Sunday, June 16, 2013

NSA admits they listen to U.S. phone calls without a warrant, more than half the Senate skips briefing

Madison Ruppert
Activist Post

In a secret briefing, the National Security Agency (NSA) admitted they can listen to U.S. phone calls and other communications without a warrant but over half of the Senate decided to fly out of Washington D.C. early and skip the briefing on the NSA’s surveillance programs.

According to Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), in a secret briefing the NSA told members of Congress that the contents of a phone call could be accessed “simply based on an analyst deciding that.”

This makes the uncovering of programs like PRISM, Boundless Informant and the turning over of all U.S. phone records by Verizon that much more troubling since the government previously insisted that they did not access actual content.

If the NSA wants “to listen to the phone,” apparently all that is required is an analyst’s decision, according to an in-depth article written by Declan McCullagh for CNET.

Nadler said he was told that no legal authorization is required, just an analyst’s decision, much like what was said by leaker Edward Snowden.

“I was rather startled,” said Nadler, a lawyer and member of the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary and ranking member of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.

As CNET points out, this revelation “suggests the Justice Department has secretly interpreted federal surveillance law to permit thousands of low-ranking analysts to eavesdrop on phone calls.”

Of course, the interpretation is currently secret and some in Washington have proposed legislation to change that.

Since the same legal standards covering phone calls also apply to other communications like text messages, instant messages, e-mails, etc. the statements of Nadler indicate that an NSA analyst could decide to access the contents of communications without having to obtain court approval.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has already decried the decision, with EFF senior staff attorney Kurt Opsahl saying the approach has serious “constitutional problems.”

“It epitomizes the problem of secret laws,” Opsahl said.

This shouldn’t be all that surprising given that it was reported last year that the NSA’s massive Utah data center would sift through phone calls collected at NSA “listening posts.”

Former NSA technical director William Binney, who helped bring the NSA’s global surveillance network in to the modern era, also said that the NSA records the calls of 500,000 to 1 million people or more who are on their target list.

While the NSA may not record all of the phone calls made every day, they “look through these phone numbers and they target those and that’s what they record,” Binney said to the Daily Caller.

Binney has also notably exposed the NSA’s surveillance programs in court along with two other NSA whistleblowers.

Yet somehow over half of the Senate thought leaving Washington early for a nice, long weekend was more important than being briefed on the government’s secret surveillance programs.

“Only 47 of 100 senators attended the 2:30 briefing, leaving dozens of chairs in the secure meeting room empty as [Director of National Intelligence James] Clapper, [NSA head Keith] Alexander and other senior officials told lawmakers about classified programs to monitor millions of telephone calls and broad swaths of Internet activity,” according to The Hill.

Unfortunately, The Hill was not given the names of the Senators who did and did not attend the closed briefing.

Even Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) seemed upset with the apparent lack of interest.

“It’s hard to get this story out. Even now we have this big briefing — we’ve got Alexander, we’ve got the FBI, we’ve got the Justice Department, we have the FISA Court there, we have Clapper there — and people are leaving,” Feinstein said.

Of course, Feinstein is not quite a consistent champion of civil liberties, transparency or even honesty but any outrage is better than none at all.

Apparently our so-called representatives in Washington would rather leave early to enjoy a long weekend than to learn about a surveillance program that seems to be violating some of the most essential rights of the American people.

I’d love to hear your opinion, take a look at your story tips and even your original writing if you would like to get it published. I am also available for interviews on radio, television or any other format. Please email me at

Please support our work and help us start to pay contributors by doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.

This article first appeared at End the Lie.

Madison Ruppert is the Editor and Owner-Operator of the alternative news and analysis database End The Lie and has no affiliation with any NGO, political party, economic school, or other organization/cause. He is available for podcast and radio interviews. Madison also now has his own radio show on UCYTV Monday nights 7 PM - 9 PM PT/10 PM - 12 AM ET. Show page link here: http://UCY.TV/EndtheLie. If you have questions, comments, or corrections feel free to contact him at


This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


Anonymous said...

Citizen's Arrest. Many. Very soon.
If it doesn't happen, we deserve everything that comes from this issue.
It also applies to alot of other issues.

Anonymous said...

F.T.G. ...... What is the WORST thing the terrorist could do to America???
Leave this "government" alone.

Anonymous said...

Doesn't it go without saying that US senators and congressmen are also targets of NSA/Israeli wiretaps?

desertspeaks said...

James Clapper, Keith Alexander both committed PERJURY while testifying to congress, both are guilty of perjury of oath of office. TWO FELONIES!
If you or I had LIED to congress, we wouldn't have made it out of the room without being arrested!!!

Anonymous said...

Isn't it great how everything about the Fascist government has become secret while taking away the most basic right to privacy of the masses?

Ed said...

"Citizen's Arrest. Many. Very soon."
Then what? A trial in a "government" court? Pffft!

Post a Comment