Friday, October 4, 2013

Obamacare: Is It A Divide-And-Conquer Distraction?

Brandon Smith
Activist Post

In March of 2010, Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (otherwise known as “Obamacare”) into law amid a host of economic uncertainties and unwanted Federal Reserve bailouts. Two years before, Washington had confirmed the passage of Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) measures that had already met with disapproval from, according to some polls, more than 80 percent of Americans. In the meantime, the Occupy Wall Street movement was gaining momentum, involving elements of both traditionally Republican and traditionally Democratic organizations. Self-proclaimed “conservatives” and “liberals” were beginning to find common ground on issues ranging from the overall fiscal system to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The consensus was clear: Government had grown corrupt, power-hungry, and ultimately destructive to every citizen regardless of his political affiliation.

However, certain hot-button issues always seem to flood government rhetoric and the mainstream media whenever the U.S. citizenry begins to unify, causing renewed rifts and luring Americans to fight among themselves while the cruise ship on which we are floating sinks into the abyss. Those on the left believe Obamacare is a genuine attempt to institute socialized medicine, and they love it. Those on the right believe Obamacare is a genuine attempt to institute socialized medicine, and they despise it. But what if Obamacare’s government-controlled healthcare plan is only a secondary pursuit, while cutting America down the middle is the first goal?

Consider this: The launch of Obamacare comes at a time when the official national debt of the United States is about $17 trillion and the national deficit is some $1 trillion per year. Keep in mind that when Obama was elected in 2008, the official national debt stood at only $10 trillion. That means the Obama Administration has added more than $7 trillion in debt in only five years, and I can barley fathom how much more damage he can do in the time he has left as president.


While mainstream talking heads with low IQs proclaim victory for the Obama camp because of a supposedly “shrinking” deficit, what they either fail to mention or are too stupid to understand is that the official reporting of the deficit DOES NOT account for real deficit expenditures each year. The official deficit does not include what government number crunchers call “unfunded liabilities,” like Social Security and Medicare, or off-book agencies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The average taxpayer suffers the costs of such expenditures yet they are never counted in official statistics. If one were to tally our true national debt, including “unfunded liabilities,” it would stand anywhere from $120 trillion to more than $200 trillion. The true deficit skyrockets to more than $5 trillion per year (and growing) when such programs are included.

It is hard to say whether Obamacare costs will be openly included in official debt numbers or hidden like most entitlement programs. The point is, the government has been lying for quite some time, under multiple Presidents, about the real state of the U.S. economy.

When the White House claims in its talking points that government-assisted healthcare will require a net payment of only $1.1 trillion over the next 10 years, what method of accounting is used? Is this the total cost or just the “official cost” minus off-book liabilities? Even if this ends up being the full and complete spending required, how can Washington afford to burn another $1.1 trillion on top of $5 trillion a year already in the red?

If our national debt continues to climb exponentially, as it has in the wake of the Administrations of Presidents George W. Bush and Obama, will we see another $7 trillion or more added to the “official” number in the next five years, and can our country sustain such debt levels without imploding in on itself like a fashion model?

According to The Washington Post, Obamacare is now a fact of life, even in the face of a government shutdown.

But is this claim really true, or is it just empty posturing? You may like Obamacare, or you may hate Obamacare; but the fact remains that we CANNOT AFFORD Obamacare at this time. So my first question to proponents of socialized medicine would be:

Where is the money going to come from?

More taxes? How can Obamacare be funded by increased taxes, when the average median household income has fallen every year for five years in a row.

How about more taxes for the super rich? Four hundred of America’s top earners brought in an average adjusted gross income of $202 million in 2009. If each of these people were taxed 100 percent of their annual taxable income in act of total criminal disregard for free markets, the resulting $80 billion in revenue would still not be enough to fund Obamacare, let alone our already existing massive debts.

If taxes won’t do the job, what about foreign treasury investment?

U.S. Treasury holdings by foreign creditors witnessed a record sell-off in June of this year, and subsequent purchases have not covered the loss in recent months.

The majority of all recent Treasury purchases by foreign investors are short-term bonds, meaning international faith in America’s ability to cover its debts has fallen considerably. Creditors now want only bonds that mature quickly, so that they can be liquidated at a moment’s notice. Foreign investment in the United States is currently either static or dropping, depending on the country, meaning no extra cash flow for Obamacare.

At bottom, Obamacare is doomed to failure. The money simply does not exist in order to cover the cost. The math does not add up. Period.

Now, I can understand hard-core socialists being too dim-witted to wrap their heads around this problem. After all, the average socialist thinks government funds will infinitely expand to meet the needs of infinite demand, as long as public wealth is “harmonized” in the process. Socialists are utterly unable to imagine that the money may run out one day, thus decimating the economy.

But what about the establishment? Are the central banking elite and their minions really unaware that Obamacare is unsustainable? I think not.

Government bureaucrats and central bankers carefully create our false economic reality on a daily basis. They receive hard financial data and then spin it to suit very particular needs. Each statistic is crafted and manipulated to elicit a specific public response. Those who dominate the establishment hierarchy are exposed regularly to our dire fiscal position, hide the information and its consequences, yet, we are supposed to believe that they are “not aware” of the eventual result? Obama and the elites who pull his strings are fully conscious that our economy is on the verge of complete collapse, and they are aware that Obamacare in its current form will never survive. So why continue with the charade if there is no mathematical possibility that the program will succeed?

Social division is the only plausible answer.

Universal healthcare has been a longtime pursuit of the left, and many Democrats are willing to forgo or completely ignore other dangerous political developments surrounding the White House as long as they finally attain socialized medicine. I have personally engaged in numerous debates with Obama supporters, pointing out his transgressions against the Constitution and the Mideast, his close relationships with the banking elite, and his willingness to throw aside his own promises. Amazingly, some of his supporters admit that Obama is monstrous in many respects, but they STILL defend him on the basis that “at least he’s going to give us free healthcare.” Kill children in foreign lands, trample the Constitution, but fill their prescription for free, and they'll call you Papa Obama!

In this way, the establishment has retained about 30 percent of the American population as political cannon fodder to be exploited at will by the Obama Administration. And if a government shutdown takes place over Obamacare measures, that percentage may climb as citizens are duped into believing that Tea Party Republicans and their “unwillingness to compromise” are to blame for the situation. In fact, the entire thrust of the mainstream media's approach to the government shutdown has been to point out the legitimate consequences in the wake of a default (to which there are many), then proceed to outline how all of these horrors will be the result of conservative "brinksmanship".

If you understand that both major parties are nothing but two sides to the same globalist coin, then the idea of "brinksmanship" one way or the other becomes ridiculous. The Republican leadership plays the role of the staunch limited spending watchdog, but usually rolls over because secretly they are just as fond of centralization and debt creation as the Democrats. But what if this time, the script says they aren't supposed to roll over? What if this time, traditional conservatives are meant to take the blame for throwing the American economy into disrepute, all over Obamacare?

What the Liberty Movement needs to keep in mind during the chaos of the debt debate is that it may not ultimately be about Obamacare at all. Instead, the debt debate may be about drawing artificial lines between the American people and letting us tear each others' throats out. In the meantime, fingers may point to OUR defining principles as the trigger to the madness. Only time will tell, and the consensus holds that there is "no way" the Republicans will stand fast or that the debt ceiling will remain stationary. But, questions need to be asked here. Does the shutdown and the illusion of Obamacare serve a greater purpose?

The establishment knows that a financial crisis is upon us. The establishment essentially engineered this crisis through artificially low interest rates and the deliberate spread of toxic derivatives. But, it wants YOU to believe that the inevitable collapse was caused by something or someone else. By “political gridlock,” foreign fiscal schemes or “conservative hubris.” It does not want members of the public to draw any connections between their suffering and the international banking elite behind the greater catastrophe. Obamacare is a red herring. It's smoke and mirrors. It's a distraction. And, while we battle over a program that will never find adequate funding anyway, the rest of the economic system crumbles.

You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.comAlt-Market is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense. Join Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better.




BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

11 comments:

gnomad1618 said...

if the 5 trillion dollars a year figure is correct, we cannot pay that off with the income of the entire population. 155 million people averaging 28,500/yr comes out to ~4.4 trillion (2005 numbers via wikipedia)

Anonymous said...

It is like being set upon by a group of Skull and Bones pirates. If you protect your family, they are free to loot your home. if you protect your home, they will rape and kill your family. actually, it is the exact same social demographic as the jolly Roger flying pirates of old looting Wall Street and all of our hard earned cash from the banking system, to be replaced by low value scrip with big numbers on it. I tried to warn you. The Bernanke made off with 16$ trillion before congress caught him at it.

stevor said...

It's another Clintonesque wag-the-dog to take the sheeples' minds of how o'bama is destroying the country

Anonymous said...

"The Bernanke made off with $16 trillion before Congress caught him at it?" No, Congress helped him. They instated him. They applaud him. They get rich off of him. And they haven't stopped him yet.

We have been hijacked by pirates who have looted our treasury and turned our guns on our friends to loot the whole world. The ship is going down.

The answer to saving us all is to loose all the lifeboats. All 50 states should secede, at the same time. This will cut the head off the Federal Government, who will have no more country to govern. Every state already has a working state government, that can become a national government without a blip.

If we all secede, then we will no longer be in debt. Each state can take back the power to coin money (as written in the Constitution). We can pay a fraction of our Federal taxes to the state, and the state will be solvent again, and we will be a lot richer.

Every state can re-dedicate itself to the Constitution, the best form of government ever designed. We will have back our Bill of Rights, and all those egregious Fed inventions, from DHS to TSA, IRS and the Federal Reserve, will be gone.

We will no longer be at war. Just getting rid of the Pentagon will make us all solvent again.

Anonymous said...

Seeing that Occupy Wall Street began in September of 2011, I find it hard understanding how it was gaining momentum in March 2010.

Anonymous said...

Yes that's right - america can't afford saving hundreds of thousands of lives. Aren't people realizing the sickness and unsustainability of our current system by this ?

It's good point that this might be a coup to hide the real reasons of the economic collapse.
It could be the takeover of the profit-motive (neoliberalists, anarcho-capitalists & libertarians apparently thin that would be something good and are accelerating this change) or the bankster (such as goldman sachs).

The government shut down, economic collapse is on the horizon, banksters will indebt the government as the whole world or simply leave the government shut down for a world of cyberpunk anarchy in which the profit motive guides every aspect of society.
Feeling like we're headed for this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGKVdW2EBzM

Anonymous said...

"Where is the money going to come from?"

I guess you missed the Military/Security Industrial complex. Why save money fighting Israel's wars, when you can fund Obamacare!

Where is the money going to come from to fight America's terror wars?

I guess when the RINOs "battle" for the status quo, they can defund Obamacare to pay for more wars securing Israel!

Where is the foreign aid money going to come from to fund the zionist project?

So much funding, so many wars, and so little time...

Thanks for the distraction. Please continue shopping citizens.

Anonymous said...

You don't think maybe the idea got started before 2011? People were protesting in smaller groups before then.

Anonymous said...

The globalists and their central bankers have coopted everyone, they own the fourth estate, and their movement will proceed. However, they and the coming Anti-Christ will stopped by the Lord Jesus Christ when He finally returns to judge the entire world.

Anonymous said...

I've long said the Democrat/Republican paradigm is a farce meant to keep we the people at each others throats. A people are never more powerless and paralyzed than when they are divided right down the middle. And in that state they are easily distracted from the truth and the needed call to action through "bread and circus" antics.

Seen2013 said...

The author is overlooking a major objective to Obamacare 'ACA'. It can only be funded if the debt ceiling is dissolved completely, so the government can borrow/monetize the programs deemed necessary for the welfare of the nation.
There's a reason why welfare is referred to as the internal variation of warfare public safety, national security, taking care of dependents/desired peoples aka nanny state, and effectively solidifies centralized control. War on terror, war on drugs, war on poverty, and etc are all brackets of the welfare-warfare state, and it can only sustain these programs abstractly through military might and unlimited borrowing/monetization.

Sure, it distracts and divides the populace; however, there is a reason why the government dually encourages authoritarian decrees and democracy; it banks on being able to use democracy and authoritarianism to attain, maintain, and strengthen its authoritarian decree. It very much is two sides of the same coin/dice.

Post a Comment