Saturday, December 29, 2012

Back to the Future: What History Teaches About Gun Confiscations

Dave Hodges, Contributor
Activist Post

It is clear that Obama, Boxer, a host of other elected representatives, the media, and Hollywood stars are coming after our guns. Leading the media charge is none other than Michael Moore; he implores the nation to let the murders of 20 Sandy Hook elementary students not “be in vain and stand for gun control.” Moore seems to forget that he and his family have several armed bodyguards.

Then there is Obama who refuses to mandate that gun free zones at schools be replaced with armed guards designed in order to protect our children. And Obama also seems to forget to mention that he has 11 armed guards protecting his children while they attend school in a “gun free zone.”

Oh, I think Obama and Moore think that our children are important. It is just that their children are much more important than our children. Simply put, Obama and Moore advocate for “rules for thee but not for me.”

Outright Gun Bans Are Looming

Regrettably, I believe that we are going to see an incrementally based approach to seizing our guns on the part of the Obama administration. Subsequently, Americans could very well be on the verge of committing “National Suicide by Gun Control”.

The gun control advocates are positioning themselves and their gun-grabbing policies to be perfectly timed to influence people during this window of opportunity motivated by the highly suspicious set of mass shootings (e.g. Batman shootings, Sandy Hook shootings).


All totalitarian governments begin their invasion into civil liberties with the promise of safety from whoever plays the convenient role of the “bogeyman” of the day. In Nazi Germany, the original bogeymen were the communists, and then this specter of bogeymen kept expanding until anyone who was an enemy of the State needed to be controlled and disarmed. Isn’t this what we have witnessed since the days of 9/11 with the creation of the DHS-inspired MIAC report which lists returning veterans, gun owners, Libertarians, Ron Paul supporters and Constitutionalists as domestic terrorists. This is your list of people who will be disarmed first, and the list will keep growing until all Americans are disarmed. The totalitarian pleas of “Let us protect you from yourself” ring loudly and clearly through the halls of Congress and in the Oval Office. History shows that when governments demand to protect you from yourself, we should all get a little bit nervous.

History Speaks Will American Listen?

History shows that bad things, very bad things, happen when a government confiscates the guns of its citizens. It is an undisputed fact that gun control and gun confiscation have preceded every instance of genocide in the 20th century. How quickly we forget the lessons of history, or, perhaps we never bothered to learn the true lessons of history in the first place.

If we ever allow government to subvert the Second Amendment, we very well could be witnessing a prelude to an American genocide for specific targeted groups, for there is nothing as dangerous to a totalitarian regime as an educated and well-armed populace. Totalitarian regimes flourish in an atmosphere of ignorance. The dumbing down of American students has removed the first obstacle which could stand in the way of the establishment of a brutal police state control grid. The second obstacle, the removal of America’s citizens guns as a last line of defense against tyrannical government has commenced with the catalyst being the Sandy Hook shootings.

And let’s not forget that this criminal Obama administration has been caught shipping guns into Mexico to the drug cartels in order to undermine the Second Amendment; and we are supposed to trust these proven criminals to be the only ones who will have guns in the new UN-controlled America?

What Happens After Gun Confiscation?

Before we passively allow the Obama administration to strip away our last line of defense from an increasingly totalitarian government, by acquiescing to the United Nations and American advocates for gun control, perhaps we should examine the end game resulting from past gun control efforts:

1. In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915-1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves against their ethnic-cleansing government, were arrested and exterminated.

2. In 1929, the former Soviet Union established gun control as a means of controlling the “more difficult” of their citizens. From 1929 to the death of Stalin, 40 million Soviets met an untimely end at the hand of various governmental agencies as they were arrested and exterminated.

3. After the rise of the Nazis, Germany established their version of gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves against the “Brown Shirts”, were arrested and exterminated. Interestingly, the Brown Shirts were eventually targeted for extermination themselves following their blind acts of allegiance to Hitler. Any American military and police would be wise to grasp the historical significance of the Brown Shirts’ fate.

4. After Communist China established gun control in 1935, an estimated 50 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves against their fascist leaders, were arrested and exterminated.

5. Closer to home, Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayans, unable to defend themselves against their ruthless dictatorship, were arrested and exterminated.

6. Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves from their dictatorial government, were arrested and exterminated.

7. Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million of the “educated” people, unable to defend themselves against their fascist government, were arrested and exterminated.

8. In 1994, Rwanda disarmed the Tutsi people and being unable to defend themselves from their totalitarian government, nearly one million were summarily executed.

The total numbers of victims who lost their lives because of gun control is approximately 70 million people in the 20th century. The historical voices from 70 million corpses speak loudly and clearly to those Americans who are advocating for a de facto gun ban. Governments murdered four times as many civilians as were killed in all the international and domestic wars combined. Governments murdered millions more people than were killed by common criminals and it all followed gun control.

Historically, American gun control legislation has been imitating Hitler’s Nazi Germany gun control legislation for quite some time. Consider the key provisions of the Nazi Weapons Act of 1938 and compare it with the United States Gun Control Act of 1968. The parallels of both the provisions and the legal language are eerily similar.

The Nazi Weapons Act of 1938

1. Classified guns for sporting purposes.

2. All Germans desiring to purchase firearms had to register with the Nazi officials and submit to a background check.

3. The law assumed that non-Nazi German citizens were hostile and thereby exempted Nazis from the gun control law.

4. The Nazis assumed unrestricted power to decide what kinds of firearms could, or could not, be owned by private persons.

5. The types of ammunition that were legal were subject to control by governmental bureaucrats.

6. Citizens under 18 years of age could not buy firearms and ammunition.

United States Gun Control Act of 1968

1. Introduced term “sporting purpose.”

2. Exempted government agencies from the controls which applied to law-abiding citizens.

3. Age restrictions of 18 years and 21 years were applied to anyone who wished to purchase firearms and ammunition.

4. Authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to decide what firearms could or could not be owned by private persons.

5.The types of ammunition that were legal were subject to control by governmental bureaucrats.

6. Age restriction of 18 years and 21 years were applied to anyone who wished to purchase firearms and ammunition.

Thomas Jefferson was very clear in his writings regarding the right to bear arms. Jefferson knew that the preservation of the Republic ultimately rested upon a well-armed citizenry. Jefferson felt it was absolutely necessary for American citizens to be able to protect themselves. The protection that Jefferson spoke of was not from our obvious enemies of the day (France and Britain), but from our own government. Jefferson made this point quite clear when he admonished future generations of Americans to fulfill their duty to overthrow a government if they failed to serve the needs of the majority of its citizens.

Private ownership of guns is the necessary component needed to fulfill the Jeffersonian mandate for national self-defense. Yet, increasingly reminiscent of Nazi Germany, the United States government is incrementally chipping away at private citizens' right to own a gun. This does doesn’t make sense because FBI statistics clearly show that 90% of the guns used in the commission of a crime are stolen! Does the government really believe that criminals, both American citizens and illegal aliens, as well as terrorists, are suddenly going to perform their civic duty and immediately register their guns? How is America better-served if the only ones who don’t have access to guns are the law-abiding citizens? So, one must ask who are the gun control laws designed to protect and why?

Finally, most would wonder what gun confiscation would look and feel like in America. No speculation is necessary because of the gun confiscations which took place in New Orleans in 2006 in the aftermath of Katrina. Any American who thinks that gun confiscation is a good idea, needs desperately to watch the following video.



Is this the government that you are going to accept? Even the most brainwashed of Americans cannot deny what you just watched on the preceding video. If we allow Obama to possess the ability to ban our guns, this is what you will likely see across the country; and the potential for this to spread into a flashpoint for widespread violence, and even revolution, should be concerning to all of us. This issue, in my humble opinion, needs to be our line in the sand against this tyrannical government.


Historians generally agree that there are eight identifiable stages associated with an unfolding genocide. It would behoove all Americans to familiarize themselves with these stages in order to accurately assess the developing threat should gun confiscation ever become a reality. An analysis of the applicability of the eight stages of genocide to present day America will be the focus of the next part in this series.

Read other articles by Dave Hodges Here

Dave is an award winning psychology, statistics and research professor, a college basketball coach, a mental health counselor, a political activist and writer who has published dozens of editorials and articles in several publications such as Freedoms Phoenix, News With Views and The Arizona Republic.

The Common Sense Show features a wide variety of important topics that range from the loss of constitutional liberties, to the subsequent implementation of a police state under world governance, to exploring the limits of human potential. The primary purpose of The Common Sense Show is to provide Americans with the tools necessary to reclaim both our individual and national sovereignty.



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is a very, very important Heads Up Video News Clip!

Insider: Obama To Fully Engage Gun Owners with Armed Feds in 2013

http://www.infowars.com/insider-obama-to...


Infowars.com | Alex talks with Doug Hagmann of the Northeast Intelligence Network about information released by his high-level DHS contact.
http://www.infowars.com/insider-obama-to-fully-engage-gun-owners-with-armed-feds-in-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-3661183

Anonymous said...

Make and take a stand against the coming gun laws. Don't cooperate and register yourselves as sex crime criminals are required to do! Save some semblance of self respect and freedom! Just say "NO" to the coming gun laws and probable confiscation. Save our constitutional republic.

Paul Panza said...

The desired result of the fear mongering is being achieved: more gun sales and more identified future terrorists. The Fourth Reich is happy. The great trap of the "defend yourself with guns if they take them away" is making them rich and putting all those with registered weapons on the "List". They have weapons like the Death Ray, HAARP,, drones and robots, large numbers of foreign troops available and a reorganizing mindset. Good luck with a civil war on a radioactive, weather warped battlefield! There is something more important to do, like getting ready for the obvious coming crack down.

Kevin Patrick Wright said...

You might want to proof-read your stories before publishing. The first few sentences had grammatical errors.
Then, this quote: "Oh, I think Obama and Moore think that our children are important."
My response: Are you really that naive?! They don't give a rats ass about OUR children, otherwise THEY wouldn't:
1. send them to die in racist fake wars,
2. kill them slowly with GMO's and other toxic "food", including hormone manipulators,
3. poison them with pseudo-"medicine",
4. dumb down their education,
5. fill their daily lives with meaningless trivia, "texting", "sexting", and other "chat",
6. indoctrinate them to be perpetual "CONSUMERS" of petroleum-based plastic garbage,
7. confuse them with prepubescent discussions of adult sexual matters and "gender bias",
8. allow teachers, psychologists, psychiatrists, counselors, priests, rabbis, coaches, cops, and other deviant psychopaths to molest them,
9. rally them to revolt against their parents by force-feeding them lies about "global warming", "overpopulation", gun-control, etc.
10. deny them a REAL understanding of their inalienable civil and unalienable human rights, granted by their Creator (sovereignty), and instead, teach them that the "State" has authority over them, etc., etc., ad nauseum.

THEY "care" only about USING "the children" as tools, i.e. "fodder" for THEIR agenda; the one-world government's "final solution." OUR children have become nothing more than collateral damage and sacrificial pawns, while THEIR children are "untouchable."

Another quote: "13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves against the “Brown Shirts”, were arrested and exterminated."
My response: Propaganda B.S.!!! No mention of the "Bolsheviks"???

A "psychology" professor, statistician, and researcher ought to know better than to use propaganda and "scare tactics" (FEAR) in order to cause panic and incite a "Civil War", which the weapon$ dealer$ and banker$ would LOVE to see.

The statistical probability of ANY government removing nearly half a BILLION guns and much more ammo from an armed populace is asinine! NOT going to happen!!! THEY stand a better chance of killing us $lowly with diabetes, vaccines, disease, and more FEAR.

Canada and Australia "banned" guns, but I personally know a LOT of them who have multiple guns cached away and readily available "just in case."

Russian and Japanese leaders of the past have said that the only reason why they never invaded mainland USA was because of her heavily armed populace. Messing with tens of millions of well-armed, poverty-stricken white and blue-collar "rednecks"... well, heck, that ain't too smart, knowhattameen?

It is KEY to understand what LAWS really are. There is Natural Law, Constitutional Law, and if you are misinformed or deceived, there is "Commercial Law" = Acts, Bylaws, Statutes, and other legislation which is not actual LAW, but simply Commercial Code for business (commerce/banking) purposes. These pseudo-"laws" only have authority over you if you CONSENT to them.

A Sovereign human being under Common Law jurisdiction is unencumbered by these tyrannical and fictitious "rules." Be free, know your rights! Educate yourself.

I didn't bother reading the whole article.

SHILL?

Anonymous said...

From an article in Russian Pravda:
".. it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear."
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/28-12-2012/123335-americans_guns-0/

Anonymous said...

"Would you be willing to put a sticker on your car window or the front door of your house saying 'I am an anti-gun person--there are no guns in this [car/house].'"

We've all seen variations on this. The sentiment is accurate, the point obvious, the logic inescapable. Unless one denies the importance or validity of logic.

Unfortunately denial of logic is precisely what we see time and again among anti-gunners. No logical argument gets through to them.

Whether this is the result of dumbing down American education over the years (that's certainly part of it), or mental saturation by mindless infotainment inundating us with logical absurdities and conditioning us to accept them as normal and factual, or is merely a function of a nation's becoming too fat and lazy to do basic research and form their own conclusions instead of wallowing in their emotions, the situation is clear. The more historical facts you present, the more cogent your logic, the more you will be attacked as a monster who is part of the problem, willfully ignorant of the "obvious solution": Make guns go away and violence will go away.

No amount of "cruel" fact or logic will break through the emotional bubble with which these people have surrounded themselves. Whether the issue be the coming financial collapse, the continued invasion of the US by criminal illegal aliens, the charade of two-party system "free" elections, or the vital role of the Second Amendment in underpinning civilian liberties against clear and present encroaching tyranny, they won't get it.

Perhaps it is time to simply let them go. They've nothing to contribute. When the bad times come, when they find themselves being raped, pillaged, starved, and slaughtered, simply turn away and link arms with those who saw it coming and prepared for it.

They've been warned repeatedly in every way we know how; if they insist upon being canaries in the mine shaft, so be it. Screw 'em if they can't take a hint.

I, for one, am sick being labeled a potential mutant baby killer on every blog I participate in.

Anonymous said...

To the wiseguy Kevin Patrick Wright commenting on proofreading, above: check your own post out before commenting.

Following a colon denoting a list, a semi-colon is used at the end of each item when the list itself contains a comma.

Anonymous said...

11:57AM

I will call you a talented diabolical troll for the gun industry. Better?
Extremely lame effort with your (straw man) they labeled me a baby killer whine. But for divisive negative impact and overall generation of hostility, I give you an A+. Same goes for AP on this issue. Brutal.

Richard said...

Read the book: "Death by Gun Control", you can get a copy at jpfo.org

Post a Comment