Activist Post
WikiLeaks has released damning emails embarrassing Syria and exposing “Syria’s opponents”, says Julian Assange. There were more than 2.4 million emails that show correspondence between “Syrian political figures, ministries and associated companies” between August 2006 and March 2012.
The Associated Press reports, “WikiLeaks’ Sarah Harrison told journalists at London’s Frontline Club that the emails reveal interactions between the Syrian government and Western companies, although she declined to go into much further detail. … WikiLeaks posted only a handful of the documents to its website Thursday, but the disclosure — whose source WikiLeaks has not made clear — wouldn’t be the first major leak of Syrian emails.”
Harrison said that the “material is embarrassing to Syria” but claims that Syria’s opponents will equally be ashamed. “It helps us not merely to criticize one group or another, but to understand their interests, actions and thoughts. It is only through understanding this conflict that we can hope to resolve it.”
Called “The Syrian Files” numerous diplomatic correspondences are more of an exposure to insider information than WikiLeaks disclosure concerning the US government’s role and responsibility in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The hacked emails include:
• Correspondence from the Baath party
• Contains information on foreign affairs, finance and Assad’s presidential business
• Records of financial transfers from Syrian ministries to nations
• Over 68,000 are in Russian
Russia is in arms trade with Syria even though the UN with pressure from the US has imposed sanctions against Assad’s government because of the fake revolution called the Arab Spring that was inspired and controlled by Soros infiltrators and the CIA.
WikiLeaks and Assange have not “verified all the emails” because of the sheer volume; however, they claim that they are “statistically confident” that the files they have obtained are genuine.
Questions surround Assange’s connections to the CIA and his ability to expose “leaked” information. As a psy-op, the manifestation of Assange and WikiLeaks has effectively used engineered operations of secret document exposure to give the appearance of forced political responsibility for intelligence and policy failures. This is detailed in the CIA document entitled, The Secret Team.
The CIA connection to Assange creates an avenue where fake leaks of documents can be made to give the illusion to the public that they are privy to secret information.
Meanwhile, the CIA “people-power coup” has been integral in many fake revolutions both in the streets of foreign nations and on the Internet.
WikiLeaks assisted the US government’s overthrow of the Tunisian government. Assange’s portrayal as a lone wolf just trying to expose corruption has aided the US government as the perfect psy-op cover that convinces individuals to rally in favor of their hero, Julian Assange, and keep his crusade alive.
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.
You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE.
BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW
12 comments:
where does it say that these documents were obtained by "flame"?
I wonder were are the wikileaks of Libia?
I don't believe in this guy an its wikileaks at all.
No wekeleaks of Israel?
COME ON GUYS!
Anytime so-called "damning evidence" is released of alleged wrong doing and they don't or won't mention the source, you can bet your left foot that Israel is the "source".
Seriously, does anyone still buy Wikileaks as anything other than a government sponsored psyop/propaganda apparatus. The dead giveaway is the MSM's focus on Wikileaks.
Zionist pissyleaks - a pack of lies
Dale is confused (is that the goal of this Posl false flag impersonation of a radical critic?)There may or may not be some truth in this allegation that Wikileaks is a CIA operation...or that Assange is not really blonde.
But assuming as true what may be true is a logical fallacy which makes an illegitimate leap from speculation and suspicion to reality.
I read the links from this article; the Tarpley article makes some outrageous claims, which does not prove they are wrong, but no real evidence is produced: only assertion and in some cases pretty unbelievable details (Assange was part of a cult as a child with a fake mother and took LSD and has died his hair as a manifestation of racial superiority) for which no evidence is given. This sounds like character assassination.
It's like the internet; every crazy idea is out there and if you string them together, you can, using internet sources, contend that Jesus was a CIA agent.
I don't know about Posel--her Facebook (which is an empty vessel) portrays her as an Occupier type,without friends, but she has written articles about FAst and Furious in which Darrel Issa is seen as a credible and sole source to implicate the whole Obama administration...as tho she were the PR for Issa.
Other articles have led me to suspect that she is not what she portrays (radical Occupier) but as (perhaps paid, like Assange) a CIA operative,
with a false front/flag hangout such as that she (parroting Tarpley) accuses Wikileaks of being. a CIA hangout operation. Tarpley, who tried to run for Senate as a LaRouch candidate also believes global warming is a hoax, just like Wiki leaks.
The trouble is, I think he is right on many things..but then he goes off the cliff, just as Posel does. It reminds me of the adage that any idea, taken to its extreme, becomes absurd. Those attacking the CIA are CIA operatives, 99% of climate scientists are involved in a giant hoax, etc.
But hoaxes, false flags, and psy-ops happen..but
we need evidence, not the absurd assertion of what might be possible.
So I don't know: I want to be fair, but there is something very suspicious about her sources and the way her attacks on Obama and the CIA and the colored revolutions and Soros, etc etc, all have an air of the hangout, the deliberate deception of a fake revolutionary. I might be wrong: she might be a real revolutionary, just a little nuts.
I get sucked in my agreeing with much of what she reports, but then it takes that right turn...and the suspicions arise. I asked her to be my friend on Facebook but she turned me down.
Ouch
Dale has more to say: pt 2
Maybe I'm on to something. At any rate, it is no crazier than the narrative she is spinning.
Sometimes, crazy is the way things are.
The logic of "radicals" like Tarpley and Posel is like the narrative of reverse racism, in which it is claimed that the victims of racism are the real racists. In the Tarpley/Posel version, Wikileaks attacks on the CIA are limited self-inflicted criticisms, intended to justify the real motive: to demonize the enemies of the CIA but pretending to be an attack on the CIA. In other words, Wikileaks is the real liar for its expose of US war crimes are "old news."
This is a fine way to dismiss damning accusations (oh, I knew that; so what?)...but showing US soldiers gleefully shooting down innocent journalists and then those who came to remove their bodies, including children: that is spun such that this is just the CIA putting the blame on the Army.?? Really? This is pretty twisted thinking. "Let's show war crimes (the CIA tells Wikeleaks) to provide cover for exposing our real enemies." that is the Tarpley/Posel thesis, presented as fact.
I hate the CIA as much as anyone, but this is too much. This is cutting off your nose to spite your face. Or is that the CIA methodology?
This article, and the sources it relies on, are right on some issues just enough to inspire trust but then they do a 180 turn, as tho they were part of the CIA hangout false flag operations. And I remain suspicious and confused.
Who's to say America is not behind all this negative information to attempt to justify their next "planned war"to literally seize control of the middle east's oil reserves?I put nothing past the misadministration of the u.s. Total world control is their M.O. This is the brainchild of the Govt dept creation team.Rgds Arth
I have my own blog where I place all media propaganda. I was surprised to find this among my files from a couple of years ago leaked from Wikileaks...I posted it on the hashtag on twitter yesterday and one would have thought it would be front page news BUT no it does not suit the agenda. US plan for regime change in Syria from 2006.
I am going to send you a couple more links. Food for thought.
http://syriathemediawar.blogspot.com.es/2012/05/homs-2006-wikileaks-syria-america-dirty.html
Assange-Whose fooling who ?
http://thedisclosureproject-steelmagnolia.blogspot.com.es/2012/07/wikileaks.html
http://wikileaks.ch/reldate/2011-02-11_0.html
The Chile and Syria cables have been removed but where there just a couple of days ago.
http://wikileaks.ch/reldate/2011-02-11_0.html
Wikleaks Israel cables are here .
http://wikileaks.org/origin/41_0.html
If you notice most if not all states at the top of the cable it is not complete ?
I have been through most and there is nothing about their ethnic cleansing and building of concentration camps which is now happening and has been happening for quite sometime.
Don't forget tomorrow there is the internet blackout. I do not believe FBI explanation for that either.
Our brains are being more than brainwashed we are being bleachdwashed and I no longer believe anything or anyone.
http://cryptome.org/2012/07/whos-who-wl.htm
Whose who at Wikileaks.
Post a Comment