Students Sue After Entire High School Illegally Groped And Molested By Cops

By Matt Agorist

Worth County, GA — Violated children and furious parents have just filed a massive lawsuit after the Worth County Sheriff’s office conducted an illegal search of 900 students — in the name of the war on drugs. The rights-violating intrusive and aggressive patdowns and drug dog searches at the school yielded absolutely nothing.

An Atlanta attorney is now representing multiple students who were subjected to invasive and outright horrifying body searches during a mass — and warrantless — search for drugs at a South Georgia high school. Attorney Mark Begnaud, who filed the class-action lawsuit, called out the sheriff for conducting “900 illegal, suspicionless searches.”

“This was a textbook definition of overreach,” said Begnaud. “They pulled 900 students out of class. They did full, hands-on body searches.”

To highlight the sheer unnecessary police state tactics of the tyrannical Worth County Sheriff Jeff Hobby and his deputies — not a single bit of contraband was found.

According to Begnaud, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation has now opened an investigation into the incident. However, no charges have been made.

As the Daily Report notes, Begnaud said the suit seeks certification as a class action on behalf of every student who was searched. It also asks for unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, as well as a declaratory judgment that a law enforcement officer violates a student’s constitutional rights when he conducts a body search absent either voluntary consent or an individualized suspicion that the student has broken the law. The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Leslie Abrams.

On April 14, when the students of Worth County High School returned from spring break, they arrived at school to find a police state had taken over. The sheriff and his deputies — with no probable cause — detained and illegally searched every single child in the school, all 900 of them. More than 40 cops from five other law enforcement agencies participated in the raid.

When kids went home that day to tell their parents what happened, naturally, they were furious as it is a gross violation of the children’s 4th Amendment rights.

“It’s essentially a fourth amendment violation,” said Begnaud. “It’s 900 illegal searches, suspicion-less pat downs, suspicion-less searches.”

Naturally, Sheriff Jeff Hobby is standing by this rights violation on a massive scale, noting that as long as a school administrator was present, the search of the children was legal.

Apparently, in the sheriff’s mind, school administrators can usurp the constitutional rights of children in favor of unlawful police searches.

But school officials and the student rule book disagree.

In the student handbook, it says school officials may search a student only if there is reasonable suspicion the student has an illegal item.

As WALB reported at that time, Worth County Schools attorney Tommy Coleman said in order for the Sheriff’s office to search any students, they’d had to have reason to believe there was some kind of criminal activity or the student had possession of contraband or drugs.

Declare Your Independence!
Profit outside the rigged system! Protect yourself from tyranny and economic collapse. Learn to live free and spread peace!

Counter Markets Newsletter - Trends & Strategies for Maximum Freedom
Claim Your FREE Issue Today!

“If you don’t have that then this search would violate an individual’s rights,” said Coleman. “[It] violates the constitutional right and enforcing them the right against unreasonable search and seizures.”

Interim Worth County Superintendent Lawrence Walters said he understands parents concerns about the drug search at Worth County High school on Friday, according to WALB.

“I’ve never been involved with anything like that ever in the past 21 years and I don’t condone it,” said Walters.

Walters said he was notified that there was be a search but pointed out that he did not give permission nor did he approve the mass groping of children.

“We did not give permission but they didn’t ask for permission, he just said, the sheriff, that he was going to do it after spring break,” said Walters.

“Under no circumstances did we approve touching any students,” explained Walters.

Adding insult to injury, many students complained that they got far more than just a pat down.

According to the complaint,

Defendants’ searches of students were intrusive, performed in an aggressive manner, and done in full view of other students. For example: a) Deputies ordered students to stand facing the wall with their hands and legs spread wide apart; b) Deputies touched and manipulated students’ breasts and genitals; c) Deputies inserted fingers inside girls’ bras, and pulled up girls’ bras, touching and partially exposing their bare breasts. d) Deputies touched girls’ underwear by placing hands inside the waistbands of their pants or reaching up their dresses; e) Deputies touched girls’ vaginal areas through their underwear; f) Deputies cupped or groped boys’ genitals and touched their buttocks through their pants. 8. Defendants had no warrant or other authority to perform a mass search on hundreds of public school children.

When multiple students complained about being groped by at least one sicko deputy, Sheriff Hobby ensured parents and school officials that “corrective action was taken to make sure the behavior will not be repeated.”

Exactly who that cop was and what ‘corrective action’ was taken, remains a mystery.

“I’m okay with them doing the search, if it was done appropriately like the school has done in the past,” said father of two Jonathan Luke. “But when they put their hands on my son, that’s crossing the line.” 

Aside from not finding a single bit of contraband, the sheriff’s search was also entirely uncalled for as the Sylvester Police Department did a search on March 17 — just a few weeks before — and found no drugs.

But Hobby told reporters he didn’t think that search was thorough enough, so he decided to do his own. And, this time, he’d grope every student.

As for the 900 counts of deprivation of rights under the color of law that the sheriff should be facing, despite the investigation, not a single charge has been levied against the department.

Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Facebook. This article first appeared here at The Free Thought Project.


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

18 Comments on "Students Sue After Entire High School Illegally Groped And Molested By Cops"

  1. “I’m okay with them doing the search, if it was done appropriately like the school has done in the past,” said father of two Jonathan Luke. Part of the problem. No reason to have a kid in these institutions. No statement quoted from Sheriff that even makes any sense, and the lame excuses of school admin. makes them complicit.

  2. So the administrator knew this was coming after spring break & did nothing about it? He should be sued as well.

  3. Stuff Statists Don't Like | June 4, 2017 at 3:19 pm | Reply

    Mental conditioning for kids to get used to living in a police state, yet constantly told they’re free at the same time, ensuring cognitive dissonance sets in as well, so when they become adults they don’t question their propagandized manipulated minds. They will live in a state of normalcy bias when grown.

  4. Truth Seeker | June 4, 2017 at 3:45 pm | Reply

    I would imagine if many kids said that there was a rogue cop, im sure they know his name…this article is suspect. Seems this article is also a bit of propaganda….(PROPAGANDA—>>> “I’m okay with them doing the search, if it was done appropriately like the school has done in the past,” said father of two Jonathan Luke)

  5. If I were on the jury, I’d bankrupt the entire city. Enough already with the idiot cops who can’t follow the law–and with every ignorant wimp who defend or won’t stand up to them.

    • NJguy - Proudly Deplorable | June 5, 2017 at 7:51 am | Reply

      That would just penalize the taxpayers. How about suing the sheriff and those involved personally? Is that possible?

      • While it is occasionally possible, after a lot of legal mumbo jumbo, the city indemnifies the criminals it employs, so the effect is the same. And it does penalize the taxpayers, but perhaps that will wake them up to the gestapo tactics of their “law enforcement” and get them to DO SOMETHING about it.

  6. there is a reason why God gave us guns

  7. The captain needs to be fired along with those that conducted this b.s.
    The Principle needs to go as well.

  8. First: it was done by the Gestapo for the school, these children still have rights even if they were in the school. Second: the US congress has a bill that will make any law suit against law enforcement illegal, Gestapo will be immured. Third: if the Gestapo had nothing better to do, then you do not need them, it was a power thing.

  9. ZeroabsolutlyNone | June 5, 2017 at 10:32 am | Reply

    Enough of this “sue the school…bankrupt the entire city” stuff. It’s (way past) time to hold the “law breakers” (the cops themselves) accountable. When they commit these egregious violations they need to be immediately dismissed from the force and their “certification” immediately revoked so they can never work in law “enforcement” again. If you want to be a cop…do it right or don’t do it. That would fix it.

  10. “No charges levied”? How about pink slips?

  11. “I’m okay with them doing the search, if it was done appropriately like the school has done in the past,” said father of two Jonathan Luke. “But when they put their hands on my son, that’s crossing the line.”

    Memo to Mr. Luke:

    They “crossed the line” precisely because you were “okay with them doing the search, if it was done appropriately”.

    “Appropriately”?

    Are you kidding?

    Give ’em an inch, and they’ll take a mile.

  12. mary_podlesak | June 5, 2017 at 6:32 pm | Reply

    decommission the police. overthrow the government.

  13. Excuse me Mr. Luke, but I think your wife has drugs. “I’m okay with them doing the search”.
    Nothing to worry about, they were just looking for picks for the Bush/Clinton pedophile ring.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*