28 Declassified Pages Do Nothing To Explain Implausibility of 9/11 Official Story

twitpic-54By Joe Jankowski

The long-awaited 28 secret pages from the Congressional Joint Inquiry into the 9/11 Commission report were released on Friday, indicating that the alleged hijackers may have been in contact and supported by individuals connected to the Saudi Arabian government.

The declassified documents were published by the US House Intelligence Committee and confirm the suspicions that have brewed since the pages were made classified that Saudi officials played a role in the New York City terror attacks.

“While in the United States, some of the September 11 hijackers were in contact with, and received support or assistance from, individuals who may be connected to the Saudi Government,” the report reads. “There is information, primarily from FBI sources, that at least two of those individuals were alleged by some to be Saudi intelligence officers.”

The report continues:

The Joint Inquiry’s review confirmed that the Intelligence Community also has information, much of which has yet to be independently verified, indicating that individuals associated with the Saudi Government in the United States may have other ties to al-Qa-ida and other terrorist groups. The FBI and CIA have informed the Joint Inquiry that, since the September 11 attacks, they are treating the Saudi issue seriously, but both still have only a limited understanding of the Saudi Government’s ties to terrorist elements.

Kevin Ryan of Dig Within reports:

The 28 pages say a lot about two men—Omar al-Bayoumi and Osama Bassnan. The pages hint at the idea that Al-Bayoumi and Bassnan, who sponsored some of the alleged hijackers in the U.S., were Saudi intelligence agents or assets. Although this is not new, the pages also mention that both of them worked closely with the Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission (SACM). That should bring investigators back to the WTC security company Stratesec, which held its annual meetings in SACM offices.

***

The pages also reveal that, “several Saudi Naval officers were in contact with the September 11th hijackers.”

The pages serve to reinforce some information that was readily available about suspicions of Saudi involvement in 9/11 but they do nothing to put to rest the controversy surrounding the implausible official story given to the American public and the collapse of the towers that many experts argue could not have happened solely from the impact of airliners.

Questions still remain as to why WTC building number 7 fell when no plane had hit the building and was only infected with mild office fires.

The 28 Pages do nothing to explain the contradiction between the official explanation of how the towers fell and how they actually fell on the morning of 9/11.

The American public was told by the 9/11 Commission to believe that the buildings collapsed under gravity from structural failure due mainly to fires initiated by the impacts of the airplanes.

But as many experts have pointed out, this is highly unlikely considering the spread of debris that occurred in a massive radius around the towers and the obvious pulverization of the buildings’ make-up.

“Large multi-ton beams were hurled hundreds of yards laterally, gravity works vertically not laterally,” explains Jody Gibbs, a 35-year architect and member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

The thousands of experts with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are quick to point out that the manner in which the WTC buildings fell and the ejections of pieces of the buildings exhibit all the signs of a demolition.

In the video above you can see these experts’ testimonies of how they believe the official story given to the public is bogus.

Take into consideration what then-governor of New York George Pataki had to say at Ground Zero shortly after the towers fell.

“The concrete (of the towers) was pulverized,” Pataki told CNN.

The core structure of the World Trade Center Twin Towers was a steel reinforced, cast concrete, tubular core.

“And I was down here on Tuesday, and it’s like you were on a foreign planet,” the Governor continued. “All of lower Manhattan, not just this site, from river to river there was dust powder 2-3 inches thick. The concrete was just pulverized.”

Does that sound like a result of a gravitational collapse?

Download Your First Issue Free!
Do You Want to Learn How to Become Financially Independent, Make a Living Without a Traditional Job & Finally Live Free?

Download Your Free Copy of Counter Markets
Issue: Trends & Strategies for Maximum Freedom

If jet fuel cannot melt steel beams, then why was there a presence of molten steel during and after the collapse of the Twin Towers?

Despite the denials by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that molten steel was found during and after the towers’ destruction, eyewitnesses have said on record hat they did indeed see molten steel when inside the buildings.

Reports also said that molten steel was present at Ground Zero after the buildings had fell.

Visual evidence of molten steel pouring out the side of the towers also counters NIST’s claim.

As two-decade-long chemical engineer, Robert Kim Ireland, explains that “jet fuel, which is essential kerosene, is not capable of melting steel nor iron.”

Kerosene or jet fuel burns at less than 1600 degree Fahrenheit, while molten steel needs at least 2700 degrees Fahrenheit in order to melt.

Since jet fuel is not capable of melting the steel beams which made up the towers, experts have pointed to the use of thermite to bring down the buildings.

This might be the best insurance against economic collapse (Ad)

NIST’s blatant lies that no molten steel was present, and the fact jet fuel can not cause the liquid steel which poured out the side of the damaged WTCs, should open every American’s eye to the false “official story” that they were fed.

The Smoking Gun: WTC 7’s Collapse

The collapse of WTC number 7 has long been called the smoking gun that proves the official story of 9/11 to be false.

According to the official explanation of the collapse, the building fell due to office fires. This would be the first time in history that a steel high-rise building collapsed due to fire.

But as this video shows, experts have blown it wide open that it was impossible for the high rise to collapse in the manner it did due to the fire damage that it had sustained.

According to experts with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, WTC 7 fell into its own footprint at free-fall speed. Meaning that it fell with no resistance.

The official explanation violates the fundamental law of a physics as the structures below the point the building began to fall would have to cease to exist in order to validate the theory.

All of the information above begs the question: Were the buildings rigged to come down in a controlled demolition?

It is obvious that WTC 7 did not fall due to fire and had all the hallmarks of a controlled demolition.

The presence of molten steel and the obvious pulverization of towers 1 and 2 make a clear statement that the planes were not the sole culprit in the destruction of the towers.

The release of the 28 pages might be a step forward in bringing justice to those who were behind what happened on 9/11 but they distract from some very serious questions surrounding the collapse of the buildings.

Joseph Jankowski is a contributor for Planet Free Will.com. His works have been published by recognizable alternative news sites like GlobalResearch.ca, ActivistPost.com, Mintpressnews.com and ZeroHedge.com. 

Follow Planet Free Will on Twitter @ twitter.com/PlanetFreeWill

Subscribe to our newsletter – The Information Leak


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

17 Comments on "28 Declassified Pages Do Nothing To Explain Implausibility of 9/11 Official Story"

  1. this is more repetition, there is no official sources, since the murder of KENNEDY by the CIA, only the bureau of the three B’s, gives statements to the public, in case not many people know what that means, it literally means,— BULLSHIT BAFFLES BRAINS.

  2. How many buildings go dark the week(s) before for testing purposes.
    Who knew of the billions in gold bullion.
    Put Larry ‘pullit’ Silverstane in with the water board experts at gitmo, the truth will out.

  3. well gee doesn’t this fall right in line with the FBI excusing hillarys activities and all the other drool from the establishment? I mean was anyone really expecting anything different? like truth?
    a good policy to keep in mind ‘if the govt says it its a lie, if the govt touches it or interacts with something it will become corrupt very soon’

  4. Common Sense | July 18, 2016 at 7:34 am | Reply

    The title is wrong. Should be…
    Missing 28 pages reveal gullibility of America.

  5. You could hand this article to 99% of the American Sheepulation, force them to watch the videos, and they would STILL believe the “official” brainwashing bullshit story. We live among fools. Even with 100% proof shoved in their mouth breathing faces, they still can’t grasp what’s happening around them. But HEY….Pokémon….Over THERE —–> Let’s go find him !!!

    • How true! I’ve almost given up, however I do have many bumper stickers on the rear of my 2000 Jeep and they have done a lot of good. People come up to me in parking lots and actually ask me good questions. I keep a stash of A and E booklets and they take them. I also keep CD’s in the Jeep as well. This is all I can do. Everything else falls on deaf ears.

      a and E

      • What an awesome idea Jim! I’m going to order up some of these things from A/E and start doing the exact same thing. Hopefully others will join us?

      • Me too I have DVD’s and video’s but it all falls on deaf ears and I am talking about here in New Zealand because they saw the planes enter the buildings and then the humpty dumpty falling of the towers. Mention a third tower and that just gets a blank look too.

    • this is a quote by someone much smarter than me but I believe it applies ‘its easier to fool someone that it is to convince them that they Have been fooled’

  6. Maybe the real 28 pages would.

  7. 911 Woke Me Up | July 19, 2016 at 3:17 am | Reply

    Of course it wasn’t going to expose any real information. Anyone who believed otherwise hasn’t fully woke up yet. Would psychopath criminals reveal their own crimes against humanity? Of course not. As long as the illegitimate criminals, who have stolen our country through fake elections and other criminal activity are in charge the truth will be covered up.

    I still find it hard to fathom the depth of the brainwashing and conditioning of the masses to accept nothing but the mainstream media as the truth. A sad and pathetic bunch that falls hook line and sinker for the current “divide and conquer” strategies, false flag and hoax shootings, etc. Very sad indeed.

    • … WELCOME!!! … to the wonderful world of “DEMOCRACY” — CORE ESSENCE of the pseudo-14th Amendment Constructive Trust — and the etymological source of which connotes “Divide & Conquer”!!!!

  8. 28 redacted pages. More zio b.s.for the room temperature boob tube crowd.
    The Usurped States need to have an independent investigation without the nwo Zelikow.
    read : ‘The Commission the uncensored History of the 911 Investigation’ Philip Sheldon.

  9. Read it, read it again and there was nothing of interest. Made me wonder what was all the hoopla about these ’28 pages’ in the first place. You want the real truth of that horrible day? Start by ‘waterboarding’ Cheney and working your way through the WH ‘crew’!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*