Here’s What the Media Won’t Report About the Dakota Access Pipeline Opposition

nodaplBy Chris “Kikila” Perrin

There is an ongoing clash in what is known as North Dakota; an event that is more than simply a protest, it is an intersection of many different ideas and values that transcend the issues that appear to be at the fore: water, land, and oil.

One of the unfortunate side-effects of this growing intersection is that the deeper meaning, the long-standing issues that have contributed to the confrontation, are being ignored and therefore forgotten by the press, and by those who rely on the popular media for information.

By framing discussions and reporting of the Dakota Access Pipeline and Water Protectors from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and their supporters as a legal question, the mass media not only overlooks the colonial and assimilatory aspect of such arguments, they actively participate in them.

That a definable rule of law, as codified by a judicial body and overseen by agents of that body (often a police force), is universal and, therefore, universally applicable, let alone fair, is a colonial construction.

As actions in and around Cannon Ball escalate, there is a growing discussion in the popular press as to the legality of these actions. Treaty rights, private property, and violations like trespassing have all become central issues to how the grievances of the Water Protectors and their allies are being portrayed, particularly on the ground, ignoring the very idea that the imposition of a colonial legal structure is, by its very imposition, an act of colonization.

Declare Your Independence!
Profit outside the rigged system! Protect yourself from tyranny and economic collapse. Learn to live free and spread peace!

Counter Markets Newsletter - Trends & Strategies for Maximum Freedom
Claim Your FREE Issue Today!

Pre-Columbian North Americans were not a lawless group, despite such portrayal. Nor are their descendants. What was at issue during the early stages of colonization was the inability for Euro-North American governments to recognize indigenous concepts of law (Sally Falk Moore, Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), Introduction).

Imposing Euro-American legal structures on Native Americans not only created the conditions for dispossessing indigenous peoples from their traditional lands, it also set the stage for all future arguments. Basically, in creating a legal system in the European model, the U.S. is able to choose the language of all conversations it has with Native land defenders, and Native territorial disputes.

It has been suggested in the press that the treaty governing the disputed territory opens the land to development, and that the Water Protectors and their allies are misinformed. Other articles argue that eminent domain was never employed in this area, pointing out that much of the property in question is private. In what is typical of the propaganda rhetoric offered by the mainstream media, it is what isn’t said, or omitted, that needs clarification.

Private property, insofar as this context is concerned, is a colonial import, making the point moot when talking about industrial development. That the press and conservative commentators point to the rule of law and legislation by an assimilatory judicial body as justification for continued dispossession, and the unending marginalization of alternative systems of justice, forces the conversation to take place within the colonial framework.

As police escalate the violence at encampments near Cannon Ball in what can only be described as the next wave of cultural genocide through Manifest Destiny, aspects of the greater conversation over assimilation and colonialism remain off the table.

At the very least, grassroots and social media have forced the issue into the mainstream. At most, the way this moment in history is represented, and the conversations this action is producing, are not addressing the underlying issues that continue to undermine reconciliation, leading to an even greater divide between the colonial government and its marginalized and forgotten citizens.

This article (Here’s What the Media Won’t Report About the Dakota Access Pipeline Opposition) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Chris “Kikila” Perrin and UndergroundReporter.org. If you spot a typo, please email the error and the name of the article to [email protected].


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

5 Comments on "Here’s What the Media Won’t Report About the Dakota Access Pipeline Opposition"

  1. Charles_Higley | November 9, 2016 at 8:39 pm | Reply

    The so-called European model was not really applied in the US as we never assimilated the native populations. Instead, we made them permanent dependent aliens of the US, having a whole different set of lows from the rest of the country. Having made that blunder and not assimilating native Americans, we have set ourselves up for them to take advantage of these differences. The recent development is a United Nations push to allow native Americans to basically reclaim all their old lands, the boundaries of which we do not know, and allow them to manage all this land as if theirs.

    The UN gave some land back to an original native tribe in the Amazon. At gunpoint they made the residents of a town dismantle everything they owned and made them move. The land is not empty because the original tribe is , by the way, extinct. This is the UN’s way of pushing humans off the land, and they truly favor lethal force to make it happen. DO not let anyone tell you that the UN is all about peace. Wherever, UN “peacekeepers” go, the death count rises as they shoot both sides and set up their own illegal activities in the meantime.

    • Robin O'connor | November 10, 2016 at 9:41 am | Reply

      Non-violence isn’t working we need to start sabotaging that thing every way we can spend some of that money hiring Blackwater people get them out cost some lives

      • Get on the next bus, Robin! They have the IDF there with their thick, bamboo torture, clubs, my people are bused and locked up in dog kennels with numbers, they have the Zio-NATO stormtroopers there as well. All news drones are shot out of the sky with Stinger Missiles. Massive U.S. military for an UNARMED protest. BLM was kicked out long ago as we know they’ve been compromised. They’ve run over two people and injured them. Spray pepper spray into three horses eyes, who have bolted into the road and they have run them down on purpose. They have no guns to send their blessed souls on their Final Walk so those cretins do it. This is what YOU will see soon. Nothing matters until it affects YOU; so be prepared.

    • arielmonserrat | November 10, 2016 at 1:53 pm | Reply

      1) Native Americans never wanted to be assimilated into the rest of America, their beliefs and lifestyle is very different and should be respected.
      2) YES, the “European model” is used on America’s Native Americans. It’s called the Doctrine of Discovery, made by the pope in early to mid 1400’s. It decrees that all indigenous people discovered in uncharted lands will be forever treated as children, kept on reservations and overseen by whites.
      Lakota met with 500 ministers this past week to discuss this doctine, as it needs to go NOW.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*