A Primer: USAID and US Hegemony

USAIDBy Tony Cartalucci

A nation is its institutions. If those institutions are overrun and no longer exist, so, too, does the nation itself cease to exist. Institutions range from the offices of government, to education, to agricultural and economic development, to the management of natural resources, national infrastructure including energy and transportation, and security. These are the things we think about when we think about the concept of a modern nation-state.

Contrary to popular belief, the invasion and occupation of any particular nation is not a mere exercise of military might. It also, by necessity, involves the destruction or overrunning and eventual replacement of all the above-mentioned institutions.

The most extreme modern-day example of this was the US invasion of Iraq, where Iraqi institutions from top to bottom were either entirely destroyed and replaced, or taken over by the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). The CPA was literally headed by an American, Paul Bremer, who, far from being a military man, was instead drawn from the US State Department and a background of chairing corporate-financier boards of directors.

The CPA assumed responsibility for all aspects of life in Iraq, from the privatization of Iraq’s economy, to “reconstruction,” to reorganizing the nation socially, politically, and economically.

The average onlooker will remember US President George Bush’s “shock and awe,” and may remember several of the more notorious battles of the invasion and subsequent occupation. What they rarely recall is the all encompassing dominion the US assumed over the nation through the CPA which was merely underpinned by US military forces. Yet despite the relatively dull nature of the CPA’s work versus security operations carried out by American forces, the CPA is what essentially “occupied” and ultimately conquered Iraq.

USAID and Co. – Low Intensity Invasion and Occupation

Iraq and Afghanistan are extreme examples of the US exercising global hegemony, which included spectacular, full-scale military invasions, lengthy occupations, and nationwide “nation-building” carried out by various organizations utilized by the US to project power abroad.

One of these organizations is USAID. It should be, but rarely is, troubling to the world’s nations that USAID played an integral part in the invasion, occupation, and conquest of Iraq and Afghanistan, while it also maintains an extensive presence everywhere else US interests have directed their attention.

USAID and a virtual army of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and front-companies it supports worldwide, are engaged in activities in other nations ranging from education, energy, natural resources, economic development, transportation, and security – or in other words everything foreign nations should already be attending to themselves.

USAID does not seek to genuinely partner with foreign governments, but instead, create networks that operate independently of and parallel to existing, indigenous institutions and networks. USAID and its expanding network of facilitators extends into any given nation, slowly assuming responsibility over all areas a sovereign government should be managing, leaving existing governments irrelevant, empty shells. When parallel networks gain critical mass, they can then be used as a means of removing existing governments from power, and installing a client regime in its place – one that answers to the special interests that sponsored and directed USAID’s activities to begin with.

USAID actively seeks to co-opt local talent – both individually and small groups of talented individuals. They generally target start-ups and independent NGOs which is why USAID and other US government-funded NGOs are increasingly engaged in co-working spaces – even sponsoring the creation and management of new spaces across the developing world to create a convenient poaching ground for local talent.

A Global Game of Go

USAID does not exist to “aid” anyone. It functions solely to overrun a targeted nation by building their networks over existing indigenous ones, turning a nation’s people against itself, and making preexisting networks irrelevant.

They are essentially filling up the sociopolitical, geostrategic, technological, and information space with their own influence, displacing all else.

Unlike the Western game of chess, where players seek to eliminate their opponent’s pieces from the board in a game of strategic attrition, USAID and other organizations like it and the strategy they are pursuing is more comparable to the Eastern game of Go. In Go, players seek to place as many pieces as possible onto the board, assuming control over the most territory.

In this context, any nation could represent a board, with its own pieces scattered across it in areas like energy, education, healthcare, and security. USAID seeks to place its own pieces on this board, generally under the guise of charity or foreign aid. It continues placing its pieces on the board, backed with inexhaustible resources and the benefit of its true intentions often being poorly understood by the governments and the people of the nations it is operating in.

The US through USAID is essentially playing a game of go against an unskilled player who doesn’t even know the game has begun. USAID is then able to quickly and easily overwhelm the board with its “pieces” – NGOs it funds, organizations and talent it has co-opted, and entirely parallel institutions running various aspects of a targeted nation right under the nose of that nation’s government.

In coordination with other US State Department-funded political fronts and NGOs, the business of then eliminating indigenous institutions and overthrowing established governments in favor of proxy institutions run by Western interests and client regimes bent to the will of the US, can begin in earnest.

Targeted nations often realize too late that the “space” on the board has been dominated by these foreign interests with whatever remains of indigenous institutions and networks so badly neglected and atrophied, they stand little chance of putting up any resistance.

Counterinsurgency Manuals are USAID’s “Rule Book”

USAID’s version of Go has its own rule book of sorts, found easily online as free downloads from any number of US government websites in the form of counterinsurgency manuals. In these manuals, it is described how gaining control over any given population requires controlling the basic essentials that population depends on – everything from energy production to education, to garbage collection and job creation.

This Book Could Save Your Life (Ad)



By controlling these aspects in any given population, one then controls that population itself. It is the key to not only defeating an “insurgency,” it is also the key to running a successful insurgency oneself. USAID projecting its influence into any given nation is in fact a sort of insurgency – a literal attempt to take control of a government – however incremental and patient the nature of that insurgency might be.

Areas included in US counterinsurgency manuals as essential to control include (but are not limited to):

  • police and fire services,
  • water,
  • electricity
  • education and training,
  • transportation,
  • medical,
  • sanitation,
  • banking,
  • agriculture,
  • labor relations,
  • manufacturing and,
  • construction

When inquiring into how many of these are regularly included in USAID programs, the answer is virtually all of them.

Beating USAID’s Game

For any given nation, USAID should be listed as a foreign agency and its activities heavily restricted. Every penny they administer, if allowed to operate at all, should go straight into government programs. USAID programs should be made subordinate to government institutions, carried out by government institutions, and its role in such programs credited subordinately to government institutions. USAID should be strictly forbidden to operate independent networks, programs, workshops, contests, and meetings anywhere beyond America’s borders.

But more importantly, nations must understand the Go board their territory and populations represent. They must create and place their own superior pieces upon this board in such numbers and of such quality that there is no room for USAID’s pieces to begin with. By doing so, a nation is not just countering USAID and the conspiracy it represents, it is defeating it at the most fundamental level this “game” is being played.

A nation creating strong institutions and networks within their own borders to manage and move forward those areas essential to the progress of modern civilization precludes the need for “foreign aid” in the first place. It is not just a matter of pride that a nation need not rely on “foreign aid,” but a matter of its survival, as “aid” is not given freely, and as in the case of USAID, serves as a vector for hegemony’s projection into the very heart of one’s nation.

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook”.


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

6 Comments on "A Primer: USAID and US Hegemony"

  1. It would have been helpful to have real life examples or more detailed examples as the article doesn’t conform to my experiences of USAID in Africa, China and Latin America. I can see that in the case of Iraq, with USAID setting up its “Civil Society” parallels, the traditional system was replaced, and USAID”s puppets stepped into those new roles. I have provided USAID with various proposals in response to its advertised grants, which proposals were very, very detailed. I spent three (3) years analyzing US AID’s programs and auditing the consequences of their various endeavors. By 2011, USAID refused to work with any US NGO they had not worked with before. USAID said they would only work with a small subset of NGO’s, and anyone who could and wanted to do great work to benefit foreign populations had to pay off USAID’s “selected” group with anywhere from 40-70% of the grant’s money as bribes to keep the “selected” group’s rent paid, their fat cat salaries paid, etc., even though this USAID’s “selected” NGO did absolutely nothing, I also interviewed dozens of foreign “political” leaders who had moved their own families to upper middle class and wealthy suburbs in the U.S. on the “bribe money” they got from USAID. In fact, many of these foreigners spent less than 5% of their time in their home countries. USAID spends a lot of money buying foreigners and moving them to the U.S., especially to areas near Washington, D.C.. I audited hugely funded lines of programs, including the alleged programs, totaling over $500 Billion, to end AIDS, and found that less than 2% of all monies US Taxpayers paid into these programs ever filtered down to the intended foreign population who needed the aid. Less than 2%! By the way, not one condom was ever purchased as part of the $500 Billion. The corruption of USAID is despicable. I asked one of USAID’s foreign puppets how he could stand to drive past 2 year olds standing out on the main highway prostituting themselves in order to eat. His big Mercedes, paid for by USAID, kicking up dust in the faces of these children, and he said, “don’t tell me you care about little black babies.” For all the hundreds of billions spent by USAID, Africa, outside of several urban South African towns, doesn’t have any clean water, treated sewage or any other hygiene. Large German water purification devices are bought and delivered whenever Europeans work in areas of Africa. There is no transparency with USAID. None. It’s totally corrupt, and that’s how Hillary Clinton, when SOS, was able to direct tens of billions of dollars of USAID’s money to this or that foreign leader to buy mining rights for her brother or handle other corrupt assignments. No transparency. Despicable. And, Yes, USAID spends billions in China, and I checked with one of their primary beneficiaries, and 98% of the monetary grants is used to buy influence and pay bribes.

    • One of the best comments I’ve ever read. Thank you.

    • Fabulous comment. I am a career military adviser and notice the exact same MO on advisory programs. I worked closely with the advisory program in Iraq and it was ran in a way that the individual organizations responsible for the defense were on different sheets of music. Our entire advisory program as now conducted internationally is designed to make militaries dysfunctional. It would take time to explain in detail how this is accomplished without low level advisors even being aware that it is happening. I have been an advisor since 1984 and have worked in 21 countries if you find this section interning more information could be.provided.

      • Thank you, and I would love to know. Great that you figured it out. Yet, the military continues to cause the chaos and harm intended. Are you interested in writing an article for Activist Post? You can. In the early 1970’s, my father learned from one of his close military friends (think WWII and Korean War) that he should calm down about the Viet Nam conflict. Like many vets, my father was in distress about the anti-war protests of his children. My brother lived outside the country for more than 10 years after trying the Peace Corp. My father was plainly told the real scenario for Nam. As a result, he calmed way down. His friend was definitely in a position to know and went on to head up an important section of NATO. Your knowledge would be so very helpful. Sounds like you still live outside the US.

    • So which NGO’s are not corrupt that are worthy to be supported for charitable causes?

  2. cellaphaneman | July 10, 2016 at 6:18 am | Reply

    Another corrupt top down agency. The U.S. taxes at work. Missing the mark, of course. Paddnig the pockets of those that have.
    Stop filling income tax.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*