By B.N. Frank
Since 2018 there have been reports of sudden illness among people and animals after 5G was turned on (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). In December 2019 doctors, scientists, engineers, and public advocates asked President Trump for a moratorium on 5G because of health and safety risks (see 1, 2, 3). Many cities and countries have taken action against 5G and even banned it including Switzerland.
Despite all of this AND the telecom industry giving congressional testimony that they have NO scientific evidence that 5G is safe, it continues to be promoted, installed and even celebrated in the U.S. In fact, since the beginning of the year, the first American 5G-enabled school went live in Ohio and a 5G-enabled hospital for veterans was opened in California. Now, Walmart may add 5G at all their stores and health clinics.
From 5G Crisis:
Ironically, Walmart and Verizon are in talks to outfit Walmart stores with powerful, wireless-radiation emitting antennas and other equipment to provide shoppers with new health clinic services.
Meanwhile, the U.S. National Toxicology Program recently completed a $30 million-dollar study which found “clear evidence” of cancer associated with chronic, low-level exposure to wireless radiation. So the question remains…are unnecessary, time-saving services worth the undeniable risks 5G radiation poses to consumers’ health?
From the Wall Street Journal:
If a deal is signed, it would be part of an effort inside the country’s largest retailer to remake its roughly 4,700 U.S. stores into hubs that draw shoppers for medical treatment and other services, not just groceries and clothes. Walmart also could use the 5G services to improve cameras alerting staff to shoplifters or scanning shelves for out-of-stock inventory.
Misinformation about 5G has been reported by many sources including The New York Times, which also partnered with Verizon for a 5G Journalism Lab. Sounds fishy, right? One of their reporters was even accused of violating a truth and accuracy code for this by the Press Council of Ireland. Bwah.
Of course exposure to all sources of cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation – 1G through 4G – is harmful AND pollution from Electromagnetic Radiation (“Electrosmog”) was also a problem before 5G. Environmentalists and health experts have also been saying we should be reducing sources of Electrosmog not increase them. Regardless, the “Race for 5G” does the opposite AND includes blasting it from space with satellites. That’s why opposition continues to increase in the U.S and worldwide.
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other sources of unsafe technology. For more information, visit our archives and the following websites:
- 5G Information
- The 5G Summit
- Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
- EMF Safety Network
- Environmental Health Trust
- My Street, My Choice
- Physicians for Safe Technology
- Scientists for Wired Tech
- Wireless Information Network
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.