Democrat Convention in Trouble? Claim of Actors Hired to Fill Empty Seats And Clap

CoVOYZJWYAEoBuPBy Catherine J. Frompovich

Remember the children’s story about the Emperor who wore such fine clothes that no one could see them until, finally, one little kid had the integrity to say the Emperor was “balls naked”?

Well, now interpolate that story into an analogy for the Democratic National Convention that’s been playing to a half-empty audience.  The Democrats and the media are acting like the confused or demented Emperor who thought he was wearing such fine clothing that he didn’t realize his butt was bare!

If the Democrats have to advertise and are willing to pay $50 per person to sit in empty seats to cheer for Hillary, what does that tell you?  They have lost a lot of their party base!  It would appear that those who walked the political plank and left experienced a reality check on what’s really going on in party politics in the USA, however a little too late, it would seem to me.

According to an email listed on this site “Actors Needed for National Convention (Philadelphia)” states,

Looking for 700 people to be utilized as actors during the National Convention. You will be paid $50 for each night of the remainder of the convention.

On July 27, Michael Salamone said on Twitter:

The Democrats are bussing in actors to fill space after kicking half the party out. This is not a convention.  Just a con.

All the above is very disturbing because it shows how desperate the elites are to crown Hillary queen of the new world order in the USA!  Furthermore, their undemocratic actions, which the media buys into and supports, portend to what kind of takeover is sitting in the wings of history IF Hillary is forced down our collective throats as a country through even rigged voting machines!

If they are willing to be so brazen NOW, that tells how desperate they are to force Hillary Clinton into the presidency of the USA.  It’s not the people’s choice; it’s the one world order’s choice!  Do you want that?

USA, wake up!

As a country, we apparently just lost your independence and democracy in 2016 in Philadelphia, the very place where the country became an independent republic.  How ironic!

Remember the words of Benjamin Franklin, “You have a republic, if you can keep it.”

Are we up to keeping the USA a democratic republic or will we allow it to taken away from us by a rogue political party apparently hell-bent on making it a gulag in the one world order’s plans for a global Corporatocracy?



Image Credit

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

24 Comments on "Democrat Convention in Trouble? Claim of Actors Hired to Fill Empty Seats And Clap"

  1. Common Sense | July 28, 2016 at 12:05 pm | Reply

    Of course this is what is going on and has been for some time now.
    The evil pied pipers that have stolen power have been staging televised speaking events complete with compliant audiences and applause signs. Readers and repeaters much like the TelePrompTer president we have. Just about as fake as they come.
    The only difference now is that the mountain of evidence of this facade is causing the real ugly face to show itself. The mask is coming off and what you are now seeing is the evil that has been playing you all this time. The deck has been stacked and the game rigged so that the house wins. I know it’s difficult for many to face the ugly truth of what has been going on but better the truth than an ongoing lie. At least at this point we have solid ground to work from.

    • arielmonserrat | July 29, 2016 at 11:10 am | Reply

      Yes, at least now we know the nature of the beast and that at least one of the culprits is DNC. I’ve watched this whole shitt show and was a lifelong Dem for 40 yrs – I’ve left the party, never to vote Dem again. Jill Stein gets my vote, and she’s added alot of Sanders supporters to her side. Green Party may become a viable option to Dem party if enough people support it.

  2. Westcoastliberal | July 28, 2016 at 5:32 pm | Reply

    And if the DNC is even taken to task for this, they’ll compare it to the “seat fillers” at the awards shows and blame it on the teevee production people. Mark my words, because that’s what our “democracy” has dwindled down to be.

    • Our Constitutional Republic has dwindled because the American people have not bothered to read the US Constitution (very short document) or their own state Constitution as is required of them. Admittedly that has been done to the people by dumbing down education, making education a governmental thing though they have NO lawful authority to do so. By propaganda, and subliminals, etc.

      • People want something for nothing.
        This rule is so universal it is scary. It doesn’t matter how smart someone is, that stinking concept will creep in in all sorts of ways to their thinking. I know I catch myself in the trap quite often. So then take a step down to the mass of people who really just aren’t that smart or don’t bother to apply themselves for whatever reason, and imagine how much this rule DOMINATES their life and thinking.
        Those who wield power know that the masses can be run on the fantasy of something for nothing, and, they are more than willing to continuously sell the people the fantasy that they are getting something when in fact they are not. Because the people drawn to government, for the most part, are not good people. It isn’t complicated.

      • Cal, you are spot on. If the souless commie Clinton gets in, thank deibold. And prepare for all out madness. Gulag Archipelago 2 is forth coming brought to you by the same ideologies of the tribe that ruined Russia and Eastern Europe at the turn of last century. It matters very little who gets the nod—divide and conquer is the strategy, and the end justifies the means is in play either way. We need another Andrew Jackson.

        A quote from Cicero is timely now!
        “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

        Cicero

  3. How dumb must you be to vote for Hillary?

    • What makes you think that the public votes are counted? Or are counted correctly?

      • Joseph Stalin said that the outcome of an election is not determined by who gets the most votes, it’s determined by those that count the votes.

        • Even Stalin thought he needed to bother to count “votes”. How much behind they were in those times……

          The rulers of today know the winner long before the publik even started thinking “election”. But they don’t need to fake “unity” as the Communists did. Instead they are playing the more effective division game.

          “A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.”- Aldous Huxley in Brave New World

  4. I’m sure at some point in the not too distant future they will dispense with real world and all that you believe will be cgi.

  5. “Are we up to keeping the USA a democratic republic…”

    The USA is NOT a democratic republic, she is a Constitutional Republic. There is a “democratic” process that is used, elections, but other then that everything is in writing within the Constitutions – US Constitution, each state Constitution – that those who serve within the governments of this nation are required follow, their contracts. One of the most helpful and powerful things people can do is to at least READ the US Constitution, a VERY short document; then read their own state’s Constitution as they are the contracts that ALL who serve within our governments are under and lawfully Oath bound to.

    Consider JFK’s words spoken at Yale University, June 11, 1962 and know why the word “democratic” is used by those working to destroy the USA from within: “For the greatest enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.”

    Not only that, but NONE of the delegated authority that is used within our governments – yes plural – is assigned to a person, none of it. All the delegated authority that was split between the state and federal governments is assigned to either a branch, or to a named-in-writing office within a branch. The people who serve within those branches or offices are ALLOWED to use the authority that comes with that position for as long as they meet the required criteria prior to taking that office – be it elected, hired, contracted, etc position – and do the duties as assigned, take and KEEP the Oath(s) required.

    *Each US state is still its own sovereign nation with the US Constitution being the compact that was made between the states to act as the states and peoples representatives dealing with foreign affairs.

    **Here in the USA we are not supposed to have factions, political parties, because they corrupt and divide our nation, they easily invite foreign corruption into our own government, etc. This can be seen in what is ongoing within our nation today. If we want to have free and honest elections we must do away with factions, machine voting, and severely punish all who are involved in the crimes of Election Fraud – which may also qualify as treason against the American people.

    It is equally important to realize that nothing a traitor, or domestic enemy of the American people, the USA, its legitimate government is lawful and binding on the American people, the nation as a whole. Because the US Constitution is in writing and available for all to read, for all to know exactly what the people who serve within our governments are allowed to do in our name, when they make deals with those that are outside of the parameters delegated they should have known in advance that when the American people discovered that corruption that they would not abide by it. Basically that person/those persons had/has NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to represent the American people and this nation whatever position they occupy beyond that which is in writing and to which that person serving is bound. Basically tough luck for them, we are NOT responsible for any unlawful deals made with any – countries, people, corporations, etc.

    *Modern voices on that subject;
    Justice Sandra Day O’Connor: “The Constitution does not protect the sovereignty of States for the benefit of the States or state governments as abstract political entities, or even for the benefit of the public officials governing the States. To the contrary, the Constitution divides authority between federal and state governments for the protection of individuals. State sovereignty is not just an end in itself: “Rather, federalism secures to citizens the liberties that derive from the diffusion of sovereign power.”

    Mack and Printz v. United States: “The Framers rejected the concept of a central government that would act upon and through the States, and instead designed a system in which the State and Federal Governments would exercise concurrent authority over the people. The Federal Government’s power would be augmented immeasurably and impermissibly if it were able to impress into its service – and at no
    cost to itself – the police officers of the 50 States… Federal control of state officers would also have an effect upon the separation and equilibration of powers between the three branches of the Federal Government itself.”

    Framers and forefathers voices on that subject;
    James Madison, the “Father of the Constitution”: “The States then being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity, that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide in the last resort, whether the compact made by them be violated; and consequently that as the parties to it, they must themselves decide in the last resort, such questions as may be of sufficient magnitude to require their interposition.”

    James Madison, Federalist 14: “In the first place, it is to be remembered, that the general (federal) government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects, which concern all the members of the republic, but which are not to be attained by the separate provisions of any”.

    James Madison, Federalist 45: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal
    government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and
    indefinite. The former (feds) will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State.”

    James Madison, Federalist 46: “The Federal and State Governments are in fact but different agents and
    trustees of the people, instituted with different powers, and designated for different purposes… They must be told that the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone; and
    that it will not depend merely on the comparative ambition or address of the different governments, whether either, or which of them, will be able to enlarge its sphere of jurisdiction at the expence of the other. Truth no less than decency requires, that the event in every case, should be supposed to depend on the sentiments and sanction of their common constituents.”

    Thomas Jefferson: “The several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government (what is now called the federal gov); but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes – delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and
    that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force: that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the
    exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party (the people) has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”

    ** George Washington on factions in his farewell presidential speech: “‘The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different
    ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.

    Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind, (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight,) the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

    It serves always to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

    … But in those of the popular character, in Governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary
    purpose. And, there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be, by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.” (end Washington quote)

    John Adams: “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.”

    This is also important to also be aware of so that one understands our LEGITIMATE and in writing government better.
    Alexander Hamilton: “The only constitutional exception to the power of making treaties is, that it shall NOT change the Constitution… On natural principles, a treaty, which should manifestly betray or sacrifice primary interests of the state, would be null.” (caps mine)

    Alexander Hamilton: “… a treaty cannot be made which alters the Constitution or which infringes any express exceptions to the power of the Constitution of the United States.”

    Alexander Hamilton, concerning the supremacy clause, Federalist 33: “It will not, I presume, have escaped observation that it expressly confines the supremacy to laws made pursuant to the Constitution.”

    Reflect upon these words by Michael LeMieux: “The Constitution has very little to do with the American citizen. It was written to establish a Federal Government and to place the boundaries by which that government would operate. The constitution was never designed to provide or enumerate the rights of the citizens but to restrain the federal government from meddling in state and ultimately citizen affairs.”

    • USA is a Kleptocracy masquerading as a Fake Republic.

      People want to be free and yet they don’t want the responsibility that comes with that. They don’t want the REALITY of freedom, they want the concept without the work. Remember Jefferson said you need a revolution and some blood periodically. Look around, most people aren’t willing to do ANYTHING, much less something that would work. Once you accept this you then clearly see why we have the totally screwed up POLITICAL SYSTEM that we have. People who want power take advantage of this. It is no more complicated than that.

    • arielmonserrat | July 29, 2016 at 11:06 am | Reply

      When I was in 8th grade, I was taught we are a democratic republic, NOT a constitutional republic. We are supposed to be a representative democracy, where we vote for our elected officials to represent us. I was never taught we are a constitutional republic. This is simply your spin, not what we actually call ourselves.

      • Yeah, that is the dumbing down of Americans through public education. Did you bother to check it out for yourself? Do some research?

        James Madison, “Father of the Constitution,” argued that in a pure democracy, “there is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual.”

        Delegate Edmund Randolph agreed with Madison, saying: “In tracing these evils to their origin, every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy.”

        John Adams added: “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” (By the way Adams is correct.)

        What you are saying is that they rammed it into your brain until you believed what they said as true. Not that you bothered to research it for yourself. Education is not “giving you the answers, it is teaching you to find them for yourself. Slaves are not allowed to think for themselves, nor to have an opinion. Do you know why that is so? Because there is nothing more dangerous then a person who can think for themselves instead of being told, “taught”, that things are this way.

        Do you think that if you did not believe what they had ‘taught” you that you would be as accepting of the unlawful things being done? That you would be accepting when a person (who lawfully has no authority over you, but is ALLOWED to use the authority of the branch or office within a branch) tells you what they can do as your “ruler”? Obviously you must have as obama (deliberate lowercase “o”) told Americans that he gave himself First Degree murder “powers” (assassination powers) it was accepted by those younger then 35 – up.

        Alexander Hamilton: “We are a Republican Government. Real liberty is never found in despotism or in the extremes of Democracy.”

        Thomas Jefferson: “I believe the states can best govern our home concerns and the federal government our foreign ones.”

        Yet if you, and they, bothered to read his contract you would see that not only he does NOT have that authority, but that he is REQUIRED to be treated as any other person is treated – charged, arrested, and a trial by jury.

        Do you also believe that there is a point on US soil where there is no US Constitution and that you and others have no natural rights? Because if you do, READ THE US CONSTITUTION. There is NOT.

        Do you believe that there is such a thing as “martial law” or “emergency powers” here in the USA? There is not, it is just a traitor openly declaring he/her treason and trusting that the dumbing down worked. Those are the exact opposite of the US Constitution, plus the Constitution itself was created during emergency. Our framers actually were learned (something you could be if you put a bit of effort into it) and knew history showed that governments ALWAYS murder more of their people then anyone. That is why the authority delegated is NOT given to any person but instead assigned to a branch or office within a branch.

        Michael LeMieux sums up our federal government in an understandable way: “The
        Constitution has very little to do with the American citizen. It was written to establish a Federal Government and to place the boundaries by which that government would operate. The constitution was never designed to provide or enumerate the rights of the citizens but to restrain the federal government from meddling in state and ultimately
        citizen affairs.”

        James Madison, Federalist 14: “In the first place, it is to be remembered, that the general government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects, which concern all the members of the republic, but which are not to be attained by the separate provisions of any”.

        St John Tucker: “The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or
        interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people;…” (The congress of the United States = federal government in case you are wondering)

        Benjamin Franklin: “In free governments the rulers are the servants, and the people their superiors and sovereigns. For the former, therefore, to return among the latter was not to degrade but to promote them.”

        St. George Tucker: “The Federal Government is the creature of the States. It is not a party to the Constitution, but the result of it – the creation of that agreement which was
        made by the States as parties. It is a mere agent, entrusted with limited powers for certain objects; which powers and objects are enumerated in the Constitution. Shall the agent be permitted to judge of the extent of his own powers, without reference to his constituent?”

        Are you aware that not taking or breaking the Oath means that the person so doing has committed at least one felony (depending on the state they are in) and the crime of Perjury?

        Patrick Henry: “It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation
        was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.”

        Yeah, that is correct. Now read and consider this.

        Thomas Jefferson: “The most effectual means of preventing [the perversion of power into
        tyranny are] to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts which history exhibits, that possessed thereby of the experience of other ages and countries, they may be enabled to know ambition under all its shapes, and prompt to exert their natural powers to defeat its purposes.”

        If that is true, and it is, then the best way to destroy our nation is to dumb down the people. But also, why is this true? It is true because there are three branches to the American government and it is NOT the same three branches that is found in both the federal and state governments.

        You see, the First branch of the American government is “We the people of the united States” as the source of all governmental authority. We also RETAINED much authority, it was NOT delegated to either the state or federal governments. That authority is above and beyond the authority of those that serve within our governments. I’ll post an example at the end*. Were you taught that in your “democratic republic” class?

        The Second branch of the American government is the states. Yep, each state is still its own sovereign nation still today. Were you taught this in your “democratic republic” class?

        Thomas Jefferson: “I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground:
        That “all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people. To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take
        possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.”

        Thomas Jefferson: “I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the
        people themselves, And if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control
        with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power.”

        George Washington: “The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the
        Republican model of government, are justly considered as deeply, perhaps as finally staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.”

        James Madison, Federalist 46: “… the ultimate authority … resides in the people alone”

        James Madison, Federalist 45: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State.”

        James Madison, Federalist 39: “Each State, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act. In this relation, then, the new Constitution will, if established, be a FEDERAL, and not a NATIONAL constitution.” (It was established.)

        *Grand Jury – “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.

        “Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)

        “The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”

        “Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand
        jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal
        wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”

        “The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”

        “Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge.”

        “Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful of them to do so.) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992) (end Grand jury quote)

        I hope this gets you to question what you have been “taught”. If not you, then another. Our nation needs its people to quit letting those who serve within our government, or anyone else – including me – tell you what to think. Go do the research starting with reading the US Constitution (and not online as they have been unlawfully changing it)

      • fukkinrokkin | July 31, 2016 at 9:39 pm | Reply

        I’ll make it easy for you, show me where the word “democracy” exists in the constitution, much less what you say we are “supposed to be a representative democracy” Rights, or the law for that fact, are not up for popular vote, pretty simple.

  6. Why are you crying for this fake Democracy ?
    .

  7. Panetta, along with Dempsey, are traitors to the USA. They committed TREASON on the senate floor at a hearing, and though the legislators that were there were shocked, they did not press charges making them, and everyone else there, complicit in that treason. They said that there loyalty goes to the UN. That they gave the American military to the UN to use as their enforcement arm. That they would follow the directions of the UN, and then MAYBE inform the legislatures who have the only and sole duty of being able to declare war.

    That is correct, ONLY the Congress can declare war. And by that being delegated to them, it is forbidden to any other within the legislative branch, and forbidden to others in the other branches, etc.

    US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 ‘the congress shall have the Power: “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water”.

  8. Rudy Campilii | July 29, 2016 at 8:04 pm | Reply

    Why do we need “government”? Why do we need people that boss us around (laws) and steal our money (taxes) and send our children off to war so some banker and weapons manufacturer can buy the government that keeps them in business? People, WTFU!

  9. A quote from Cicero

    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

  10. So what did all those Bernie supporters accomplish? The DNC snakes replaced the empty seat holders with fake delegates. Everything about the DNC is a fraud in my opinion so as Hillary would say: “What difference does it make?”.

  11. Hillary WILL win, regardless of whether a single person votes for her! We know she will get at least 1 vote (HERS). Cathy O’Brien (MK Ultra victim) who was raped by Hillary, stated way before Obozo came along, that Hillary was promised the President spot by all of the criminal satanists controlling our govt. Just like they did with Romney, Trump will say or do something stupid weeks before the Poll, the MSM will go overboard with the Trump attacks, make claims that the Polls show Hillary ahead by 5 to 10% and Surprise we have our 1st Lesbian President! Until people Wake up that we do not have a Fair and Honest Election, and that they are fabricating votes out of thin air, and do something about it then we will NEVER get our country back!

  12. AlaskaFreddy | August 2, 2016 at 6:52 pm | Reply

    I feel like I am at Disneyland going through “The Hillary Ride.” “Hellooo AMERICAN PEOPLE, welcome to the Hillary Ride…. “

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*