Friday, July 13, 2012

Merck Teams With Gates Foundation to Further Worldwide Depopulation

Susanne Posel, Contributor
Activist Post

At the London Summit on Family Planning (LSFP), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) pledged $560 million to their campaign to depopulate underdeveloped nations. World leaders, private-sector corporations, UN representatives and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) attended the LSFP.

Warren Buffet, friend and fellow Elitist, has agreed to hand over most of his wealth to charity; contributed stock valued at $1.52 billion in his annual gift to the BMGF.

Buffet asserted in a YouTube video in 2011:
I urge people to unbutton their wallet, pull out a check, reach into their purse, whatever it takes. You will find that when you give a dollar and something of yourself, a lot more than a dollar comes out the other end.
By 2020, Melinda Gates hopes to have extended the use of forced sterilization through manipulation of foreign governments to further the scheme of preventing 80 million of “unwanted pregnancies” in places like Africa, India and Southeast Asia.

Victoria Jennings, a director of Georgetown University’s Institute for Reproductive Health, said: “To have someone like her on the world stage saying ‘come on’, it does serve as a tremendous lever to ratchet up the concern.”

Pharmaceutical giant Merck announced in a formal statement that they will donate $25 million over an 8-year period as a “Merck for Mothers” campaign in line with the BMGF depopulation agenda. By claiming that this initiative is to “reduce maternal morality around the world” and will “advance efforts to help reach United Nations Millennium Development Goal 5, which calls for a 75 percent reduction in maternal mortality and universal access to reproductive health by 2015.”

Both Merck and BMGF have outlined a plan that focuses on 3 “key areas”:
  1. Use propaganda in the mainstream media to gain public support for reducing the world’s population.
  2. Employ drug and private-sector corporations to ensure “family planning” resources can be utilized in underdeveloped nations.
  3. Coerce governments, corporations and “civil society” to support the social meme of over-population and the BMGF remedies for quelling this problem.
The scheme for controlling the world’s population is the brainchild of Ban Ki-moon, the UN Secretary-General’s Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health (GSWCH):
Every Woman, Every Child, and innovative public-private and civil society partnerships developed through the Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition. The Summit also aligns with the broader framework established by the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) almost 20 years ago.
The ICPD officially contended that universal education, reduction of infant births, protection of maternal mortality as an excuse to sterilize millions of women, and purveying “family planning” as a cover for preventing the most densely populated areas from continuing to freely procreate were the most effective course of action to ensure the agenda of the global Elite.

As of now, the ICPD Beyond 2014 offers a “global consensus on the human populations” as a policy to guide reproduction under the guidelines of social progress and environmental sustainability because “human beings are at the center of development.”

The ICPD’s plan of action admonishes the cooperation of governments to support BMGF family planning schemes in relation to “protecting the environment” from over-growth of human population.

The GSWCH, working with the World Health Organization (WHO) is a global plan to bring vaccines, international interventions and financing to the UN for the purpose of:
  • Controlling access to healthcare in underdeveloped nations.
  • Use pre-determined drug corporations to treat third world nations so that they are no longer allowed to freely procreate.
  • Monitor and evaluate the progress of depopulation in these areas.

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE


This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


Roland.T.Flakfizer said...

Crazy! Don't these people realize that we should just let everyone do anything they want? We can support 18 billion people easily. Heck, 48 billion! A trillion!

We live in a world of unlimited resources. Unlimited space, unlimited energy, unlimited food. There are ZERO negative consequences to rampant population growth. None.

How dare someone try to think their way out of this problem!

Anonymous said...

And sterilization of filthy,third-world savages is a problem,why exactly? In the past,at least half-century or so,the trend as been the polar opposite it seems,with the West pouring billions of agriculture and food aid into these chronically dysfunctional societies so the population can breed like lice,and subsequently not being able to feed all the new offspring,thus continuing the cycle of suffering. Sterilization and eugenics are 2 policies much needed into today's world!

Anonymous said...

All those believing in depopulation should kill themselves and their families

Anonymous said...

Well, as long as they don't start a pandemic and force costly experimental vaccines on everyone.

James Mason said...

... The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for legalising mass murder ... If only those 'unwanted' peoples were like Bill & Melinda, things would be OK ... ??? Sounds like modern day Hitlers to me ...

Nemetron 2000 said...

It's funny how it's always the people with ridiculous sums of money that champion these 'soft-kill' agendas. Overpopulation would not effect them in the first place, because they have the financial ability to just up and leave an overpopulated area of the world and go to some less populated area. They have homes all over the damn planet. Hell, these fuckers can buy their own fucking islands if they wanted. So why the hell do they "care" so much about a problem that will never effect them?

The answer is simple. They don't care.

They sit up here and claim to be providing people with a "choice", but the reality is that there is no choice when social, political, or economic pressures force you to choose one way. That's the game being played here. Introduce the illusion of choice then create a social climate that literally forces people to "choose" sterilization.

"You want a job? First, take this shot."

"You want a house? First, take this shot."

"You want a car? First, take this shot."

"You want some food? First, take this shot."

"You want to stop living like an animal? First, take this shot."

That's it in a nutshell. They won't force you to take the shot, the social climate and your desire to experience a half-way decent existence will force you to take the shot. They sow the seeds for the society to be 'pro-sterilization', and then they sit back and watch the show.

Those of you who still insist things like this are necessary need to do as Anonymous 1:21pm said and lead by fucking example. Either that, or shutting the fuck up would suit me just fine.

Anonymous said...

That LPAC video is BS, don't waste your time watching it.

Anonymous said...

Dale says:
This article can be seen in the context of the criticism of the ICPD when it first convened in 1994 in Cairo. According to Wiki:

"The Holy See and several predominantly Islamic nations were staunch critics and U.S. President Bill Clinton received considerable criticism from conservatives for his participation."

The consensus arrived at included the right to reproductive health, such as contraception, treatment for infertility, and health programs to reduce infant and maternal deaths. Reproductive health, it was made clear, did not include advocating abortion, much less forced sterilization, a paranoid fantasy of the far far right.

The "right of densely populated continue to freely procreate.." is Posels' way of saying:
helping desperately poor areas where hundreds of thousands die from lack of reproductive health is part of the global conspiracy to kill 6 billion people. Offering contraception is twisted to mean forced sterilization.

Family planning is not a "cover" but a reality only when reproductive health services are available. To deny such services, to deny women access to medical treatment and contraception, is to reduce them to breeding machines and deny them the right to plan their families according to their own wishes.

This article, like others Posel writes, was quickly written and poorly sourced. It repeats paranoid fantasies about the efforts of the "elite" to kill of 90% of the world's population, under the guise of helping people. We are to believe that the Gates are giving hundreds of millions in order to kill off the poor.

I advise readers to research Melinda Gates, the UN agencies dealing with population, and previous articles by Posel which represent the most reactionary views of Catholic bishops and the anti-contraception right wing (such as Santorum), which regards family planning as sinful. This is fake journalism intended as propaganda for these views.

Eli said...

The explanation for this seemingly inexplicable madness of the Rich an Shameless comes from one of Gates' partners in their morally and mentally sick projects in Africa:

"Africa is now the last frontier in terms of arable land,” said James Nyoro, the Rockefeller Foundation’s managing director for Africa. “With the population growing to 9 billion, the rest of the world will have to depend upon Africa to feed it.”

And to the Anynomous imbecille minion of Satan above; I have lived with "filthy thirld-world savages" for the past 10 years. Why did I move here? The freedom and dignity of living in a society where life is not always about money, stuff and sex.

Second only to the culling of populations that the US military complex are conducting across the world, the population of the US itself are being culled faster than any other with e.g. vaccines, substandard food, chem-waste (flouride) in the water. Just look at the stats for cancer in the US the past 100 years. Or cardio vascular health problems.

Anonymous said...

and btw,,,america is a third world country now

Anonymous said...

This is just the begining the USA is on the list, if you don't work you will got to a fema camp

Anonymous said...

I don't get it. Just stop providing food and aid to these countries and their populations will stabilise naturally.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

I don't get it. Just stop providing food and aid to these countries and their populations will stabilize naturally.
July 14, 2012 6:38 PM

Well and simply said Anon - we are aiding and abetting their rampant overpopulation.

Anonymous said...

Let's hope they succeed!! Depopulate is essential, overdue and exactly what is needed. The only thing wrong with the current agenda is they need to depopulate the United States (the world's biggest consumers / polluters wasting the most resources and making the largest contribution per capita towards global warming).

Frankly, I am 100% for global depopulation (seriously).

Banky Loon said...

Doctors Of Death
Some say Mengele is still alive
The Lucius Trust and The United Nations
The UN (who with NATO now run our military)decided to have a limited war with Korea where they got free US soldiers to brainwash.It only took a handful of guards to keep hundreds of USA soldiers in line.
How fitting Mr.Ban Ki Moon (There is rumor that he is a Moonie by the way he evasively talks about his faith)who no one allegedly knows whose side he was on in that cconflict.They say he just hid in the hills during the war....that's all.
Kkorea and China were very good at brainwashing annd other neat stuff!
Now we allegely owe our lives to the Chib=nese and the Secretary GENERAL is a MIA Korean war survivor! But at least the head of the UN Security Council is The President so we can thank our lucky stars for that.
Heres a bit on Korean brainwashing
Hip hip hooray for Ban Ki Moon!
He's probably not really a Moonie.
But he's a loonie!

what do i know? said...

To reduce population:
Let people in countries keep, or at least benefit from, the wealth they produce. There are natural self-regulating mechanisms for population that are not about life being "nasty, brutish and short" so that some may be uselessly or unproductively wealthy while others starve.
Also, the Rockefeller Foundation long ago discovered that women's literacy was the strongest correlate with reduction in population growth. Other such organizations have made similar discoveries to moderate their initial Malthusian approaches.
And regarding eugenics, to breed better humans, restore truly romantic love, e.g. individual selection of mate, reintegration of sex and love, love and individual values (i.e. not religious fake "values"), etc.
People commenting here have bought into the Californican superficial "leftist" ideas about there being "overpopulation", and that being the source of all things bad in the world. The right wing racist side of that is "immigration", but it's pretty much the same thing. It's blaming the existence of other people for the problems you'd rather deny than deal with creatively and appropriately. It's blaming them rather than counting the existence of other souls as one of the enjoyments of human life deeper than just that nice scenery and climate and other superficials. All that "over" population and those "illegals" that get in your way and make your shallow lives so unpleasant for you are just your excuse for supporting politicians whom you expect to take care of such things for you. Left and Right ignore the possibility that, with a little good education and better arrangements people, or "immigrants""illegals"and so on, are the solution not the problem.

But go ahead and keep being ignorant if that's what you want, things will work out despite you or any depopulation ambitions of the ignorant and incompetent "elites".

Post a Comment