Friday, March 23, 2012

U.N. Policy Paper Outlines 7 Building Blocks for 'Heavy-Handed' World Government

Activist Post

The fact that the world is being restructured from decentralized diversity to collectivized hierarchy by an authoritarian regime cloaked in green trappings can hardly be disputed.

The final push toward the next and perhaps final phase may be announced this June at the 2012 U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

A Scientific American editorial by Gary Stix highlights a policy article written by several dozen scientists that appeared online March 15 in the journal Science.

The conclusions reached by the scientists, as well as the editorial from a staff member of Scientific American are incredibly unscientific and fly in the face of the many thousands of independent scientists and researchers who have refuted the theory of man-made global warming.  Regardless, this small group pushes ahead with their suggestions that the only way to combat such a global catastrophe is of course to solve it through global government.  And not just any global government, but one that Scientific American suggests should be "heavy-handed (in its) transnational enforcement powers."

The policy paper entitled, "Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance" is one of the most blatantly authoritarian among the incrementally more open policy papers that we are witnessing, as global governance continues on its runaway path in the name of saving humanity from itself.


Opening with a summary, the conclusions and solutions are clear:
Science assessments indicate that human activities are moving several of Earth's sub-systems outside the range of natural variability typical for the previous 500,000 years (1, 2). Human societies must now change course and steer away from critical tipping points in the Earth system that might lead to rapid and irreversible change (3). This requires fundamental reorientation and restructuring of national and international institutions toward more effective Earth system governance and planetary stewardship. (Source)
The full text of the article is available for a fee which we paid for access, and we can tell you that it is centered around the "Building Blocks" that form the foundation for the edifice of a one-world government.  These building blocks have been repeated throughout globalist literature, so this is nothing necessarily new, but the fact that they fall within the context of at best a hotly disputed assertion that humans are to blame for catastrophically altering their environment -- namely through climate change -- indicates that their agenda must move forward, factually based or not. (All section titles are paraphrased.)

Consolidating global agencies -- The globalist framework has been established through agencies like the United Nations, World Trade Organization, World Bank, and their countless tentacles, which have formed a web of incredibly corrupt and inefficient bureaucracy that most thinking people would love to see eradicated.  However, as opposed to dismantling these agencies as complete failures, there is a proposal to unify them further under the green umbrella.  The suggested organization would be called the UN Sustainable Development Council. 

Integrating 'Sustainable Development' to the local level (Agenda 21) -- Once such a council is established, it will efficiently and heavy-handedly dictate down the pyramid of global control until it reaches each and every community.  This is the stated objective of Agenda 21 as a way to transform the 21st century by centralizing power and eradicating individual freedom.  When this goal is understood, then it becomes quite clear that when we see similar rules put in place for disparate nations in the areas of food, banking, and the eradication of civil liberties, it is part of this coordinated plan toward planetary governance. Local communities become viewed merely as outposts for resistance and must be made to comply with the dictates of the pyramid's capstone.

Bringing emerging technologies under global control -- Interestingly, geo-engineering is openly mentioned here, despite it being still considered a fringe conspiracy theory under the name of Chemtrails.  Nanotechnology, biotechnology, and other scientific endeavors must also be brought under global control by a worldwide council that presumably will lay claim to this intellectual capital and resource generation.  There is discussion about a framework of conventions to theoretically ensure that all participants adhere to an agreed-upon basis for research and implementation.

But has this ever really worked before?  We have a convention against the use of biological warfare; a convention against the use of most non-lethal weapons, a convention against torture, etc., and yet our world is seeing only a ramping-up these activities.  The conventions merely provide a framework for enabling the control and allocation of whatever it is that they are designed to address -- rarely are they a method to prevent and deter abuse.

The creation of a global legal and economic framework -- This is one of the most insidious, as it literally encourages local laws and economic policies to be rewritten with the goal of furthering a global matrix of interconnected bureaucracies that all but eradicate the ability of local communities (or countries) to opt-out of this dictatorial mission.  The paper uses the word "discrimination" in a most accurate way to promote only green initiatives.  There are no specifics given, but we only need to look at the "green" and "alternative" businesses that have been promoted (and invested in) by government to see that most have been an abject failure, leading to the bankruptcy of several in near-record time.  It is much too early for the proposal of the largest government the world has ever known to lay claim as being experts in resource management and alternative energy.  If this is put into effect on a global scale based on the small-scale examples we have seen so far, we will witness the utter implosion of the global economy, and a mass reduction in the standard of living for the average person, as well as the inability for entrepreneurs to circumvent such a system if it should fail. (Source)

Consensus-based decision making becomes majority rule -- This is yet another very dangerous concept, as is the antithesis to a functioning republic.  The paper highlights the "efficiency in decision-making" that is the hallmark of majority-based rule, versus that of a consensus.  And there is a reason for this -- because every individual has an innate right to participate in the very decisions which will most impact their life.  The decision for global governance and sweeping policy changes right down to the local level are the last decisions that should be made hastily.  Just one example was the mass agreement to the validity of man-made global warming, which resulted in a carbon credits market, and other transformative policies, only to be swayed the other direction when evidence of a cover-up known as Climategate revealed a distorted picture of the true scientific data, as well as the hidden political and economic agendas.  A free society is indeed a transparent one, but that will never flourish under a panel of experts reporting to select councils and governed by regents, because the independent researcher has no place in such a system. 

Legitimacy and accountability of stronger intergovernmental institutions -- Here they admit that global governance removes local sovereignty, and try to work their way around the issue by proposing a representative system, no doubt to give the illusion that the people have a say in what gets decided. "Global governance through UN-type institutions tends to give a larger role to international and domestic bureaucracies, at the cost of national parliaments and the direct involvement of citizens." They claim that accountability and decision-making will be strengthened "through special rights enshrined in agreements or stronger participation in councils that govern resources and in commissions that hear complaints."  They also call for more transparency as an "effective accountability mechanism".  Yet, the entire report is based on cherry-picked and unproven science. Finally, this section also discusses accounting for "imbalances in the strength" among different countries, probably to make sure the right countries (the G20) actually have the power, much like the U.N. Security Council.

The creation of global financial instruments -- I think we all have learned enough about the inherent toxicity of "financial instruments" such as derivatives and the carbon market scam.  The paper alludes to an "emissions market" which will be employed to ensure that poorer countries receive financial support through a system of "equity and fairness."  When has this happened even once within any initiative promoted by globalist interests?  The World Trade Organization has been an abject failure; the World Health Organization has been a disaster; and the IMF has been perhaps the most blatantly corrupt and predatory of them all.  These systems do nothing to empower and support the poor; they are there to create the very terms and compliance that is required to co-opt their resources and productivity and loot sovereign nations. (Source)

To enshrine these building blocks of world governance, it is proposed that there needs to be a "constitutional moment" in the reordering of world politics, similar to what followed WWII.  It is disingenuously implied that the international norms set for human rights serve as an example for a similarly standardized approach to counter the destruction of the environment. 

It is admitted that the birthplace of Agenda 21, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (1992), will once again see a "test of politcal will" to implement drastic changes.  Those changes will continue to radically build upon the reduction in national sovereignty that we have witnessed across the board.  They are changes which will no doubt continue to erode individual freedom and contribute to the massive financial hardship we are being subjected to through authoritarian, centralized rule by a fascistic cabal of bankers and politicians that collude to keep humanity from realizing its true potential.

There must be mass outrage to such a degree that even their plan for "majority rule" cannot succeed.  A rising tide of protest and civil disobedience can easily smash each one of the building blocks above.  The Achilles Heel of their plan is resistance to any initiative that would remove the power of local communities to support and sustain themselves, and instead force sworn fealty to a group of overlords who admit to their desire to impose a scientific dictatorship to be ruled by councils of experts.  It has been these so-called experts, at the behest of governments throughout history, who have led to nothing short of a mass murder machine.  We need to keep that in mind as they attempt to guilt trip us into compliance with their "humanitarian" agenda.

Additional Resources:
Earth System Governance Website:  http://www.earthsystemgovernance.org/
Planet Under Pressure (conference March 26-29, London) http://www.planetunderpressure2012.net/

You can support this article by voting on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/ra5em/un_policy_paper_outlines_7_building_blocks_for/

Read other articles by Activist Post here.




BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

This AGW scam is getting worse and worse these days despite the increasing amount of scientific data contradicting the theory.

A writer in my local town paper recently did an article attacking 'climate change deniers' literally saying that basically they are the only people that IT IS OK TO HATE(and dismiss and refuse to actually debate, etc.).

At no point in time was even a vague reference to 'Anthropogenic', 'man-made', 'human caused' or any such thing included in the story, it just lumped every person who has an issue with the AGW theory into a single box labeled 'climate change deniers' and said they all think there is NO climate change at all and are clearly stupid as such.

The real issue has always been the cause of the climate changes and whether or not the climate change today is anything unusual by natural standards.

Our atmosphere exists as a sort of regulator between the Earth's surface and the space environment around Earth which are both constantly varying in numerous ways - the climate will vary along with all of that logically.

It's sad that I had respected his writing more than any other writer in the paper for a long time but for him to completely ignore reason and intelligence in order to publish an Agenda 21 propaganda hit-piece completely destroys his credibility.

Even the small town publications aren't safe from the Agenda that seeks control at a municipal level.

Anonymous said...

These are just more of Rules for Social Behavior otherwise known as Law, The Law, one of the most irrational, slipshod inventions ever conceived by man cf. Rube Goldberg.

In all of history, "The Law" has always been much less than satisfactory. Whether it's a Law of a household or the Law of the World, it all ends the same ... as a revolting, unjust heap o' crap, progressively filling with impractical rules that over extend its range or attempt to rectify its own shortcomings!

With all the Laws the US, it's very likely that every citizen, from newborns to centenarians, is eligible to be prosecuted for a felony! Note that that includes the prosecutors.

And so will it be with whatever these pitiful, boring, egotistical UN fools will concoct!

Anonymous said...

How can any sane person buy into this AGW scam? The whole concept is preposterous and is a pretext for the worst form of global dictatorship anyone could possibly imagine. Needless to say, the sheople are eating it up like candy and they will eventually get what they deserve. The Moe strongs and al gores of the world will be rolling in the aisles laughing.

richard said...

It's very likely that weather patterns have shifted due to the rapid movement of the magnetic pole over the last decade. Is it possible that the powers-that-be have used this as an excuse to promote AGW and hence world government? Wouldn't surprise me in the least.

Anonymous said...

The Rothschild tribe are estimated to be worth 500 trillion dollars, about half of the GDP of the entire world. Then you have the Windsors with the Queen being the largest landowner on the planet. Add the Rockerfellars, Warburgs, Schiffs, Harimans, Bushes, Duponts and a few others and a solution to Earth's problems is readily apparent. Their carbon footprint is larger then all of humanity put together. Just get rid of them all. Problems solved.

Anonymous said...

None of this will ocme to pass, the UN is out of luck and so is the Green ghouls who are making a fortune off th ebacks of hard working Americans who have always lived right with or without the EPA, th eonly ones ruining thsi planet is the pooliticians themselves. Just the fact that no one has stopped Monsanyto ends any argument as far as I am concerned. The UN is not a humanitrian group, they will be disbanded when obama is removed shortly, he is mentally incompetant to lead, he never was competent and he is a usurper, end of story. There will be no glabalization anymore, it isn't workiing. The UN killed their Golden goose and when they went into Libya and watched Gadhaffi be murdered that showed their true colors, they ar eafrican barbarians not Humanitarians. Here is a video everyone should watch, you can skip the first 5 or 10 minutes if you want to of Alex Jones, Linden LaRouche is who you should listen to. Hopefully Ron Paul will get in, unless its fixed, the numbers they are showing on TV is not what I am seeing in other places so who knows, i fAcorn tries any funny business this time it will be too bad, there will be no one ot bail them out this time. Here is the video, try and watch the whole thing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E7IQMYkw1g&feature=share

GrinNBarrett said...

this format is very hard to read the black is more charcoal against the green I had to copy and paste to my email program to read. Can you do something to make it more clear and easy to read. Not all of us are young.

Anonymous said...

I agree with GrinNBarrett! Please, a little printable contrast.

Blair T. Longley said...

Applying energy laws and general systems theory to human societies results in perceiving that the most labile component that controls those systems is those people who are the best at being dishonest.

There are chronic political problems inherent in the nature of life, which must be resolved somehow. Humans have evolved an ecology where the men that prey on men are the top-most of the top carnivores. They operate the organized systems of lies and robbery that we call civilization.

There is no going backwards to any old fashioned religion or ideology to find new solutions to those chronic problems, and the expedient solutions developed by the dominant elites, who were the best at being dishonest, and backing that up with violence, in the past.

To genuinely go forward is to take a trip through an infinite tunnel of deceits, to fall way, way down the rabbit hole, or be sucked up and up the tornado, as were Alice or Dorothy in those classic metaphorical stories.

The fundamental concepts necessary to applying science to human society are SUBTRACTION and ROBBERY. Those foundations are necessary to attempt to make political science consistent with physics and biology.

As Einstein said, the splitting of the atom has changed everything, except the way we think, and therefore we head towards unprecedented disasters.

Indeed, we need to apply science to ourselves. However, that requires a creative synthesis of ancient mysticism with post-modernizing science.

Indeed, if we develop self-conscious computers, then they will also have the same problems as we do. The writers of those mainstream articles about coercive world government have apparently not done much reflection upon themselves.

We need our dominant organized crime gangs (i.e. countries, corporations and churches) to develop greater spirituality, that will enable them to negotiate better death control systems, which then could sustain better debt control systems. However, developing better murder and money systems can never escape the chronic political problems that have always existed.

Who guards the guardians?

I am sorry to say that, because backing up lies with violence can never make those lies become true, established systems have a natural tendency to become more and more psychotic. The superficial suggestions for "world government" proposed in various propaganda pieces reveal more that there authors are proto-fascists, and thus, more like psychotics than scientists.

Scientist, study thyself!

Then one will also be studying thy enemy.

Anonymous said...

The global GDP is 63 trillion in US dollars, not one quadrillion dollars, making all your data invalid. I do agree the super rich are playing Monopoly/God because, in their warped, demented mind, they truly believe they are superior beings to lead the surfs of the world. Our present situation is that of a James Bond movie where there are hundreds, if not thousands of Dr. No's, Mr. Bond has retired and MI6 has been taken over by Spector using all of its resources to evil ends.

jollyroger said...

Get U.S. out of the U.N.!
Get the U.N. out of the U.S.!

Anonymous said...

Be prepared! WWIII is here and smoldering, soon it will be burning out of control. True Evil stalks this world. They are about to start murdeing people in unimaginable numbers. All that can be said is get yourself and your family prepared!

Anonymous said...

All of these so called experts seem to have forgotten that it isn't human activities that cause global warming. If they had an ounce of common sense they would admit that there is only one thing that will cause global warming and that is the sun. Warming on the earth through geologic time shows that the sun has increased the earths surface temperature.

Blair T. Longley said...

Regarding the post above denouncing the "error" that mistakes the money from the real economy.

The real economy may only be about $63 trillion, however the banksters HAVE created at least $700 trillion in derivatives, to gamble with. Indeed, the total amount of fiat money created out of nothing, globally, is likely over a quadrillion units!

Privatized fiat money is a crazy cult, that became our state religion. Our fundamentally fraudulent financial accounting system does NOT operate with any principle of conservation of money, and therefore, it totally inconsistent with the conservation of energy. THEREFORE, IT IS INSANE!

After spending thousands of hours studying the issue of human caused global warming, I felt like dog chasing its own tail. In the end, I found there turned out to be almost no sources of information that were trustworthy.

I believe that we do NOT actually understand the Sun, therefore, we do NOT understand our climate.

Anonymous said...

Of course anyone with a pulse should be able to deduce that planetary temperatures are primarily affected by 1)The Sun 2)The earths inner core activities 3)Ocean currents. AWG is a myth and a total scam. Moe Strong and his band of freaks got the scam in gear with their Earth Summit back in '92, and none of these evil, satanic little bastards will rest till they get their one world government. This will happen, just a matter of when.

Anonymous said...

Heheheh!

The outright Hubris of the Elite, non-Humans in this Planet!. It's obvious, these Creatures are NOT Human, NOT native to this Planet.

The Mother aka Nature aka The Spirit of the Planet, the Lord of the Constants.

The Ancients knew, and the Indigenous Peoples know today, that The Mother will only put up with so much!


The Spirit of this Planet, Overlord of Nature IS going to re-form this Planet, the way IT wants, NOT any other way.

freeboard said...

The late Joan Veon had addressed these issues in depth.
Check the video
out.

Post a Comment