The Telecom Industry (“Big Wireless”) and Those Who Support Them Don’t Care About “The Precautionary Principle.” There is No Love in Not Caring about Harm from Radiation Exposure.

By B.N. Frank

An excerpt from a recent Newsweek article, clarifies that the U.S. FDA still doesn’t care about known harm caused by cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation exposure:

Current cellphone safety regulations are based on a premise that is now arguably false: that cellphone radiation can cause harm only by heating tissue. The FDA, however, has no plans to strengthen the regulations.

According to the article, some experts do care:

  1. Olga Naidenko, a senior science adviser with the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit in Washington, D.C.
  2. Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society.
  3. Various public health advocates who called for the WHO to upgrade its classification of cellphone radiation from “possibly” to “probably” carcinogenic.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates new technology; HOWEVER, they are NOT a health organization.  FCC employees cleverly defer to the FDA to avoid being held accountable for harm caused by exposure to technology.  So – like the FDA – The FCC doesn’t care about harm either.

Many U.S. elected officials don’t seem to care either.  This all becomes more obvious and ridiculous every day since Big Wireless has never said their products were safe.  They’ve simply used outdated legislation and “Big Tobacco” tactics do keep the unsuspecting public buying their products.

Since 2012, The American Academy of Pediatrics and many other experts have been recommending caution with digital, electronic, and wireless technology – especially among kids.  They have asked for the reassessment of federal safety guidelines, standards, testing and warnings.

For many years, tech inventors seem to have cared about their own children’s use and exposure to radiation emitting technology.  They’ve been sending them to private “low tech” schools and limiting the use of tech in their homes.

In the meantime, Big Wireless has encouraged American public school systems to collectively spend $60B to become “high tech.”  Research has indicated that public school kids aren’t better off educationally or otherwise.  In addition to contributing to excessive screen use and digital addiction, it has also exposed them and staff to prolonged involuntary harmful radiation.

Over the years, other countries have been proactive about raising awareness and encouraging adults to limit cell phone use – especially by kids.

Recently in France, scientists demanded the immediate recall of millions of cell phones after government data revealed that 9 out of 10 phones tested exceed regulatory limits.

Cell phone manufacturers at least care about their shareholders.  They have warned them that they may eventually be found liable for harm caused by their products.  Now no one will insure them – not even Lloyd’s of London.

Decades of research from government, independent, industry and military scientists have already proven that exposure to all sources of cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation are harmful in more ways than cancer risk.  Lab testing is available to diagnose if exposure is causing or worsening symptoms and illnesses.

Exposure concerns and warnings have been covered by broadcast news stations as well as many others including:

  1. 2010 GQ Magazine
  2. 2010
  3. 2011 PBS
  4. 2012 “Cell Phone Right to Know” Act
  5. 2014 Berkeley, CA  “Right to Know Ordinance 
  6. 2015 NBC “The Today Show”
  7. 2017 National Institutes of Health
  8. 2018
  9. 2018: Oz
  10. 2018 Daily Mail UK
  11. 2018 Democracy Now
  12. 2018 The Nation
  13. 2018 NPR
  14. 2018 The Telegraph UK

Regardless, in the U.S, TV, film, and marketing – even for prescriptions –continue portraying tech use in ways that violate even outdated federal safety guidelines.  Marketing products to children is 24/7.  Even Sesame Street encourages tech use.

Big Wireless along with many U.S. elected officials and The FCC are forcing small cell tower infrastructure and harmful 5G millimeter wave radiation in communities everywhere despite much opposition from health advocates and public outcry.  This is being marketed as “The Race for 5G.”

“The Race for 5G” completely ignores “The Precautionary Principle” but these folks don’t seem to care.

Doctors, environmental groups, organizations, scientists, and some elected officials have been fighting legislation that forces this technology and infrastructure on the public.

Since 2004, The International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) has opposed the use of their stations for cell towers and antennas.  If firefighters are concerned about exposure to wireless radiation – shouldn’t we all be?

There is no love in not caring about any of this.

For more information, visit the following websites:


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

4 Comments on "The Telecom Industry (“Big Wireless”) and Those Who Support Them Don’t Care About “The Precautionary Principle.” There is No Love in Not Caring about Harm from Radiation Exposure."

  1. Captain Trashman | July 29, 2018 at 6:31 am | Reply

    We sure have funded a lot of Monsters that are above the law.

  2. FCC and FDA have ZERO in common, wi-fi is about ELECTROMAGNETISM, FDA is about food and drugs… A piece of facts related to EMF safety, described by R.O. Becker, one of the fathers of electro-medicine (next to Tesla, R.Reif) , in one of his books, quote:
    “the ability of electricity to cause tissue heating and shock was well known even before the tum of the century. In the United States these became the only recognized biological effects of electricity. As a consequence, from a side-effects viewpoint, tissue heating and shock were the only hazards guarded against during the development of the electrical power and communications industries. This approach translated into the 10,000-μW rule for permissible exposure which was adopted by the military services and industry (but not by the federal government which preempted the right to regulate EMFs and then elected not to establish any environmental or occupational safety levels). In the Soviet Union, however, EMF regulation developed very differently. Soviet investigators reported that electromagnetic energy could affect the central nervous, cardiovascular, and
    endocrine systems without causing tissue heating or shock. These results led to the adoption of a 10-μW rule for the workplace and a 1-μW rule for the general environment. The Soviets also adopted regulations governing exposure to levels of power-frequency fields considered to be completely safe in the West. The evidence (part four) now shows, overwhelmingly, that the Soviet approach was the correct one. Indeed, no other outcome was possible given both the demonstrated role of intrinsic EMFs in physiological regulation (chapter 2), and the sensitivity of living organisms to natural EMFs (chapter 3).”

    So, who within the officials in USA hates their own citizens so much, that they prefer a slow kill on everyone, on much larger scale than in russia??? Are these the same ‘people’, who forced GMO’s on all americans, while knowing very well, that russia and many others, reject every single toxic GMO out there ??? Are these the same people who know exactly that the GMO pest is being affected by the EMFs to even more detriment on all humans???

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.