By Jack Burns
Alexander, AL — The Southern Poverty Law Center has reached a $680,000 settlement in its lawsuit against the Alabama city of Alexander and its police chief Willie Robinson. The settlement was for depriving 190 of its residents their rights to due process (6th Amendment) and the unlawful seizure of their property (4th Amendment). Sheriff Robinson has even been asked to resign by lawyers representing their client.
Each one of the 190 individuals will receive $500 cash from the city for jailing them for being too poor to pay the fines imposed on them by the town. As reported by AL.com, “Hundreds of impoverished residents have faced unconstitutional and unjust treatment in Alexander City simply because they were too poor to pay fines and fees,” said Sam Brooke, in a press release. Brooke is the SPLC’s deputy legal director. He added, “The shuttering of this modern-day debtors’ prison, along with the monetary award, brings justice to many of the people who were unfairly targeted for being poor.”
The way the injustice flourished was as follows. A resident would receive a speeding ticket, for example. If they were unable to pay, they were arrested, taken to jail, and forced to remain there. While in jail, they would earn $20 a day for just being in jail, and $40 a day for doing laundry, cleaning, or washing police cruisers, until the total sum of the fine was paid in full. Each person was not allowed to go before a judge, nor to have a lawyer present to help in aid in their defense.
Around 30 percent of Alexander inhabitants live below the poverty line. Plaintiff Amanda Underwood is one such person, who was jailed twice for not being able to pay her fines. Underwood previously earned $8 an hour and has two young children, according to the SPLC release. After not being able to pay a fine of $205 for a traffic violation, Underwood had to borrow money to secure her release. On a separate occasion, Underwood was fined $250 for driving without a license. She spent five days in jail working off her debt.
What may have seemed like a quick way for the town to punish offenders — and settle long-standing fines, fees, and court costs — turned out to be a complete violation of Alexander residents’ civil rights. Underwood reveled in the victory saying, “I am glad the city is going to pay everyone who they jailed, to try to undo some of the harm they caused…I am so proud that this lawsuit has made a difference. I hope it will help many others, especially those like me who have been unfairly punished for being poor.”
Brooke said Alexander’s settlement out of court is just the latest in a string of successful lawsuits in Alabama which have made a positive impact on civil rights. “Courts are being sued and forced to change their procedures, and judges have been censured and suspended,” Brooke said. “And now a municipality has been forced to pay those it illegally jailed. We hope and believe all courts are now getting the message: It is unacceptable to punish the poor just because of their poverty.”
There’s very little difference between jailing someone to work off a fine, and selling one’s property to pay for such fines. One is a debtor’s prison and the other results in a debtor’s auction. In both cases, the police benefit from free labor and free revenue generation. Civil Asset Forfeiture (CAF) has been used for years to punish citizens accused of crimes such as drunk driving, driving with too much cash on hand, or being in possession of marijuana. Hopefully, with wins such as what the SPLC has been able to achieve in Alabama, more progress can likewise be made in CAF cases across the country as well.
Jack Burns writes for TheFreeThoughtProject.com, where this article first appeared.
Every once in a blue moon, the SPLC screws up big time, and does something right.
That’s how they keep there credibility with the masses. But leave know doubt they are a weapon for the elites (illuminati)
Even a male rapist will have a few female friends!
Jail the sheriff as a slaver till he dies and compensate those held at $20/hr.+ damages.
But is this just enough to keep us confused. Im very doubtful of this who thing. Maybe propaganda?keith
“What may have seemed like a quick way for the town to punish offenders — and settle long-standing fines, fees, and court costs — turned out to be a complete violation of Alexander residents’ civil rights”.
Indeed, it is called involuntary servitude or slavery which is not allowed until after conviction for a crime–not infractions, ever.
“It is unacceptable to punish the poor just because of their poverty.” They broke the law and that may be a reason to take some kind of action.Would you be so kind as to offer a solution ?
Why does one have to have a solution? Are we supposed to have a solution for everything?
I’m just asking .There seems to be no end to those that complain but don’t want to resolve any issue….
Are you actually suggesting that people must have a solution to something just because they complain about it?
Revoke their license could be a first step. If you are not going to follow the laws, why have them?
There are antiquated laws all over the place. People (and the law) simply ignore them, because it’s absurd today to refrain from washing a smelly goat on Sunday… public sidewalk or not!
I suppose lawmakers could spend time looking them up and writing laws to negate them. On the other hand, maybe there are better things to do with one’s time.
no, moron. BECAUSE WE HAVE A PROBLEM WHICH NEEDS ONE. In this case, OVER-REACHING FRIGGIN’ GOVERNMENT. duh
Oh goodness. When talking of “problems” in general, I seem to have overlooked the one specific problem you had in mind! WTF is wrong with me?
Fair enough. The root issue is making actions that harm or threaten no one or their property against the law in the first place. This is where the solutions start: No harm, no foul, no punishment. At least in the world of Sovereign People.
Why are the fines so high in the first place and whose right to charge anyone at all just like parking meters you have no right to do this
I know nothing about the town or it’s issues, but has nobody thought that the Sheriff might have been doing the poorest in society a favour?
Being paid $X to do menial tasks seems to me to be a lot better than being on the streets and earning zippo.
That is assuming those people were doing it really tough and on the streets. If not, then that raises other issues. Just an observation from afar.
A broken clock is right twice a day…. Although I have mixed responses to this. What will happen, is the legislative bodies will take away the option of a fine for punishment of a “crime” (statutory violation), and simply create jail time penalties. Think hard about this before emotionally reacting. Think hard about what the communist SPLC really wants in the long run: GULAGS… and any excuse to get us in one.
190 residents will get $500.00 each……. 190 X $500.00 = $95000.00…….Out of a $680,000.00 fine the city/taxpayers must pay.. Where did the other $565,000.00 go ???? Evidently the splc/lawyers are as big a bunch of thieves as their city (so called) law enforcement. The only causality is the Sheriff has to resign ? All of those in their local government should be jailed and they are the ones who should pay the fines too.