Former British Ambassador Says Russia Election Hack Conspiracy Theory is Kafkaesque

craig-murrayBy Kurt Nimmo, Blacklisted News

For the political class and the establishment media, fantasy has become hard, cold fact: Russia hacked the US election.

There is absolutely no evidence of this.

The New York Times, The Washington Post, ABC News, NBC News, Politico, on and on, the entire establishment media is feeding on a lie given credence by an organization that has lied, cheated, and killed people for almost 70 years—the CIA.

On Monday, outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said Donald Trump colluded with WikiLeaks and the Russians.

“Someone in the Trump campaign organization was in on the deal. I have no doubt. Now, whether they told [Trump] or not, I don’t know. I assume they did. But there is no question about that,” Reid told The Huffington Post. “So there is collusion there, clearly.”

“Don’t put blindfolds on,” Reid said, urging us to believe the agitprop put out by the Mighty Wurlitzer, the CIA, and the illogical conclusions of the Democrats, echoed by millions who no longer believe in democratic elections, or what passes for democratic elections.

Craig Murray, Britain’s former ambassador to Uzbekistan, on Monday dispelled the myth in a post on his blog.

“A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims,” he writes. “The CIA claim they ‘know the individuals’ involved. Yet under Obama the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through extradition. We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilize a US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals? Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of ‘We know who it was, it was the Russians’ are beneath contempt.”

“I know who leaked them,” Murray told The Guardian. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.”

Murray writes that the fantasy embraced by Democrats and passed off as truth by the establishment media is Kafkaesque.

The worst thing about all this is that it is aimed at promoting further conflict with Russia. This puts everyone in danger for the sake of more profits for the arms and security industries—including of course bigger budgets for the CIA.

He told Russia’s Sputnik the claim is “absolute nonsense” and added that it “is extremely amusing for the CIA to be accusing another country of interfering in domestic elections, when interfering in other country’s domestic elections on scores of occasions is what the CIA has done to effect regime change for the last 70 years so really; this is almost beyond satire.”

Back in August, NSA whistleblower William Binney said the DNC leak was not the work of Russia, but rather a disgruntled intelligence worker. He said the hacker was motivated by Hillary Clinton’s disregard for national security.

Despite this, the fantasy lives on. “Donald Trump is increasingly alone in questioning conclusion that Moscow stole emails from Democrats and Hillary Clinton’s campaign,” insists The Wall Street Journal.

Establishment Republicans have joined Democrats in calling for an investigation. Ten members of the Electoral College sent an open letter to James Clapper, director of national intelligence. They argue it will be impossible to fulfill their constitutional obligations unless they know “whether there are ongoing investigations into ties between Donald Trump, his campaign or associates, and Russian government interference in the election.”

This is the last ditch effort to overturn the election and install Hillary Clinton in the White House. It is unlikely the electors will change the election result. However, after Trump is inaugurated, there may be an attempt to impeach him using bogus “evidence” cooked up by the CIA and passed off as gospel truth to a gullible public, especially Democrats.

Kurt Nimmo is the editor of Another Day in the Empire, where this article first appeared. He is the former lead editor and writer of Infowars.com. Donate to ADE Here.


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

4 Comments on "Former British Ambassador Says Russia Election Hack Conspiracy Theory is Kafkaesque"

  1. As can be seen, Donald Trump has many enemies. His election is associated with the plan of God, and therefore his enemies will not defeat him. Let me remind here a fragment of an ancient vision: “And [the king of the north] will go back (to) his land with great wealth [1945. This detail indicated that Hitler will attack also the Soviet Union and will fight to the bitter end. In the beginning there were no signs of such the ending of this war]; and his heart (will be) against the holy covenant [hostility towards Christians. Soviet Union introduced state atheism]; and will act [it means activity in the international arena]; and turned back to his own land [1991-1993. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact. Russian troops returned to their country]. At the appointed time [he] will return back.” (Daniel 11:28, 29a) The return of Russia in this context means the breakup of the European Union and NATO. Many countries of the former Eastern block will reconcile with Russia. Such is the plan of God. It is no coincidence that Barack Obama wins presidency in 2008 and 2012. God in this way has secured us against a premature world war. The first should be the return of Russia, and then the war, and not vice versa. (Daniel 11:29,30; Matthew 24:7; Revelation 6:4) The victory of Donald Trump also is not accidental. (Jeremiah 1:12) There is hope for improvement in Russian-American relations. The world will be safer, at least for a moment.

    In 1882 British troops occupied Egypt. Great Britain then took the role of “the king of the south”. Around the same time, Russia expanded its influence in the region, which previously belonged to Seleucus I Nicator, and took the role of “the king of the north”. (Daniel 11:27)

    All the details of this vision are being fulfilled from the time of ancient Persia, in chronological order. It is true that this vision is variously interpreted. As one can see, it has a lot of details. Therefore the insightful person is able to detect any error or sophistry.

  2. againstcorporaterule | December 14, 2016 at 12:50 pm | Reply

    And the deadly silence about Hillary’s election fraud committed against Bernie Sanders in the DNC primary continues.

    If Trump’s election can be overthrown for reasons of “election fraud,” then surely Hillary’s subsequent “election” can be voided for the exact same reasons -and we can have Bernie Sanders as president as it rightly should’ve been from the start.

  3. Where are we in the stream of time? Here is a short analysis of this vision.
    Daniel 11:2 – Cambyses II, Bardiya (Greek: Smerdis), Darius I, Xerxes I.
    Daniel 11:3, 4 – Alexander the Great.
    Daniel 11:5 – The king of the south = Ptolemy I Soter. One of his princes = Seleucus I Nicator.
    Daniel 11:6 – The king of the north = Antiochus II Theos. The king of the south = Ptolemy II Philadelphus.
    Daniel 11:7-9 – The king of the north = Seleucus II Callinicus. The king of the south = Ptolemy III Euergetes.
    Daniel 11:10-19 – The king of the north = Antiochus III the Great. The king of the south = Ptolemy IV Philopator (11:10-12); Ptolemy V Epiphanes (11:13-17).
    Daniel 11:14b, (LITV) “And the sons of the violent ones of your people shall rise up to establish the vision [to fulfill the vision (KJ2000)], but they shall stumble.” = The Maccabean revolt. (Compare Matthew 24:15; Daniel 10:14)
    Daniel 11:20 – The king of the north = Augustus.
    Daniel 11:20b – “and within a few days he will be broken, but not in anger and not in battle”. Augustus died after a brief illness. Seleucus IV Philopator was assassinated!
    Daniel 11:21-23 – The king of the north = Tiberius. The Leader (chief) of the covenant = Jesus Christ. (Isaiah 55:4)
    Daniel 11:24 – The king of the north = Tiberius and the successive emperors.
    Daniel 11:25, 26a – Aurelian against Zenobia (queen of Palmyra).
    Daniel 11:26b = The twilight of the Roman Empire. (Compare Daniel 9:26b)
    Daniel 11:27 = Russia and Great Britain (from second half of the XIX Century).
    “And both these kings, their hearts (will be) to do mischief, and at one table (they) will speak a lie. But it will not succeed, for yet (the) limit to (the) appointed time.” (literal translation) It certainly suggests that the verse does not relate to the ancient times. It describes the end of times right before the appointed time. (Compare Daniel 11:29a)
    In 1882 British troops occupied Egypt. Great Britain then took the role of “the king of the south”. Around the same time, Russia expanded its influence in the region, which previously belonged to Seleucus I Nicator, and took the role of “the king of the north”.
    Daniel 11:28, 29a = Russia after the Second World War.
    Daniel 11:29b, 30a = WWIII. This will be a nuclear war. (Revelation 6:4) “A great sword” = a nuclear sword. As Jesus foretold, it will be “the beginning of birth pains”. (Matthew 24:7, 8)
    Daniel 11:30b – The king of the north against the holy covenant. The persecution of Christian minorities. (Compare Matthew 24:9)
    Daniel 11:31-35 = The great tribulation of the small Christian churches. (Matthew 24:15, 21, 22; Daniel 7:25; Revelation 6:9-11; 11:2, 7; 13:7)
    “The abomination of desolation”= “The beast”= The future world government.
    Daniel 11:36-39 – Russia before World War IV. Dictatorship and militarism.
    Daniel 11:40-43 = WWIV.
    Revelation 17:16 = “The judgment upon the great harlot who sits on many waters” = The pastors of large churches who betrayed Christ. (James 4:4)
    1 Corinthians 15:52 = The first resurrection and transfiguration. (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18; Revelation 19:7-9; Matthew 24:30; Revelation 1:7)
    Ezekiel 43:11 = The Third Temple, also known as Ezekiel’s Temple. (Ezekiel 37:24-28; Romans 11:25-32; Hosea 3:5; 5:15)
    Daniel 11:44 – “News (reports) from the east and from the north”- Psalm 48:2; Job 37:22; Isaiah 41:25; Joel 3:16; Jeremiah 25:30.
    Daniel 11:45 = Ezekiel 38:8-23 = The attack of Gog of the land of Magog (a future dictator of Russia).

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*