Tuesday, April 9, 2013

UK Man Wins Court Victory Over BBC for 9/11 Coverup Broadcast

Activist Post

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.



Below is the broadcast where the BBC announced the collapse of WTC 7 while it was still standing behind the reporter.




Read other articles by Activist Post Here




BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

36 comments:

Anonymous said...

Brilliant work, everyone! Very Well Done! Keep the train rolling, it is gathering momentum.



Anonymous said...

District Judge Stephen Nicholls said that, even if he accepted and agreed with the evidence, that would not give him grounds to rule that Rooke was not guilty.

He imposed a six month conditional discharge, with £200 legal costs.

Anonymous said...

Anyone know of a movie that comprehensively pulls all these little facts together? And don't say loose change; it's too graphics and fx heavy.

King of the Paupers said...

Jct: Nice to see the 911 hoax coming down. Now to stop chasing and killing the wrong guys.

Field McConnell said...

BBC in UK and Wells Fargo ( Warren Buffet) in US failed to destroy America on 9/11 but for more explicit details google [ BBC + Wells Fargo + Chips + Hamish + IOC ] or go to: http://www.abeldanger.net/2013/02/chicagos-candyman-and-her-short-for_21.html The mechanism that facilitated the attack was FBCA, Federal Bridge Certification Authority created in Chicago for Ministry of Defence and other evil participants.

Anonymous said...

I really hope this is a victory, a simple small true victory.

But knowing how our fascist rulers play with us, I have my doubts. If recent history teaches us anything, it is that this Rooke dude will be busted in the town square next week for having drunken sex with a billy goat......or something like that.
Until then, it is good news.

Anonymous said...

If you want a couple good movies to explain and tie these together, I'd suggest Ryan Dawson's War by Deception and Michael Rivero's All Wars Are Banker's Wars. They're both available at http://undergrounddocumentaries.com/

Anonymous said...

He was fined 200 pounds and given a conditional discharge, so technically he WAS guilty. Though he didn't have to pay the fine for not having a television licence. And fyi , this case occured way back in february nearly ywo months ago.

Anonymous said...

The documentary on this subject is entitled. "9/11 Missing Links", a definite, "must see".

Anonymous said...

BBC is british prpoaganda machine whgose journalists must be attracked and toreture4d to death because they have caused millions of deaths in lkast two decades only. in okhanow bombinbg by timothy mcvitee bBXC said within ten mintures of news of coppalse abd attack of bombing that 3 arab men have been apprehended at thethrow airport and implied that arabs were involved in terror attack -BBC is racise lair agency workign for parasite english race

Anonymous said...

expel all bbc journalists and all british english journalists from all places int he world.
Allowing british journalists is very dangerous-they are the spies working to destabilise al countries not under them.
10/02/2011, 00:08
besides whenever the english journalists infiltrate the news media or forum the news become propaganda for the english interest only. The same happend with CNn and is happening with al jareeza where english journalists infiltrated.
Another example is Russia today where the english journalists have hijacked the agenda of Russian tv.
Just one example out of thousand as to how much the english journalists do the propaganda for england even in Russian tv.
amonst those anti russian and the traitor media is Russia today and novosti. russia today is more interested inw aht happens in england than in what happens in russia-because it has bene infiltrated by english spy journalists of worst kind whose political elanign is notonly towards england but towards racist uk

Anonymous said...

Tony Rooke should straighten up his affairs and get his will updated because he will most certainly have to be "taught a lesson" by the powers that be!

Anonymous said...

Where Did The Towers Go? By Dr. Judy Wood uTube and book for a differnt scientific view.

Anonymous said...

The BBC cannot be taken seriously if it suspiciously reported the collapse of the WTC7 some 20 minutes early without checking out the source. This is another example of a Botched British Comedy.

Anonymous said...

14 comments:
Anonymous said...
Brilliant work, everyone! Very Well Done! Keep the train rolling, it is gathering momentum.





April 9, 2013 at 1:54 AM
Anonymous said...
District Judge Stephen Nicholls said that, even if he accepted and agreed with the evidence, that would not give him grounds to rule that Rooke was not guilty.

He imposed a six month conditional discharge, with £200 legal costs.

April 9, 2013 at 7:18 AM
Anonymous said...
Anyone know of a movie that comprehensively pulls all these little facts together? And don't say loose change; it's too graphics and fx heavy.

April 9, 2013 at 7:29 AM
King of the Paupers said...
Jct: Nice to see the 911 hoax coming down. Now to stop chasing and killing the wrong guys.

April 9, 2013 at 7:36 AM
Field McConnell said...
BBC in UK and Wells Fargo ( Warren Buffet) in US failed to destroy America on 9/11 but for more explicit details google [ BBC + Wells Fargo + Chips + Hamish + IOC ] or go to: http://www.abeldanger.net/2013/02/chicagos-candyman-and-her-short-for_21.html The mechanism that facilitated the attack was FBCA, Federal Bridge Certification Authority created in Chicago for Ministry of Defence and other evil participants.

April 9, 2013 at 7:38 AM
Anonymous said...
I really hope this is a victory, a simple small true victory.

But knowing how our fascist rulers play with us, I have my doubts. If recent history teaches us anything, it is that this Rooke dude will be busted in the town square next week for having drunken sex with a billy goat......or something like that.
Until then, it is good news.

April 9, 2013 at 9:45 AM
Anonymous said...
If you want a couple good movies to explain and tie these together, I'd suggest Ryan Dawson's War by Deception and Michael Rivero's All Wars Are Banker's Wars. They're both available at http://undergrounddocumentaries.com/

April 9, 2013 at 2:55 PM
Anonymous said...
He was fined 200 pounds and given a conditional discharge, so technically he WAS guilty. Though he didn't have to pay the fine for not having a television licence. And fyi , this case occured way back in february nearly ywo months ago.

April 9, 2013 at 3:06 PM
Anonymous said...
The documentary on this subject is entitled. "9/11 Missing Links", a definite, "must see".

April 9, 2013 at 3:08 PM
Anonymous said...
BBC is british prpoaganda machine whgose journalists must be attracked and toreture4d to death because they have caused millions of deaths in lkast two decades only. in okhanow bombinbg by timothy mcvitee bBXC said within ten mintures of news of coppalse abd attack of bombing that 3 arab men have been apprehended at thethrow airport and implied that arabs were involved in terror attack -BBC is racise lair agency workign for parasite english race

can someone please explain to me what this has to do with the british public or as this thread the british race??????
don't we all have suppose leaders media that the public is ashamed of??
the public don't want to go to war in any country 1) it is posh boys who play war yet not put their on children on the front line
2)we cannot afford to fight for other countries even if this is to take dictators out or to help with charity works
saudi publicly displays their greed by buying solid platinum cars! nearly all the british public would like to have their money while they scrape every last penny we all have!

if you are going to bring an arguement about british publis and not the establishment well this shows how shallow you can be!
this is about the elite that all of us have and who all control every single person on this planet, it is up to us to change this and not bickering between ourselves!!

can I point out on here that the British public give more money to third world countries than any other country, instead of their own leaders taking their own peoples money for their own greed instead of giving their people food and clean water>

Anonymous said...

most of the remarks here saying that the british are racists!!
just look at your threads then tell me you are not the racist ones!!!

God is the only one judge that will judge us all


those without sin cast the first stone!!

HereAmI said...

There is a conspiracy. This is not a theory. The conspiracy is to establish jewish hegemony over the entire world; as per the clear statement of intent revealed for all to see in the Talmud, to which the vast majority of jews either explicitly or implicitly adhere. 9-11 enabled this agenda to proceed. Mossad's motto is "making war by deception", so the BBC is merely one link in their strategy. The additional elements are the disarming and subsequent murder of American goyim; Diane Feinstein is the figurehead in this plan; together with all the other jews who now chair every significant committee in Congress. The murder, rape, and horrific torture of 50 million Russian Christians following the jewish take over of the Russian State in 1917 shows clearly what is planned for the rest of the world, beginning with America.
As far as 9-11 is concerned, this building did not fall because of explosives, although explosives may have been a part of the deception to mask the real provenance of the collapse. Look at the video. Do you see the hallmark sideways explosions? And the clouds of dust and debris ejecting sideways?
Didn't think so.
These buildings were all "cooked" during the day. The metal substructures were fatally compromised, thus when the collapses finally occurred, it was because their internal elements had turned to jelly. Cars and people far from the Towers were also affected, which does not happen with explosives.
Dr Judy Wood has explained all this to you; but no-one is listening.
For a staggeringly simple yet absolutely compelling expose of the jew, what he does, and what he plans, visit Brother Nathanael's website. As an ex-jew, he has first-hand knowledge of their modus operandi.
Tim Webb.

Anonymous said...

As people have said three times already, he was given a conditional discharge. He was guilty, but merely did not have to pay a fine for being in breach of his TV licence. Stop and think about what you're actually saying for 5 seconds.

Anonymous said...

Someone was asking for a documentary on the subject.

I recommend "Experts Speak Out". The most recent work from the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW6mJOqRDI4

Anonymous said...

There is an advertizing lupe being played all the time, so it's difficult to hear what's being said. On purpose no doubt. Somebody must be very worried. I'm in the UK.

Anonymous said...

He was given a conditional discharge, he had to pay £200 costs.
He was not found not guilty.
If he does not buy a licence now, or dispose of his TV , the conditions of his discharge will be invoked.
He could also go to prison if he does not pay the costs.
Who writes this bullshit?
Why are you taken in by it ?

wishbone said...

great, its worth the 200 quid, KEEP PUNCHING, KEEP POUNDING, we'll get them on the ropes soon.

Anonymous said...

Amazing!!!

If more people stood up and refused to pay the fee AND went to court I wonder what would happen.

Anonymous said...

More proof conspiracy nuts are idiots.

He was found guilty of not paying his tv license. The conspiracy bollocks couldn't even be considered by the court because the case is deemed as strict liability.

In short, an idiot went to court after not paying his license and was found guilty. That's it. Nothing more.

Michael Moulds said...

The rabbit hole on this whole 9/11 etc. goes as deep as hell.

Anonymous said...

Check out AE911TRUTH.ORG

Anonymous said...

Dr Judy Wood has uncovered more of the truth about this stunt than any other researcher. She is by far the best qualified scientist to analyse the facts and has established beyond reasonable doubt that 'they' used Directed Energy to powder those buildings. The seismic readings alone tell us that we should pay serious attention to the work of this wonderful lady. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1NbBxDGSkI

Anonymous said...

So when does the BBC get investigated for this false reporting, to be able to report something that hadn't happened suggests implicity on such a serious event, if a Meyerbeer of the general public had reported it they would be arrested by now...

Anonymous said...

The Judy Wood crowd does a lot more to discredit and hurt the 911 truth movement than the BBC does.
Avoid those filthy liars whose only mission is to force a discussion of their ridiculous failed ideas in order to make truthers look crazy.

Anonymous said...

More conspiracy THEORIES. Nothing more. Ok, I will play along. Bigfoot wired the buildings to explode - all the night before. A job that takes a demolition crew 3-4 weeks (wiring and compromising columns) all done in one night, and the drywall was replaced so well NO ONE noticed! I realize it is easy to try to perpetuate a theory without ever having to provide any real evidence, but please, think before you put all of this out there. I realize it feels better to have some nice neat on-going theory that the world bank and whoever else did this, but do any of you really think this building was wired to blow - in one night, and no one noticed? Sorry, not possible, and that debunks every THEORY out there about this building. So, a reporter made an error and called a building by the incorrect number. That, and that in itself, is a basis for a worldwide conspiracy? Hmmm. Pretty shaky.

Average Joe American said...

Hey, Pretty Shaky 2:55 PM, regarding your straw man argument about Bigfoot and one night's wiring, no one even said that. You've demolished your own absurd argument (which no one even proposed here, or to my knowledge has ever seriously espoused), well done. Dead argument right there.

But intelligent readers knew you were a shill when you brought up Bigfoot in sentence four. If the letter "T" still worked reliably on your keyboard we'd surely be hearing your views on tin foil.

No intelligent individual believes the official lies of the JFK, RFK, MLK and Malcom X murders, and most of planet Earth knows OKC and 9/11 were obvious false flag operations. Some of us even know Pearl Harbor and Tonkin Gulf never happened the way we were told, and realize that Israelis have bombed Americans and Brits for political gain (the King David Hotel and the USS Liberty for starters, if memory serves).

Or is all that magic bullet failed radar stuff just theory?

I watched the Bldg. 7 broadcast clip. I'm guessing it was not an "incorrect number" error. It was aired to the entire world many hours after the first two buildings collapsed (One and Two, how'd she surprisingly and accurately come up with...Seven?), nearly half an hour before the event actually occurred, you idiot. Not exactly your basic scripting or continuity slip up.

Watch your Caps Lock, it appears to stick when you get to the word "theory." And now, my child, get back to your Popular Mechanics while the grownups discuss reality amongst themselves.

Go play along now, as you say. This stuff's rather serious to the adults who tried to build a better world for you. Some of what we grownups are discussing here isn't for innocent little ears.

xmasdale said...

The latest from the 2000 strong Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: the You Tube "Solving the Mystery of WTC7" is the best tool I have seen for introducing new people to the 9/11 issue. It is very clear and distinct, only 15 minutes long, and focuses on the achilles heel of 9/11, WTC7. It features professionals in engineering and building design, pilots, fire fighters, demolition experts, chemists, physicists and bereaved families of those killed on 9/11. Very powerful!

Anonymous said...

Here's an interesting argument; paying the BBC would thus be providing financial support to terrorism. Same for American cable companies. We wouldn't want to provide material support to the enemy would we?

Iamkare said...

"A job that takes a demolition crew 3-4 weeks (wiring and compromising columns) all done in one night, and the drywall was replaced so well NO ONE noticed!"

You are the perfect example of why someone who has never done a single Iota's research into what you're talking about. If you had, you would know that every query you put forward has been conclusively answered by more than one of the ongoing investigations into 9/11 truth.

The day after G.W.Bush took office in 2001 Marvin was handed a $50 million plus contract to handle security of the Twin Towers and Dulles Airport. Marvin was in charge of security on 9/11 at both the WTC and Dulles.

It is also well known that in the months before the events, Bush's security firm cleared out entire floors of the building for 'security drills' (that didn't involve bomb sniffing dogs) and in Loose Change they interview survivors and staff of the building who state on the record they could hear "something going on in the lift shafts"

So it wasn't done over one night, it was done over a span of months in the lead up to the event to avoid suspicion.

Now that's cleared up can you please offer me a concise and scientifically viable explanation as two how the impact of one 747 striking a steel mesh building on the 77th floor can cause the total structural failure of the entire building and have it fall at free fall speed into it's own footprint?

"We designed the buildings to resist to the impact of one on more jetliners...The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners." ~ Frank De Martini - W.T.C. construction manager

Every characteristic of the collapse of the building shows that the central pillars were cut to provide the path of east resistance and therefore, it is a physical impossibility for it to be anything other than a controlled demolition.

Why even write an opinion on something you clearly now nothing about, are you seriously that starved for attention?

Anonymous said...

What a load of bullshit!

He didnt win anything! He was given a bill for £200 court costs and a 6 month conditional discharge...which by definition is loosing the case as he was found guilty.

You lot are fucking idiots!

Unknown said...

And Anonymous loses it and resorts to name-calling. lol! "starved for attention" lol!

Post a Comment