Epstein – Bondi – Deep State

Pam Bondi has made perhaps the most serious mistake of her entire life that she will look back on for years to come. Epstein’s saga was not some pedophile BS – it was the most sophisticated blackmail organization in modern history. As I have said before, I was personally warned that they would use women to try to get into my operation. That was back in the ’90s. This was nothing more than a honey-pot operation. It is understandable that Bondi has not found any “incriminating ‘client list‘” related to Epstein, triggering significant backlash among both Democrats and Republicans, when this was really a blackmail operation, not pedophiles.

The real question remains FOR WHOM WAS EPSTEIN OPERATING? Was this for the CIA or the Mossad? People wrongly think that releasing the “client list” will expose pedophiles. If that were the only issue, the Democrats had these files before the election and would have used them. Nevertheless, the MAGA base would like to see Trump FIRE Blondi without a doubt. She has become a massive liability and will impact the elections in 2026.  Bondi has refused to tell the truth, pretending there are no files, rather than explaining that this was a blackmail scheme operating for some intelligence operation was the wrong move.

Even the Daily Mail is now reporting the chaos at the FBI and the rumblings behind the curtain that even Kash Patel and deputy Dan Bongino are considering quitting over Epstein files after a furious clash with Pam Bondi. Even though Trump had promised transparency,  this is a scandal for which his presidency will also be remembered. Granted, this is far from just some pedophile operation. This one dives head-first into the Deep State.

As far as Maxwell being in jail, in New York City, after she was found guilty following a one-month jury trial, of:

• conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts,
• conspiracy to transport minors to participate in illegal sex acts, transporting a minor to participate in illegal sex acts, sex trafficking
• conspiracy, and sex trafficking of a minor.

CONSPIRACY is the favorite of tyrants, for you do not have to prove you even committed a crime. All you need to prove is that there was an agreement – nothing more. So there does not have to be a client list. All they had to tell the jury was that Maxwell agreed with Epstein to get 16-17-year-old girls to entice their targets for blackmail. They did not have to prove that they had sex with a target. They did not have to prove that any target KNEW the girl was 17 vs 18. The jury only needs to find that you agreed to anything. Then you are guilty. Suppose Bill Gates was friends with Epstein to have him blackmail people to force them to do some mandatory vaccine or climate change agenda. That, too, would be a conspiracy. Gates could go to prison for 20 years based solely on such an agreement.

The two-page memo regarding the client list read: “This systematic review revealed no incriminating ‘client list.’ There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. … “We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.”

The Roman Emperor Maximinus I used Conspiracy, a crime still used by the United States, yet abandoned in Europe, Russia, and China since it is immoral. Unlike the United States, China’s Criminal Law (中华人民共和国刑法) does not have a specific, independent crime called “conspiracy.” Simply agreeing to commit a crime is generally not punishable by itself if no further preparatory or substantive acts are taken in China.

Conspiracy is the law of tyrants, for it allows the conviction of someone for a crime they did not commit, nor even attempted to commit, but you claim they “intended” purely as a mental state to commit in the future. Maximinus I engaged in legal persecution. He used conspiracy effectively and tore the Roman economy apart at its seams. He charged a noted Senator by the name of Magnus with conspiracy against the emperor, found him guilty, executed him, and then arrested 4,000 others, claiming they conspired with him to depose him. He then used criminal law to claim they had committed a conspiracy, and that, of course, justified confiscating all their property as well.

If you look closely, about 25% of all federal crimes are only conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371), where they do not have to prove you committed an actual crime, according to analyses of USSC data and reports from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The major conspiracy statute is used in drug cases, 21 U.S.C. § 846, which is most often used.  Analysis of drug cases reveals that conspiracy is a dominant charge in federal drug trafficking cases, often being the primary or only charge used.

The DOJ Will Seek Death Penalties for Conspiracy

Indeed, conspiracy charges are frequently and strategically used in federal murder cases when they do not have to prove you even killed someone. They are a powerful tool for federal prosecutors to avoid hard evidence, often serving several critical purposes. Conspiracy charges allow prosecutors to hold all participants in a criminal agreement responsible for the murder, not just the person who pulled the trigger (the “triggerman”). Anyone remotely connected can be executed under conspiracy even if they did not know someone else was going to kill someone. One famous case in the Southern District of New York charged three separate Italian groups with conspiracy to murder the same individual, when they did not have to prove anyone killed the individual; all they had was his car left at the airport, and nobody saw him ever since. All three Italian families were found guilty with no body and just theories.

Overcoming Evidentiary Hurdles is the #1 objective of using conspiracy. Proving conspiracy (an agreement and overt acts) can sometimes be easier than proving the specific intent and act of murder itself, especially for individuals further removed from the killing. Evidence like communications, meetings, financial transactions, or preparatory actions can establish the conspiracy.

Then there is the Pinkerton Liability. Under the Pinkerton doctrine (based on Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946)), conspirators can be held liable for foreseeable crimes committed by their co-conspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy, even if they didn’t directly participate in or intend that specific crime. This is crucial in murder cases. This is what makes the US conspiracy law the law of tyrants. They can sentence you to death for the actions of someone else with no requirement to prove you even knew, so much for justice.

Conspiracy to commit murder (often charged under 18 U.S.C. § 1117) carries a potential penalty of up to life imprisonment, or if death results, potentially the death penalty or life without parole. Conspiracy charges are not just used; they are a fundamental strategy in federal prosecutions. They allow the government to achieve its virtual 99% conviction rate.

If the Feds charge you with any crime, you have ZERO or at best 0.1% chance of winning. Conflicts of interest abound, and there is no shot of ever getting a judge recused. The law is ignored 100% of the time. The US Federal conviction rate: 99.6% (due to plea bargains in 98% of cases) is higher than Russia’s reported conviction rate: 99% (official statistics). Germany’s conviction rate is 90% (includes confessions/abbreviated procedures), and France stands at 89% (correctional courts). The US has the highest conviction rates in the world thanks to conspiracy. So much for equal justice and the land of the free, which they interpret as that they are free to prosecute anyone they desire – i.e., Donald Trump, to interfere in the 2024 election.

For Maxwell, they did not need a client list, prove any sex took place, or that the girls were paid. All the jury required was to “assume” Maxwell agreed with Epstein, who was dead. They did not need to name any client, and they certainly stayed far away from explaining whether they targeted someone for blackmail at the direction of someone else. They did not even have to prove a motive.

There will never be freedom in the United States until the charge of CONSPIRACY is repealed.

The pro-government Judge Alison Nathan even admitted that the multiple conspiracy charges were really just the same crime cleverly worded to confuse the jury:

“The overarching conspiracy — which, as the Government argued and proved at trial, employed a single ‘playbook’ to groom and sexually abuse underage girls — constitutes a single conspiracy offense with multiple victims,” the decision said. This case has only highlighted the abuse of our legal system. Had there been no charge of conspiracy, they would have had to actually prove a crime took place, not just an agreement, and then we would have perhaps discovered who Epstein was working for.

If Trump actually pardoned everyone charged with conspiracy, at best, there would probably be just 1% remaining in prison.