Thursday, March 7, 2013

Malaysia Invaded -- Hundreds of Terrorists Land on Beaches, Western Media Mute

Tony Cartalucci
Activist Post

Hundreds of heavily armed terrorists have crossed from the Philippines and landed in the eastern Malaysian state of Sabah. Dozens are already dead, and the Malaysian military has brought in aircraft and armor to confront the audacious, bizarre invasion, scattering militants into the jungles of Borneo island. A seemingly headline news event, the invasion has been downplayed and spun by the Western media, many calling militant Al Qaeda-linked terrorists, an "armed Filipino clan."

Image: Malaysia has called in air support and armor to confront a bizarre terrorist invasion in its eastern state of Sabah.

The West's woeful, irresponsible coverage of a burgeoning region-wide destabilization, fits in nicely with its coverage of US-Saudi funded/armed terrorism around the world, including in Syria where US-funded terrorists of the so-called "Free Syrian Army" have just taken dozens of UN peacekeepers hostage in the Golan Heights - just days after the US announced it would fund the terrorists further, to the tune of $60 million and the West's Arab partners have just granted the terrorist faction Syria's seat at the "Arab League."

Terrorists are US-Saudi Funded Extremists - Part of Engineered Destabilization.

While the West pleads ignorance over the identity of the militants held up in the jungles of Malaysia's Sabah state, the militant organizations themselves have declared thousands more in reinforcements are being arranged in the Philippines to join and exasperate the conflict. The Free Malaysia Today newspaper reported in its article, "10,000 Tausugs to sail to Sabah," that:
Thousands of Tausug from Basilan, Sulu and Tawi-Tawi have sailed to Sabah to reinforce members of the so-called royal army of the sultanate of Sulu who are fighting it out with Malaysian security forces, a Moro National Liberation Front official said Tuesday.

The Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) of course, is one of several of Al Qaeda's franchises in Southeast Asia, and spun off the notorious terrorist organization, Abu Sayyaf, a US State Department-listed foreign terrorist organization with direct ties to Al Qaeda.

The Philippines' terrorist organizations, located amongst the country's southern islands have long held ties to Al Qaeda and receive funding and support from Saudi Arabia. AFP reported in their 2010 article, "WikiLeaks: US suspected Saudi ambassador to the Philippines of terror link," that:
The United States suspected a Saudi Arabian ambassador to the Philippines of potential involvement in funding terrorists, according to US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks this week.
The report would also state:
Francis Townsend cited Waly’s intervention to secure the release of two members of an Islamic charity detained in the Philippines, the cable showed.
The group was suspected of funneling funds to Al-Qaeda-linked groups based in the southern Philippines. It continued stating:
The February 24, 2007, US embassy cable named the charity suspected of terror financing in the Philippines as IIRO, which stands for the International Islamic Relief Organisation 
Intelligence agencies have said IIRO was set up by Muhammad Jamal Khalifa, a brother-in-law of Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden.
The report concluded by stating:
Overall, the WikiLeaks cables singled out Saudi Arabia as the key source of funding for radical Islamist groups including Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba and Hamas.
Saudi Arabia is of course is the chief financier of Al Qaeda, and is currently leading efforts to fund, arm, and fill the ranks of Al Qaeda's franchises from Mali and Libya, to Syria and Iraq. A multitude of reports from across the West have identified Saudi Arabia as the linchpin in Al Qaeda's global terror campaign, including the US Army West Point Combating Terrorism Center.

Its reports "Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq" and "Bombers, Bank Accounts and Bleedout: al-Qa'ida's Road In and Out of Iraq," identify a vast terrorist network maintained by the Saudis that recruits, arms, and funds terrorists from across the Muslim World, and can funnel a mercenary army into any desired nation. At the time, the desired nation was Iraq. In 2011, it was Libya. Today it is Syria. The same network that US soldiers fought in Iraq is verifiably in use today, in support of US regime-change operations in Syria.

And while it is acknowledged across even the Western mainstream media that Saudi Arabia is a notorious state-sponsor of terrorism, including the terrorists allegedly behind the September 11, 2001 attacks that left 3,000 Americans dead, the US has had a decades-long, deep economic and military relationship with the despotic Arabian autocracy.

The US maintains permanent military bases inside Saudi Arabia, funds the Saudi military, and has recently concluded the largest arms deal in US history with the Saudis. Additionally, Saudi Arabia's brutally repressive internal security apparatus is a creation of US advisers and operators.

The Saudi royal family and the elite amongst the US corporate-financier Fortune 500, have maintained deep financial and political ties as well. Saudi Arabian corporate-financier interests (run by the royal family) are tied directly to Wall Street and London via conglomerations like the US-Saudi Arabian Business Council and representation upon the JP Morgan International Council (Khalid Al-Falih of Saudi Aramco, amongst the highest valued companies on Earth).

This also includes the Bin Laden family, whose multi-billion dollar Saudi Binladin Group is an active member of the US-Saudi Arabian Business Council and plays a central role in deciding bilateral policy for the benefit of collective US-Saudi corporate-financier and corresponding geopolitical interests. At one point, the Bin Ladens and the Bush family sat around the same table, as both families were involved in the equity firm, Carlyle. In fact, Bush and Bin Laden family members were clicking champagne glasses together in Washington on 9/11, an event that would make both families immensely rich in the coming decade.

It is clear, most acutely in Libya and Syria, that the use of Saudi Arabia's global Al Qaeda mercenary army serves both Saudi Arabia's interests as well as Western geopolitical ambitions, including to exact regime change around the world. And it just so happens that the West and Saudi Arabia both seek regime change in currently Russo-Iranian-Chinese friendly Malaysia.

West Attempts to Install Client Regime in Malaysia

The West has been propping up Malaysian opposition candidate Anwar Ibrahim for years.

Anwar Ibrahim, head of Malaysia's opposition coalition, which includes the Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS), has spent a lifetime in the service of Western interests. Anwar Ibrahim was Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined National Endowment for Democracy's "Democracy Award" and a panelist at a NED donation ceremony - the very same US organization whose subsidiaries are funding and supporting Bersih, a faux-pro-democracy Western-funded street movement that in fact was created by, and in the service of Anwar Ibrahim's political ambitions.

Bersih's street activism fits into a global pattern of Western-backed "color revolutions," where meddling in sovereign nation's political processes to install Western-client regimes is disguised as "democracy promotion."

Anwar Ibrahim's affiliations with Malaysian "Islamists," the already active political subversion his US State Department-funded Bersih movement is sowing in Malaysia's streets, and his Western backers' habitual support for terrorism internationally as a geopolitical tool, raises the possibility that his opposition movement is complicit in the conveniently timed militant destabilization Malaysia now faces, only months before 2013's general elections.

This may be why the Western media refuses to properly cover an otherwise very noteworthy conflict. The fact that these militants are emanating from long-time US ally, the Philippines, and the Philippines' current role in assisting the US "pivot" towards Asia, and more specifically facilitating a proxy confrontation with China, illustrates the greater regional implications at play. The US intends to install client regimes in Myanmar led by Aung San Suu Kyi, Thailand led by Thaksin Shinawatra's despotic political dynasty, and in Malaysia led by Anwar Ibrahim. Together, this front will then be turned against Chinese interests as part of a long-planned desire to encircle and contain China.

It will be done so under ASEAN and at the cost of Asia's stability and prosperity.

The future of Asia hangs in the balance, and, therefore, conflicts like Malaysia's battle against armed extremists in Sabah may not be covered by the Western press, but it must be covered by the alternative press. The unhinged insanity that is now spilling blood on Malaysia's shores, also represented by the West's proxy Anwar Ibrahim and his attempts to provoke street protests against the ruling government, illustrates just how dangerous the current Anglo-American international order is, and how far its reach extends.

We must identify the corporate-financier interests driving this agenda, - interests we most likely patronize on a daily basis, and both boycott and permanently replace them to erode the unwarranted influence they have used, and will continue to use against people the world over.

Tony Cartalucci's articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report, Alternative Thai News Network and LocalOrg. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here.


This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


Anonymous said...

Mr. Cartalucci,

The Sultane of Sulu, the real owner of Sabah, is not linked to a Al Queda which is created by your own government, Amerika. They did not invade Sabah (leased territory to Malaysia by Sultanate of Sulu who is a Filipino and a Muslim). The Malaysian government is paying rent on Sabah to the Sultanate of Sulu for more than a hundred years now and even at the present time. This is well documented and admitted by Malaysia that they are paying rents to Sultanate of Sulu. So, who is the owner of Sabah? Malaysia or Sultanate of Sulu. Who invaded Sabah? Malaysia or Sultanate of Sulu.

Also, if you read the Australian papers and The Economist news releases they are not mute at all as you claimed to be. They are siding with Malaysia. Were they not part of Western media?

You are trying to make something that is not true at all, to make it fit with your theory.

Let me post a link because it will enlighten you with some facts:

Anonymous said...

@1-st comment
I don't get it. Malaysia is also Muslim and they paying rent, as you mentioned in your comment. So what is the fuss about? Why's the invasion happenning? The only reason as I see it is to create a conflict in the Muslim world (devide and conquer) so that they would not be able to stand up united against the banking cartel.

Rabbitnexus said...

To the first anonymous poster. Your argument is specious. It does not explain why the conflict is underway then. As you say, rent is being paid. Just because there is some coverage in the Western media in the region, doesn;t mean it is fair or balanced. The difference is usually hjow much emphasis things are given, because even the most damning (for the Zionist masters) news is often covered by their controlled media, once. Then it is either dropped in the memory hole or displaced with something more loud and shiny, often a celebrity scandal for example.

Mel Nelson said...

Great exaggeration of the facts, in order to get view closer to the truth... for hundreds read one hundred... For Rent read ceded to the UK a few hundred years back... Instead of Free Malaysia Today Read any popular newspaper like the Straits times.

Sheesh... what a load of crap!

Anonymous said...

It's the Free Malaysian Army bringing democracy to Malaysia!
It's all for a GODD CAUSE!

Anonymous said...

"Saudi Arabia is of course is the chief financier of Al Qaeda, and is currently leading efforts to fund, arm, and fill the ranks of Al Qaeda's franchises from Mali and Libya, to Syria and Iraq. A multitude of reports from across the West have identified Saudi Arabia as the linchpin in Al Qaeda's global terror campaign,...."

You keep on trying to connect Saudi Arabia and Al Qaeda with the Sultanate of Sulu. Let me say this, during the time of Marcos, he keeps on sending his wife, Imelda Marcos, to Libya's Muammar Khaddafi, why? Because the supplier of arms and financier of secessionist thugs in muslim Mindanao, which is adjacent to Sabah, was Khadaffi not Saudi Arabia. Marcos wants Khadaffi to stop supporting those thugs. Now that Khadaffi is gone,.... Saudi Arabia?

The Sultanate of Sulu only sent 230 men to reclaim their land. If Saudi Arabia is financing the reclamation of Sabah, they should send at least a couple of thousands.

The current president of philippines,Aquino, who is a documented psychiatric patient, don't want any types of problems with Sabah because his family and relatives invested hundreds of millions of dollars if not billions, one of the company is Petron Oil.

Anonymous said...

just Google philippines newspaper and you can get the story,
"where they landed last month to assert a long-dormant territorial claim in what has become Malaysia's worst security crisis in years.

A spokesman for the Manila-based sultan, who called for a midday ceasefire, said 235 people including eight women took part in the original incursion."

there is no al-CIAda involved and it is more than likely being exaggerated to get more people to read the article.

Anonymous said...

Listen up,

There is no Al Quaeda, you've been brainwashed to think such is real...
It was created by Israei'is Mossad and our CIA.
Remember Bin L;aden was always a CIS asset.

He was recruited by our CIA to fight the Russians out of Afghanistan; that's when the CIA set up, a database called Al Qeada, that's all it is.

Bushes two phony ass wars on so-called terror was and is bogus, but they needed a perfect enemy, so they used the word Al Qeada as their perfect enemy, because all there was and still is and always will be a bunch of radicals and freedom fighters.
They don't want our troops in their country killing innocent people period.
We stole Iraqi's 700 trillions bucks worth of oil reserves and mass murdered some two million innocent people, mainly for Zionist Israel.

Zionist Israel and their Mossad pulled 911, there is a mountain of evidence; their finger prints are all over 911.

Anonymous said...

abs-cbnnews is a pravda of current psychiatric president, Noynoy Aquino.

If you want the truth on Philippine affairs, read or go to facebook and look for Showbiz Government.

Anonymous said...

I take back what I said about abs-cbnnews, it is not a pravda newspaper. It is a good newspaper but not as good as

Anonymous said...

1st comment - the terrorists came FROM the Philippines. They are not FROM Borneo, they DO NOT live in Borneo. They came across on boats, with guns right before Malaysia's elections the US is trying to disrupt and rig. The terrorists themselves admit they are involved - terrorists with LONG STANDING TIES, ADMITTED TIES to Al Qaeda.

And yes, we all know Al Qaeda is not a real organization, and is run by the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia. I think the article even calls them a US-Saudi mercenary force.

Hide Behind said...

The US Marines were invited back to Islandsto help the Alquino government put down 5 or 6 different groups that startedout as peacefull dissidents but they used military. As far as AL Queda goes thatis the standard bull shit line to justify US military intervention.
Al Queda "THE LIST" began even before bin Ladins time andwas CIA, BRIT, and Israeli assets ofdifferent groups and yes familys along with an international cast of black market gun merchants and loyal bribed clan chieftains from Algeria, N. AFRICA, Central Asia and ME.
Heavy concentration of Philipine populace from all etnic groupins andgovrrning philosophys in OLY/TAC/SEATTLE AREA and Islamics some but few and they all say maineeason for dissentis the complete c.
WE have a floating military base off shore there and between 1500 to 3500 troops acting as trainers and we also go in field with their militar by Seal and Marines instructors.
Minesweeper, as there are no mined waters was shalow draft and used more like our old Riverine Boats of Vietnam days. Can travel shallow waters even get close to shore to drop off or pick up sealsor Philipine ranger/ commando types.
NOW signing treaty to go back to old Subic Bay Naval Base.
4 uS military so far sent home forrape there. Casualtys denied by USbutreturnees say differently.

Hide Behind said...

Whole dn place is corrupt eccept once you get away from larger citys.
Tens of thousands of women live and work all over the world many married, and send money home to husbands and children and stay away for years at a time.
Wonderfull hard working ladies in a hard harsh world and many are abused but because familys dependent upon them they work none the less.
Tough Critters.
Many political prisoners in prisons that are like 1700's horror stories.
Used to buy, from friends those bottles and crafts thir relatives made while incarcerated have to purchase decent food and clothes etc. had so many ships and islands scenes in bottles I called it my Philipine navy fleet.
Worry now U S there as already they have set in motion the El Salvador Solution.
In a nation of large numbers in poverty under corrupt regime any blodfy bastards can make good money inUS supplied militias; Killing small landholders and dissenters.
US has become a traveling butcher._

Paul Kwiatkowski Kasper said...

hold tight... michelle, clinton and bush shall set up a fund to save the day

Anonymous said...

AL-Cia-Da.. there is. But there ain't no Alkaeda.

I use to think Tony Cartalucci is a well informed writer BUT seems not.

The current ruling regime/Junta is in bed with these sulu terrorist - they have a deal but the ruling regime reneged on a promised to give them a hefty piece of land in Sabah as their launching base.

So, Tony if you are reading - take note and LEARN!

Sulu Warrior.

DutchUncle said...

Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are MUslim,,,and being Muslim Obama will protect them,,send in American troops to "Fight the exsisting leadership",,god where have we heard that,,,and set up yet another Muslim Brotherhood Dictatorship.

Isis Baha Allah Baha said...

In all the confusion … one thing for sure … is that the fight against what is and has been … is a fight in the right direction …

Anonymous said...

There is no al-Qaeda, that was created to get us to bomb Iraq after Israels false flag 9-11 operation.

Anonymous said...

Here is the the original copy and translation of the lease agreement of Sabah of 1878 between British Company and Sulu Sultanate.

Anonymous said...

According to this article the supporter or financier is Saudi Arabia and directly connected to a Amerika's Al Queda. Also, according to this article that the U.S. is supporting the opposition and don't want the current administration/prime miniter to remain in office.

Accoding to a link below, written by a Malaysian from Sabah, Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan, STAR Sabah Chief, the supplier of arms and financier is not Saudi Arabia. Al Queada has nothing to do with it. The supplier and financier or supporter of muslim Mindanao is the current administrator/prime minister of Malaysia.

Anonymous said...

The question is why Malaysia's current administration and the previous ones are supporting muslims in Mindanao with arms and money?

This is a classic divide and conquer. If Mindanao is destabilized, the Sultanate of Sulu and the Philippines will not be able to make claim on Sabah as their top priority.

Malaysia is even supporting muslim thugs in Mindanao to be an independent state that way the Sabah claim will not materialize. They are creating Bangsamoro. I will not go through it because it is too long to explain it here.

Anonymous said...

I love the brainiac that said Bush's two fake wars.

Iraq was, is and always will be Clinton's little Gem starting with his strikes on iraq in 1993 then 1998-2000[Operation Desert Fox (that aroused from Clinton's Iraqi Liberation Act)]
Clinton's refusal to deal with Bin Laden through out the 90s is confirmed to have started the conflict in Afghanistan by US and international investigations.
Clinton started the Iraq war and caused 911 in to 8 months of Bush's presidency.

His attacks on Iraq started in 1993. In retaliation for an Iraqi plot to assassinate former U.S. President George Bush during his April visit to Kuwait, President Bill Clinton orders U.S. warships to fire Tomahawk cruise missiles at Iraqi intelligence headquarters in downtown Baghdad.

Snopes, the far left liberal truther squad has it documented. TRUE - Clinton Iraq War WMD Speech in 1998 - TOP DEMOCRATIC OFFICIALS say ON RECORD AND TO THE PUBLIC that Saddam has WMDs or making them
Also the video shows top Democratic officials 2002 stating AND supporting the decision to go to war.

Clinton's speech on attacking Iraq for WMDs

Hillary Clinton talks about her vote to go to war, Saddam, and WMDs 2 weeks before war in a meeting with Code Pink and Unreasonable Women for the Earth in March 2003.

Democrats claiming WMDs on video

Hillary Clinton on Iraq WMDs

Democrats on WMDs in Iraq

Here is Clinton's Iraq war, in their own words.

Clinton on Iraq WMDs 1998 speech
The year was 1998, the Clinton Administration was making a case against Iraq to justify an eventual attack by the United States.
Do any of these arguments against Iraq sound familiar? George W. Bush is accused of lying about Iraq's WMDs. Was President Clinton also lying?

Anonymous said...

Does everyone remember when the violence began in Libya and Syria and all the trolls came out and said it was everyone but Al Qaeda, the US and Saudi Arabia had nothing to do with it, and in fact, we were imagining the violence?

Sure looks like the trolls are back in force. In fact, I'd dare say the eventual scale of this conflict can be measured by the number of trolls and the degree to which they lie.

Anonymous said...

Don't believe everything you read, and this article is a shining example.

Anonymous said...

And Activist Post posting these types of exaggerated opinions, pulls everything else they publish here into question. So, never take anything on face value, specifically not here. ALWAYS ASK QUESTIONS, no matter what you read…..

Anonymous said...

"The Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) of course, is one of several of Al Qaeda's franchises in Southeast Asia, and spun off the notorious terrorist organization, Abu Sayyaf, a US State Department-listed foreign terrorist organization with direct ties to Al Qaeda."

MNLF is not Al Qaeda or franchise of Al Qaeda. It is like you are saying that MI6 of UK is a franchise of CIA. They are completely separate but they can operate together if they have a common interest.

MNLF has a budget in millions of dollars given by Philippine government to improve the areas of muslims in Mindanao. But what did the leaderships of MNLF did? They just put the money in their own pockets. The Abu Sayyaf group found out about it so they separated from MNLF and dreamed about having their own millions too, not for the improvement of the people of Mindanao. Same thing with MILF.

Then the US brand them as Al Queda or Al Queda franchise for the above reasons I discussed. This is idiotically laughable.

Anonymous said...

What is the legal basis of sabah claim by the sultanate of sulu?


Malaysia was formed and given independence by the British Government in 1963. The Sultanate of
Sulu and North Borneo was also given by the British Government the 'Letter of Administration' to Sabah, acknowledging all the property of the Sultanate of Sulu over Sabah in 1939. To the effect that 1939 isearlier than 1963 explicitly telling us which one is genuine and legal. Another striking solid and legal evidence of the Sabah ownership is the
case filed by Indonesia to the United Nations to claim part of Sipadan,Sabah against Malaysia . The UN ruling under ICJ explicitly
stated that Indonesia has no sovereign rights over Sipadan ,Sabah because it is owned by the Sultanate of Sulu under administration of
Malaysia. Therefore, if Malaysia will not acknowledge the ownership by the Sultanate of Sulu over Sabah, Malaysia is directly
violating ( for in fact being violated for 47 years) the UN sanctions over Sipadan, Sabah stating that the Sultanate of Sulu is the legitimate owner of Sabah. Moreover , if Malaysia will not acknowledge the 1939 High Court decision and the implementation of the 'Letter of Administration' over Sabah that the Sultanate of Sulu is the owner of
Sabah , Malaysia has to nullify their Independence given by the British Government in 1963 ,simply because it is the same government,
the British Government who gave authority over the ownership of Sabah which is far earlier than their independence in 1963. The
continued ignoring of Malaysia to this day of the rights to possess the ownership, over Sabah by the Sultanate of Sulu Kingdom, creates a
continuous anger on the part of the Sultanate people for prohibiting them to live in their own land and even expulsing the people of the
Sultanate living in Sabah today.

Anonymous said...

Why is the Western media supporting Malaysia instead of the Sultanate of Sulu who is the historical and legal owner of Sabah?

"....corruption of media to sway global opinion for its interests was the centerpiece of an exposé by Rosie Gray, staff of Internet news magazine BuzzFeed, on March 1 entitled, “Covert Malaysian Campaign Touched a Wide Range of American Media.”

The report uncovered how US media outlets “carried pieces financed by the Malaysian government,” where payments for such “propaganda for the government of Malaysia” to “conservative American opinion writers — whose work appeared in…the Huffington Post and San Francisco Examiner to the Washington Times to National Review and RedState — emerged in a filing this week to the Department of Justice.”

Taken from‘malaysiagate’.html

Anonymous said...

The most baffling of all, is why the US is mute in supporting a long time ally, the Philippines, in this malaysiagate, in the reclamation of the land that legally and historically belongs to Sultanate of Sulu.

Why? The US wants to partition Philippines, to separate Mindanao from it. They want to Balkanize it.

Why? The US cannot control hundreds of lawmakers in the Philippines to approve a new US base in Mindanao. If Mindanao is separated from Philippines they can easily control a handful leaders of MILF, that will control Mindanao, and a new US military base will be installed. They will be able to milk the natural resources of Mindanao including oil and gas and other minerals. This will include Spratly which is being illegally claimed by China.

Post a Comment