Former Actor and Reality TV Star Dissect the Staged Assassination of Russian Ambassador

By Vin Armani

In this video, former actor Nathan Stolpman and reality TV star Vin Armani discuss the theatrical staging of the alleged assassination of Russia’s ambassador to Turkey, Andrey Karlov. Seemingly brave photographers capture every angle of the event while they manage to stay out of each other’s frames and the trained police officer shooter deliberately ignores them? It’s not natural behavior. It’s how reality TV participants behave when they’re supposed to pretend that there are no cameras, says Armani. Watch the video to see if it looks genuine or like a false flag to you?

Watch the full broadcast here

See Vin Armani speak and hang out in person Feb 25-28th at Anarchapulco

Vin Armani is the host of The Vin Armani Show on Activist Post, TV Star of Gigolos on Showtime, Author, DJ, and Agorist Entrepreneur. Follow Vin on Twitter and subscribe on YouTube. Get the weekly podcast on iTunes or Stitcher.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

7 Comments on "Former Actor and Reality TV Star Dissect the Staged Assassination of Russian Ambassador"

  1. Gerald Chopik | January 1, 2017 at 4:29 pm | Reply

    I appreciate that you have a need to generate revenue of this site but I gotta say that the ads that run around your articles are so bad that they destroy any cred your site might otherwise have. I couldn’t possibly forward any of your links to friends without getting a lot of negative feedback. It’s tough enough trying to get sheeple to wake up. This format does not help and only works agoinst you/us.

    • If we all give more money to the site then there would be no need for the ads. Simple.

      • Gerald Chopik | January 1, 2017 at 6:35 pm | Reply

        Yuri – Thanks for the quick response. It’s not clear from your note whether you are with the website but I’m going to assume, yes. Please understand that in no way should any of the following be interpreted as wanting to be disrespectful of your website of your efforts. I think we all understand that ad revenue is a necessary part of hosting a viable website. But there should at least be some relationship between site content, target audience that is pulled in by that content, the desire to increase that audience, and also the content/target audience/products in the ads themselves.

        I would imagine that the majority of your target demographic comprises those that are “aware” of most of the matrix, are tired of the BS that we see every day, and certainly tired of constant push by main scam media for the consumerism that keeps the planet enslaved. As such, how do the low-level/zany ads on Activistpost appeal to and support the interests and needs of your readership?

        No question the site need ads. But the issue is one of continuity and quality. For any website to thrive today content is king. When you have the right content you attract the right audience who are more than happy to refer your content to friends, family and associates. Wrong content – and that includes the ads – referrals all but disappear. And so too can the original visitors you worked so hard to attract.

        I have no idea what your traffic is like and I’m not in that business so I don’t have any ulterior motives. But I have been responsible for some fairly significant website and so the suggestions I would offer are as follows.

        1- Run a readership survey – if you don’t have one yet – and get a handle on who your visitors really are.
        2- Approach advertisers that you see on other sites that target a similar audience, tell them upfront what you want to accomplish, and offer them a great deal on an introductory package – i.e. other activist sites; conspiracy sites; prepper sites; off-the-grid; organic gardening; etc.
        3- Once you replace the current advertisers with quality advertisers that offer products and services in keeping with your audience two things should happen. Advertisers should get more click thrus – and better quality. That’s important. Visitors will be more comfortable with the site, will refer more often, and your traffic will go up.

        My two cents worth. And good luck.

        PS – You are welcome to delete this entire post if you like and I won’t be offended.

        • Sandy Schwartzkopf | January 2, 2017 at 1:54 am | Reply

          I’m curious, what adds do you see? Mine are just other articles that would attract the same folks as false flag stories. I ask because I do not automatically runs scripts when I open a page and I got a warning message about the page” trying to run scripts from unauthenticated sources.”

    • I find the unnecessary talking far more irritating than any ads. Why do we need to hear small talk around whether or not it’s a public holiday and this guy or the other are doing a show on that day anyway?

      Also, I attempted to listen to the entire broadcast – but 2+ hours?! Come on who’s going to listen to that, especially when most of it is unimportant chatter?

    • It is not adds on the site,chopik , but your computer. Get it cleaned and use add blocker.
      And get read of your stupid avatar.

  2. What bothers me about the video of the shooter behind the ambassador is the fact that while the shooter is on Karlov’s left, it looks like he’s going for his firearm, then closes his jacket and navigates to Karlov’s right side. Then pulls the gun and starts firing. It looks like the shooter is being cued. Anyone else see this?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.