Afghanistan War Spending, In 2018 Alone, Could End US Homelessness—TWICE

By Rachel Blevins

Defense Department officials are claiming that the cost of the United States’ longest war in history will be $45 billion in 2018, which is actually double to estimate of what it would cost to end homelessness in the U.S. annually.

Randall Schriver, the assistant secretary of Defense for Asian and Pacific security affairs, said that he expects the Afghanistan war to cost American taxpayers $45 billion this year, which in addition to logistical support, will include about $13 billion for U.S. forces, $5 billion for Afghan forces, and $780 million for economic aid.

Schriver made the announcement during the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan also spoke, and said he believes the United States’ policy “acknowledges that there isn’t a military solution or a complete solution.”

“I understand it’s America’s longest war, but our security interests in Afghanistan, in the region are significant enough … to back the Afghan government in their struggle against the Taliban,” Sullivan said.

Over 31,000 civilian deaths have been documented in Afghanistan following the U.S. invasion. The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan began documenting civilian casualties in 2009, and the combined number of civilians who were killed and injured that year was nearly 6,000. The number has steadily increased over the years, and in 2016, it reached a record high with nearly 3,500 killed and nearly 8,000 injured.

report from the UNAMA noted that in 2017, the death rate for children increased by 9 percent over the previous year, and the death rate for women increased by 23 percent. The report also claimed that an increase in airstrikes has led to a 43 percent increase in causalities.

The Hill reported that the Defense Department officials did receive some criticism from senators such as Jeff Merkley, a Democrat from Oregon, who questioned why the Taliban would want a political settlement now when they already “control more territory than they did since 2001” when the U.S. invaded the country—claiming the purpose was to defeat the Taliban.

Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, also criticized the massive 2018 budget for the Afghanistan War, and argued that after 16 years, Afghans still “don’t seem to be able to defend themselves,” and for U.S. taxpayers, billions of dollars are “just being thrown down a hatch in Afghanistan.”

“I think there’s an argument to be made that our national security is actually made more perilous the more we spend and the longer we stay there. … We’re in an impossible situation,” Paul said. “I just don’t think there is a military solution.”

Paul has a history of criticizing the amount of money the U.S. government spends in foreign countries, especially on wars in the Middle East. After Trump vowed to continue the longest war in U.S. history in August 2017, Paul criticized the move and asked when the U.S. would start focusing on its own country.



“We spent billions of dollars—I think it’s over $100 billion—building roads in Afghanistan, blowing up roads in Afghanistan, building schools, blowing up schools, and then rebuilding all of them,” Paul said. “Sometimes we blow them up, sometimes someone else blows them up, but we always go back and rebuild them. What about rebuilding our country?”

Paul has a point, and the money that is being used to kill innocent civilians in Afghanistan is desperately needed in the United States. According to estimates from Mark Johnston, the acting assistant housing secretary for community planning and development, “homelessness could be effectively eradicated in the United States at an annual cost of about $20 billion.”

If the United States government cut its budget for the Afghanistan War in half, and put half of the money towards ending homeless in America, it could make a difference. If the government gave the entirety of the money it is using for endless proxy wars in the Middle East back to the taxpayers it was originally stolen from so that they could invest it in helping the individuals in need in their own communities, it could work wonders.

Rachel Blevins is an independent journalist from Texas, who aspires to break the false left/right paradigm in media and politics by pursuing truth and questioning existing narratives. Follow Rachel on Facebook, TwitterYouTube, Steemit and Patreon. This article first appeared at The Free Thought Project.


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

3 Comments on "Afghanistan War Spending, In 2018 Alone, Could End US Homelessness—TWICE"

  1. We ought to let the Taliban go about teaching their people how to grow sweet potatoes, corn, wheat, grapes instead of letting American soldiers teach them to keep growing heroin poppies. At least then the Afghanistan people could feed themselves as well as possibly contribute to the commodities markets via exporting surplus food goods rather than the other black gold. But no, that won’t happen as big pharmaceutical companies lobby aggressively to keep pushing hillbilly heaven (Oxycotton), Skag, Dope, morphine.

    Funny too how our alleged representatives in Appalachia are keen to do jack about the addiction problem pushed in our area by said pharmaceutical lobbies and companies backing them. Yet we poor Appalachian folk are dying from these addictions hand over fist. great War on Drugs, huh? It’s more like War on all people using Drugs as a silent weapon.

    Nope, I don’t apologize for having intellect enough to have figured that out nor for writing it here. Power needs Truth spoken to it and Truth needs to be the light that shows the evil what it is to be put at bay.

  2. The pentagon is pledged to serve the BritishEmpire/N.A.T.O. HEROINE MAFIA FOREVER. They pentagon wipes their ass with our Declaration of Independence.
    They are traitors. Federal Reserve Notes are pentagon military scrip. When people try to use fake money as charity it does not work to make them lucky. We need real silver money to practice charity so it can make us lucky. People without luck take no chances. People who never take chances are cowards. People who have no regard for luck are the damned who live in hell.

  3. except for LEGAL (questionable – see below) treaties, South Korea (turn down the burner anyway), Japan (they can look after themselves), Germany (same as the above), the United Kingdom (same story) America should begin withdrawing all forces occupying (whether legally, NOT – treaty, or illegally – Afghanistan, Syria, and over a hundred other “Sovereign” nations around the world) immediately
    they are not the police force of the world, more like the Keystone Kops
    Donald Trump, here is looking at you, to remove this stain from America’s history, because if you don’t, you will be remembered the same as your predecessor, the lying turd-in-charge, barack hussein obama “all of our troops in Iraq will come home” only to be redeployed to Afghanistan and Syria, and SOMEHOW back to Iraq as well?
    of course the US constitution disallows a standing military – thus, we don’t have to argue the legality of their deployment, because they are in any case illegal!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*