Global Air Quality UNFIT Per the WHO — Are Chemtrails to Blame?

chemtrails_deesBy Catherine J. Frompovich

It’s official!

A new WHO air quality model confirms that 92% of the world’s population lives in places where air quality levels exceed WHO limits*. Information is presented via interactive maps, highlighting areas within countries that exceed WHO limits. [1]

The World Health Organization (WHO) published that confirmation of air quality in a press release issued September 2, 2016.  Heck, I could have told them that years ago without performing any studies or quality models just from looking at skies overhead and seeing ‘sky graffiti’ that spreads out into ‘blanket clouds’, which make sunny days dark, dreary and dreadful of what’s falling to earth—the  particulates we humans are forced to breathe.

Question:  Do the ‘clouds’ in these photos look like anything Mother Nature would provide?

pic-1pic-2Photos Source

Furthermore, what kind of ‘flight plans’ do those chemtrails represent?  Even a Kamikaze pilot could do much better, I think.

Isn’t it common horse sense to question what’s in those ‘trails in the sky’, since normal contrails dissipate within seconds?  Furthermore, modern jet engines are not supposed to produce contrails except in extreme conditions!  Something downright nefarious obviously is going on and it’s affecting air quality, regardless of what the WHO or climate geoengineers deny about “chemtrails.”

What is air pollution’s toll on humans?

According to the WHO,

Some 3 million deaths a year are linked to exposure to outdoor air pollution. Indoor air pollution can be just as deadly. In 2012, an estimated 6.5 million deaths (11.6% of all global deaths) were associated with indoor and outdoor air pollution together.

“Air pollution continues take [sic] a toll on the health of the most vulnerable populations – women, children and the older adults,” adds Dr Bustreo. “For people to be healthy, they must breathe clean air from their first breath to their last.” [1]

So why, then, are global governments and corporations [6] engaging in Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and other weather geoengineering practices that absolutely contaminate the air that all forms of life on Planet Earth are forced to breathe?

If anyone doubts that’s a reality, well, here is some pretty powerful documentation:

The 784-page “Weather Modification: Programs, Problems, Policy and Potential” (May 1978),%20Problems,%20Policy,%20And%20Potential%20(May%201978,%20784%20pages).pdf

“Weather As A Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” (52 pages)

Manipulating weather is not some two-bit endeavor: Numerous ‘resources’ obviously become engaged and deployed, the least of which are chemicals, gases, machinery and technology.  Someone has to foot the bill for that and ‘underwrite it’ too!

Who’s financing the polluted air we breathe?

Do you think the WHO knows?

How about the U.S. Congress; does it know and if not, why not, and when will it find out?

So what’s the U.S. government doing that’s reported in “Federal Climate Change Expenditures Report to Congress,”  a 48-page report.  “Check mate, Congress!”

Why’s the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) funding research into manipulating the climate? [8]

Or, is it Bill Gates? [7]

Apparently, the weather geoengineering rabbit hole really is very, very deep!

That WHO press release mentioned above has the chutzpah to blame poor air quality on,

Major sources of air pollution include inefficient modes of transport, household fuel and waste burning, coal-fired power plants, and industrial activities.

So they concocted a ‘sensible-sounding’ reasoning, including creating a surreal reality, for pushing their infamous “carbon taxes.” [2,3]  However, the WHO and weather geoengineers deliberately omit the number one air quality pollutants—those doggone ubiquitous chemtrails that contain toxic chemicals, aluminum chaff, biologicals and ‘unknowns’ used in Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering.”

According to Global Research’s “Chemtrails: The Consequences of Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols on Human Health,”

Over the past decade, independent testing of Chemtrails around the country has shown a dangerous, extremely poisonous brew that includes: barium, nano aluminum-coated fiberglass [known as CHAFF], radioactive thorium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, desiccated blood, mold spores, yellow fungal mycotoxins, ethylene dibromide, and polymer fibers. Barium can be compared to the toxicity of arsenic.(4) Barium is known to adversely affect the heart. Aluminum has a history of damaging brain function. Independent researchers and labs continue to show off-the-scale levels of these poisons. A few “anonymous” officials have acknowledged this on-going aerosol spraying.(5) [4]

I’d say the above information sure sounds like an incredible roster—plus tonnage—of toxins being sprayed into the atmosphere, which creates the air pollution we breathe in a much greater proportion than what the WHO wants to blame it on: transportation modes, household fuel, waste burning, coal-fired plants and industrial activities, even though those ‘offenders’ provide a tremendous amount of air pollution.  However, why deliberately spray more toxic clouds and pollution on humans like we are some sort of roaches to be gotten rid of?

Fine particulate matter pollutants, which are less than PM2.5, is being set as the “standard” for acceptable air quality by the WHO.  However, take a read on this:

* WHO Ambient Air Quality Guidelines

WHO air quality model confirms that 92% of the world’s population lives in places where air quality levels exceed “WHO’s Ambient Air quality guidelines” for annual mean of particulate matter with a diameter of less than 2.5 micrometres (PM2.5). WHO guideline limits for annual mean of PM2.5 are 10 μg/m3 annual mean.

PM2.5 includes pollutants such as sulfate, nitrates and black carbon, which penetrate deep into the lungs and in the cardiovascular system, posing the greatest risks to human health.

Incidentally, the WHO has another website, “BREATHE LIFE” [5], which states “air pollution is an invisible killer,” so why, in the name of all that is common sense, isn’t the WHO doing something about stopping chemtrails?  Good question?  Or, are they playing some sort of shell mind games with us about air pollution to fit in with some specific agenda?

What do you think?




List of Geoengineering Experiments and Who Funds Them

New Science Study Comes Closer To Disclosing The Catastrophic Health And Environmental Consequences of Climate Engineering

Image Credit: David Dees Art

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

4 Comments on "Global Air Quality UNFIT Per the WHO — Are Chemtrails to Blame?"

  1. There is clear evidence from multiple sources both within military research and the scientific community that Aluminum nanoparticles are bad for not only human health but the environment as well. There are so many things one can say about it, that it is hard to know where to start.

    In a paper published around 2001, out of Wright Paterson AFB, Dayton, Ohio, “In Vitro Toxicology or Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Macrophages” you’ll see that this nanomaterial has a severe impact on the function of Mitochondria in rat (and in turn, human) cells even at relatively low exposures. Mitochondria absorb toxins in your cells and excrete a substance called Adenosene Triphosphate (ATP) that you cells use for energy. This material also impairs and suppresses the ability of white blood cells (Macrophages) to attack infection agents through a process of engulfing the invader called “phagocytosis”.
    So by impacting the function of white blood cells specifically assigned to the alveoli (the little air sacks in your lungs) the ability to defend against airborne infection is severely impaired.

    According to one report I read in the Journal of Aquatic Toxicology, this material also attacks the exterior cellular membrane of certain forms of fresh water algae- (the very foundation of such ecosystems) and biologists across the world are seeing as much as a 90% decline in fresh water invertebrates directly attributable to the presence of this material. There’s no telling how this impacts the oxygen-producing phytoplankton of the world’s oceans, but it can’t be good.

    The question becomes, “If this material is so harmful, why then are they using it in such massive quantities?” I’ve wrestled with that question for a long time. But beyond the attempts to manipulate weather, steer storm systems, cause droughts, floods and political destabilization through crop loss and asset denial around the world, it may be that the agencies responsible for this deployment are looking forward to something far more threatening; at least I hope so. And that would be the impact of a major coronal mass ejection from our sun, which could cause world-wide failure of electrical grids and systems of all kinds, eventually leading to the death of millions of people. Planes without electrical systems hardened for a massive EMP would literally fall out of the sky. Virtually all non-hardened transportation systems (cars, trucks and locomotives) would all cease to function. Water pumping systems and power generating systems would all fail. There would be no food transport, no water (except what you find in the local stream) and no refrigeration of existing food stocks. It would lead to a global economic collapse, and by some estimates, a 90% death rate in the U.S. population alone.

    But by placing a uniform, stratified layer of conductive nanoparticles in the atmosphere, such an EMP from a CME might be dissipated. That’s the only “good” thing I can say about it. It’s a real head-scratcher.

  2. deplorableredneck | October 23, 2016 at 7:39 am | Reply

    I requested the laughable EPA, I actually thought it was for Environmental Protection, to check them out years ago.
    They are a joke, and refused to come up with a functional game plan. The EPA killed the Animas river in Colorado.
    More re-dick-ulas waste of tax payer monies (labor).
    D.C. is the land of scum and perverts, keep sending them (thieves,murderess, traitors and goat worshipers) your hard earned labor (illegal taxes).

  3. deplorableGweneth | October 24, 2016 at 6:01 am | Reply

    There were so many yesterday 10/23/2016 over the Colorado mountains. They turned the entire sky into this soupy looking substance. One could see where the sprays would start and stop.
    Idiocracy at it’s finest.
    BTW: Coronal ejection causing massive outages via an emp is strictly theoretical and has never been proven.
    It would be nice to actually come up with a way to prove this may or may not happen.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.