Woman Refuses To Give Up List Of Fellow Activists, Gets Three Years

By Janet Phelan

The plea offer was clear: Give up the names of your fellow internet activists who are blogging about guardianship abuse and you get a “Get out of Jail Now” card.

The plea offer, which embattled litigant and guardianship reform activist Barbara Stone refused on January 8 in a hearing in Miami Dade Court, reflected the idea that, according to her attorney AJ Amoroso, the prosecution believes that there is a “Mafia” of unknown bloggers who are putting up websites and otherwise engaged in social media efforts to expose problematic guardianships.

“I don’t think there are secret meetings or like a secret society engaged in this,” said a somewhat puzzled Amoroso, who as a criminal defense attorney confessed little knowledge of the machinations going on in probate court, machinations which bloggers, unidentified as well as named, are calling a “holocaust ” on the elderly and disabled.

The “Mafia” simile was scoffed at by a guardianship activist from Tucson. “The Mafia has money,” she said. “We don’t have any money. We just have dead relatives.”

In refusing to give up the names of the partisans, oops, I mean the other individuals who are regularly posting about how adult guardianships have resulted in the wholesale liquidation of estates as well as — all too often — the untimely death of the elderly or disabled ward, Barbara Stone lost any mitigation in sentencing and was then sentenced to thirty months in prison by Judge Tim Bailey. Following release from prison, she must then serve six months of a contempt of court sentence levied by the guardianship court judge, Michael Genden.

Stone’s saga began in 2013, when, alarmed at the condition of her mother in a facility into which she had been remanded by her court-appointed guardian, Jacqueline Hertz, Barbara took Helen Stone out of the facility and to lunch at a nearby Denny’s. Barbara was then arrested and charged with a multitude of crimes, including custody interference, elder abuse and kidnapping.

Only the custody interference stuck, a felony which carries a potential five year prison sentence. Barbara was offered a plea agreement but something went wrong in the mix and in August of 2016 she was apparently hit with a contempt of court charge by Judge Michael Genden. At that point Barbara Stone, who had already served substantial time in jail for feeding her mother, jumped probation and took off.

She ended up in Tucson, where she was living under an assumed name and reportedly continuing on in her activism concerning corruption in the guardianship courts. Stone was subsequently arrested as a fugitive from justice in June of 2017 and in the course of the arrest, picked up another criminal charge when she reportedly maced the arresting officer. She was extradited from Arizona to Florida in November of 2017.

Stone, who was a real estate attorney in New York, had no prior criminal history before she took her Mom to lunch and has accumulated over 500 in-jail days since the “Denny’s debacle.”

Prior to leaving Florida, Stone filed a number of lawsuits against Genden and the guardian. In the recent proceedings following her extradition back to Florida, the court heard from at least ten individuals, including Judge Genden and the guardian’s attorney, Roy Lustig, how she “ruined their lives.”

“Barbara refused to show any remorse,” said Amoroso, which he states may have contributed to the stiff sentence.

Amoroso, who is her criminal defense lawyer representing her only for the past couple of weeks, has said that he plans to file for a mitigation of sentence. “I have no doubts at this point in time that the probate courts are corrupt,” he stated in an interview this week.

Speaking from Florida, Dr. Sam Sugar, who is the head of Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardianships, a grassroots advocacy group, had this to say about the recent actions in the Stone case:

If accurate, the reports that a defendant in a criminal pleading was offered a reduction in sentence in return for unmasking the identities of Americans exercising their First Amendment Rights online with comments about abusive guardianship courts are a chilling reminder that the Gestapo tactics of Nazi Germany have found a new home in Miami Dade courts–the real secret society!

Scott Warfman, the prosecutor from the State Attorney’s office, could not be reached for comment on the “turn over everyone you know” plea offer.

On the initiation of a guardianship, an individual loses all control over his own assets and property as well as the right to have any say about his personal life and associations. A recent article in Forbes estimated that there are approximately 1.5 million Americans under guardianship, with roughly $273 billion in assets that have been transferred out of reach of the wards and into the bank accounts of the guardians.

Janet Phelan is an investigative journalist and author of the groundbreaking exposé, EXILE. Her articles previously appeared in such mainstream venues as the Los Angeles Times, Orange Coast Magazine, Long Beach Press Telegram, etc. In 2004, Janet “jumped ship” and now exclusively writes for independent media. She is also the author of two collections of poetry—The Hitler Poems and Held Captive. She resides abroad.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

8 Comments on "Woman Refuses To Give Up List Of Fellow Activists, Gets Three Years"

  1. Judge Micheal Genden deserves to shot at dawn for treason. This guardianship issue need much more attention.

  2. This judicial travesty is just another example of how deep corruption is in the American system of “justice”!

  3. What do you expect out of kangaroo courts?

  4. No doubt the persons investigating the dishonest guardians and the dishonest judges did interfere with the plush lives of the judges and guardians, who parasite on the estates of the elderly, who are processed through such kangaroo courts like cattle. The dishonest psychiatrists, social workers and psychologists who provide fraudulent evaluations and opinions are equally guilty. Perhaps more so.

  5. sovreigncitizen | January 12, 2018 at 7:03 am | Reply

    You will not succeed fighting these scumbags in their own courts. If you want his shit to stop, you need to use violence. Would a dead judge hold you in contempt?

  6. The judge is a terrorist.

  7. Steven Gaylord | January 19, 2018 at 5:55 am | Reply

    The prosecution believes[?] that there is a “Mafia” of “Unknown Bloggers” who are putting up websites and are engaged in social media efforts to expose problematic “Guardianship”?

    So here we have 1.5 million Americans under guardianship, with roughly $273 billion in assets that have been transferred out of reach of the wards and into the bank accounts of the guardians. What???

    Mr. Prosecutor, may I ask, Who’s really the fu*king Mafia here? It is also apparent that the law has gone renegade and is complicit in asset thievery… $273 billion dollars in assets is nothing to scoff at.

    The Probate Court[s] are corrupt. Without a doubt! As to Prosecutor Scott Warfman, Judge Tim Bailey, Judge Michael Genden, and Guardian Jacqueline Hertz, one question, What’s your cut? These criminals are the ones that should be doing time on RICO charges. And they know it! They justify their right to steal and lie and take the cowards way out; they are to be despised and shunned.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.