Monday, September 26, 2011

AIDS Vaccine Coming Soon -- Experimental Vaccine Led to Censored Deaths

Anthony Gucciardi
Activist Post

Scientists are hailing a new discovery in the field of AIDS research that may lead to the development of an AIDS vaccine. The discovery, revolving around the elimination of a cholesterol membrane surrounding the virus, emerged from The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. However, the past of the AIDS vaccine is something that few scientists want to discuss. The controversial trials of experimental AIDS vaccines that led to the loss of innocent lives have been ignored by mainstream scientists and reporters. Even the scientists responsible for the deaths covered up the situation, failing to report the fatalities of their trials in order to prevent the public from finding out.

In 1991 it was reported by the Chicago Tribune that in a trial of only 19 participants based in Paris, at least 3 had died from adverse reactions to the experimental AIDS vaccine. In an attempt to cover up the deaths, the French and American authorities that sanctioned the experiments did not report the deaths in medical journals. Even after the deaths, the AIDS vaccine experiment continued, putting lives in danger purely to examine the nature of the reaction. It took the questioning of French physicians who examined 2 of the 3 dead participants to bring the truth to light, exposing the fraud to the media.

Even more shocking is the fact that the trials later continued in South Africa on unsuspecting victims looking to decrease their chance of contracting HIV. What researchers soon found was that the vaccine actually led to an increased risk of contracting HIV. 

Scientists: HIV Vaccine Increases HIV Risk

The censorship regarding the horribly unsafe nature of the AIDS vaccine is so extreme that it took scientific whistleblowers to warn South Africans against participating in the vaccine trails, citing the fact that the vaccine actually increases the probability that the recipient develops HIV. The report was published in the Washington Post in 2007, after the trials were shut down after scientists claimed they were ineffective and needed more research. The whistleblowers state, however, that they were forced to stop due to an increase in HIV infection following the vaccine.

Interestingly enough, the AIDS vaccine in question is developed by Merck, creator of the Gardasil shot which has been linked to over 49 deaths and countless hospitalizations. The Gardasil shot, of course, may soon be forced upon young girls and boys thanks to legislators who were paid by Merck to pass a bill making the shot mandatory.

Vaccine risks are oftentimes covered up by mega corporations such as Merck in order to make a profit and avoid public scrutiny. It’s time to make vaccine manufacturers answer for their misdeeds through peaceful activism, as they have been granted legal immunity from all lawsuits — valid or not. Join the Vaccine Information Week movement and demand change within the vaccine industry.

Please visit Natural Society for the latest health news and vaccine information


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

3 comments:

Joe Dead Horse said...

There's still the question of how the HIV epidemic got started in the first place. Years ago, purely hypothetical theories got trotted forth and those theories just got repeated over and over again. But now, it's obvious to see that the hypothetical cause just doesn't match to the observed real-time effect. Therefore, something else was the actual, primary cause.

There seems to be a definite correlation between the hepatitis vaccination trials of the late 70s and the initial spread of HIV-1 in the USA.

Still unknown at this time for absolute certain if the trials were the initial cause, and if so, if the initial transmission of HIV-1 was deliberate or accidental. Even if it was accidental, that's still no excuse as it was well known by the late 70s of the extreme danger of using primate tissues (including human) to create vaccines from because of the chance of accidental inclusion of unknown viruses.

Coincidence is hardly ever purely coincidental. After the 70s vaccine trails, AIDS started manifesting in the exact same pattern as the places the trials took place. Before the trials. no HIV-1, after the trials, HIV-1 is now coast to coast in the USA.

And HIV-1 is now a major killer of people-of-color in the USA. If you're an american with brown skin, remember that HIV-1 can and will kill you. Living in a small town out in the boondocks is no safety factor as HIV-1 is now literally everywhere in the USA.

Although HIV-2 is mostly in Africa, there's also something very odd about its initial epidemiology as well. Hypothetical cause doesn't match to real-time observed effect.

Or, to make a long story short... "Somethin' ain't right." Or... "Humanity has apparently shot itself in the foot yet still once again."

Anonymous said...

My boyfriends parents were super elated for him to get the Hep B shots...which he got one, but im blocking the rest.you get 3? And wow, ill bet he shows up HIV+
He would have if he got all three...
He had the first before i met him.

Id rather die of aids than take their experimental vaccines...that they swear up and down are safe and all...

It's the fault of the gay community...i found the latest stuff i was reading on hiv+ in a gay club...TURNED BACKWARDS so no one has to see the cover of the free magazine is informing MSM closeted men to get tested for aids.

Gay men should care more about their health and then we could put a stop to this experimenting and denial.

Anonymous said...

What is left out of all this is how awful the diagnostic tests are. One can test positive when one has +-70 conditions, anything from having TB, a flu shot or being pregnant. I bet the higher rate of testing HIV positive after having had the vaccine against it is due to the fact that the tests are so bad that any vaccine would make for a positive reaction.
http://www.virusmyth.com/

Post a Comment