. Doyle and D. Read Moffett, published by Arthur D. Little, 1961

Angels Don’t Play this HAARP: advances in Tesla technology by Jeane Manning and Dr. Nick Begich, published by Earthpulse Press, p78, 1995

1st National Science Foundation annual weather modification report, p14, 1960

“New Horizons of Naval Research and Development” by William Francis Raborn, published in U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, January, 1963

“Ten Year Program in Oceanography: TENOC” by the U.S. Navy, March 13, 1961

9th National Science Foundation annual weather modification report, 1967

“Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification” by the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences Select Panel on Weather Modification, 1966

Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences memorandum to Homer E. Newell dated June 21, 1966, as it appeared in the appendix to “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification” by the Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences Select Panel on Weather Modification, 1966

“The Interdepartmental Committee on Atmospheric Sciences: A Case History” by Robert E. Morrison

U.S. patent #5,003,186 “Stratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warming,” 1991

“Multiple Instrument Studies of Chemical Releases and Heating at Arecibo” by Stanford Research International, published by Stanford Research International, 1994

“Air Force 2025” by the U.S. Air Force, published by the U.S. Air Force, 1996

“An Operational Analysis for Air Force 2025” by the U.S. Air Force, published by the U.S. Air Force as part of “Air Force 2025” by the U.S. Air Force, published by the U.S. Air Force, 1996

Global Warming and Ice Ages by Edward Teller, Lowell Wood and Roderick Hyde, published by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1997

Websites: 

worldcat.org
amazon.com
abebooks.com
google.com/patents
airforce.com
navy.mil
ge.com
weathermodification.org
adlittle.com
signal.army.mil
uscg.mil
commerce.gov
nsf.gov
noaa.gov
whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/nstc
usda.gov
defense.gov
doi.gov
dot.gov
state.gov
epa.gov
energy.gov
nasa.gov
raytheon.com
sri.com
llnl.gov
aircrap.org
globalskywatch.com

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA author and activist. Check out the newly updated and expanded edition of his ebook Chemtrails Exposed.

  • gozounlimited

    Today we see weather manipulation on the West Coast with geoengineered aerosols over the Pacific creating a ridge of high pressure. The chemtrails collude with HAARP destroying low pressure rotation with magnetic down bursts. The high pressure over the Pacific creates the jet stream that goes up toward the arctic and down over the mid-west and north east delivering freezing arctic clippers. The frozen East Coast’s demand for oil is stabilizing the oil market and the ongoing drought in California insures food inflation and the monetization of water. All orchestrated by the banksters and Fed Reserve with the total support of state and federal government.

    See Here: http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/national/satellite-wv (Orange depicts magnetized geoengineered aerosols over Pacific creating high pressure ridge).

    • DougDeGrave

      Oh god. Not HAARP! LMAO.

    • Joseph Larson

      Thank you

  • Scottie M.

    Chemtrails? Lol!

    • The voice

      Put a patch over your other eye so you can be blind like all the other sheeple

      • Scottie M.

        Contrails are formed at high altitudes (5–10 miles or 8–16 kilometres)
        and if any chemicals were released at such altitude they would disperse
        harmlessly and fall many hundreds of miles away, or degrade before
        touching the ground.

        • Truth Speaks

          Internet argument champion???

          You seriously need help.

          • dale ruff

            Truth speaks? You are speaking the Orwellian truth promoted by the fossil fuel oligarchs to confuse the gullible public. Scottie M is wrong: your tin foil hat will not protect you from the propaganda you have embraced and repeat.

        • Windy

          In Middle Tenn. I had kept track of the weather because it was hardly sunny with blue skies anymore. Out of 97 days there were 6 days of blue skies the rest were a grey out or it started out blue and in late morning or sooner the jets rolled in and the trails came and with in an hour or so the sky was a white out from jet clouds.
          Six days in 97? My trees are dying the bark is falling off and they all seem to be covered with fungal issues. I lost 7 trees so far and others are on their way out.
          Harmless? Really?

          • dale ruff

            FAct: today there are millions of flights each year; almost all commercial flights travel in the stratosphere were contrails are formed in the freezing temperatures.

            Fact: contrails, ordinary vapors containing jet fuel contaminants, form cirrus clouds which slightly warm the atmosphere and are pushed by currents thousands of miles over months before falling to earth (mostly to the ocean) radically diluted.

            Fact: millions of flights a year leave millions of contrails which do effect the weather by slightly trapping heat under the cirrus clouds formed. The more flights, the more cirrus clouds formed and the warmer the atmosphere.

            Fact: there is no need for a propaganda myth like
            chemtrails to explain the contrails you see from the thousands of flights each day, which spread into cirrus clouds and create a haze that is not that much different from the ground level haze of fossil fuel pollution.

          • judynz

            They say when we pass away we get to see our life & what we stood for. We get to step aside from our mistakes & see them for what they are, Lessons. I doubt we are expected to feel embarrassed by our closed minded ignorance.

          • dale ruff

            Judynz, I wonder if the “they” who are able to tell you what happens as you die are the same “they” who have polluted your mind with chemtrail myths?

            Those who dismiss the science of those who spend their lives studying the atmosphere and instead embrace the fake science of chemtrails, which is promoted by the fossil fuel propagandists, would indeed be embarrassed by their ignorance.

        • judynz

          Oh dear Scottie, I hope you are being paid well for trying to convince your fellow humans their health & the environment is not being seriously affected by these chemicals. Are you proud of yourself???

          • Scottie M.

            You know how to protect yourself against chemtrails? Cover your head in tin foil. Better yet, cover your entire body just to be safe.

          • dale ruff

            You are paid by the Koch brothers to call actual atmospheric scientists sell outs and anyone who trusts them paid shills. Are you proud of yourself for earning your blood money?

            (Just kidding! I know you are a normal useful idiot who has been brainwashed and volunteer your efforts for nothing!)

        • The voice

          Contrails are made up of ice which dissipate, chemtrails are chemical compounds which continue to form then dissipate into wider clouds and spread out over the sky

          • dale ruff

            You are begging the question, assuming what is to be proved. Actual atmospheric scientists do not buy the fossil fuel propaganda about chemtrails, but you do.

            Contrails have been created since planes flew in the lower stratosphere (as in WWII) and they spread horizontally and form cirrus clouds, which trap heat and slightly heat up the atmosphere. Chemtrails are fictions invented to fool the sheeple so that the fossil fuel polluters, like the Koch brothers, can thwart government efforts to reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. I suggest you listen to the atmospheric scientists instead of the fossil fuel oligarchs whose motive is to confuse the public in order to shift blame from themselves to the agency which is obligated to reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

            You have been duped and now you have been taught to mock the scientists and those who believe they are correct. The Koch brothers millions have bought many useful idiots….who spout fake science while ignoring actual science. Wake up, brother, they are using you.

          • The voice

            Methinks you are the one who needs to wake up

          • dale ruff

            I am awake to science, evidence, and the dangers of fake conspiracy theories, which shift blame and poison the well of legitimate conspiracy allegations.

            I am awake to the fact that the Kochs have spent many millions to confuse the scientifically illiterate public about who is really to blame for pollution and global warming.

            I am awake to the fact that many people would rather believe profit-driven propaganda than real science.

          • The voice

            The public is not the culprit here it is the multinational corporation and government collusion that is greatly contributing to the majority of pollution on the planet. And please stop the the conspiracy theory nonsense it is conspiracy fact that the chemtrail spraying is loaded with aluminum it has been recorded and proven time and time again

          • dale ruff

            There is no scientific evidence that the contrails seen in the lower stratosphere are “chemtrails.” There is no proof. Stop with the fake science and listen to the actual atmospheric scientists.

            Behind the chemtrail and climate denial theories are the fossil fuel oligarchs who seek to confuse the public and shift blame from their own profit-driven and lethal industries (8 million each yr are killed by fossil fuels, with hundreds of millions sickened) to the government, which is the only agency in a position to enact laws to reduce pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, etc. They (the polluters) rely on scientifically illiterate useful idiots to brainwash with their propaganda.

            We know where the pollution comes from. Chemtrails and climate change denial are designed to distract the public and thwart efforts to do something about it.

          • The voice

            Sorry, I dont believe government funded studies only independent ones who have proven the content time and time agaign

        • Padraigin Eagle

          You’re such a sweet sheople of the turd kind, does it smell unbearably when you open your trap, Twatie.

        • dale ruff

          That is a fact…the ordinary jet fuel contaminants in ordinary contrails travel thousand of miles over months before falling to earth (mostly into the ocean) radically diluted. But the useful idiots who follow the Koch brothers propaganda about climate denial and chemtrails are passionate in their stupidity.

          As Yeats said in The Second Coming:
          ;;;;the best lack all conviction
          and the worst are full of passionate intensity.

          Such is the tragedy of our age.

      • dale ruff

        The real sheeple are dismissing the explanations of actual atmospheric scientists and buying the propaganda lies of the fossil fuel polluters, who spend hundreds of millions to brainwash gullible scientifically illiterate dupes into shifting blame for lethal pollution, which kills 8 million each year, from the actual polluters to the government, in order to prevent the government from enacting laws to reduce pollution, greenhouse gases, and thus save lives.

        The useful idiots who buy this corporate propaganda are taught to claim that all atmospheric scientists are frauds and that those who believe in science are sheeple.

        Welcome to the Rabbit Hole, where logic and proportion are softly dead.

        • Don’t waste my time

          Dale. You screwed up first by starting with the “go live in Somalia” comment. That is the first red flag. 2nd. How in the world do you have the time to write out all of those responses. You are good but not good enough. I would suggest your handlers deduct 50 – 75% off your fee. You did much work here, but you screwed up your believability. If you really believed what you where saying you would have abandon this post long ago. FAIL

  • Windy

    I just put a comment up a shot time ago and it was taken down and this is the second time this happened and I wondered why.I have never commented any where with vulgarity and I agree with most of your articles.I do not understand.

  • dale ruff

    1. At the altitude (30-35,000 ft) at which contrails are observed, there is no way to either target a population or cause a cooling of the weather. At that altitude, before the frozen vapors descend to earth, they will be blown thousands of miles and fall (most often in the ocean) months later. Targeting is not possible.
    2. Contrails, which spread out horizontally, form cirrus clouds, which in almost all cases warm the atmosphere. Does anyone seriously think the government wants to increase global warming?
    3. You will not find contrails at lower temperatures, for instance at the level of typical rain clouds. It requires freezing temperatures to create contrails and this almost always is above 30,000 ft, where commercial flights by the millions transit each year.
    4. To target a population, you would have to release particles at a low elevation…and you will not see contrails at low elevations.
    5. You cannot cool the atmosphere with contrails, because they become warming cirrus clouds. You can observe and feel this any day.
    6. Patents of procedures which are unproved are not evidence; nor are proposals. Contrails are seen on ordinary commercial flight paths, and it is absurd to think that commercial flights are trying to poison those below or cool the weather.
    7. Those promoting the chemtrails conspiracy theory are aligned with the climate change deniers, who are funded by the wealthy pollution oligarchs, such as the Koch brothers, who are seeking to confuse the public and poison the well of legitimate conspiracy theories. If you want to know who is killing tens of millions of people each year with pollutants, look no further than your local oil refineries, your local coal operations, and the hundreds of millions of fossil fuel run cars and trucks.
    8. By diverting attention from the known polluters and killers, chemtrails shifts blame from the actual polluters to the only organization large enough to actually do something about it: the government. Pollution does not recognize borders, so pollution control must be national ,regiional, and global. Those whose profits are threatened by ending the lethal onslaught of fossil fuel pollution, want to convince you that not only is the disasterous degradation of the environment not their fault but that the government, which is the only agency with the ability, to curtail the dirty energy oligarchs, is the guilty party. This is akin to Hitler blaming the Jews (and liberals and social democrats) for the defeat and humiliation of Germany.

    This is no exaggeration since over 8 million die each year from fossil fuels, and hundreds of millions are sickened. Normal jet residue in commercial flights does pollute the atmosphere but not deliberately, and not nearly as much as the ground based oil/gas/ and coal industries.

    Wake up: you are being duped! Chemtrails not only lack any basis in atmospheric science but they poison the well of real crimes against humanity generated daily by the dirty energy cartels, who want to shift blame to the government in order to hide their own responsibility for killing millions each year, in order to make more money.

    Note that those promoting the theory are never actual atmospheric scientists but propagandists for the fossil fuel industry, hiding under laws which protect their funding. Who benefits from this absurd theory? Only those who are killing you on a daily basis and don’t want you to turn to government to stop them.

    Now watch the non-scientist zealots attack me, instead of going to the atmospheric scientists to learn the truth. I am used to it.

    • Disgusted

      Dale Ruff, the shill. Who’s paying you? Or, are you really that damn dumb?

      • dale ruff

        My last sentence, after presenting both scientific evidence based on atmospheric science and the motive behind the chemtrails conspiracy theory:

        “Now watch the non-scientist zealots attack me, instead of going to the atmospheric scientists to learn the truth. I am used to it.”

        Disgusted replied, as I predicted: “Dale Ruff, the shill. Who’s paying you? Or, are you really that damn dumb?”

        I am used to it.

        • timwebb1000 .

          I love how a non-scientist like “dale ruff” urges the rest of us not to listen to “non-scientists”.
          The irony is almost palpable.
          Rather than listening to atmospheric scientists like the legions of bought-and-paid-for fraudsters resident under such rocks as the University of East Anglia ( “Climategate”, anyone? ), perhaps we should actually read the article above, where endless papers refer to the efforts of the US government to manipulate the weather with particulate emissions combined with EM radiation.
          Dale urges us not to look up,
          “…It is not necessary to look up and away from the ground level…”
          lest we see for ourselves the patent and criminal absurdity of his drivel.
          Let him access and watch the YT presentation called “What in the world are they spraying”, and then come back here with more of his denialist mendacity.
          But perhaps he has a more important appointment; maybe to catch up on his vaccination schedule.

          • dale ruff

            Tim, I see you are out trolling again. I urge all non atmospheric scientists, like myself, to listen to the actual atmospheric scientists. That is solid advice, tho you are unable to digest it. Your claim that atmospheric scientists are bought and paid for has no evidence and so can be dismissed as a fake argument.

          • zb

            Perhaps Dale never goes outside, so maybe he has never seen a chemtrail. He may not have time to go outside in between writing a continuous stream long-winded contrarian posts on this site. Dale is very hung up on educational credentials and conventional sources of authority. We have all met people like that. Whats important is that he actually believes he knows more than everyone else, not whether he really does

          • dale ruff

            I urge all non-scientists to rely on actual atmospheric scientists for information, as I do.

      • dale ruff

        Truth-telling is its own reward. Who pays you to spread fake science?

    • Tuaca1107

      You must be in such denial you cannot process the fact the everything on the planet is being poisoned by chemtrails.

      Here is a Quote from Dr. Lorraine Hurley, received her medical degree from Boston Univ Sch Of Med, Boston Ma 02118.

      Think about this! The planet is now so poisoned
      ­with billions of tons of barium, nano-particles of fiber-coated
      aluminum, ethylene dibromide (a pesticide that dries out every mucosal
      part of our bodies and destroys the soil), and the rest of this
      Chemtrails spew, PLUS chronic low-level radiation, and 100,000 other
      mostly untested chemicals– so that thousands of edible plants are
      already having tremendous difficulty growing normally. Have you noticed
      how the taste has changed in vegetables? For example, carrots used to be
      sweet. Organic carrots used to taste sweet and crunchy. Now they are
      bitter, even when grown in supposedly “organic” soil. How can they have
      a sweet taste, when all our soil is filled with a poisonous brew of
      Chemtrails and pesticides? The term “organic” no longer exists.

      Cornell University has been teaming up with the
      government to create genetically modified plants that will be able to
      “grow” in poisoned Chemtrails/EMF/GM soils.(5) Think about this! We
      cannot eat this kind of hazardous food without grave consequences, and
      these are already in evidence.

      Question: Can we link how sick so many millions of us are, because the food chain has been so dramatically poisoned with
      Chemtrails along with the entire rest of the pollution spew?

      Given this unprecedented and off-the-scale hazardous scenario of these military Black Operations that have suppressed our immune systems and are methodically destroying all life, our planet may
      possibly survive this horrific onslaught (but in an entirely different
      form without any life), but certainly it will not be fit for human
      habitation or life as we know it now. Can we really process this
      concept? IS THERE STILL EVEN ANOTHER HIDDEN AGENDA?

      • dale ruff

        Dr. Hurley is a family physician with no medical specialization and zero education in atmospheric science. She is no more qualified to confirm “chemtrails” than an atmospheric scientist is qualified to diagnose cancer.

        I wrote, anticipating refutations based on people with NO background in atmospheric science: “Note that those promoting the theory are never actual atmospheric scientists……” Apparently, you did not note that.

        As for nano-particles of aluminum, etc, it is a simple fact that hundreds of common household products contain such particles, including sandpaper and food. The actual pollution of our environment by fossil fuels, contaminated food, and common products amply explains the existence of these substances in the environment.

        You apparently have fallen for the fossil fuel polluters efforts to brainwash you into shifting blame for our degraded environment from their own industrial waste, to the one agency which can reduce this pollution, which is the government, nationally and globally.

        We know why 8 million die each year from fossil fuel pollution and hundreds of millions are poisoned, why our foods are full of toxic substances, and why common household objects proliferate toxic elements. Those who profit from this pollution wish to convince you that it is not they (like the Koch brothers, BP, etc) who are killing you but some sinister government conspiracy. Then, most certainly, once a bunch of non-atmospheric scientists have miseducated you, you will certainly not trust the EPA or the UN to deal with this lethal pollution…and their obscene profits, based on polluting and killing millions, will not be thwarted by an educated public.

        I urge you to listen to the atmospheric scientists who ARE qualified to discuss and educate you on contrails and the fallacies in the chemtrails narrative.

        Our earth is degraded and polluted, we can agree on that. But there is not need to believe fake theories which poison the well of legitimate conspiracy theories and which shift your focus away from the real villains, those who profit from the ordinary pollution of oil refineries, coal mining, fossil fuel vehicles, and the proliferation of toxic substances in everyday products. Chemtrails is a right wing, fossil fuel propaganda ploy, which seduces people with no knowledge of atmospheric science into denying the very real, everyday cause of this global degradation.

        We know who is killing you: the oil companies, the coal companies, and those who promote their propaganda lies, which never includes those actually qualified to discuss the issue. I urge you to listen to the atmospheric scientists and not people who are totally unqualified. I presented the evidence and science of why chemtrails make no sense, but you have found a family doctor who is right about all the lethal substances in our lives but totally unqualified to discuss where they actually come from. It is not necessary to look up and away from the ground level, where everyday hundreds of millions of people pollute the earth with their cars, their fossil-fuel based electricity, and the everyday products we use in our industries and our homes.

        You have been blinded by fake science promulgated by unqualified people. I urge you, once again, to find out what those who study the atmosphere scientifically have to say.

        They say, but you must learn this for yourself, that “chemtrails” makes no sense at all either to poison people or to cool the atmosphere. Occam’s razor teaches us to accept as most likely the explanation which has the fewest assumptions. The simplest explanation for the destruction of our planet, our rivers, our food, our atmosphere is the normal deadly pollution caused by the extraction, production, and consumption of fossil fuels. Chemtrails is a theory which blinds us to the obvious cause of our polluted earth and thus serves those who profit from the lack of political will to regulate fossil fuel producers to reduce pollution and to replace them with clean, green energy like sun and wind. Always ask: who benefits? Who benefits from the chemtrails narrative? The polluters, the wealthy oligarchs who crave more wealth at the expense of human and environmental health.

        I know you won’t be convinced, so I urge you to go to the atmospheric scientists to educate yourself and liberate yourself from the propaganda of the dirty energy industry.

    • Richard Wilcox

      Ahem, so then why do we see white streaks all over the sky (contrails?) these days and for the last several years, as opposed to not too many years ago when we did not ever see such phenomenon in the sky? I am old enough to know what my eyes and common sense tell me, that these “contrails” are not normal in any way whatsoever;

      Interestingly, although you claim that people documenting chemtrails do not rely on atmospheric scientists (even after a huge article which relies on scientists), no where in your comment do you cite such sources for your purported scientific observations or your conclusions which are not supported by sources or facts;

      As for the Koch brothers, this is the typical global warming garbage we
      get from the liberals and “climate believers”, and that stupid CIA funded website, “Metabunk” which “debunks internet conspiracy theories” by selectively picking apart weak theories while ignoring substantive ones;

      FInally, most people that put “Hitler” into the argument are usually either clueless or lying about WWII, see: Mike King’s great website Tomatobubble.com or John Friend’s website The Realist Report instead to get another view on what happened in WWII not told to you by Zionist Controlled Media (ZCM).

      Thank you, I’m not attacking you but just questioning the strength of your arguments.

      – Richard Wilcox
      https://wilcoxrb99.wordpress.com

      • dale ruff

        Contrails have been observed since planes flew in the stratosphere. You can look up images online of WWII contrails from military planes.

        Each day, there are more and more flights (mostly commercial) and thus more and more contrails, which in fact do likely effect the weather by creating cirrus clouds, slightly warming the atmosphere. This is the result of normal contrails.

        The idea that there has been a sudden spike in the number of contrails is false. The rise has been gradual, in accord with the rise in flights.

        If you want to find out what actual atmospheric scientists think about chemtrails, you can easily do a search. Non-atmospheric scientists who make claims about “chemtrails” are not qualified, any more than a biologist is qualified to make scientific claims about quantum physics.

        As for the Hitler comparison, I will make it simpler for you:
        IF a very bad leader believes something that is true or worthy (such as cancer research), that is no reason to oppose that cause. I used Hitler to point out that even the worst and most evil leaders support some good causes and that this is no reason to oppose those causes.

        I am neither clueless about Hitler nor WWII. He did, in fact, oppose smoking, and promoted the earliest cancer research (which actually found the cause of cancer: acidication of cells). Your claim is without merit.

        As for Metabunk, it is wrong on some issues, correct on others. I rely on actual atmospheric scientists for my information on contrails. I suggest you do some research and avoid taking non-experts too seriously.

        Alleged “chemtrails” can be explained simply by the existence of contrails in the stratosphere; the logic behind “chemtrails” does not hold up, since, based on the science, spraying in the stratosphere cannot possibly target populations, and it cannot cool the atmosphere. I know of no motive for the government or anyone to warm the atmosphere, do you?

        So chemtrails is a myth that distracts the gullible public from focusing on the actual causes of lethal pollution, and it is the case that those who profit from such pollution use “chemtrail” believers as useful idiots to shift blame from themselves (whose motive is profit) to the government (which is the only organization capable of passing laws to reduce pollution and save lives.).

        I urge you to do some research on atmospheric science and find out what the experts in the field have to say. I urge you to ignore those whose expertise is NOT in atmospheric science. And I urge you to consider the lack of motives behind the chemtrail allegations and who actually benefits by distracting and confusing the public.

        • Joseph Larson

          Sorry Dale the troll but these aircrafts do not follow commercial traffic travel patterns and I have PERSONALLY witnessed the aerosols being turned off and on when approaching and leaving particulate cloud formations already laid down. Sorry man you just blew your cover.

          • dale ruff

            You have not PERSONALLY witnessed aerosols being turned off and on. You have witnessed planes going from freezing temperatures to non-freezing temperatures and back. You ASSUME what you are seeing are what you wish to believe, but belief is not evidence, and atmospheric science teaches us that temperatures in the lower stratosphere vary from freezing to non-freezing. When entering freezing temps, the planes form contrails; when leaving, the contrails cease.

            I have no cover. Science is open and subject to questioning. There is no need to postulate a narrative of sprayed aerosols when normal contrails fully explain what you are seeing. For example, weather fronts change the density of air and this changes the point at which freezing occurs. Also as planes cruise at different altitudes, the temperature varies. I suggest you read at least one article on atmospheric science before asserting that from 30,000 ft, you can see events which atmospheric scientists explain with simple observations about varying temperatures in the atmosphere.

            Sorry, man, but you just exposed yourself as a scientifically illiterate fool.

          • Joseph Larson

            Like I said I have witnessed this 100’s of times and it most definitely is done for the soul purpose of saturation and sky cover. You obviously are paid and your the fool without a doubt. Im not going to waste time trying to convince or listen to paid shrills. The article listed is all anyone needs to understand what geoengineering/chemtrials are all about. As for you good luck with your boot licking make your Mom proud.

          • DougDeGrave
          • Nicholas I

            Chemtrails gassed the Jews!!!!!

          • DougDeGrave

            And according to some of these gullible lemmings, “they” are gassing YOU too!

          • Nicholas I

            The chemtrails make everyone gay, and I just started watching the Ellen show! Oh no!

          • Nicholas I

            I don’t see what the big deal is. When I was a kid, dentists used chemtrails to anaesthetize patients.

          • Nicholas I

            Blame Canada!

          • DougDeGrave
    • Dale, I understand your skepticism, but it appears that you weren’t paying attention when (and if) you read this article. There are patents detailing the modification of the weather going back to 1927, and even the federal government’s own documents to be found on the Defense Technical Intelligence Center (DTIC) website makes reference to “weather-forcing aerosols” along with an eight year study conducted at Wright-Patterson AFB between June, 1993 and March, 2001 to determine the hazards of Aluminum nanoparticle toxicity to American Servicemen. See: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCcQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fhandle.dtic.mil%2F100.2%2FADA445568&ei=aUbkVOruOYirogS1yIDwBg&usg=AFQjCNH-r1bJzqVpNjWsun89SonzV7MQmg&sig2=2jjVcDwmQNrNfE9Aw7FNUA&bvm=bv.85970519,d.cGU

      This study (one of many, should you care to look) details how this material suppresses the actions of white blood cells in the lungs (your first line of defense against infection) to go after biological and toxic threats. And perhaps you weren’t paying attention to the quote from the Admiral’s evaluation of the research into weather modification and its value to a military force: To not only obscure the movements of our forces, but to effectively achieve battlefield denial to the enemy by undermining their ability to move, through flooding, extreme cold, snow or severe storm conditions. Why do you think the military’s RFP (Request For Proposal’s) on all recent fighter and attack aircraft have stipulated an “all weather capability”? It’s because that enables our forces to maneuver and project force upon the enemy even while the weather stops the enemy in their tracks. And that’s not all.

      If you can control the weather, you can bring drought to foreign lands causing crops to fail (among other things) and starve or destabilize a local population, making a stand against American forces a much more difficult task.

      In addition, NASA put out a document in the mid-2000’s on “gelled and metalized fuels” using a combination of silica-based aerogels and oxide-coated Aluminum nanoparticles in rocket propellants but also in jet fuel, like JP-8. See: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/Fuels-And-Space-Propellants/RACNanotechnologyGelledFuelsDastoorHQ05-2001_brief.pdf
      (scroll to page 22)

      So why would the military or civilian carriers WANT to put this stuff ikn their fuel tanks? Simple. As you increase your altitude, the level of Oxygen present becomes less. Combustion efficiency drops off. But Aluminum Oxide nanoparticles are made up of three atoms of Oxygen for every two atoms of Aluminum. Once these nanoparticles are vaporized in the combustion reaction, they give up all that Oxygen, making for better thermal efficiency, greater thrust and range from that fuel load. The byproduct is a condensate of Aluminum- “chemtrail”- (which reacquires the Oxygen as it cools) and this becomes a larger nanoparticle, suitable for ice nucleation at almost any altitude where temperatures are below freezing. That can be as low as 14,000 feet in some parts of the world.

      This material can include the solidification of the Silica Aerogel which helps to loft the Aluminum particulate and this can reflect enough solar radiation in the infrared band to reduce surface temperatures by as much as 15 degrees Fahrenheit. Sometimes the expelled aerogel even makes it to the ground undamaged. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkE7KB_M8uI
      This is further evidence that these gelled and metallized fuels are currently in use.

      But the particles can be sprayed independently of the engine/combustion application and by managing the exact size of these aerosol nanoparticles, a high frequency RF transmission can actually cause these particles to heat up because of resonance matching of the RF wavelength. The same principle used in Stealth coatings on the F-117A Nighthawk; thus converting the radar (microwave) signal to heat, reducing the RCS (radar cross section).

      The same principle is used in the Kanzius cancer cure by infusing Carbon or Gold nanoparticles into a cancer patient. The nanoparticles cling to a certain protein in a malignancy and by lightly bombarding the patient with the resonant microwave frequency of those particles, the cancer tissue is heated up to about 135*, and this kills the tumors anywhere in the body. Normal cells are not harmed. I think clinical trials are now starting. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RPoNJ51dYg

      Put the same kind of stuff up in the air in the form of Aluminum Oxide nanoparticles and you have a highly reflective aerosol on the one hand, (for cooling) or an air mass laced with countless numbers of these particles that can be painted with a microwave frequency and you can dramatically heat up that air mass causing it to rise and form a powerful low pressure system. The convective lofting can create hailstones as large as a softball. You can find video of this right on YouTube. Tell me that doesn’t give a military force the edge when suppressing the movements of an enemy on the battlefield.

      If you don’t see the obvious applications of this technology from a military standpoint, then maybe you really are a shill… Or you’re just not paying attention.

      • Peter A. Kirby

        It’s so good to hear from you again. Thank you for your insights and the ‘NANOTECHNOLOGY AND GELLED CRYOGENIC FUELS’ pdf. I have saved it and I will look over this information closely when I go about writing that paper later this year.

        That video of the first cloud to fall to earth is both disturbing and fascinating. This is probably that stuff people have been finding that looks like spiderwebs covering the ground. That guy who stuck in his arm in it may have regretted it. Is this stuff bad for you?

    • Been_Down_That_Road

      So, where do I go to get my piece of the Koch brother’s funding? I clearly missed out on that while I was busy watching “them” turn my normal bright blue skies and warm days into days
      with funny looking clouds that I’ve never seen before and much cooler temperatures than they would have been.

      • dale ruff

        You don’t get jack shit, been down. You are what political scientists call a useful idiot, someone who, to their own disadvantage, is persuaded to hold and support a position which is actually harmful to them.

        Cirrus clouds are not funny looking. Contrails, since planes first flew in the stratosphere, have formed, going back 70-80 yrs. Contrails spread out and form cirrus clouds, which slightly warm the atmosphere.

        The number of flights has risen rapidly and so the number of contrails has risen. Today, there are over 100,000 flights a day (mostly commercial), and it is a fact that the resulting contrails DO effect the weather (slightly warming). The more flights, the more contrails, the more warming.

        Cooler temperatures are not the result of the condensation trails you see at the level of cirrus clouds. You will almost never see contrails at lower altitudes (such as rain clouds) since it requires freezing temperatures (at higher altitudes). You will not see condensation trails except at this high altitudes.

        Contrails (or alleged chemtrails) do NOT cool the temperature nor can they be used to target populations as air currents carry them for thousands of miles over months before they dissipate, highly diluted (ie the jet fuel particles that are part of the process).

        If you have scientific credentials, you can certainly find a source of income from the Koch brothers, who have spent tens of millions to convince useful idiots that the problem of pollution is not their coal and oil operations (which kill over 8 million a yr and sicken hundreds of millions) but some nefarious operation high in the sky, thus shifting blame from themselves to the organizations in government which have the ability to regulate and reduce pollution. This is clever but it requires gullible scientifically illiterat people to serve as useful idiots to create a misinformed public which can block effective governmental action to reduce pollution and save lives.

        An example of Koch funding was the Berkeley Project, where they hired a “climate skeptic” to examine and expose the government climate data. In fact, the Project found the government data to be accurate and the claims made based on that data to be under-exaggerated. The Kochs funded a project which was supposed to expose government fraud but in fact, it confirmed government accuracy. The former “climate skeptic” wrote this op-ed in the NYTimes:

        The Conversion of a Climate-Change SkepticBy RICHARD A. MULLER

        Published: July 28, 2012

        “CALL me a converted skeptic. Three years ago I identified problems in previous climate studies that, in my mind, threw doubt on the very existence of global warming. Last year, following an intensive research effort involving a dozen scientists, I concluded that global warming was real and that the prior estimates of the rate of warming were correct. I’m now going a step further: Humans are almost entirely the cause.

        My total turnaround, in such a short time, is the result of careful and objective analysis by the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project, which I founded with my daughter Elizabeth. Our results show that the average temperature of the earth’s land has risen by two and a half degrees Fahrenheit over the past 250 years, including an increase of one and a half degrees over the most recent 50 years. Moreover, it appears likely that essentially all of this increase results from the human emission of greenhouse gases.

        These findings are stronger than those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations group that defines the scientific and diplomatic consensus on global warming. In its 2007 report, the I.P.C.C. concluded only that most of the warming of the prior 50 years could be attributed to humans. It was possible, according to the I.P.C.C. consensus statement, that the warming before 1956 could be because of changes in solar activity, and that even a substantial part of the more recent warming could be natural.

        Our Berkeley Earth approach used sophisticated statistical methods developed largely by our lead scientist, Robert Rohde, which allowed us to determine earth land temperature much further back in time. We carefully studied issues raised by skeptics: biases from urban heating (we duplicated our results using rural data alone), from data selection (prior groups selected fewer than 20 percent of the available temperature stations; we used virtually 100 percent), from poor station quality (we separately analyzed good stations and poor ones) and from human intervention and data adjustment (our work is completely automated and hands-off). In our papers we demonstrate that none of these potentially troublesome effects unduly biased our conclusions.”

        Since this disappointing result, the Koch brothers have stopped openly funding projects to create doubt about climate change. They are now funding their propaganda efforts through opaque methods like 3d parties, etc.

        If you have scientific bona fidas, and are willing to help them trash legitimate science, they will have a job for you. If you do not, then believing them rather than actual climate scientists marks you as a useful idiot.

    • Peter A. Kirby

      Dale Ruff,

      1.) Your assertion that chemtrails are not effective at 30,000 to 35,000 feet is just plain wrong. Atmospheric scientists running this program can calculate all the environmental factors influencing sprayed particulates once emitted. All one needs to do is take into consideration these factors and spray the particulates at the appropriate place. Anyway, the point of spraying is not to make the particles fall to the ground at a specific location as you seem to suggest. The point is to saturate the stratosphere and upper troposphere with this stuff so that the ionospheric heaters work better.

      2.) Contrails do not spread out to form cirrus clouds. Chemtrails do. The government runs this program in order to control the weather. It has nothing to do with the patently false theory of man-made global warming.

      3.) I think you are confusing temperature with altitude. Get back to me on this one please, if you will.

      4.) Again, the point of releasing particles as described in this article is not to make the particles land in a particular place. The purpose is to saturate the atmosphere in order to make the ionospheric heaters work better.

      5.) Again, cooling the atmosphere is not the point of these operations. Anyway, contrails don’t do jack diddly squat. Chemtrails do.

      6.) Some patents are spurious, yes. But the patents mentioned here are highly credible and relevant. The information presented in this article is simply a compilation of the evidence. Maybe you are not familiar with the term. ‘Evidence’ is defined in the Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary as: “Something which shows that something else exists or is true. A visible sign of something. Or material that is presented to a court of law to help find the truth about something.” All the information presented here meets these criteria. Please see my response to the other troll (possibly a computer), Defiant. You guys wouldn’t be sharing notes now, would you?

      Your other sentence under number 6 is so convoluted and unsubstantiated that I am hesitant to even address it. But, here I go. Yes, if the atmospheric conditions are right, contrails are seen being emitted from airplanes. This has been the case since the beginning of the jet age. We are not here concerned with contrails. We are concerned with chemtrails. Also, this paper does not claim that the objective of the New Manhattan Project is to poison people below. This paper claims that the New Manhattan Project’s primary objective is weather control. ‘Cooling the weather’ is also not stated here as a reason for the New Manhattan Project. Controlling the weather is.

      7.) The theory of man-made global warming is patently and provably false. The driver of climate is the sun. Man’s contributions to global climate are insignificant. The earth’s global annual average temperature is not rising and neither are sea levels. Even if they were, who is to say that this trend will not reverse. Only the most ignorant and dogmatic portions of our society cling to this fantasy of the establishment for which we are supposed to sacrifice our quality of life. The politicians love it though, because it is an excuse to grow the government.

      It has become the mark of true ignorance to scapegoat the Koch Brothers. See MSNBC. The Koch Brothers’ efforts are insignificant in the face of the overall establishment. I don’t know what the Koch Brothers do and I don’t care because they are only a small piece (if they are a piece at all) of the puzzle. To regurgitate the term ‘Koch Brothers’ and think that this somehow supports your case is simply ludicrous.

      8.) Your conspiracy theory about big oil creating a false conspiracy in order to shift blame is convoluted at best. This crutch, used so frequently by trolls and robots such as yourself asks us to disbelieve our own eyes, common sense and vast expanses of scientific evidence. This is why trolls harp so repeatedly upon the notion that what we see in the sky are normal contrails. It is integral to their tired, deceptive argument. This is the troll thesis: The lines in the sky are normal contrails and this chemtrail conspiracy talk is just a ploy by the Koch Brothers and big oil to distract people. Every chemtrail shill in history has argued this point. I’ve dispatched many of them. Yes, big oil pollutes. But it is nothing in the face of megatons of toxic metals raining down upon the Earth and all its inhabitants. Our focus remains upon chemtrails. You are not duping me.

      • dale ruff

        Number 1 you just made up.Please cite any atmospheric scientists who claim they can calculate air currents so accurately that they can predict where a vapor trail will end up.

        Number 2: contrails spread out to form cirrus clouds. That is basic atmospheric science. You claim the government is doing this to control the weather: what is the motive to increase atmospheric temperature, which contrails as they form cirrus clouds do?

        Number 3: altitude and temperature are closely related which is why you never see trails below the cirrus cloud level (around 30,000 ft).

        I suggest you read at least one article on atmospheric science, since everything you have claimed is contrary to the actual science of the atmosphere.

      • GTP

        Peter Kirby, we most definitely need to talk….Please PM me at my congressional site GregPallen4Congress. I look forward to hearing from you, Sir.

    • Joseph Larson

      Your a complete moron. I suppose you think the government is always helping you and looking out for your best interest too…give me a break,http://youtu.be/daGuPLXVunQ

    • Joseph Larson

      Also I might add that before climate change it was global warming. Climate Change is a natural process however,CO2 is not a culprit but a ploy to tax and gain more control. You make sense but fail to beleive this is a problem. Never…NEVER!!! has the EVER EVER been trails that go from horizon to horizon and stay in the atmosphere all fu**ing day and eventually cover the whole sky. Wake The F**k up you fool

      • dale ruff

        Global warming is real and the result is climate change.

        Climate change such as we see today is not natural since it is influenced by greenhouse gases like CO2 and methane.

        CO2 absolutely is a culprit, as it traps hot air and increases global temperatures.

        Contrals have been photographed (see http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/) when planes fly at altitudes through freezing temperatures.

        WWII planes flew as high as 29,000 ft and there is abundant photographic evidence of the contrails formed. Most commerical flights cruise at around 30-35,000 ft where there is commonly freezing temperatures, which produces contrails.

        Today, there are 100 times more flights (if not more) than in the past so of course there are 100 times more contrails.

        Contrails do influence the weather by forming cirrus clouds, which slightly warm the atmosphere. The more flights (millions a year), the more contrails, the more warming. Like ground pollution, the contrails of common airplanes influence the weather.

        Cursing does not strengthen your case, fool. You are being duped by the polluters who are promoting climate denial and chemtrail theories to blind you to the lethality of everyday fossil fuel pollution, which kills millions each year. Wake up, fool!

  • Bradley James

    Do the right thing and refuse to pay for the destruction of you and your families life, . Boycott the IRS , the fed gov , trade barter grow a organic victory garden .Stock up . Starve the beast.

    • dale ruff

      Boycott fossil fuels. Stop using government roads. Go to nations with no government control like Somalia.

  • New Manhattan Project is spot on. Most do not remember this project was top secret super hush that NO BODY but the insiders knew what was going on for a very long time and with a large populace involved in the project. Good article. The good news….the people residing up in that ridiculous capstone of power having goat sex, licking pig butt are definitely nervous and losing power. They will begin to make more mistakes than ever before and already have with all the false flags. Second good news is science isn’t an exact science, whether its from this planet or a different dimension. Go see KINGSMAN…the villain Samuel Jackson creates a CELL signal that turns everyone violently against one another with a frequency. Whole lot of truth in some of these movies folks,,, and tinfoil hat, take your meds, and black helicopter jokes won’t make it go away. Gonna have to trust me on this one.

  • Chem trails

    It’s unbelievable that after all the discovery and evidence that is now available we have people so lost that they are still trying to defend this lie that all this spraying is NORMAL. It’s just contrails!

    Right.

    The people who are trying to convince everyone this is not real are either paid to do so or are stupid on a monumental level.

    There’s no fixing that, and even if it were true that all this was just contrails, why would someone care if others had a misconception of it.
    What motivates someone to go through the trouble of “correcting” someone else. Many people believe in ghosts, ufo’s, devils, angels, etc.

    I see no one on a quest to correct them all, which is why I am suspicious of paid trolls to purposely confuse or lie.

    • Poths

      I don’t think it is unbelievable at all. There is “evidence” on both sides. One side talks about atmospheric conditions for contrails, the other points to patents for weather modification. I’m not qualified to know if this atmospheric stuff is correct and I don’t have time or resources to do my own research. And on the other side, these patents are highly suggestive but they are not either conclusive proof. It’s not stupid to believe the official story, it’s the result of strong societal pressures and an education system that demands regurgitation of facts rather than development of critical faculties. So if we could stop fighting one another and slinging insults and claiming to have absolute truth on our side, perhaps we could actually have a positive debate that allows us to share information and work TOGETHER towards the TRUTH.

      Don’t call people trolls and don’t call people stupid, let’s just talk about this!

    • dale ruff

      Are you saying that the atmospheric scientists are all paid to lie or stupid? Is it possible those who dismiss the science are paid or stupid? Misconceptions confuse the public and thus help block legislation and regulation to reduce pollution, spewed out by the fossil fuel industry, which funds such myths as climate denial and chemtrails.
      The motive to block governmental action by creating useful idiots and politicians funded by the fossil fuel industry in order to maximize profits at the expense of human and environmental health.

      Who will you trust: atmospheric science or the fossil fuel industry?

  • Chem trails

    Whether Dale Ruff is paid or just that lost doesn’t make any difference.
    There are many people damaged in this way and the BEST thing to do is not respond at all.

    1) They won’t have the audience they so severely desire (due to their lack of confidence and self esteem)

    2) Their plans of derailing points of interest will be nullified.

    • dale ruff

      When people cannot make a rational argument based on evidence, they attack those who can as “paid shills.” This level of logical fallacy and dishonesty exposes their utter lack of credibility.

  • Defiant

    LMAO! Patents prove NOTHING. You can bring a picture of a block of wood to the patent office and register it as a particle smasher. Really. A patent doesn’t mean the technology works. It’s not even proof that the technology is physically real–functional or otherwise.

    There are patents for free energy devices. Obviously, they don’t work…or we’d be flying around on saucers that would make Jetson’s car look like a steam engine.

    Folks REALLY need to learn the difference between “evidence” and “proof.”

    • Padraigin Eagle

      Talking out your arse again, evidence and proof that you are a cretin.

      • dale ruff

        When lacking all logic and proportion, resort to personal insults.

    • Peter A. Kirby

      Your childish remarks only defy common sense, Humanity and your own conscience, if you are Human at all.

      Please let me explain to you how the world works, Defiant. There are patents, then there are patents. Yes, some patents are whimsy. The patents referenced here are not. The patent #4,686,605 ‘Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere,’ which is the most prominently referenced here, is a patent which lists the main scientist behind HAARP (Bernard J. Eastlund) as the inventor. This patent was assigned to a division of a major corporation (APTI/Atlantic Richfield) which was then acquired by the company that built HAARP; BAE Systems. The patent is not speculation or conjecture, it is a description of how a real-world machine (HAARP) works. The credibility of this patent is reinforced when Dr. Eastlund laments it ever being made public as he did in ‘Angels Don’t Play This HAARP.’ He didn’t want to deal with the political fallout generated by such a revealing document.

      Nikola Tesla’s patents come from a genius among geniuses whose scientific exploits account for so much of today’s modern technology. Tesla and his work cannot be written off as irrelevant. Those who attempt to discredit Nikola Tesla only discredit themselves. The establishment has proven themselves expert at discrediting themselves in this fashion.

      The ‘Stratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warming’ patent again is no shot in the dark. This is a patent issued to a legendary defense contracting firm, Hughes Aircraft. Hughes Aircraft was subsequently acquired by the defense contracting behemoth Raytheon. The patent outlines a scheme consistent with today’s SRM geoengineering thesis. Are we to believe that this is a coincidence? This is the establishment here to ram this thing down our throats.

      This article does not only reference patents. The highly credible patents referenced here add to a body of evidence which includes historical fact, theory and documentation of real-world experiments. I am merely compiling the evidence and presenting it in a fashion that allows people to understand what this is. I don’t figure that your mind will be changed. I only write this so that everybody else can plainly see the fallacy of your arguments.

      • Joseph Larson

        Here Here… Awesome and, thank you for your sound research Peter!

    • dale ruff

      Nor do proposals prove anything. The world is full of useful idiots.

  • Dan

    An interesting article. It doesn’t, however, explain why there are always, at least from my observations,
    the heaviest concentrations of criss-cross patterns over the more
    densely populated areas. He has
    not touched on that aspect of chem-trails which I find troubling.
    I
    suspect that, although weather control is probably a definite facet of
    spraying, there is a more sinister motivation behind it. On several
    trips by auto I could determine where every town or city was located
    along the way not by looking at signs but by looking at the cross work
    pattern in the sky over every city or town. If weather control was the
    real plan intended, why wouldn’t it be evenly spread across the
    landscape and since we know that aluminum and Barium and other toxic
    metals and chemicals are contained in the emissions, prudence would
    dictate that populated areas should be avoided.
    We have been warned that a major human extinction of around 90% has been in the plans for quite some time. Couple this with the sudden rabble rousing regarding forced vaccinations which, if imposed, could deliver an agent to make whatever they are spraying more receptive or vice-versa and you have another diabolical scheme from all those boys and girls in DC pretending to be looking out for your best interests.
    I’m afraid when someone tells me to listen to the scientists and believe what they are telling us, I smell a stinking rat in the wood pile. Remember when we were told that all the scientists were in agreement with Al Gore’s [you remember him. The moron who invented the internet but can’t tie his frigging shoelaces] “Inconvenient Truth”. Its inconvenient alright for everyone who was about to get socked with another tax on energy. A tax to make the fattest even fatter and the humblest even more humble–and hungry. The plantation management has some dastardly deeds in store for us and listening to the shills that act like point men for these supposed scientific proofs would be hilarious if it weren’t for those that join in out of desperation to move in the direction of current popular thinking. Did I really say thinking?
    What this country needs is a very large guillotine factory, fully staffed and running 24 hours a day.
    Those that don’t watch the news on TV are uninformed and those that do are misinformed. YOU CAN’T MAKE A HORSE THIRSTY!!

    • DougDeGrave

      Why would they spray directly over the populated area ? By the time the alleged particles hit the ground, they will be 500 miles away.

      • Dan

        Right, Doug, 500 miles away. If anyone believes that then I would say their brain is 500 miles from their head. That is one of the most asinine suggestions I have ever heard. Why would they lay down a spread of spray over a populated area unless they intended that it affect that area? If you are not too busy quoting the so-called scientific geniuses out there you might take a trip down a major highway and learn something. If you go 500 miles you might retrieve your brain.

        • DougDeGrave

          Why? Maybe cause they aren’t spraying anything, perhaps? I guess you just believe all the asinine pseudo-scientific theories by ignoring facts and basic atmospheric physics. Maybe your version of physics would work for you on Jupiter, but not here on this planet.

          • Joseph Larson

            You guys just dont get it, even if it slapped you in the face. Maybe this will help get you out of that sheeple atitude…http://youtu.be/daGuPLXVunQ. real officials/scientists and pilots discussing these excercises

          • DougDeGrave

            Real quacks. Dane Wigington? LMAO. Oh yeah, “sheeple”, that’s exactly what you are, repeating tired clichès and blindly falling for this debunked poppycock.

          • Joseph Larson

            Why dont you just admit your a troll you scum. Go lie in your grave you doug…hahahahahahhaha

          • Kussit

            Why don’t you just admit YOU’RE* a returd and save yourself, imbecile ….

          • Joseph Larson

            Thanks for that great analogy, does this make you feel powerful

          • Joseph Larson

            perfect example of a troll as i never said a word to you and your first reaction is attack

          • Kussit

            Nope, that was a correction, not an attack, you should thank me …

          • Joseph Larson

            can you expand on your explanation of attack in name calling…what your reasoning and so forth…does this make sense to you…comprende?

          • Kussit

            Sorry, I don’t converse with “Sheeple” …..

          • Kussit

            Not as much as it justifies you acting like a turd …

          • dale ruff

            This “diverse panel of experts” lacks any actual atmospheric scientists.

          • Kenneth Vest

            Long streams of gases coming from high G aircraft are at best, POLLUTION, which causes cancers. These streams of whatever.. are much to prevalent to ignore. Manipulation of our world should never be conducted w/o the consent of all her inhabitants. Quacks or no Quacks, there is always a bit of truth, and in this case please do not dismiss the pollutants we are experiencing from the military industrial complex as a whole. They are certainly devastating.

          • Windy

            Well,well,well all these folks are spending all this time and all these billions and all this thinking working together all this time on some silly little nothing BS. Really? OK.

        • dale ruff

          Dan, atmospheric science teaches us that trails in the lower stratosphere will be carried thousands of miles by air currents over a period of months before, radically diluted, they will fall to earth, or in most cases, into the ocean. If you think atmospheric scientists know less than you about atmospheric behavior, you may have a brain disease which combines ignorance with arrogance.

          • Joseph Larson

            Maybe you would benefit by reading the article, but everyone knows thats not what your job is…

            In the 1967 National Science Foundation’s ninth annual weather
            modification report, it reads, “ESSA [Environmental Science Services
            Administration] is also investigating the effect of cirrus clouds on the
            radiation budget of the atmosphere by studying aircraft-produced
            contrails which often spread into cirrus layers covering considerable
            fractions of the sky. One technique proposed for modifying lower cloud
            development has been the generation of a high level cirrus deck with jet
            aircraft. By intercepting solar radiation at high altitude it may be
            possible to influence larger scale cloud development elsewhere by
            reducing solar input and reducing convective cloud generation in areas
            where they are not needed.” This is essentially today’s geoengineering
            thesis.

            A little later in that same report, it reads that their computer
            atmospheric simulations, or ‘models’ as they call them, might simulate,
            “…producing high-level cirrus cloud cover over an area by means of jet
            aircraft, inserting particulate matter into the upper atmosphere to
            alter the solar radiation balance and the like.”Now please take a hike troll!!!

          • dale ruff

            Hmnn…a 1967 investigation on whether contrails might influence…..

            This is a 47 yr old investigation of whether it is possible……….

            Contemporary atmospheric science knows that cirrus clouds almost always warm the atmosphere.
            ” Depending on their location in the atmosphere, they can either help
            cool the Earth or warm it up. Unlike liquid water clouds, which
            generally cool the Earth by reflecting sunlight, ice clouds can help
            warm it up by absorbing reflected heat

            Although mineral particles have always found their way into the upper
            atmosphere, where cirrus clouds hang out, humans have increased the
            amount of mineral dust that arrives there through land-use changes such
            as deforestation and land development, Toon( Brian Toon, a researcher at the University of Colorado )said. Cziczo estimates that
            the level of these minerals has increased by about 50 percent since the
            beginning of industrialization. Metallic particles are also introduced
            by humans through the burning of fossil fuels and other industrial activities, he said.”livescience.com

            Cirrus clouds are ice clouds which do usually warm by absorbing more reflected heat than they allow in. Contrails form cirrus clouds.

            Thus fossil fuels both create C02 in the atmosphere, which acts as a greenhouse gas to warm the atmosphere, but the fossil fuel contaminents from ordinary contrails also form cirrus clouds which usually warm the atmosphere.

            There is no need for a conspiracy theory (especially one which poisons the well of legitimate conspiracy allegations) to explain what atmospheric science completely explains.

            Nor is there need to reach for a 47 yr old investigation of possibilities to disprove what has been proved in more recent times by atmospheric scientists.

            So go back under your rock, troll.

          • Joseph Larson

            I give up on you!!!!!

          • dale ruff

            I suggest you do not use 47 yr old investigations of possible connections which may…..as evidence. You have given up on science.

          • Joseph Larson

            I give up on you cause your a troll, have a nice life if thats possible

          • dale ruff

            You have given up on making your case, using he fake excuse that “your(sic) a troll” to hide behind.

            I have a very nice life, based on the fact that my thinking is based on an ethics of strict honesty and compassion and is rooted in reality.

          • Joseph Larson

            I give up on you because your a buffoon troll who understands the complexity of these programs who’s current job is to stamp out people with common sense. Any 5th Grader understands contrails do not stay in the sky all fu**ing day long you buffoon. Since that’s your best logic please go home and bury your head under the covers.
            Like I said and I repeat, these programs are real and your a troll end of story. MY logic is based on common sense,as your is based on science surrounded by misinformation/manipulation of the facts and eye witness accounts. when intellectual like G. Edward Griffin, get involved then you have to wonder, as many climate scientists also will tell you the military continually spray chemicals and chaff in the sky more than ever before in our history. here is another documentary for you to watch…or not cause your a buffoon who will not listen to the other side https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-5VnMIiKPY#t=258

          • dale ruff

            If you think the views of atmospheric scientists is trolling, I give up on you. Trusting science over myth does not prevent one from having a nice life. Your logic is bizarre.

          • Poths

            @dale ruff, science, or the scientific method, is a body of techniques for ascertaining knowledge; it is about evidence and it is about observations, and it is about pulling together different sources of information to reach the truth – investigation, my friend. For my part the 1967 report, as well as numerous other historic documents now declassified (e.g. disclosures from Porton Down in the UK), demonstrates that amongst certain military and scientific circles there was a keen interest in, and even the will to carry out, experiments spraying people and/or the environment. Evidence that it has been done is not proof positive that it goes on today, but is nonetheless an important item of data when investigating potential black projects such as this. The information you have posted is interesting, but what you say is not actually proof that aerial spraying is not occurring if you think about it carefully. If we’re honest it’s something none of us really knows either way 100%. The evidence of my own eyes and the documentary evidence from the past suggests to me that it is possible, even probable, that something untoward is going on. The reason why people still debate it is that neither side has conclusively proven their point.

          • dale ruff

            Your pedantic lecture on scientific method is unnecessary for me; you should address it to the chemtrail zealots

            It is not for me to prove that proposals made decades ago are not being carried out globally but for those making these assertions to prove they are.

            Part of scientific (and intellectual) discipline is Occam’s Razor, using the fewest assumptions to make the case. Atmospheric science completely explains the appearance of chemtrails in the stratosphere from normal flight emissions and therefore it is unnecessary to speculate beyond that.

            What your own eyes have seen is not evidence of chemtrails…..but evidence of contrails, which no atmospheric scientist denies. Atmospheric scientists do not still debate the issue…only that minority which have fallen for the myths promoted by the fossil fuel industry (along with climate denial) to shift blame from their own lethal pollution to the government for the damage to human health.

          • jimmy corn

            Sorry this is a year later but high bypass fan turbo jet engines (or whatever the correct name is for the jet engines used in most airplanes today) are designed to not make contrails. Only of the rarest of circumstances do they create small fast dissipating contrails. So that papers conclusions are erroneous. And havent taken into account that the jet engines cant make contrails so contrails arent the cause.

          • dale ruff

            “. The likelyhood that a particular eng35ine will create a contrail is governed by the “contrail factor”, and this is higher for high bypass engines – I encourage you to research this for yourself, and I give some links below.

            The classic demonstration of high bypass engines producing more contrails is the study:
            Ulrich Schumann and Reinhold Busen, 2000, Experimental Test of the Influence of Propulsion Efficiency on Contrail Formation
            http://elib.dlr.de/9247/1/aerscitech-2000.pdf

            You are repeating lies which have no evidence.
            I doubt if you have even ONE class in undergraduate science to deal with this issue, and yet you smuggly can dismiss the scientific research of trained experts with PHds in atmospheric science etc.

            All jet engines release water vapor which freezes into white crystals in the freezing temperature in the stratosphere (30-35K altitude) .

            I will challenge you do do your own research:
            Have you ever seen “chemtails” below this level (the level of cirrus clouds)? You have not.

            Have you checked the commercial flight paths where you observe the sky to atch to observed trails? What you are seeing are the contrails from the million flights a year.

            If you are unwilling to do the observations to prove or disprove chemtrails For Yourself, you are a sheep.

            Can you find one atmospheric scientist with research in the field who accepts the chemtrail conspiracy theory?

            Where did you learn about “chemtrails?” Was it from real scientists or from some website whose funding may have been from the fossil fuel industry which benefits by distracting people from the known, daily pollution they cause which kills millions each year?

            Contrails contain pollutants and also slightly warm the atmosphere; they are blown thousands of miles as they spread out over months before falling mostly into the ocean. You cannot target people from 30,000 ft.

            The EPA is seeking authorization to regulate jet fuel as it does ground fuels to limit environmental/health damage. The fossil fuel industry has supported politicians who want to shut down the EPA.

            Follow the money: cui bono. Do not believe anything you cannot either find evidence (scientific, generated by research) for or check yourself.

            And then apply science, which refutes the value of targeting at an altitude where you have NO control over where the whatever you spray will end up.

            Ordinary contrails, which are increasing each year as more and more flights take places, warm the atmosphere. I know of no one who has a vested interested in exacerbating global warming……

          • dale ruff

            You h!ave given up on science and been suckered into propaganda. Bravo!

          • Joseph Larson

            I pointed this part of the article out to you to give you a clue how long and old this science has been around. Currently this is an active program and you once again have blown your cover by your very reactive responses as anyone on here can now see you are a paid shrill. Stay in your denial and very thick brainwashed head of yours and have a very karamatic life because its coming around dude.

    • Peter A. Kirby

      Assuming your observations are accurate, my take is that chemtrails may be sprayed over populated areas in order to accomplish the secondary (or is it the primary?) objective of the New Manhattan Project; mass mind control. The weather control aspects of this Project are the more documented and provable; that is why they are presented here. If I started writing about mind control before proving weather control, more people would be alienated and therefore less people would come to grips with this information at all. My intention is to make as many people as possible aware of this Project. I’ll have more about the mind control aspects of this Project probably later this year. Cheers.

      • Joseph Larson

        THANK YOU ONCE AGAIN KIRBY! NICE TO SEE SOME REAL STAND UP PEOPLE STILL EXIST!

        • Peter A. Kirby

          You are welcome, Mr. Larson. I assume you will keep firing.

    • Patricia P Tursi

      YES. Why is no one discussing the elimination of 15/16 of our world;s population? The Georgia Guidestones, Agenda 21, and others call for this grand reduction. If we look at the rate of increasing disease, we see one way this is being accomplished. Genetic Engineering and Genetic Engineering are working together toward this goal.

      • dale ruff

        Because the world’s population is still growing rapidly and methods of halting this dangerous rise include economic policies which create food and financial security, at which point people voluntarily reduce the birth rate. Almost all of the advanced high income nations have birthrates below replacement level. QED.

    • dale ruff

      Populated areas have more commercial flights, which leave more contrails. Occams razor.

      • Joseph Larson

        Also I might point out to you and your other troll friends that it doesn’t take a person with a degree in atmospheric science to understand and have common sense enough to know this shit is happening and its ongoing. Hopefully people like you we have to answer to the law suit also. Now here’s what I suggest you do. First go confess to your parents whats going on and what they think you should do. Then become a hero and do the right thing and become a Whistle-blower. You know you will feel better having helped bring this to light and saving millions upon millions of children, animals, nature…everything. Its all in your hands dude c’mon.

      • Poths

        Occam’s razor doesn’t actually prove anything; it’s just a technique to use when choosing between competing hypotheses and it doesn’t necessarily infer greater truth, and besides I don’t believe it applies here; that’s because I don’t see how it can account for cross hatching, since commercial flights tend to follow particular flight paths which wouldn’t form cross hatching. I have also seen planes doing loops in order to come round and spray the perpendicular lines. I also noticed that they would spray upwind of a populated area and the crosshatching would drift over during the course of the day. I don’t consider my observations as conclusive proof of anything, but they are suggestive.

  • Peter A. Kirby

    Don’t pay $110 for it! Get your free pdf of the smash hit ‘Research in Electrical Phenomena Associated with Aerosols’ by Vonnegut et al right here for free:

    http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD0266563

  • Ingolf Stern

    Ionized nano particles of aluminum oxide, barium, and other metals are used to form a lid or dome over an area. the dome is formed by the wind spreading out the trails into a smear or sheet. the sun ionizes the particles, giving them an electrical charge. the electrically-charged air/metal aerosol can then be manipulated by shooting RF energy at it. what can you do with an EM dome? you can bounce EM energy off of it. you can bounce it either way – in or out. so when done from “out” the dome is an EM shield (EMP shield?). when done from “in” it becomes a waveguide. you can shoot EM energy from underneath and channel it over the horizon. I have read that they have 3D radar that gives them an actual visual picture of an area like a video game. it uses the ionized dome as a waveguide to channel and focus the EM energy. of course, they can also affect the weather and peoples bodily EM fields (read: minds). also, the metal falls out from the sky and poisons the ground/people/animals. lots of mysterious ailments. this stuff isn’t magic, it’s just unusual for the proles. what do we do? easy – turn off the TV. stop going to the mall. stop buying useless shit. be kind. stop enlisting in the damn army. sheesh. why are people still enlisting?!?!?! we have to STOP participating. that is all we have to do. turn our attention from the matrix. do not buy a new car. do not fly to paris. do not buy a new cellphone. of course, you wont do that and so this stuff will continue.

  • Dylan

    A while back I posted a link to this paper from way back in 1970
    ON THE POSSIBILITY OF WEATHER MODIFICATION BY AIRCRAFT CONTRAILS
    http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/098 … 0-0745.pdf
    This fellow even implies, in 1970, that they MIGHT BE PART OF SOME COVERT OPERATION TO MODIFY THE GLOBAL CLIMATE AS PROPOSED BY ANOTHER SCIENTIST IN 1965.
    “The writer himself has seen instances in which a single contrail seemed to grow until it became an overcast covering the whole sky. If the contrail were indeed responsible, which is by no means certain, this would constitute definite proof that contrails are capable of SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON LOCAL WEATHER, AND EVEN POSSIBLY ON
    GLOBAL CLIMATE, IF SUCH OCCURRENCES ARE WIDESPREAD AND
    FREQUENT.”
    “THE POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS ARE CONSIDERABLE;
    IN FACT, IT SEEMS PROBABLE THAT ONE OF THE PROJECTS FOR
    MODIFYING THE GLOBAL CLIMATE DISCUSSED BY FLETCHER (1965),
    NAMELY MODIFICATION OF THE CLOUD COVER OVER THE NORTH
    POLAR BASIN BY CLOUD SEEDING, IS ALREADY UNDERWAY, ALTHOUGH
    THE SCALE IS STILL MORE MODEST THAN HE ENVISIONED.”

    It’s no longer modest.

    This should put to rest the notion that contrails of an extraordinary nature did not exist prior to 1997 put it should also put to rest the notion that an organized, global effort to modify the climate is a relatively new idea.

    Now I have found a paper written by the scientist referred to in this paper, J.O. Fletcher in 1969. Fletcher discusses modification of cloud cover over the North Polar Basin by Cloud Seeding. Yes, cloud seeding and the intent of such an operation is quite clearly for causing a warming to melt the Arctic ice. It corresponds to an astounding degree with what I have been suggesting is actually underway.

    Managing Climatic Resources
    http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2009/P4000-1.pdf · PDF file

    I recommend that you read the whole paper but I have taken out some excerpts of particular interest.

    “Still another form of growing pollution, and one whose possible effects have received little study, is the creation of cirrus cloudiness (vapour trails) by the exhaust products of high-flying aircraft.
    Increases cloudiness of any form tends to increase the reflectivity (albedo) of the Earth and, according to Bryson’s calculations, a 1% increase in mean albedo would cool the Earth by 1.6OC. However, it should be noted that increased cloudiness at high levels greatly reduces radiative loss to space, and this would have a warming effect on the Earth. Thus, the dual effects of more or less cloudiness are great, but the direction of the net influence depends on the type and height of the clouds, and whether they are in a dark or sunlit region of the Earth.”

    “Possibilities for Purposeful Influence on Global Climate
    It has for example been noted that the creation of dissipation of high cloudiness has an enormous influence on the heat budget of the atmosphere and of the surface. It is estimated that it would take only sixty C-5 aircraft to deliver 1kg per km2 per day over the entire Arctic Basin (10 to the 7 km2). Thus, it is a large but not impossible task to see such enormous areas.
    Assuming that such seeding were effective in creating or dissipating clouds, it is of interest to estimate the effect of such cloud modification on the heat budget of the surface/atmosphere system. It is estimated that the presence of average cloudiness over the Arctic in July decreases the radiative heat loss to space by about 350 billion cal/km2/day from what it would be without clouds. By comparison, total cloud at 500 meters would decrease radiative heat loss by only 500 billion cal/km2 per day., while total cloud at 5000 meters would decrease radiative loss by about 1000 billion cal/km2/per day.”

    “These numbers demonstrate not only the enormous thermal leverage that might be exercised by influencing mean cloudiness, but also the range of influence that might be possible, depending on cloud type, height, and its influence on the regional heat budget. This conclusion is further underscored by noting that mean monthly values of radiative heat loss at the surface have been observed to vary by more than 100% in different years at some Arctic stations possibly due to variations in cloudiness.”

    “Ice free Arctic Ocean

    The largest scale enterprise that has been discussed is that of transforming the Arctic into an ice-free ocean. As was noted earlier, this has been carefully studied by the staff of the Main Geophysical Observatory in Leningrad. The central question is the stability of the ensuing global climatic regime. This question cannot be adequately evaluated until global climate simulation models are better developed and suitable simulations performed.
    There is also a certain amount of uncertainty in regard to the engineering feasibility of removing the Arctic pack ice. It is possible that the capacity of the present technology may be sufficient to accomplish this task, but this has not been established.
    Three basic approaches have been proposed ( Fletcher, 1965): (1) influencing the surface reflectivity of the ice to cause more absorption of solar heat; (2) large-scale modification of Arctic cloud conditions by seeding; (3) increasing the inflow of warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Ocean.”

    “International Cooperation

    The management of global climatic resources is a problem shared by all nations. So far, international efforts in climatic research have been directed toward observation and understanding , and cooperation has been good. It is a challenge to political and scientific leadership to preserve this spirit of cooperation as further progress is achieved toward prediction and control.”

    And here we are today…….

  • Robert Stiles

    I also believe the aerosols are slowly being used for mind control purposes. The aluminum is hard wired into our brain and our thoughts, moods controlled wirelessly like monkeys used in experimental labs.

Thank you for sharing.
Follow us to receive the latest updates.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

Send this to friend