Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Exposed: US Troops Guarded Terrorist Camp in Iraq

US State Department now races to find a new home for US State Department-listed terrorist organization

Tony Cartalucci, Contributing Writer
Activist Post

In a move that almost defies belief, is so brazen and hypocritical many will not believe it no matter how many State Department officials confirm it, the US has been guarding a terrorist training camp inside Iraq with US troops and is planning to relocate them, possibly in a freshly abandoned US military base in Iraq, while D.C. lobbyists work feverishly to have them de-listed, armed, and sent to conduct terrorist operations in Iran.

MEK. Admittedly a terrorist organization, listed by the US State Department as being such, it is fully funded, armed, and backed by the United States, based in France and US-occupied Iraq, and allowed to conduct terrorist operations against the Iranian people. The "War on Terror" is a fraud.

Foreign Policy Magazine has reported in their article, "State Department scrambling to move the MEK -- to a former U.S. military base?" fully admits that Mujahedeen e-Khalq (MEK) is a terrorist organization used by Saddam Hussein to attack Iran in the '80s and was responsible for the death of US military personnel and civilians. Foreign Policy reports that efforts by the Iraqi Army to evict MEK has resulted in armed clashes.

Foreign Policy then reports the United Nations "Assistance Mission in Iraq" (UNAMI) is working with the US State Department to relocate the terrorists within Iraq and possibly at a US military base near Baghdad's airport.

Despite being listed as a terrorist organization by the US State Department (#28 listed as "Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization"), its leadership is harbored in Paris, its rank and file harbored by US troops in Iraq, and the US State Department itself overseeing their continued existence and the continuation of their armed terrorist campaign. 


Foreign Policy also notes a huge lobbying movement in Washington working to de-list MEK as a terrorist organization, including:

Congressman John Lewis (D-GA),
former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell,
former FBI Director Louis Freeh,
former Sen. Robert Torricelli,
Rep. Patrick Kennedy,
former CIA Deputy Director of Clandestine Operations John Sano,
former National Security Advisor James Jones,
former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean,
former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani,
former Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Richard Myers,
former White House Chief of Staff Andy Card,
Gen. Wesley Clark,
former Rep. Lee Hamilton,
former CIA Director Porter Goss,
senior advisor to the Romney campaign Mitchell Reiss,
Gen. Anthony Zinni,
former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge,
former Sen. Evan Bayh

Indeed, warmongering Islamophobist cheerleader Rudolph Giuliani is taking money from a genuine terrorist organization and lobbying the US government to have it removed from the US State Department list. Tom Ridge is also listed as coddling MEK terrorists, ironically after being named the first "Homeland Security Secretary" from 2003-2005. Lee Hamilton, the vice chairman of the 9/11 Commission, is perhaps the most alarming name listed, as it casts serious doubts over the objectivity, integrity, and veracity with which he conducted his "investigation" of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Though it isn't money alone that motivates this eager throng of traitors to remove MEK from the US State Department Foreign Terrorist Organization list, it is their desire to see MEK worked with more closely -- armed, trained, and sent into Iran -- with open, rather than covert American support, just as Saddam had done decades ago to conduct a campaign of terror against the Iranian people.

MEK has been considered by the Fortune 500-funded Brookings Institution as a prime candidate for US-backing in an effort to undermine and remove the Iranian government. In Brookings' 2009 report, "Which Path to Perisa?" it is stated:
Perhaps the most prominent (and certainly the most controversial) opposition group that has attracted attention as a potential U.S. proxy is the NCRI (National Council of Resistance of Iran), the political movement established by the MEK (Mujahedin-e Khalq). Critics believe the group to be undemocratic and unpopular, and indeed anti-American.

In contrast, the group’s champions contend that the movement’s long-standing opposition to the Iranian regime and record of successful attacks on and intelligence-gathering operations against the regime make it worthy of U.S. support. They also argue that the group is no longer anti-American and question the merit of earlier accusations. Raymond Tanter, one of the group’s supporters in the United States, contends that the MEK and the NCRI are allies for regime change in Tehran and also act as a useful proxy for gathering intelligence. The MEK’s greatest intelligence coup was the provision of intelligence in 2002 that led to the discovery of a secret site in Iran for enriching uranium.
Despite its defenders’ claims, the MEK remains on the U.S. government list of foreign terrorist organizations. In the 1970s, the group killed three U.S. officers and three civilian contractors in Iran. During the 1979-1980 hostage crisis, the group praised the decision to take America hostages and Elaine Sciolino reported that while group leaders publicly condemned the 9/11 attacks, within the group celebrations were widespread.

Undeniably, the group has conducted terrorist attacks—often excused by the MEK’s advocates because they are directed against the Iranian government. For example, in 1981, the group bombed the headquarters of the Islamic Republic Party, which was then the clerical leadership’s main political organization, killing an estimated 70 senior officials. More recently, the group has claimed credit for over a dozen mortar attacks, assassinations, and other assaults on Iranian civilian and military targets between 1998 and 2001. At the very least, to work more closely with the group (at least in an overt manner), Washington would need to remove it from the list of foreign terrorist organizations. page 117-118 of "Which Path to Persia?" Brookings Institution, 2009
Readers may also be shocked to find out that not only has this been proposed, but long ago approved. This was revealed in Seymour Hersh's 2008 New Yorker article "Preparing the Battlefield," which stated:
The M.E.K. has been on the State Department’s terrorist list for more than a decade, yet in recent years the group has received arms and intelligence, directly or indirectly, from the United States. Some of the newly authorized covert funds, the Pentagon consultant told me, may well end up in M.E.K. coffers. 'The new task force will work with the M.E.K. The Administration is desperate for results.' He added, 'The M.E.K. has no C.P.A. auditing the books, and its leaders are thought to have been lining their pockets for years. If people only knew what the M.E.K. is getting, and how much is going to its bank accounts—and yet it is almost useless for the purposes the Administration intends.'
And as moves are being made to get MEK de-listed as a terrorist organization by the US State Department so that even more aid can be rendered to this admitted terrorist organization, Seymour Hersh in an NPR interview also claims that select MEK members have already received training in the US.

Quite clearly this reveals that not only is the "War on Terror" an absolute fraud, but so are the politicians, policy wonks, and military "leaders" who have promoted it, pinned medals on their own chests for "fighting" it, and have made immense fortunes and power grabs while burying the American people in unprecedented debt, tyranny, and economic catastrophe in the process. Let's not forget the thousands of dead US troops duped into fighting this war and the hundreds of thousands maimed and broken, both physically and mentally, for what was essentially a gimmick to justify ravaging and looting the Middle East -- a campaign that is still ongoing.

And while the new gimmick is utilizing terrorist groups like MEK or Libya's LIFG to sow violence within a target country and then send NATO to "rescue" them from the nation's attempt to defend itself, the "terrorist" card is still in play regarding Iran.

It is clear then, that America's greatest threat is its own "leadership," bought and paid for by Wall Street and London's corporate-financier interests and pursuing their agenda at the cost of the rest of humanity. We must identify these interests, boycott them out of business, and replace them entirely with local, pragmatic solutions. 

Tony Cartalucci's articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at 
Land Destroyer Report.   


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Gen. Wesley Clark in that list as a lobbyer.. wow, do we remember this guy people? Look him up on youtube. He was the one supposedly exposing what the military was up to in the middle east and acting like the good guy.

Anonymous said...

I too was surprised to see Gen. Wesley Clark on the list after his exposing the U.S. plan to take down 7 countries in 5 years.

Anonymous said...

If the US Government is giving material support to this terrorist group, shouldn't our new National Defense Authorization Act require anyone involved with this to be held indefinitely without the right of a trial?

Why can't we argue that if we pay taxes to a government (USA) that supports terrorist organizations like this, we would be in violation of the NDAA?

There's got to be a brilliant legal mind out there that can make some headway with this. This sounds perfectly logical to me but if anyone can poke some holes in my argument, I'd like to hear them.

Anonymous said...

By voting for leaders of an organization (The US government)that supports terrorist groups, would I at risk of being held indefinitely detained without any rights like the NDAA says?

Would anyone that performs work for the US government and recieves money from them be considered to be supporting an organization that is involved with terrorist groups?

If not, why not?

Inkling said...

Next "terrorist attack" on the USA? Whats the betting that it will not be "blamed on Al Qyaeda, but on another group, possibly MEK?????

Andrew said...

The statement you make within the first line of your article says it all..."In a move that almost defies belief".

What the hell is going on? Why is the American public putting up with this evil administration?

The whole world, even Australia, looks up to the United States of American for support and guidance. This story is very upsetting...

I don't mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist but guarding a terrorist training camp inside Iraq with US troops sounds to me like the American government has been secretly supporting the "Terrorists"???

PS: You need to add a "receive a response when comments are posted" check-box so people who comment on your Blog get an email notification. It helps me manage my Blog and respond to comments quickly.

Anonymous said...

I have personally been to that base in Iraq. Its a military base that belongs to the Iraqis and the Iranians that helped Saddam in the war against Iran live there. There have been clashes between the Iranian residents and Iraqi soldiers over mistreatment and lack of supplies. American soldiers tried to maintain equality for the Iranians. The base has been turned over to the Iraqis for atleast 2 years now.

If you want to call them terrorists for helping fight a war against their own country over 20 years ago...what do you call the Iraqis assisting the US in Iraq now? Keep in mind that most of the Iraqi refugees are now living in Michigan...are they too terrorists? How about the present administration of Iraq? Malaki was a key opponent of Saddam living in London until the all clear was given to him to return to Baghdad. Is he a terrorist? How about the people all over the world aiding the CIA in their respective countries? Are they all terrorist for working against their countries with the "Good Guys?"

One thing I have learned in my experience in the global war on terror is that good and bad...right and wrong are merely perspectives. It all depends from which side you are looking from.

Anonymous said...

Anon Dec 22 945: MEK are terrorists because they blow up civilians for their political cause. The Iraqis helping Americans are called "traitors" - as in, they helped a foreign power destroy their country and mass murder 1 million of their own people.

As far as anyone doing business with the Narco-Terroists in the CIA - they are called collaborators and also traitors. None of them are good guys - they are all verified, treasonous opportunitic scum with a slight chance that some of them are just useful idiots.

Right and wrong are absolute - there is only ONE truth.

Anonymous said...

Your dollars at work. The politicians only use YOUR money. Stop sending them your money.

Anonymous said...

So, the true enemies of this nation are the elected "representitives" who have sworn to uphold our constitution & laws! Surprised? I am not.....even just a little bit. These traitors must really hate America to sell us all out for the price of merely greed & power. The seeds that our so called leaders are now sowing will have to be reaped by us (We the People) eventually in the future. With the war mongering neocons in our US government supporting well known terrorists, this very unwise plan will surely come back to haunt us all.....most likely in payment of hatred & violence towards Americans in general. Uh, thanks.....Uncle Sam! (These old, scary white men in charge are so stupid & evil.) I guess if you control & own assets worth beyond millions of dollars.....then nothing else but murdering the innocents of countries which do not bow down before you will only do to amuse & entertain you. They say that absolute power corrupts people.....absolutely! Sadly, how true this quote has proved to be.

Kat Sung said...

Hound

The war on terror was invented by the Feds. The purpose is to demand more money and power from people. So when the intelligence and Pentagon are there, the terror will be there too. If there is none, they create one.

Human have hound in their house to protect their family against the wolf. As the hound getting more power, they don't want to be guards any more. They want to be master. So the hound trained some wolf they captured. Let these agent wolf to attack and kill human. Human is frightened. They give hound whatever they demanded -money, power ..... Now hound become master. When they need something, they let the agent wolf have an attack on human, then said, this is a long war, to protect your lives, I need warrantless surveillance, more budget fund, torture prison.... . The hound repeated its demand, "This enemy has struck us, and they will strike again, and we'll give our folks the tools necessary to protect the country," if you don't then the hound "can not protect ourselves".

That's why we saw after 10 years, occasionally a wolf or two were captured. But hundreds of thousands of innocent people died. There is an endless war to control people. A constant blackmail for more power.

Post a Comment