Is the Trump Administration Reversing Support For WikiLeaks?

By Derrick Broze

After months of public support for WikiLeaks, President Trump’s administration is now considering punishing WikiLeaks for the release of leaked CIA documents.

“I love WikiLeaks.” That’s how presidential candidate Donald Trump described his feelings for the anti-secrecy organization at a rally in October 2016. Trump was celebrating WikiLeaks for their release of documents leaked from the Democratic National Committee, specifically those from Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta. Hillary Clinton’s email and the corporate collusion that was revealed by their release, were a popular topic for Donald Trump during his campaign. However, since WikiLeaks  released  new CIA documents on Tuesday, the Trump administration has called for prosecuting the organization and whistleblower.

WikiLeaks exposed the Central Intelligence Agency’s spying capabilities in an explosive new document dump dubbed “Vault 7.” The vault is a massive collection of 8,761 documents related to CIA surveillance activities, including everything from the CIA’s infiltration of smart phones, televisions, and cars, to the creation of a hacking station posing as a U.S. Consulate in Germany. WikiLeaks claims that the CIA recently lost control over a “majority of its hacking arsenal including malware, viruses, trojans, weaponized ‘zero day’ exploits, malware remote control systems and associated documentation”. The archive was apparently circulated among former U.S. government hackers and contractors before being shared with WikiLeaks.

The documents detail how the CIA’s hacking squad had blossomed to over 5000 registered users by the end of 2016 and produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other “weaponized” malware. The hacking tools are built by EDG (Engineering Development Group), a software development group within the CCI. The EDG creates, tests, and offers support on all backdoors, exploits, trojans, viruses, and other malware used by the CIA in its surveillance operations. As part of a program code-named “Weeping Angel,” the CIA was able to target Samsung Smart TVs via a ‘Fake-Off’ mode which would deceive the owner into believing the TV is off. In this ‘Fake-Off’ mode the CIA could use the TV as a recording device for conversations in the room.

According to Reuters, two officials speaking on condition of anonymity said that the intelligence community has been aware of the breach since the end of 2016 and that they believe the documents are indeed authentic. One of the officials told Reuters that the companies who contract with the CIA are already in the process of checking the computer logs and emails of employees who had access to the information leaked by WikiLeaks.

In response to the leaks, White House press secretary Sean Spicer told the press that the leaks undermine national security. “This is the kind of disclosure that undermines our country, our security and our well-being,” Spicer said. He also differentiated between the leaking of Podesta’s emails and the CIA documents, stating that there is a “big difference” between “undermining of Hillary Clinton” and “the leaking of classified information. There is a massive, massive difference between those two things.”

In an interview on Fox News’s “Special Report,” Vice President Pence also signaled a different outlook on WikiLeaks. “Trafficking in national security information, as is alleged WikiLeaks has done here, is a very serious offense,” Pence said. “It represents a compromise of the security of the American people.”

Pence said Americans “should be deeply troubled” by the leaks, which he claims are “designed to damage the Intelligence Community’s ability to protect America against terrorists and other adversaries.” Pence also stated that the President and the administration will “use the full force of the law and resources of the United States to hold all of those to account that were involved.” So far President Trump has not given a statement himself, but the words of his press secretary and vice president seem to indicate a change in tone.

However, if the president does indeed reverse his position on WikiLeaks it would not be the first time. As USA Today reported, Trump called WikiLeaks disgraceful in December 2010 following WikiLeaks release of classified cables from U.S. Embassies. “Trump, years prior to announcing his presidential campaign, appeared on the Kilmeade & Friends, a radio show on Fox News,” wrote USA Today. “In a clip posted on YouTube to preview the interview, host Brian Kilmeade mentioned WikiLeaks, saying, “You didn’t have anything to do with it, did you?” Trump replied, “Nope, but I think it’s disgraceful. I think there should be a death penalty or something.”

Trump’s call for a death penalty (presumably for WikiLeaks editor and founder Julian Assange) is actually not a new position either. During an interview on CNN, Trump called NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden a “total traitor” and in an interview on “Fox and Friends” Trump said that there still exists a “thing called execution” for people like Snowden.

So, according to President Trump, leaking information which exposes the massive surveillance state that exists in the United States is worthy of execution. To those who believe Trump is an anti-establishment president fighting off the forces of the globalists, please think again. Trump is a tool for the establishment and you are being played. Just like the Democrats were in 2008, the Republican-leaning individuals are also being deceived. The sooner Trump supporters accept this, the sooner we can truly break free of the left-right paradigm and expose the corruption and tyranny from right and left.

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for and the founder of the Follow him on Twitter. Derrick is the author of three books: The Conscious Resistance: Reflections on Anarchy and Spirituality and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 1 and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 2

Derrick is available for interviews. Please contact

This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

42 Comments on "Is the Trump Administration Reversing Support For WikiLeaks?"

  1. chaos theory | March 10, 2017 at 8:33 pm | Reply

    Wikileaks and the White House, tune in for another episode of As The World Turns

  2. “Fox News’s “Special Report,” Vice President Pence also signaled a different outlook on WikiLeaks. “Trafficking in national security information, as is alleged WikiLeaks has done here, is a very serious offense,” Pence said. “It represents a compromise of the security of the American people.”
    Pence said Americans “should be deeply troubled” by the leaks, which he claims are “designed to damage the Intelligence Community’s ability to protect America against terrorists and other adversaries.””

    Yet what those leaks show is that the CIA was going after American citizens, etc NOT “terrorists and other adversaries”. So my question is, can VP Pence be trusted? He is also bound by Oath to “Support and Defend” the US Constitution – not the CIA, or any political office, which the CIA is going against. Basically the CIA is working against the American people and the USA with their covert actions used against us. Since the use of force is implied and/or implemented by them, that makes them *Terrorists, and quite possibly, Traitors – along with VP Pence against the American people and our legitimate government.

    It is REQUIRED of all Oath takers, particularly those that serve as US Presidents with the higher requirement of “Preserving, Protecting, and Defending” the US Constitution, to keep their Oath, that all unLawful (unconstitutional) acts committed by those serving within our governments – state and federal – be made known to the American people so that they can deal with it as the people see fit to deal with their governmental servants.

    Whistle Blowers are those who KEEP their Oath to “Support and Defend” the US Constitution, making known to the people the crimes committed by those who are under contract and Oath; but instead they work against the American people and our legitimate government committing crimes that can cause harm to the people and/or our nation. Because every person who serves as a US President is held to the higher standards of PRESERVING, PROTECTING, and DEFENDING the US Constitution, if President Trump does not enforce the supreme Law of our land, if he does not work to Preserve it from domestic enemies and foreign ones, then we must remove him and replace him along with the others who SERVE WITHIN our governments and work against it. That includes the VP Pence if necessary.

    President Trump has yet to require that Hillary Clinton, and her “assistants” be charged with the crimes they committed against our nation, against the American people. Why?

    We the people did not put him into office to do the same old stuff the other political domestic enemies of our nation who serve/d in our nation has done. We put him into office to “drain the swamp”, remove the domestic enemies and traitors to our nation. That is the people’s, and the US Constitution’s, first requirement of him. Is he man enough to do the duty as is required in writing of him, that he accepted with the Oath to do?

    • Louis Charles | March 11, 2017 at 2:15 pm | Reply

      How much do you want to wager that Pence is caught up in PedoGate, too? At this juncture, I say he’s about a 3-2 favorite on a bet on the “over / under” of yes vs. no. He worked his way up the political ladder the old fashioned way, he “earned it”. My money says somewhere along the line, fellow GOP dungHeap and swamp member, Dennis Hastert had/has some “influence” here.

  3. Can’t fix something if we don’t know it’s broke…. and the CIA spying on Americans is an agency that is broke…..

    • They owe me a computer. Every piece of security software I put on my computer gets bypassed. Not to mention the credit cards I had to change…

  4. Think of Whistleblowers (WikiLeaks) as White Blood Cells….. when they start leaking, it’s nasty business….but, it’s a good indication that there is something wrong at work here….

    • assange says he is annoyed by anyone who questions the impossible official account of 9/11.

      he is on their side.

    • JoAnn Dolberg | March 12, 2017 at 9:51 am | Reply

      When Assange was at WikiLeaks, that organization had a 100% correct track record. He is not there anymore (since he was abducted on October 16, 2016, and has not been heard from since. ALL interviews are fake (including Hannity’s); am thinking the rogue CIA “white cells” are now attacking the rest of their own white cells, probably in effort to bring down Trump administration.

      • Like the proverbial onion skin removal of layers of reality. We are unfortunately left with more educated guessing then facts at times. Jim Stone has some interesting takes on the Pam Anderson spin that appeared suddenly with no previous celeb gossip since Oct regarding their alleged relationship. In their own words…

        “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”
        William Casey CIA Director (from 1st staff meeting 1981)

  5. “White House press secretary Sean Spicer told the press that the leaks undermine national security.”

    Idiot. The CIA has been undermining US national security since the day they were created. Right now, they are taking a lead in trying to undermine Trump. This organization needs to be put thru a woodchipper until it is no longer recognizable. Just like the pedogate/pizzagate perps.

    I don’t get Trump. I have never seen a man this powerful that flipflops about virtually everthing. I’m beginning to believe that Trump is being blackmailed over his trips on Epstein’s lolita express.

    • Louis Charles | March 11, 2017 at 2:09 pm | Reply

      yes. I believe you have the answer to our foot-dragging problem. I bet they have something on Sessions, too….something his wife, and fellow church members would not appreciate. JS has been walking around really nervously since young independent (and quite libertarian), journalist David Seaman has made pedoGate his personal crusade. So, I’ll venture a guess that YOU GET TRUMP. He’s broiling inside over all this stuff.

      • These comments are getting more like backyard over the fence gossip than fact filled dialog.

        • Louis Charles | March 14, 2017 at 1:14 pm | Reply

          FACT OR FICTION? Was Trump ever at Epstein’s Island? If so, why? This isn’t about “speculation” or gossip. This is about what is making our government remain so damned evil to the core…. and so impossible to clean up. Frankly, it all makes the case ever stronger for the AnarchoCaps amongst Libertavia.

          • I don’t know, was he? If so let’s get a link up. I’ve been in the counter culture movement for 50 years. I’ve written books, songs, and essays on the subject. I have yet to embrace gossip as a valid source of information, coming from the disipline of being a reporter.

            What is “AnarchoCaps amongst Libertavia??”

          • Louis Charles | March 14, 2017 at 4:49 pm |

            Libertavia is my colloquial slang word for that imaginary-bubble-world “nation” in which the libertarians of America dwell. It’s a place where only whining, complaining and debating over the same crap going on 46 years…. The AnarchoCaps are the subset of libertarians who believe in ZERO government and ZERO guarding of borders… assuming they even have borders around some jurisdiction. In either case, its a place where actually organizing to capture political majority (even in a small village of 500 or less), is a comedy act to be witnessed!

          • Thanks. Clever play on words. It sounded like one of those made up countries in movies. “So Mr. Phelps, the potentate of Libertavia has been at odds with…”?

            It has gotten so much more difficult to keep up with all the various groups. I actually was a Kennedy liberal when it meant something else than the crap it is these days.

      • All speculation fellas! Be careful.

    • “Trump is being blackmailed over his trips on Epstein’s lolita express.”

      Any proof? Never heard of this before.

    • Trump had little if any to do with Epstein. What contact he ever had was minimal and decades ago.
      Blackmail might be a possibility. But perhaps we’ll eventually find out.

  6. People who voted for Chump are getting the clown they wanted, another flip flopping, lying A$$hole. You get what you vote for.

    • Common Sense | March 11, 2017 at 8:48 am | Reply

      Your statement implies, 1) Voting systems integrity is intact.
      2) There was another candidate who wasn’t a lying card carrying club member.

      Who in your mind could be POTUS and actually work effectively against the den of devils in DC ?

      • Ron Paul, IF we could keep them from murdering him. He never once during his time in office voted against the American people, against the US Constitution; and he is the ONLY person who has served within our government in God knows how many decades that kept his Oath and is still breathing.

        If President Trump is not going to keep his Oath; along with those that serve within the legislative branch and the judicial who we already know have not kept their Oaths, why are WE not removing them by charging them with the felony and Perjury for breaking the Oath and the contract that they serve under?

        The wording of the Presidential Oath was established in the Constitution in Article II, Section 1, Clause 8: “‘Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”’

        Notice that the Framers placed the presidential Oath of Office after the beginning clauses which set forth the organization of the executive department, and before the ending clauses
        that specify the contours of the President’s assigned power. The President is required to take the oath after he assumes the office but before he can lawfully execute it. The location and phrasing of the Oath of Office Clause flat out suggests that it is not empowering, but that it is limiting – the clause limits how the President’s “executive power” is to be exercised.

        We are not a monarchy, or a dictatorship, where one person holds all the power, what we are is a Constitutional Republic. What does that mean? That means that the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution are the governments; the people elected, hired, contracted, etc are put into place to carry out the duties that are found in writing within those contracts.

        Judges are not in office for life. They are allowed to retain that office for as long as they use “good Behaviour” while serving. What is “Good Behavior”? It is doing the duties as assigned by the Constitutions, taking and KEEPING the Oath(s) of Office required of them.

        Article 3, Section 1: “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme
        Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.

        What about federal governmental spending? What powers do those who serve within the legislative branch have delegated to them in writing? (Per Publius Huldah and the US Constitution)

        “In a nutshell, our Constitution authorizes the federal government to handle the following objects for the Country at Large:
        — Military defense, international commerce & relations;
        — Control immigration & naturalization of new citizens;
        — Domestically, to create a uniform commercial system: weights & measures, patents & copyrights, money based on gold & silver, bankruptcy laws, mail delivery & some road building; and
        — With some of the amendments, secure certain civil rights.

        As stated in the 10th Amendment, all others powers are reserved by the States OR The People….

        What would our Country’s financial condition be if WE THE PEOPLE had enforced the enumerated powers on Congress? It is the enumerated (listed) powers which list the objects on which Congress may appropriate funds:
        — immigration office (Art. I, §8, cl.4)
        — mint (Art. I, §8, cl. 5)
        — Attorney General (Art. I, §8, cl. 6)
        — post offices & post roads (Art. I, §8, cl. 7)
        — patent & copyright office (Art. I, §8, cl. 8)
        — federal courts (Art. I, §8, cl. 9)
        — military (Art. I, §8, cls. 11-16)
        — the civil list (Art. I, §6, cl.1)
        — [and other objects listed in various other articles, sections, &clauses]

        Do you get the idea? The Constitution itemizes what Congress is PERMITTED to spend money on. See also the two geographical areas over which Congress was delegated “general legislative powers”: Art. I, §8, next to last clause, & Art. IV, §3, cl. 2.” (End Publius Huldah quote; caps mine)

        The US Constitution assigned to the people the tools needed to keep control of those who serve within our governments, and we let them dumb us down, tell us what they mean so that we do not read them for ourselves; let them tell us our type of government is a “Democracy”, etc. Not only are the tools assigned to us, but there are specific instances within the US Constitution where the governmental duties to the tools the people use/the people are also laid out in writing. What are those tools? The *Grand Jury, Grand jury Investigations – both of which the people can call forth and send out their OWN people to investigate – no governmental permission needed, and if found that a trial and charged are needed, can call forth a Grand Jury trial. Then there is the **Militia. Also Elections which must not be fraudulent. When those that serve within our government cannot run them as such, since they are our tool, we must run them ourselves. Political parties, those are called “factions” by our forbears because they separate and divide the people, causing them to select sides instead of candidates.

        *Grand Jury – “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has NOT been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.

        “Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon
        for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)

        “The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”

        “Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”

        “The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”

        “Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”

        “Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful of them to do so.) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992) (caps mine)

        **George Washington: “It may be laid down, as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government…, but even of his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the
        Total strength of the Country might be called forth at Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency.” (“Sentiments on a Peace Establishment”, letter to Alexander Hamilton; “The Writings of George Washington”)

        Those who serve within our governments – state and federal – are constitutionally required to use the Militia and because of that requirement, forbidden to use any other agency, etc for those purposes. That was done to protect the people from those in government wanting power and control over the people.

        The Militia, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15, has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:
        — Enforce the US Constitution (supreme Law of this land) and each state’s Constitution (highest Law of the state),
        — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
        — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
        — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

        Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.“

        The duties that those who serve within the state and federal governments have to the Militias are found in Clause 16.

        Clause 16: “To provide for organizing, arming and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the
        States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

        Then consider also the so called “laws” that have being passed and implemented. If one knows the US Constitution they then know that MOST of those so called “laws” are really Color of Law, pretend laws. They are enforced because the enforcers themselves are either so dumbed down, or willingly working to destroy our nation from the inside. Yet they too are Oath bound to support and defend the US Constitution, not those who serve within our governments at any level. Since they are required by that Oath to know what the US Constitution allows, their enforcement actions are ***Terrorism.

        ***28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

        Color of law. The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under “color of law.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 241.

        Gov. Samuel Johnston, North Carolina Ratifying Convention of the U.S. Constitution (1788): “When Congress makes a law in virtue of their constitutional authority, it will be an actual law. I do not know a more expressive or a better way of representing the idea by words. Every law consistent with the Constitution will have been made in pursuance of the powers granted by it. Every usurpation or law repugnant to it cannot have been made in pursuance of its powers. The latter will be nugatory and void… Are laws as immutable as constitutions? Can any thing be more absurd than assimilating the one to the other? The idea is not warranted by the Constitution, nor consistent with reason.”

        John Adams, “A Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal Law” (1765): “Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right… and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, and indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge, I mean of the characters and conduct of their rulers.”

        Daniel Webster: “We may be tossed upon an ocean where we can see no land – nor, perhaps, the sun or stars. But there is a chart and a compass for us to study, to consult, and to obey. That chart is the Constitution.”

        Michael LeMieux: “The Constitution has very little to do with the American citizen. It was
        written to establish a Federal Government and to place the boundaries by which that government would operate. The constitution was never designed to provide or enumerate the rights of the citizens but to restrain the federal government from meddling in state and ultimately citizen affairs.”

        Chief Justice John Marshall: “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action, according to our will, within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.”

        “The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism.” The Supreme Court of the United States, 1866

        “Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the Federal Government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency and they are not altered by emergency.” Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, 425 (1934)

        • Louis Charles | March 11, 2017 at 2:26 pm | Reply

          without the WELL REGULATED MILITIA, as best described by Edwin Vieira, or implementing the deputiz’m plan, this Constitution (and the respective documents in each state) is a pipe dream. Without putting the power of The Doctrine of Lesser Magistrates into effect (with the militia teeth behind it) we remain in the position of begging our masters to treat us nice while yoking us and shoving a cattle prod up our rectums (rectii?) Or, we could follow Kokesh, Broze, Bush, Cantwell, Berwick, Passio and Rose to a giant ranch and give it a go in Anarchoville. I’m game. Are you?

        • Dude, this is a comment box not a PhD forum. ?

          In a few words…
          In 1606 King James set up The Virginia Company to begin settlements in Virginia. Its early members were aristocrats. Eventually it was disolved and formed into a royal colony.

          After the original 13 colony’s ‘independence,’ an ‘independent’ country was formed. The Virginia Company simply changed its name to the United States of America.

          There are two USAs… a USA and a usA. The united states of America with a lower case ‘u’ and ‘s’ are the lands of the various states. The United States of America, capital ‘U’ and ‘S’, is the acreage on which is built the federal capital, Washington DC and the District of Columbia. The USA is not a country, it’s a corporation owned by the same bloodlines who owned the Virginia Company, because IT IS the Virginia Company!

      • Louis Charles | March 11, 2017 at 2:18 pm | Reply

        If he doesn’t drain the swamp, he won’t be working too effectively much longer. Jeff Sessions is letting him down. There is enough pedoGate evidence to start a Grand Jury investigation YESTERDAY, and fumigate WDC… and the state capitols, too. Yet all we hear is chirping crickets. What happened to the Special Prosecutor Donald promised? Judge Nap is waiting for his call…………………………….

  7. Mike and Donny haven’t figured out yet that they are just the entertainment – a distraction to keep the proles busy fighting each other, while the real government keeps on with its work spying on everybody, organizing the pedophile blackmail rings, stealing from everybody who has anything, shipping drugs, and training the soldiers for the urban warfare that will inevitably result when most of the food supply collapses.

    • Joseph Conrad | March 12, 2017 at 12:22 am | Reply

      So true ! The greatest fear of the Rich 1% is the same today as it was in ’68.
      MLK died then when he figured out how to unite diverse, disparate groups against Vietnam !

      TODAY, the key is to unite the Right Deplorables with the Left Despicables against US Fascism.

      • Fascism, socialism communism are all against freedom and the Constitution. They’re are all forms of collectivism which is also against the Constitution.
        So shouldn’t we all be in favor of liberty and limited government in this republic?

  8. Statements such as those made by the current president and other US politicos concerning the death penalty for Assange make him more secure as most nations have a policy of not extraditing individuals who would be subject to execution in the US. The only way they could get their hands on him would be to render him by kidnapping him out of the Ecuadorian embassy and the UK. To do so they would have to ignore the sovereignty of both nations and create an international incident! Yes, the current president is foolish enough to pull such a stunt but surely his advisors wouldn’t be.

  9. Louis Charles | March 11, 2017 at 2:03 pm | Reply

    So the real question for libertarians becomes: When the first anarchoCap town, village, city, county, state or nation (including a Seasteading venture) emerges, how will this organized statist “hacking” and spying in all our personal, private devices and sanctuaries be stopped? How shall we protect ourselves from such invasion? Oh. and before you start typing, I duly request: SHOW ME, DON’T TELL ME. We don’t need to hear echos of Murry Rothbard in our heads any longer. Show us your anarcho Galt’s Gulch. I might even buy some property within. …which reminds me: What’s going on with Kokesh’s court case with the zoning board of BFE Co., AZ?

  10. JoAnn Dolberg | March 11, 2017 at 7:47 pm | Reply

    YES!!! President Trump SHOULD punish WikiLeaks for this leak. WikiLeaks is now being run by the CIA. Julian Assange was abducted October 16, 2016, the day Kerry personally went to the Ecuadorian Embassy and threatened them if they did not shut Assange up; Assange has not been heard from since the October 16 date. All the interviews including Hannity’s were fake! They used voice technology equip and computer-generated images. All the Pamela Anderson/Julian Assange crap that’s being shoved down your throats is fake. Assange is no longer connected with WikiLeaks. We are in a war, people….you had better research for yourself and stop allowing others to lead you around like a show dog.

    • Yvonne Forsman | March 11, 2017 at 9:35 pm | Reply

      Correct, Assange is gone since October. But the Hannity interview was recorded b/f that. It was aired in January or February (?) to make it look recent and as if Assange is still at the embassy in London. But sources have said the British police which was guarding the embassy for four long years, making sure Assange won’t escape, is no longer outside the embassy, it was removed in October. CIA is probably running Wikileaks since then. Judge Janine said on TV today that the recent “leaks” is nothing we already didn’t know. So that shows it is all bs, fake. Yes, I think Trump should deal with Wikileaks!!!! Hahahaha.

      • JoAnn Dolberg | March 11, 2017 at 10:37 pm | Reply

        The Hannity interview was done with computer-generated images and the flaws are revealed on the video…many of us caught them, and the best review and updates are being done by Eric Wolfbitn Jewell on youTube. VERY fascinating; he is a truly qualified individual, has experience, also doesn’t make any “wild” statements, but thoroughly researches. It is my opinion that the rogue CIA is manipulating the WikiLeaks events now in an effort to supply plausible excuse for getting rid of the one they took, and also to bring down the Trump presidency. Thanks for your comment, Yvonne; I think if you subscribe to wolfbitn you will really be intrigued by what you hear and can dig even deeper into all kinds of things.

        • Thanks for the share of Jewell, on right now in background.–With respect to holding taped interviews to play at a later date is a frequent technique the CIA used to
          keep Bin Laden ALIVE even though he died in December 2001. Actors resembling him were substituted and fake videos leaked to the news hubs . All of the former papers of record have violated every rule of journalistic integrity that is declining every day even as we speak. Although I haven’t given the Assange disappearance
          much thought, the fact his guards quit tells you something . Oh, I thought he gave a press conference recently discussing this recent dump, now that I think about it.
          How would that be faked with the recent info he discussed current ? I certainly keep an open mind with all the garbage history I learned in school and what is published in academia.

          • JoAnn Dolberg | March 12, 2017 at 9:45 am |

            Wolfbitn did an excellent video on how voice technology works and the “right” faces can even be added. There is much to the intel world to which we have not been privy, but slowly, it all seeps out and the general public finally learns what these rogue groups have been doing for years! Spread Jewell’s videos because time is of the essence and we don’t have a lot of it left. 🙂 I agree with you re/Bin Ladin.

        • So Hannity is lying about his apparently “in person” interview with Assange?

          • JoAnn Dolberg | March 15, 2017 at 8:28 am |

            Research and make up your own mind. Mine is made up until I see different and compelling facts.

    • Agree on the Hannity ruse. They were never in a two-shot, looking at different angles. Must wonder now about Hannities roll in all this. ?

  11. The federal government of the USA is the greatest single threat to humanity in the history of humanity. It does not matter who the president is, that entity is an EVIL, criminal enterprise.

    ALL transparency is good in regard to what that government is doing to We the People, and others, with our money.

    Hack em & stack em


  12. If they ever catch and prove exactly who in the U.S. made the leak, Trump MIGHT be able to punish them. There isn’t didly squat he, Pence, or anyone can do against Wikileaks itself. Obama tried blocking them a long time ago but learned that Wikileaks can just change its IP address and conduct business as usual.

  13. Rex MacInnes | March 13, 2017 at 6:06 am | Reply

    Draining the swamp is tricky and dangerous business: See: JFK assassination not done by Oswald Patsy.

    Note that despite many potentially disappointing policies of Trump, most of the bad ones seem to be taken by the Swamp itself, not really Trump. See: portrait of Andrew Jackson, enemy of the Rothschilds Banking Cartel, in the Oval Office.

    Note; Trump just invited the president of Palestine to VISIT him at the Oval Office!

    The US GOV is a huge entangled mess, but let’s give Trump, who is sincere to fix America, some slack please. Obama worsened the US deficit spending 220 billion dollars first fifty days, Trump decreased it by 60 billion. Trump called CNN “FAKE NEWS” LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  14. IMO, Today’s politics appear more ER repair than ever. While many out here in the virtual reality of the blogosphere have interesting and even compelling opinions, some with vetted links, we must give pause. The truth is, conclusions and opinions are based on summaries of what is available. Secret organizations by their very nature, are secret. To assume knowledge of the bigger picture is dangerous.

    World population reduction; technocracy domination; chemtrails; toxic food, water, and entertainment, etc. are all quite obvious, the conclusion as to why they are being employed is not so clear.

    In spite of a plethora of evidence regarding off planet contact and manipulation, many good thinkers on the web are in denial and therefore reducing the scope of their examination.

    It is very important to understand the sounds in the dark are real, but to assume concrete opinions is settling short.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.