By B.N. Frank
It was recently reported that insurance companies are less willing to insure satellites due to collision risks. Of course, warnings about space junk from satellites and similar vehicles have been ongoing for years (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). In 2020, a lawsuit was filed against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding satellite deployment (see 1, 2, 3); a few months ago, an astronomy professor filed an amicus brief with it. In March 2021, a petition was also filed with the FCC to pause satellite deployment due to various safety risks. Nevertheless, tens of thousands of satellites and similar vehicles have been and continue to be approved for launching in the U.S. to blast biologically and environmentally harmful 5G and Wi-Fi at Earth (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). Of course, the recent Russian satellite situation has highlighted risks of already dangerously high levels of space junk. Additionally, space junk could also reduce the quality of internet connections. That would defeat the purpose of launching more satellites to “bridge the digital divide”, right?
From Gov Tech:
Space Debris Could Create Problems for Satellite Internet
The amount of floating junk in space is increasing. The pieces of debris may pose issues for companies like SpaceX, Amazon and Boeing, all of which plan to launch new satellites for broadband connectivity.
(TNS) — The Russian missile test that shattered a dead satellite this week highlights a growing threat of space debris just as companies such as SpaceX and Boeing Co. make plans to launch as many as 65,000 commercial spacecraft into orbit in coming years.
The anti-satellite weapon smashed a Russian orbiter into at least 1,500 pieces, forming a belt of debris hurtling around the Earth at speeds up to 17,000 miles an hour. It forced ground control to awaken the sleeping crew of the International Space Station and ask them to close hatches and scramble into docked spacecraft for safety.
It also added to the amount of junk speeding through space thanks to failed satellites, discarded rocket boosters and weapons tests. This just as technology entrepreneurs and defense companies have announced plans to deploy constellations of satellites, adding to about 4,550 from all countries currently in orbit.
The Russian anti-satellite test “just makes everything worse,” said Brian Weeden, director of program planning for Secure World Foundation, a group that works for sustainable use of space.
“It’s not like the movie ‘Gravity’ where one thing happens and everything goes ‘boom,’” Weeden said. Instead there is “a tipping point, where it starts to accelerate” and the orbital environment deteriorates over decades.
Low-Earth orbit is an area of major concern because that’s where companies want to locate small observation and communications satellites. These include Elon Musk’s Space Exploration Technologies Corp., which has more than 1,700 Starlink satellites already orbiting and plans is asking regulators for permission to add 30,000 more to provide broadband Internet from space.
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission is reviewing a slew of applications from SpaceX and other companies rushing to take advantage of lower launch costs and growing appetite for data. Low orbits offer minimal lag time for data to bounce between a user on the ground and the spacecraft. Boeing, Amazon.com Inc.’s Kuiper Systems LLC and Astra Space Inc. were among companies submitting recent applications at the FCC for more than 35,000 satellites.
Already in some low-Earth orbits, the number of new objects and fragments generated from collisions exceeds those removed by natural atmospheric drag, the FCC said last year as it adopted rules to ease the threat from orbital debris. The agency regulates satellites because the spacecraft use wireless frequencies.
Other regions have sufficient densities of orbital debris to lead some analysts to conclude that they are close to or have already reached a “runaway” status, where the debris population will grow indefinitely, the FCC said.
There are about 4,550 operating satellites in orbit, with 3,790 in low-Earth orbit, according to a Sept. 1 tally by the Union of Concerned Scientists.
“We’re at a time of transformative change in the human use of space,” said Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian research institute. “We are seeing more and more satellites getting damaged by orbital debris hits. Occasionally satellites get destroyed.”
Satellite operator Viasat Inc. has warned of dangers from large constellations, saying failure risk of at least some satellites is high when thousands are in orbit.
With huge orbiting fleets, “dramatic increases in space collisions, and new space debris, are expected within just a few years,” Jim Bridenstine, a Viasat board member and former NASA administrator, told lawmakers at a U.S. Senate hearing last month.
More than 27,000 pieces of orbital debris are tracked by the Department of Defense, according to NASA. Near-Earth orbits hold much more debris that’s too small to be tracked, but large enough to threaten human spaceflight and robotic missions.
Those aboard the International Space Station took shelter for three passes of the debris field caused by the strike on the Russian satellite, Cosmos 1408, NASA said in a Nov. 15 statement.
Tom Stroup, president of the Satellite Industry Association, said the Russian weapons test put at risk craft in low-Earth orbits as well as those that traverse those regions to reach higher orbits.
“The test and the resulting impact on the space environment is of great concern to our operators,” he said in an email. Members of the trade group include Amazon.com, Boeing, Intelsat SA, Iridium Communications Inc., AT&T Inc., Lockheed Martin Corp. and SpaceX.
“The debris is already impacting our operators’ launch plans and has the potential to substantially decrease launch windows,” Stroup said.
Roughly a week before Monday’s missile strike by Russia, NASA moved the ISS to avoid a close encounter with debris remaining from a test by China that destroyed a weather satellite in 2007. The station has conducted 29 debris avoidance maneuvers since 1999, including three in 2020, NASA said in a May 26 posting online.
NASA has a set of long-standing guidelines for debris avoidance. Maneuvers are usually small and use the station’s Russian thrusters, or the propulsion systems on one of the docked spacecraft that carry passengers from Earth.
The Cosmos debris could cause problems for Musk’s SpaceX, astronomers said.
“There’s a real risk in the coming weeks that you could lose some of the Starlinks because they get in the way of this debris,” said McDowell.
SpaceX didn’t return emailed queries requesting comment. A Boeing representative also declined to comment on the risk to its fleet.
Nations are struggling with ways to reduce space debris, with techniques such as using magnetic plates to capture satellites, or using harpoons and nets, at the test stage, said McDowell. He suggested focusing on removing the largest pieces that may eventually cause the greatest number of fragments.
“At some point we have to start to clean this up,” he said.
©2021 Bloomberg L.P. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
More space vehicles = more internet interference? Even industry experts are saying yes:
- Earlier this month, Space X has claimed that Boeing internet satellites could cause interference with their internet satellites
- In July, a government agency in the UK expressed concerns that Starlink and OneWeb could interfere with each other
Back in the U.S., The FCC has catered to the telecom and cable industries for decades (see 1, 2, 3). This has led to numerous lawsuits filed against it for NOT protecting Americans and allowing them to be overcharged (see 1, 2, 3). In August 2021, a federal court ruled in favor of petitioners who sued the agency for not protecting Americans from harmful radiation exposure from wireless sources (see 1, 2) including increasingly more controversial internet satellites.
Activist Post reports regularly about satellites and other unsafe technology. For more information, visit our archives and the following websites:
- Americans for Responsible Technology
- 5G Information
- 5G Space Appeal
- Stop 5G International
- Wireless Information Network
- Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
- Environmental Health Trust
- Physicians for Safe Technology
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.