New Ontario Law Allows Gov’t To Steal Kids From Parents Who Oppose “Gender Identity”

By Rachel Blevins

Ontario has just set a startling precedent with the passage of a new law that could lead to the government seizing children from parents who oppose the “Gender Identity” agenda.

Bill 89, the 2017 Children, Youth and Family Services Act, passed by a vote of 63-23 on June 1. The new law will have jurisdiction over child protective services, and adoption and foster care services.

One of the most notable parts of the bill is that when it comes to the state’s process for deciding which home a child should live in, it takes out the consideration of “the religious faith in which the child is being raised,” and replaces it with the child’s “gender identity” or “gender expression.”

Differences include: the current Act includes the child’s cultural background in this list while the new Act includes the child’s cultural and linguistic heritage; the current Act includes the religious faith in which the child is being raised while the new Act includes the child’s race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.

Jack Fonseca, senior political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition, warned that the new law does not just affect parents who are facing the risk of having their children seized by the state, it also affects parents who are looking to adopt.

“With the passage of Bill 89, we’ve entered an era of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in Canada’s history,” Fonseca said. “Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption.”

Another troubling aspect in the new Ontario law can be found in what the government determines to be the “least disruptive course of action.” With Bill 89, it argues for the use of “prevention services, early intervention services and community support services.”

The least disruptive course of action that is available and is appropriate in a particular case to help a child, including the provision of prevention services, early intervention services and community support services, should be considered.

In a press release on the new law, the Ministry of Children and Youth Services described the legislation as helping “children and youth across the province thrive and reach their full potential by strengthening and modernizing child, youth and family services.” It noted that the law will put “a greater focus on early intervention, to help prevent children and families from reaching crisis situations at home.”

John Sikkema, a lawyer with the Association for Reformed Political Action in Canada, criticized the bill’s clause, and said that it could do more harm than good to a child when applied.

“You can imagine a situation where, say, a child’s teacher suspects that a child is gender questioning or something and they’re not being supported in that,” Sikkema said, noting that the teacher would then “actually have a duty to report certain things to a Children’s Aid Society who would look into it further.”

As The Free Thought Project has reported on multiple occasions, the United States has its own share of problems with Child Protective Services seizing children from families whose beliefs don’t align with the state.

However, the idea of basing a child’s safety in a home off of his/her “gender identity” sets a troubling precedent in the province of Ontario, and takes legal government invasion in the home to a new level.

Rachel Blevins is a Texas-based journalist who aspires to break the left/right paradigm in media and politics by pursuing truth and questioning existing narratives. This article first appeared here at The Free Thought Project.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

18 Comments on "New Ontario Law Allows Gov’t To Steal Kids From Parents Who Oppose “Gender Identity”"

  1. The psychopathic control freaks are cruisin for a bruisin and they’re gonna F-ing get it.

  2. Are people elected into power actually disabled with mental illness? Or are the people who voted these idiots in just as mentally retarded?

  3. They are just reminding you that the only role humans presently serve is to bring human life into the world. After that, the child belongs to the state. You own nothing. All is property of government.

  4. so the kid could theoretically be whisked away from school by childrens’ services after a glancing observation of experimentation/verbal expression that could be even liberally interpreted as gender questioning? Parents sure have their work cut out for them now. I’ll say this from an American perspective – make sure the little ones understand how easily the coppers or ‘protective’ agencies can disappear them from mommy and daddy. Say nothing around adults at school. In fact, say nothing to your peers. Oops, that’ll probably get them seized, too. Hey, I’m thinking about hiring a Chinese firm to build an island in international waters for a brand new nation. Anybody care to join?

  5. Ontario has a Lesbian Premier….enough said

  6. What they are not saying is that Children’s Aid and other ‘agencies’ are paid by the head, so there is much incentive to ‘take’ as many children as possible. Also, some 80-85% of fostered kids are put on brain-damaging, highly addictive psychiatric drugs from birth to the time they leave, which doubles as a great cover for sexual abuse and neglect by the foster parents. International Law, Constitutional Act 1982 and Charter in Canada make this legislation entirely null and void, but of course, one must stand on their fundamental human rights and demand common law remedies that are available since 1982 (avoid using a lawyer which will keep you in statutory court). Statutory court means the courts will always uphold the existing internal law, but common law courts post-1982 must uphold fundamental human rights as a priority over internal law such as this. The Attorney General of Ontario is supposed to ensure that no legislation sees the light of day that remotely violates the priority rights of parents and the rights of all human beings on this landmass to life, liberty and security of person, as well as the right to self-determination and to be free of fear and want. Interference with family, privacy and self-determination is against international law and a violation of Canada’s legal obligations since 1982 as expressed in the Charter. Its just that the government has worked so very hard since 1982 not to lose control of its slaves that the slaves have never learned of their rights since 1982. I have tried many times to reach the folks leading the on-line protest to no avail. Either they will not respond or once Tanya did, I returned her call to give her a general idea of what needs to be done and she didn’t bother to call back. So the ‘protesters’ keep digging a bigger hole for themselves…they are simply not interested in being educated as to how to stand on their individual human rights (Charter rights) and the politicians are doing as they are told by the Lieutenant Governor and the Governor General.

  7. Yeah it’s Canada but it is tme we quit sitting our handsand stop this kind of BS.

    • Say what you want about Canada, but CPS pulls much worse in the US.
      They’re all a bunch perverted imbeciles.

      • I didn’t say anything negative about Canada. My implication was that it happened in canada and not here. However, It will happen here if we dont start taking action.

  8. Now you know why canaduh took all the guns away from their Citizens

  9. Big prophet in the pedophile crowd. Then kill them and sell their organs.
    Where is the war on pedophiles.

  10. NJguy - Proudly Deplorable | June 12, 2017 at 9:12 am |

    I sure hope that any canadian who falls under this BS law has a gun to shoot whoever tries to take their kids.

  11. white is black down is up and transgenderism is not a mental illness

Leave a comment