As we approach the 19th anniversary of the 9/11 false flag, Leonard writes in to ask about the insurers who paid Silverstein and his cohorts over four and a half billion dollars as a result of those attacks.
Why did the insurers never investigate the possibility of controlled demolition?
Why did they pay out billions of dollars without calling the official 9/11 narrative into question?
James investigates.
Watch on Archive / BitChute / LBRY / Minds.com / YouTube or Download the mp4
SHOW NOTES:
- 9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money
- Insurers Agree to Pay Billions at Ground Zero
- Double Indemnity
- Shapiro admits Silverstein phoned insurers about demolishing WTC7
- Silverstein says WTC7 redesign ready in April of 2000
- World Trade Center owner suing airlines for billions for 9/11 attacks
- World Trade Center owners’ bid to sue airlines for 9/11 attacks blocked
- Airline defendants to pay $95 million in 9/11 settlement
- Con Ed and Insurers Sue Port Authority Over 7 World Trade
- Con Ed suit against Silverstein and Citigroup at 7 WTC dismissed
- Silverstein cleared of blame for 7 World Trade’s fall on 9/11
- 10 Major Shareholders in Swiss Re (is actually one)
- Meet The Billionaire Developer Who Rebuilt The World Trade Center To Heal New York After 9/11
- The Bonds of August: Refinancing the Twin Towers on the eve of destruction
- Insurers scramble to avoid 9/11-style coronavirus backlash
Visit James Corbett at CorbettReport.com. Subscribe to his channel on YouTube and Bitchute, and support him on Patreon.
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
Be the first to comment on "Why Aren’t Insurers 9/11 Truthers? James Corbett Investigates"